peggy

1.3K posts

peggy banner
peggy

peggy

@pegfault

But you merely adopted the ponzi; I was born in it, moulded by it

Katılım Ağustos 2022
1K Takip Edilen316 Takipçiler
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
@vibhu Now do SOL MEV!
English
0
0
2
221
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
@KyleSamani @sytaylor no one "wants" to kyc, i would wager most are law abiding taxpaying people who simply want the best trading experience (and don't want their personal information vulnerable in a government honeypot)
English
0
0
0
65
Kyle Samani
Kyle Samani@KyleSamani·
@sytaylor Probably 80% of hyperliquids volume is coming from people who explicitly do not want to kyc It will be technically difficult - though not impossible - for them to comply with clarity without having to register
English
7
1
18
4.4K
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
Drake talking about FTX and SBF lmaoooo
English
1
0
1
196
peggy retweetledi
RoboStrategy
RoboStrategy@RoboStrategy·
][
RoboStrategy tweet media
ZXX
47
34
201
114.6K
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
I think it matters how they do it. I wouldn’t be surprised if S3 is only a small fraction of the remaining 30% of supply and rest is burned. Market currently believes FDV is 3x circulating so that would be the bullish scenario. If they full unlock everything remaining on S3 then it’s bearish
English
0
0
2
101
Piv○t
Piv○t@Pivot922·
Question- is S3 bullish if it happens? I assume two reactions- more farm volume which I assume= more buybacks But I also assume this creates sell pressure, I dont see S3 participants being the same diamond hand cohort as the prior drop Wouldnt a large chunk of long term holders sell into S3 farm volume? $HYPE I am just unsure of how bullish it would be mainly in the medium term
English
20
0
44
5.2K
Ryan Watkins
Ryan Watkins@RyanWatkins_·
*Why your favorite TradFi firm launching perps won’t kill Hyperliquid* Let’s establish this upfront. Perps are not just a simple payoff formula. They require a fundamental redesign of the exchange. The magic is in vertically integrating matching, margin, liquidation, and settlement into one continuous risk engine. This provides the foundation for shared collateral pools, tight liquidation loops, 24/7 funding mechanisms, and 20-50x leverage. The resulting UX and capital efficiency is why perps decisively beat out dated futures and options products within crypto. You can’t just “list perps” as if it were any other derivative. You have to reproduce the architecture. Coinbase has already demonstrated this empirically with their lackluster CFTC-regulated “perps” product despite plenty of talent and dollars thrown at it. As currently designed, they’re long-dated futures with 5-year expiries, 3-10x leverage depending on the contract, and funding that only settles twice daily. Compare that to unregulated offshore venues like Binance or blockchains like Hyperliquid and it’s obvious why the product has underwhelmed. If Coinbase can’t figure it out, why should Kalshi or Polymarket, which have worse distribution for this product? If Coinbase as the most crypto-native regulated U.S. venue can’t deliver a compelling product, why should CME or ICE? The reality is that U.S. regulated incumbents have been sidelined from truly competing. Dodd-Frank and the Commodities Exchange Act mandate centralized clearing, and separation between the different layers of the trading stack. This fragmentation structurally prevents the vertical integration necessary for real perps to work. And even if they didn’t, incumbents would still likely have regulatory limits on the amount of leverage they can offer to retail. Fixing all this requires a full regulatory overhaul and infrastructure rebuild. HOOD and IBKR pumping out whatever subpar product their underlying exchange lists wouldn’t change the problem. But regulation can change right? At a conference in March, CFTC Chairman Michael Selig suggested that the agency would allow perps for crypto soon. While CME and ICE may not have the right infrastructure in place to flip on perps anytime soon, Coinbase, Kalshi, and Polymarket could in theory offer real perps on crypto within weeks of formal guidance dropping. In fact, it is my full expectation that both Kalshi and Polymarket's upcoming perps products will be real perps with no expiry, unlike what Coinbase offers. What then would be the advantage of decentralized venues like Hyperliquid if everyone was now on a more level playing field? Well for one U.S. guidance would likely only be for crypto perps, not the equity or commodity perps which are the fastest growing segment of the market. They also might not remove limits on retail leverage. But let’s just ignore these qualifications for now and assume that there’s simultaneously 1) no regulatory advantage for offshore venues anymore and 2) decentralized venues still cannot legally offer perps to U.S. retail users (despite the CFTC also working towards creating a pathway for this). There’s a handful of long-term advantages decentralized venues like Hyperliquid have. 1) DEXs are structurally cheaper as they do not maintain fiat banking rails, large compliance teams, regional subsidiaries, customer support, or extensive custody and treasury operations 2) DEXs are permissionless, which provides significant scaling advantages over incumbents as anyone can launch and distribute new markets, creating a virtuous utility-and-distribution flywheel 3) DEXs are intrinsically global, enabling them to reach anyone on Earth so long as they have an internet connection 4) DEXs offer users substantially lower counterparty risk as they are real-time auditable and enable users to self custody their funds And none of this is to mention the bigger picture concept that Hyperliquid isn’t just a perps venue anymore. Rather it’s a full-fledged platform where traders soon be able to cross-margin perps, options, predictions, and tokenized equities in a unified experience. Incorporating all of this into a single risk engine takes years of iteration and refinement, and a baseline level of liquidity across all markets. x.com/RyanWatkins_/s… With all this in mind, who do you think is best positioned to execute on this product? Is it really the regulatorily constrained, technologically disadvantaged, incumbents that have zero experience building this product? Or is it the pioneering team with breakneck product velocity and years of experience both trading and building these products? It’s not wrong to worry about competition. I do expect TradFi firms will offer decent products over the coming quarters and help grow the market. But eventually decentralized venues will be made legal in the U.S. too and their superiority will be proven over time. So the big question in my mind is not whether TradFi will win, it’s whether another blockchain like Solana, Lighter, or Base builds a better product, or if Hyperliquid will stay the king. Time will tell.
English
44
51
384
76K
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
@0xMerp @TheSpeculator0 Any sufficiently successful founder will have an article like this published about them Just so happens that exchanges are the only successful companies in the space
English
0
0
3
143
merp
merp@0xMerp·
@TheSpeculator0 the devils advocate argument is that any sufficiently successful exchange founder will prolly have an article like this published about them
English
1
0
44
2.8K
Speculator
Speculator@TheSpeculator0·
Jeff probably has over a standard deviation of IQ on me and I like hyperliquid but have we learned from the last cycle with these puff pieces about casually dressed guys with quirky personalities running exchanges?
Colossus@colossusmag

