Patrick Gladding

144 posts

Patrick Gladding

Patrick Gladding

@patrickglad

Cardiologist with interest in DNA

New Zealand Katılım Ocak 2010
220 Takip Edilen53 Takipçiler
Dylan Field
Dylan Field@zoink·
tell me again about how locked in you are
Dylan Field tweet media
English
339
700
12K
2.5M
Patrick Collison
Patrick Collison@patrickc·
Something I've been thinking about: gene editing drugs (like Casgevy, Luxturna, Zolgensma) are a new paradigm in therapeutics, where it may be possible to cure many diseases with single administrations rather than managing them continuously via drugs that require ongoing use. Despite that promise, though, the CRISPR-focused biotech firms (CRSP, NTLA, EDIT, BEAM) have not been doing well. There are a lot of problems with imperfect financial incentives in healthcare. Is this an important new one? In particular: why would insurance companies pay enough for the benefits here? An average enrollee lasts only a few years in the US, so any given insurance company internalizes only a small portion of the benefit from a permanent cure. But if insurance companies (rationally) underfund, pharma companies will then (rationally) underinvest. In theory, single-payer systems should pay more because of better incentive alignment, but in practice they don't have a tradition of paying enough for pharma innovation. (For the most part, they tend to ride on US coattails.) So what do we do?
English
157
95
1.3K
286K
Patrick Gladding
Patrick Gladding@patrickglad·
@bindureddy The Abacus version shows no sign of censoring, as suggested by other social media posts.
Patrick Gladding tweet media
English
0
0
0
51
Bindu Reddy
Bindu Reddy@bindureddy·
The R1 in the Deepseek app appears to be a distilled or an abbreviated version of some sort The COT and the output tokens are much smaller compared to the ones from the full model Maybe someone can verify this. If not we will run an objective eval in the morning and publish results
English
24
13
213
32.1K
Brett Hall
Brett Hall@ToKTeacher·
“But why would a superintelligence bother collaborating with a mere human?” Ah yes: like why would God ever bother asking mortal man for help? Indeed. Well, I can’t refute those who believe in the supernatural except to say: magic isn’t real. Get back to me when we see miracles.
English
6
1
26
1.4K
Brett Hall
Brett Hall@ToKTeacher·
They think if jobs are made obsolete by AI that therefore people are made obsolete. But people are not their jobs. People change jobs all the time.
English
1
3
34
1.6K
Ethan J. Weiss
Ethan J. Weiss@ethanjweiss·
Also adding this because I think it’s relevant
Ethan J. Weiss@ethanjweiss

@DrDanMO I’ve been saying for a while that some drugs make doctors happy, but not patients (statins), some make patients happy, but not doctors (viagra), few make both doctors and patients happy, and even fewer of those do so despite costing $1000/mo and having real tolerability issues

English
5
0
20
8.5K
Ethan J. Weiss
Ethan J. Weiss@ethanjweiss·
The unique thing about GLP1RAs is that these drugs are not going away despite whatever hysteria is drummed up by skeptics . Unlike most drugs (eg, statins), people desperately want them, not because they will reduce the risk of serious chronic disease (they will)
English
21
54
426
146.8K
Veera Rajagopal 
Veera Rajagopal @doctorveera·
Does it make sense to still use P<5e-8 as significance threshold in today's GWASs that include more and more rare variants (as the imputation quality continuously improve with large data and better reference panels)? An interesting preprint uses real world data to investigate this question and finds that the traditional P<5e-8 yields 20-30% false positive rate. The authors recommend a stricter threshold of P<5e-9 instead. Cheruiyot, Yang & McRae. bioRxiv biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
English
6
17
63
7.1K
Veera Rajagopal 
Veera Rajagopal @doctorveera·
Controversial take: this is interesting, but still I am failing to see what is groundbreaking about it as many are praising it to be. The inherent stability of blood counts of an individual within a range much narrower than the physiological range (determined by "healthy" population) is interesting. But beyond that the phenotypic correlations of blood counts with mortality and disease risks within the physiological range is something already known (I think). The extra thing here is the blood counts are measured in terms of "setpoints" (a fancy term for the mean of multiple measurements per individual, excluding outliers) instead of the simple arithmetic mean of all measurements per individuals (which is what we typically do in the UK Biobank). Likewise, the GWAS of blood count setpoints is almost the same as past GWASs of blood counts, just the phenotypes are a little more precise leading to slightly increased genetic signals. Foy et al. Nature nature.com/articles/s4158…
English
5
0
23
3.8K
Patrick Gladding
Patrick Gladding@patrickglad·
@KexinHuang5 Outstanding! Vinpocetine, a NP, ranks with MI and athero, linked by pollution and PM2.5 Can the evidence for this inference be interrogated further? Epinephrine ranks with MI. Causality vs association? Directionality of effect? Epi induces AMI, and used for Rx cardiogenic shock
English
0
0
0
78
Kexin Huang
Kexin Huang@KexinHuang5·
We provided this visualization tool for TxGNN predictions and explanations across 17,080 diseases to everyone at txgnn.org! Try it out! Also check out the supplementary for tons of robustness and ablation studies! This work is the result of a multi-year collaboration with an incredible team: @payal_chandak @WangQianwenToo @_toolazyto_ @AkhilVaidMD @jure @girish_nadkarni @BenGlicksberg Nils Gehlenborg, and @marinkazitnik! 📄 Read more: • Paper: nature.com/articles/s4159… • GitHub: github.com/mims-harvard/T… 10/10
Kexin Huang tweet media
English
1
4
24
2.9K
Kexin Huang
Kexin Huang@KexinHuang5·
📢 Super excited to share our new study @NatureMedicine on developing and validating an explainable graph-based foundation model for drug repurposing, designed specially for rare diseases, which collectively affect 300 million patients globally! 🧵1/10
Kexin Huang tweet media
English
16
86
490
71.5K
Patrick Gladding
Patrick Gladding@patrickglad·
@ylecun Why not put data centres into space? It solves the thermal issue, and could be coupled with QC, needing near zero Kelvin. Cosmic rays etc, cost to launch and maintenance are issues. cnbc.com/2024/06/27/eur…
English
0
0
0
41
Yann LeCun
Yann LeCun@ylecun·
AI datacenters will be built next to energy production sites that can produce gigawatt-scale, low-cost, low-emission electricity continuously. Basically, next to nuclear power plants. The advantage is that there is no need for expensive and wasteful long-distance distribution infrastructure. Note: yes, solar and wind are nice and all, but they require lots of land and massive-scale energy storage systems for when there is too little sun and/or wind. Neither simp,e nor cheap.
Danielle Fong 🔆@DanielleFong

