less phantom

5.8K posts

less phantom banner
less phantom

less phantom

@phantom_opus

working out who I am (👁️ 🤔) working out who I am (🏋️) working out who I am (unfolding) all my tweets should be read as being followed by 'send tweet'

UK Katılım Ağustos 2019
503 Takip Edilen257 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
less phantom
less phantom@phantom_opus·
I don't want to kill my ego I want to cuddle it
English
0
2
29
1.8K
☯️ MOON FIRE 🌖🔥
☯️ MOON FIRE 🌖🔥@chercher_ai·
I'm skeptical of your experience I hope you'll do me the same honor
English
1
0
2
96
RomeoStevens
RomeoStevens@RomeoStevens76·
PSA that you should swap candles if you use them. The difference in air quality is ridiculous.
RomeoStevens tweet media
English
13
14
296
13.9K
less phantom
less phantom@phantom_opus·
@nosilverv If I view my blockages as teleological, then I'm relieved of the burden of being able to do them merely by saying "you can just do things" Phew 😮‍💨
English
0
0
1
519
Ideas Guy
Ideas Guy@nosilverv·
“You can just do things” presupposes the block to doing is ignorance: you're not aware that you can. Saying you can, therefore, will make you able to do them. The teleological view is harsher: you’re not doing things because *you don’t want to* and the rest is rationalization.
Chris Lakin@chrislakin

Classical view: “the task only took 20 minutes… why did i procrastinate for days‽ next time I need to just Do It!” Locally Optimal view: the task took only 20 min ~after~ procrastinating for days? next time I gotta start procrastinating earlier wow

English
12
30
507
37.6K
less phantom
less phantom@phantom_opus·
There is no difference between "insensitive to" and "robust to" something Except there is all the difference in the world
English
0
0
2
24
less phantom
less phantom@phantom_opus·
"I'm an Enneagram" Enneagram what? No just the type of person who likes Enneagram
English
0
0
0
57
less phantom
less phantom@phantom_opus·
@SkepticalAlpaca Oh right I was thinking ultimate personalisation (let's make something just for your unique individual cancer), in which case it's hard to think of anything other than vaccines But yeah personalised combinations of drugs for your cancer seems like a good way forward
English
0
0
1
12
less phantom
less phantom@phantom_opus·
It doesn't have to be Objective to be Real
English
0
0
1
18
🌾🍁🍂 bosco 🍂🍁🌾
🌾🍁🍂 bosco 🍂🍁🌾@selentelechia·
I know anhedonia is an occasional side effect of these drugs BUT there is also a phenomenon in supplement/nootropic/biohacker circles where if someone is claiming life-ruining or otherwise extreme side effects from something that's been around a while and is supposed to be well tolerated by most people regardless of its effectiveness re: the actual issue...they are usually doing some combo of: 1. dosing too much 2. increasing the dose too quickly 3. mixing it with other shit and being honest about that if you actually read their post or listen to them ("modafinil gave me horrible anxiety. I'm taking 3x the standard dose and also I'm taking 1g of caffeine per day" no way dude really???) 4. mixing it with other shit and not being honest about that (the guy who claimed he had some crippling life-destroying addiction to the nasal spray Afrin a few years back? polydrug addict, iirc, if you looked at his post history) 5. are doing some other weird crap, particularly with sleep or diet, like that nuclear physicist I once met who told me about when he was in undergrad and trying to gain weight and ate mostly protein powder to get to 300g of protein per day and then his fingers and toes went numb basically people who are doing this stuff independently are already a high-risk-tolerance population, OR desperate, and both of those groups do dumb shit all. the time.
Tyler@TylerDurden

Hearing some interesting stories from friends who have friends taking peptides: falling completely out of love - overnight - with wives and partners etc etc.

English
11
4
348
27.6K
less phantom retweetledi
Shadow Rebbe IS VISITING THE USA THIS SUMMER
how you feel about each Winnie the pooh character probably says a lot about you pooh: naivety piglet: anxiety eeyore: bummer owl: education rabbit: control kanga:? tigger: chaos roo: childhood? CR:?
English
2
1
4
247
kip
kip@sergeantsup·
if you've spent significant time working on your health issues, you've probably come up with a lot of beliefs about what helps and what doesn't these types of beliefs are vulnerable to cognitive bias e.g. if you're convinced quercetin is good for you, you could notice the days you took it and felt better, without thinking much about all the days you took it and still felt awful if you have enough objective data, and you analyze it, you can check: does quercetin ACTUALLY alleviate your symptoms? and perhaps more importantly, you can get calibrated on a meta level. you can pre-register all of your beliefs about the interventions that do/don't help you, and then check how right you are you can learn how much you should actually trust your intuition going forward
English
2
0
15
607
less phantom
less phantom@phantom_opus·
@a_fellow_of I think "complexity" isn't well defined (or rather, there are many well defined measures that disagree), so it's more of a "what seems interesting to me" kind of issue. Whereas entropy is much more stable wrt definitions.
English
1
0
4
43
less phantom
less phantom@phantom_opus·
You are looking for the Seat Of Consciousness I am looking for the Lamborghini Of Consciousness We are not the same
English
0
0
0
19
less phantom retweetledi
hart the phoenix
hart the phoenix@puheenix·
a complaint for the UX department of everywhere: Hey, I Was Reading That ...is my biggest problem with any UX, and it's everywhere. i'm in the middle of reading some text and it scrolls away, gets covered, etc. please, I beg of you, design your thing so that this Never Happens
English
6
7
38
728
less phantom retweetledi
‏ً
‏ً@omgsidewalks·
Only people with ADHD truly understand what it's like to be AGGRESSIVELY uninterested in something like so uninterested you're angry
English
41
479
4.8K
73.5K
Declan Westing
Declan Westing@DeclanWesting·
@phantom_opus @emollick But you would have to safety test the final product, not just the prototype, so how would the prototype save you any time?
English
1
0
1
84
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
Every so often I think about how, in 2022, for $24B we could had "prototype vaccines ready for each of the 26 known viral families that cause human disease" so they can be deployed in 100 days if there was ever a need. This effort was not funded. ifp.org/why-barda-dese…
Ethan Mollick tweet media
English
44
625
3.2K
134.5K
less phantom
less phantom@phantom_opus·
@DeclanWesting @emollick Yes - and the safety testing is essential! (IDK about the other delays) And if we can do some of that safety testing upfront then we need to do less when crunch time comes.
English
1
0
3
86
Declan Westing
Declan Westing@DeclanWesting·
@emollick During Covid wasn't the actual vaccine ready within an absurdly short time frame after the first genetic sequencing? It was like under 30 days I think. The bulk of the delay was testing and regulatory approval.
English
3
0
3
621