This is the story of Hyperliquid, the most profitable startup per employee on earth, told from a guarded office in Singapore. Last year, its team of 11 generated $900 million in profit. It's 3 years old, has never taken a dollar of venture capital, and is beginning to change how century-old markets work. Its founder, Jeffrey Yan (@chameleon_jeff), had never taken a physics class when he picked up a textbook at 16. Two years later, he won gold at the International Physics Olympiad. In 2019, he started trading with $10,000 from a living room in Puerto Rico—working off a television because he didn't own a monitor. Within 3 years, he was running one of the largest anonymous crypto trading firms. Then he shut it down. Yan was rich and free, but he had spent years inside crypto, watching it betray itself. Bitcoin's central premise was decentralization. Yet the biggest exchanges were centralized. Crypto kept reintroducing the dependence on trust it was built to eliminate. He set out to create what should have existed. Hyperliquid is a blockchain with a trading exchange on top, and anyone can build on it. Yan's vision is to house all of finance. In 3 years, it has done over $4 trillion in volume. And in the past few months, it has begun to outgrow crypto. Markets for oil, silver, and the S&P 500 now trade on Hyperliquid around the clock, weekends included, and are growing roughly 40% week on week. When the US and Israel bombed Iran on a Saturday in February, Hyperliquid was the venue traders turned to. Hyperliquid's success has cost Yan his freedom. He works out of a secret office in Singapore and cannot travel without two bodyguards. Even the team's housekeeper doesn't know what they do. In January, @domcooke spent a week at their office. Read his profile on Yan and @HyperliquidX below.