i've been going on and on about this, but basically, AI flips electricity on its head. previously, nearly half the cost of electricity to the consumer was allocated towards distributing it where (and when) you want it. AI data centers want upwards of hundreds of megawatts of power in one place, most of the time. (and for training they don't care about latency) The most constrained thing isn't even the energy itself -- there's a surplus during the solar peak -- it's often the sheer availability & the interconnection. It now can take multiple years to get a grid interconnect to draw power of this magnitude, if the location can even handle it. The capital cost of the power infrastructure is just a tiny fraction (like 3%!) of the capex of the compute, and even just the depreciation of the compute exceeds the cost of even premium power. Hence, AI hyperscalers and those that aspire to be in their class are traveling to where the power is, are building where power has been (and there's legacy transmission to support it, like old nuclear plants) and are getting into the business of actually building powerplants and reactors. Utilities and transmission and distribution companies, interconnection queues, all are used to react much slower -- over many years -- unlike the top technology companies, now vying to compete at the highest levels of AI performance. Since ~99% of energy technologies previously died withering while waiting for utilities to consider them bankable, this represents an extremely fertile, attractive new state of play if you're bringing a new energy technology to market (💁🏻‍♀️🔆). Whereas before you'd have to brave what was once called a "green valley of death", now you have teracap companies like microsoft bidding on: - Conventional, large nuclear fission - Small modular nuclear reactors - Engineered Geothermal - Fusion! - Stirling Engines 😬 - Who knows what else - Maybe you, Anon! Even Tesla is standing up gas generator arrays to burn fossil fuels for their AI power supply. Shit is getting real

English
204
255
1.7K
530.1K
Ash Jogalekar
Ash Jogalekar@curiouswavefn·
I'm looking for a history of the Black Death that traces the disease through its major outbreaks, the discovery of the causative organism and successful efforts to find drugs against it. Easy to find books on the first part but not on all three. Recommendations?
English
4
0
3
1.7K
Patrick Gladding
Patrick Gladding@patrickglad·
@ylecun This is why Stephen Wolfram developed a Mathematica ChatGPT plugin. It's the same problem in biomedical AI. Impossible AI derived drug-like molecules don't conform to physical properties of matter. Physics-informed NNs are the way to go.
English
0
0
0
16
Yann LeCun
Yann LeCun@ylecun·
To people who claim that "thinking and reasoning require language", here is a problem: Imagine standing at the North Pole of the Earth. Walk in any direction, in a straight line, for 1 km. Now turn 90 degrees to the left. Walk for as long as it takes to pass your starting point. Have you walked: 1. More than 2xPi km 2. Exactly 2xPi km 3. Less than 2xPi km 4. I never came close to my starting point. Think about how you tried to answer this question and tell us whether it was based on language.
English
740
222
2.3K
1M
Demis Hassabis
Demis Hassabis@demishassabis·
We have a long history of supporting responsible open source & science, which can drive rapid research progress, so we’re proud to release Gemma: a set of lightweight open models, best-in-class for their size, inspired by the same tech used for Gemini blog.google/technology/dev…
Demis Hassabis tweet media
English
132
344
1.9K
465.8K
Patrick Gladding
Patrick Gladding@patrickglad·
@bindureddy LLMs may be very clever but the fact that you cannot search your chat history is dumb.
English
0
0
0
9
Bindu Reddy
Bindu Reddy@bindureddy·
A number of rumors of GPT-5 being released after Super Bowl! OAI is still working on the new model and it won’t be released until Q2 at the latest The next big model drop will be Llama-3 which is rumored to be very good 🔥
English
28
22
319
68.3K
Patrick Gladding
Patrick Gladding@patrickglad·
@Hragy Blade of a wind turbine, ironically passing a petrol station in Saudi Arabia
English
0
0
0
0
Hany Ragy
Hany Ragy@Hragy·
If you figure out what this is, u are clever! Answer will be in attached tweet later!
Hany Ragy tweet media
English
60
1
52
0