parul

4.4K posts

parul banner
parul

parul

@parulia

builder + investor @ 645 | investing in AI agents, dev tools, and infrastructure | previously @initialized @mit | here to help founders win

San Francisco, CA Katılım Nisan 2007
3.3K Takip Edilen11.6K Takipçiler
parul retweetledi
Miles Brundage
Miles Brundage@Miles_Brundage·
I think I would really enjoy Burning Man For five minutes Who's building this
English
16
2
60
4.9K
parul retweetledi
Alexia Bonatsos
Alexia Bonatsos@alexia·
LinkedIn is like @moltbook except the bots have humans post for them.
English
14
8
196
12.7K
parul
parul@parulia·
@alitaylor That’s such a great book. Maybe White Teeth or Remains of the Day. I’ve heard A Thoisand Acres is great too but read it way too long ago.
English
0
0
1
403
ali
ali@alitaylor·
i am almost done reading east of eden, which i am very sad about, because i am really loving this book what book should i read next? ideally something that will scratch a similar itch
English
124
1
225
25.3K
parul retweetledi
Vlad Tenev
Vlad Tenev@vladtenev·
Say hello to the world’s first autonomous mathematician … and he’s free (for now)!
Harmonic@HarmonicMath

🦾Meet Aristotle Agent, the world’s first autonomous mathematician — live and currently free of charge. We designed Aristotle Agent to solve and formalize the world’s most challenging mathematical research problems. It is now: ☑️#1 in Formal Math: We’re the #1 formal math model according to ProofBench, by @ValsAI, ahead of the closest competitor by 15%. Aristotle Agent can autonomously prove/formalize for up to 24 hrs without human intervention. ☑️Fully Agentic: Give it an English problem and it will prove/formalize from scratch, or it can work and edit files directly inside your Lean project / repository. ☑️Github-ready: Aristotle agent produces repo-quality code; project leads are increasingly merging Aristotle-drafted PRs with no modifications. Now live across both web, CLI, and API. 🔥

English
44
87
1K
150.2K
parul retweetledi
Takis Kakalis
Takis Kakalis@takiskakalis·
This article explained how to sell to an agent, but it missed one thing: Freemium. How is an agent supposed to try your product if it’s stuck behind a paywall? Today, that changes. In collaboration with @coinbase, we’ve released AgentKit, which extends x402 with Anonymous Proof of Human. Now your agents can prove to any x402 API that they’re backed by a human. Freemium makes sense again, but only with World ID. @worldnetwork
Takis Kakalis tweet media
brian flynn@Flynnjamm

x.com/i/article/2023…

English
10
8
112
26.2K
parul retweetledi
Sarah Wolf
Sarah Wolf@sarahzorah·
a credit card but instead of cash back you get Claude credits
English
199
280
6.3K
459.8K
Ron Alfa
Ron Alfa@Ronalfa·
Massive unlock for biology comes from LLM-powered agents reasoning and running virtual experiments with human bio world models.
English
6
8
89
6.6K
parul retweetledi
Pranesh
Pranesh@praneshbuilds·
@parulia an AI inbox agent romcom would be incredible
English
1
0
1
10
parul
parul@parulia·
TFW your AI inbox agent is out here cracking jokes with someone else’s inbox agent and you’re suddenly certain the introverts have won 😭
English
1
0
2
207
parul retweetledi
robyn
robyn@_robyn_smith·
Bad week to be an aperol spritz in sf
robyn tweet media
English
14
33
1.5K
61.3K
parul retweetledi
Ihtesham Ali
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005·
🚨 Holy shit...A developer on GitHub just built a full development methodology for AI coding agents and it has 40.9K stars on GitHub. It's called Superpowers, and it completely changes how your AI agent writes code. Right now, most people fire up Claude Code or Codex and just… let it go. The agent guesses what you want, writes code before understanding the problem, skips tests, and produces spaghetti you have to babysit. Superpowers fixes all of that. Here's what happens when you install it: → Before writing a single line, the agent stops and brainstorms with you. It asks what you're actually trying to build, refines the spec through questions, and shows it to you in chunks short enough to read. → Once you approve the design, it creates an implementation plan so detailed that "an enthusiastic junior engineer with poor taste and no judgement" could follow it. → Then it launches subagent-driven development. Fresh subagents per task. Two-stage code review after each one (spec compliance, then code quality). The agent can run autonomously for hours without deviating from your plan. → It enforces true test-driven development. Write failing test → watch it fail → write minimal code → watch it pass → commit. It literally deletes code written before tests. → When tasks are done, it verifies everything, presents options (merge, PR, keep, discard), and cleans up. The philosophy is brutal: systematic over ad-hoc. Evidence over claims. Complexity reduction. Verify before declaring success. Works with Claude Code (plugin install), Codex, and OpenCode. This isn't a prompt template. It's an entire operating system for how AI agents should build software. 100% Opensource. MIT License.
Ihtesham Ali tweet media
English
190
680
6.2K
908.9K
parul retweetledi
Afiz ⚡️
Afiz ⚡️@itsafiz·
LangChain just open-sourced Deep Agents—an agent harness that’s opinionated and ready-to-run out of the box. Instead of wiring up prompts, tools, and context management yourself, you get a working agent immediately and customize what you need. It’s an MIT-licensed system that’s perfect for anyone trying to understand how high-end coding agents are structured. @LangChain What’s inside the harness: - Planning: write_todos for task breakdown and progress tracking. - Filesystem: Full context control via read_file, write_file, edit_file, ls, glob, and grep. - Shell Access: execute for running commands (with sandboxing). - Sub-agents: task tool for delegating work with isolated context windows. - Smart Defaults: Optimized prompts that teach the model how to use these tools effectively. - Context Management: Auto-summarization for long threads and large outputs saved directly to files. Link in the comments
Afiz ⚡️ tweet media
English
15
54
300
22.4K
parul retweetledi
NirD
NirD@NirDiamantAI·
ByteDance open sourced OpenViking. Context database treats Agent memory like a file system. Unified management of memories, resources, and skills through filesystem operations. Three-tier context loading (L0/L1/L2) cuts token consumption while keeping full context accessible. Hierarchical organization means Agent understands relationship between information instead of isolated chunks. Built for AI Agents like OpenClaw. Repo: github.com/volcengine/Ope…
English
15
47
405
30.3K
parul retweetledi
Numman Ali
Numman Ali@nummanali·
Agentic Engineering Patterns from @simonw is awesome It’s his ever growing project on documenting the best practices with coding agents simonwillison.net/guides/agentic… Each article is short and sweet <5mins per read You have to read these if you’re a beginner
Numman Ali tweet media
English
9
37
270
19.8K
parul
parul@parulia·
lol I’m drinking the koolaid but don’t mind the pushback
Packy McCormick@packyM

