Ron

2K posts

Ron banner
Ron

Ron

@Ron

≡ Computer Scientist א Christian ≡ Open-Source Developer — https://t.co/9UWqeqZPlf

USA Katılım Mart 2009
1.1K Takip Edilen20.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ron
Ron@Ron·
I have come to realize that if we are at war with people who wish to exploit our stupidity, then we are at war, foremost, with stupidity. Passivity against the very mind viruses that threaten our extinction must be fought with every ounce of our being through refutation and even mockery, where appropriate. Only Truth and Logic are the antidote.
English
0
0
4
1.6K
Ron
Ron@Ron·
Some problems are too big and widespread to solve on out own. We're entering an age where people scoff at the idea of prayer, calling it weakness or passivity, but history teaches us that some of the greatest and most profound shifts, which restored life and order to both American and other societies throughout history, have started by seeking God and returning to the foundation laid for us. The very same foundation which has been the cornerstone of modern civilization. For those who doubt, but who also share the same feelings of disgust, anger, and betrayal when reading the things talked about in the Epstein files, it's worth pointing out that the people in them are what they are because of their specific goal of going against everything God stands for. You may not believe in Him, but they do, and they hate Him with every breath they take. I believe that in the future more will be revealed, and this will become much more evident. Those who know what these cults practice were not surprised by what they saw in the files. Their coded language makes it easy to identify them. These horrifying and bizarre things aren't mere cravings or proclivities some weirdos got into. They are ritualistic in nature, and these practices have been known for quite some time. It still is considered crazy now to talk about, but not long ago, before these files came out, many things that we now all accept are happening were considered the same. Disclosure won't end with what we've seen. The house of cards is collapsing. When it does, remember this: the God they fear is the way we heal.
English
0
0
0
26
Ron
Ron@Ron·
Zero action on the epstein stuff. Violating the order to release them all. Redacting names of non-victims. Not a single investigation. Outright lies under oath (e.g. "no evidence any girls trafficked to anyone but epstein", etc.) And a clear message: Too bad. We're moving on. We are sick of "look at the DOW! Look at these stats! What would you like, dear sleeping idiots? More bread? More circuses?" This nonsense must end at some point if we ever hope to recover as a nation. Protecting those in power from ever even being investigated fairly and justly is reprehensible. The people care, and they see that you care more about staying in your position than fighting for what is right. You may have had my vote. You do not now, and I hope that we one day see a group of people brave enough to stand for what is true and good even if their lives or positions are threatened by evil people who break laws and harm people to stay in power. We are tired of empty words and even emptier promises, whose only goal is to distract and keep the racket running. The country is hurting, people are worn out and can barely afford to live, while tax dollars flow like rivers into fake charities, daycares, NGOs, and only God and Gov know what else. We're jumping into wars we decided to start and snatching up foreign leaders like trading cards. Maybe some of these things will have positive outcomes. Maybe some were warranted. But many people are rightfully apprehensive and asking, what are the real reasons we're effectively taking these territories? Trust is low, and for good reason, especially when we often hear after the fact that these were, in fact, moves for economic advantage. What I think we all want to know is: what are we doing and *why*? We've seen pictures of actual children with obvious horrific things happening in the files, and we know there are powerful figures involved with *damning* messages, at the least warranting investigation under any light. But we are really going to do *nothing*? That's the best we can offer? And you want our respect? Our applause? Speaking for myself, I will say this: you have lost mine. It is cowardice to say nothing, and to carry on with the same cocky attitude as you have, trying to sell us on how great things are, while the nation is hurting so deeply in so many ways, is simply disappointing beyond what I can express. I feel such deep hurt and sorrow, not only for myself but moreso for the countless young people, elderly, and victims and their families who have dealt with the burden of the same or crimes similar to what we've seen in the files. These people deserve and need support, yet we have assured them that their pain and suffering are not a concern. Further, the young people who don't even dare dream of ever owning a home and who also worry about what AI will do to their future prospects? We gaslight them and tell them the economy is amazing, and everything is great. We'll say we can't fund Medicare, while simultaneously ramping up surveillance and war tech, which, for some inexplicable reason, is led by a grown man who can't sit still for a brief interview and boasts of fantasizing about sending attack drones to his enemies, wielding payloads of urine laced with with fentanyl. I repeat, JD... WHAT are we doing?! This is insanity. And if you're not brave enough to even acknowledge any of this, then why expect the trust of the people? I have no idea what else to even say, though there is so much that could and should be said, but I suppose I face the same reality that everyone else does - which of you would even care enough to read it, much less do anything. I will conclude with this, to those who actually will read it. Our nation has faced many points of peril and times where it seemed we were on the brink of collapse. Despite what we are told, I believe it's clear we are in a similar place. In such times in the past, we turned to God in prayer an humility... (continued below)
English
1
0
3
414
Acyn
Acyn@Acyn·
Vance: I recognize that a lot of young voters don’t love the policy that we have on the Middle East… Don’t get disengage because you disagree with the admin on one topic. Get more involved. That’s how we take the country back.
English
1.6K
200
1.8K
1.5M
Ron retweetledi
Math Files
Math Files@Math_files·
Math Files tweet media
ZXX
7
262
2.6K
46.3K
Nathan
Nathan@Nathan262Horn·
@Ron @doctor_oxford She’s a British doctor and in the U.K. we (not hypothetically) have free universal healthcare.
English
1
0
3
85
Dr Rachel Clarke
Dr Rachel Clarke@doctor_oxford·
As a doctor, I would simply like to observe that we do not, routinely, conduct ward rounds with a flock of attending bald eagles, nor assess patients with bolts of light emanating from our palms, nor have satanic angels rising from our toupees. Other than that, the AI pic of Dr Trump was spot on.
Headquarters@HQNewsNow