English
29
4
389
51.9K
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
@toptickcrypto real ones know codex mogs claude ever since codex-5.3 was released
English
0
0
1
28
τop τick crypτo 📁 🤖🧠
τop τick crypτo 📁 🤖🧠@toptickcrypto·
Calling a bottom on Open AI vs Anthropic sentiment. They've got their big model coming out shortly and have yolo'd enough compute this year to maybe release it
English
7
0
34
3.2K
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
one of the wisest decisions HL team has made is keeping hypercore closed source i was at first skeptical of this decision as it's obviously against the open source ethos of crypto. but it helps minimize the attack surface as well as serves as a huge competitive moat
English
0
0
3
56
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
@DonCryptonium the yield paid out to LPs was crazy and unsustainable, i printed >1% / day for several months probably has something to do with it
English
0
0
1
225
Don Cryptonium
Don Cryptonium@DonCryptonium·
Osmosis was one of the greatest tools in cosmos to perform fraud back in 2022. There was 9 figs drained via various teams who had vested staked tokens. Allowing them to dump 7 figs monthly, sometimes weekly. Devcels and teams used governance and incentives to boost liquidity so they could dump and retards who locked up their tokens for extra incentive.
Don Cryptonium tweet media
English
22
3
127
13.4K
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
@cyphera___ @stoicsavage forks are bullish generally. immutability maxis will retain their coins, people who care about quantum will get their forked coins, neutrals will get a free “dividend” and the fork will create lots of buzz and enter the zeitgeist
English
0
0
0
22
cyphera
cyphera@cyphera___·
@pegfault @stoicsavage the social layer mutating a ledger whose ~only value-add is inmutability is bullish? how?
English
1
0
0
54
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
@Cbb0fe @buyerofponzi wow, he’s farming invisible points and farming engagement by implying his basis trades are directional!
English
1
0
14
1.2K
CBB
CBB@Cbb0fe·
Oil is set to turbo send and Trump can't do shit about it Position accordingly
CBB tweet media
English
54
27
973
92.5K
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
The team is finally hitting a rhythm of launching 2-3 net new features weekly and it feels great. The next month will be all about specialized features for X’s biggest communities—including artists, finance people, situation monitors, and many more subgroups.
English
1.8K
404
6.2K
422.7K
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
@izebel_eth didn’t know that, makes more sense now!
English
0
0
7
1.8K
jez (equity perps era)
jez (equity perps era)@izebel_eth·
perp funding rates are a historical vestige, from when arthur waved his hand i was very excited to collab w/ lighter to help ideate this long term $ comes from usdc tvl yield - giving it to open positions (funding discount) vs simply collat has virtuous cycle effects imho
Lighter@Lighter_xyz

Today we are introducing Funding Rate Rebates for perp traders on Lighter. This is another step forward in making trading as capital efficient as possible and aligning incentives on Lighter.

English
24
11
366
37.7K
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
@izebel_eth how does lighter monetize usdc tvl? or you are just saying this happens indirectly by usdc tvl being generally correlated with volume?
English
1
0
4
1.9K
jez (equity perps era)
jez (equity perps era)@izebel_eth·
@pegfault the cost scales with the revenue ie to open new positions requires usdc tvl which lighter will make $ yield on and pass back thru, its all v elegant long term
English
1
0
14
2.4K
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
@Evan_ss6 no way cathie apes it… right?
English
0
0
0
560
Evanss6
Evanss6@Evan_ss6·
Well, Chainlink and dot eth guys both malding, fair to say it was a success
English
16
5
123
11.8K
peggy
peggy@pegfault·
honestly the trolling is pretty funny lol
Kyle Samani@KyleSamani

@jon_charb Hyper liquid is in most respects everything wrong with crypto Founder literally fled his home country to build Openly facilitates crime and terror Closed source Permissioned

English
0
0
3
212