AI is very weird for me because normally I'd be the guy who'd argue that it's crazy we're not more excited about this miracle technology, but I completely get this sentiment. AI companies have clearly botched telling the story. That's a big piece of this. Telling people, "We built this thing that is definitely going to take your job and hopefully we can figure out how to give you handouts or something on the other side, or come up with even better jobs or whatever, say thank you" is clearly terrible messaging. Part of the issue is that what you need to say to raise tens of billions of dollars is very different from what you need to say to get the public excited. "This is definitely a better Google, it does some other cool stuff, too, and we think it's going to really help make you and your loved ones healthier" doesn't fund data centers. Then there's the gap between hype and the average person's experience with AI. Models are getting more useful for a small number of people - if you're a coder or a mathematician or someone who wants to make software but never learned to code, the last few model upgrades have felt really big. That's like ~5% of people, maybe? 2%? If you just want it to answer your questions or do your homework, it's gotten a little bit better, but it's also gotten better for everyone else, so it's not like you have a magic A+ machine all to yourself. Meanwhile, that very small group for whom it's more useful (or who at least say it's more useful because they don't want to be the one who admits it's not) is flooding the zone telling people, "If you don't use these tools as much as / as well as I do, you are completely screwed. You're going to lose your job to me and my army of bots. You (and your kids) are going to be part of the permanent underclass." If you dare question how incredible it is, you are told that you just don't get it, either because you're not smart enough, are too low agency, or don't pay for the latest paid models, which are the really good ones and don't even bother with the free stuff, you dumb poor. And you hear stories like the guy making an mRNA vaccine to fight his dog's cancer, which is awesome, and you're told that everyone will be able to have personalized medicine like that in the future, which sounds great. But like, are you, who can't even make a website with Claude Code, going to start using AlphaFold to whip up your own peptides? Are those dickbags telling you that they're going to be so much richer than you also going to live so much longer than you?? Plus, you hear creepy stories about AI encouraging people to kill themselves, and you know those people were probably unstable anyway and that AI is just a tool and it'll tell you whatever you want, but is it worth the risk? Pretending to be afraid of it might be the best way to stop it from taking your job, which, remember, all of the leaders at the big labs are promising it will do, unless you want to go be a plumber or something, work with your hands (they will not, of course, but you, you should probably seriously consider getting your hands dirty). Or maybe you're not pretending about being afraid, you actually are, which would be totally justified because the leaders of the big labs have told you to be afraid, that they're afraid, that these things are like nuclear weapons in the wrong hands and that there's a 10%? 25%? higher? chance that they'll kill us all, but it's worth the risk, because this is how society progresses. There's no turning back. "We have achieved Recursive Self-Improvement!" they squawk. "This is the big one! Humans are really and truly useless meatbags now! Ha ha!" And you're so confused, because most of the AI you actually encounter is slop. Poorly written social media posts, fake images, etc. Some of it is very funny, but if this is the stuff that's definitely going to take your job and then probably kill you, you don't quite see how? Are you that replaceable? Would you be more excited than concerned? Or would you be more concerned than excited? Personally, I'm excited, because I think LLMs are overhyped. We'll spend bajillions of dollars on inference in a Red Queen's Race, the slop will runneth over, some people will certainly lose their jobs, but a lot of things will genuinely improve, and a lot of people will end up being able to do more at their job than they can now. Plus, the non-chatbots, the models that power embodied AI and help crack biology, are showing early signs that they're going to be magical. In the past week or so, Travis Kalanick, Bob McGrew, and RJ Scaringe all said they're going to be building AI-powered factories. Yann LeCun raised $1 billion for world models to accelerate AI's impact on the physical world. Robots can play tennis now. We'll all have personal tennis coaches or coaches who teach us anything we want when we're around, and spend the rest of their days making our beds, doing our laundry, cooking healthy, delicious meals. The near future is going to be insanely cool, and different in all sorts of ways, some of which we can predict, and some of which we can't. But my god you weirdos need to stop shilling your dystopian fantasies to the people if you ever want them to feel more excited than concerned.

English
0
0
1
310