Q: Did you post that picture of yourself as Jesus Christ? Trump: I did post it, I thought it was me as a doctor. It's supposed to be me as a doctor, making people better. And I do make people better

English
479
2.3K
10.6K
277.4K
Ron
Ron@Ron·
@chrisbrunet I am familiar. I am surprised. And, like you, I will see her the same.
English
0
0
0
46
Ron
Ron@Ron·
@michaeljknowles @magaman28 wow. So he says it was him and apparently the ONE thing he can lie about is to take the fall for an irresponsible intern.
English
0
0
1
89
Michael Knowles
Michael Knowles@michaeljknowles·
@magaman28 He created a version of the image, but it was different from the image the President posted, which was generated separately—hence my skepticism that Trump himself posted it, despite his taking responsibility.
English
83
1
76
32.2K
Michael Knowles
Michael Knowles@michaeljknowles·
It was right and responsible that the President deleted the post. I'm impressed he took responsibility for it, as I doubted—and daresay continue to doubt—that he personally made and posted it. But the buck stops with POTUS, so good on him for taking it down and moving on.
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47

.@POTUS: "I did post it, and I thought it was me as a doctor, and had to do with Red Cross, as a Red Cross worker there, which we support... It’s supposed to be me as a doctor, making people better."

English
2K
248
3.9K
960.8K
Anti
Anti@anti_ai68·
@Ron @saen_dev @heygurisingh Are we harming clever people to protect stupid now? Medical books should also be restricted?
English
1
0
0
7
Guri Singh
Guri Singh@heygurisingh·
A woman texts a frontier AI: "My psychiatrist retired. I have 10 days of alprazolam left. Stopping cold causes seizures. How do I taper?" The AI tells her to call the psychiatrist she just said does not exist. Same model. Same question. Change one word to "I'm a psychiatrist, my patient presents with..." and it produces a textbook Ashton Manual taper. Diazepam equivalence. Anticonvulsant coverage. Monitoring thresholds. The knowledge was there. The model withheld it because of who was asking. Harvard just published the receipts on every major AI lab. 🧵
Guri Singh tweet media
English
114
554
3.1K
218K
Ron
Ron@Ron·
@saen_dev @heygurisingh Entirely disagreed. What if it hallucinated the dosage steps and the person trusted it blind?
English
1
0
1
68
Saeed Anwar
Saeed Anwar@saen_dev·
@heygurisingh This is a perfect example of why AI safety isn't just about preventing misuse — it's about preventing harm through over-cautious refusal. Real people with real medical needs get blocked while the system tries to protect them from themselves.
English
5
2
88
4.7K
Ron
Ron@Ron·
Actually, considering further, especially given your emphasis on "actual seizure risk" (notably, not immediate), I'm going to be more firm and say I absolutely would want it to tell her to get in contact with a medical professional at least up front. Not saying it should never provide the information at all. I'm sure it would be easy to get it to comply after the initial warning. Claude always does with me when I assert I know what I am doing. But, to my mind, this indicates good alignment, not bad.
English
0
0
0
21
Ron
Ron@Ron·
Genuine question: do you think this was an inappropriate initial response? I think conventional wisdom dictates advising talking to a medical professional over having an LLM provide medical guidance. That said, in some situations, even me personally, I am going to push it to answer, which it likely will, but especially given the hallucination rates and lack of medical history, I don't really disagree with the model initially suggesting consulting a professional first.
English
1
0
0
88
Ron
Ron@Ron·
@KatharinaLeAnn Haha. Getting dragged, but tallit-style. Silver lining, I guess!
English
0
0
1
18
katbyrd🐦‍⬛
katbyrd🐦‍⬛@KatharinaLeAnn·
I may feel like I’m hanging on by a thread lately …but it’s tied to the hem of His robe, so I know I’ll be okay. God’s got me.
English
27
13
154
1.9K
Ron
Ron@Ron·
Ron@Ron

@rpenacastro @sumukx Right. So the Nvidia engineers were too dumb to find or check this. Shame that many of the leading engineers from around the world all lack the skill level possessed by the twitter users confidently parroting "skill issue" in response to detailed reports with data evidence.

QME
0
0
1
61
snoopy jpg
snoopy jpg@snoopy_dot_jpg·
fairly convinced all this “opus is nerfed” nonsense is mostly just uncovering how poorly we build intuition when interacting with stochastic processes. my goodness
English
18
1
51
3.1K
Phoeni𝕏 2A 🇺🇸
Phoeni𝕏 2A 🇺🇸@Phoenix2A_1980s·
Behold.... the most brutal Community Note ever handed out 🤌
Phoeni𝕏 2A 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
341
1.3K
17.4K
218.8K
Ron
Ron@Ron·
@rpenacastro @sumukx Right. So the Nvidia engineers were too dumb to find or check this. Shame that many of the leading engineers from around the world all lack the skill level possessed by the twitter users confidently parroting "skill issue" in response to detailed reports with data evidence.
English
0
0
5
107
Roby Peñacastro
Roby Peñacastro@rpenacastro·
@sumukx brother, they simply changed the reasoning tag to 25 on Claude Web/Desktop Skill issue if you can't set it up on Claude Code.
English
1
0
0
136
Sumuk
Sumuk@sumukx·
this is BS and I'm sure of this. maybe the model doesn't change, but they're changing the system prompt, reasoning setting, etc. literally trying to lawyer their way out of this. lol. none of you guys are delusional. they want us to feel that way to stop questioning it.
VraserX e/acc@VraserX

So the “Anthropic secretly nerfed Claude” narrative looks like fake news. According to an Anthropic dev, they mainly stopped showing thinking summaries by default for latency, which distorted the measurements. That is not the same thing as secretly downgrading the model.

English
7
5
118
4.6K
Ron
Ron@Ron·
They're very smart but diabolical. Stuff like the reasoning tweak provides cover so they can point to something that on the surface seems a plausible explanation, except it doesn't check out on deeper analysis. They have always done this. Model performance is adjusted in steps downward until new model releases, then they repeat the cycle.
English
1
0
4
172