
Ravenloft43
5.5K posts





Today, @BuchananBen and I co-author a piece in the New York Times with a simple message: While we disagree on plenty, we believe AI has national security implications which deserve a careful and bipartisan government response. We can (and should) have partisan fights about all manner of AI issues, but catastrophic risk from AI shouldn’t be one of them.



Huberman just shared 10 things every man over 40 should listen to if they're thinking of using peptides to keep their brain sharp, shed body fat or sleep better. 1) A popular peptide helped people lose 1/3 of their body weight in 6 months




I think this was an important part of the market sentiment shift when The Wall Street Journal ran a front page story with undeniable facts about the AI compute shortage. The lazy portfolio managers who read the WSJ, Financial Times, and The Information for their idea and thought generation realized they had to revisit their priors about the AI infrastructure buildout liftoff amid the AI agentic exponential mega trend. The nuanced, thoughtful and detailed Andy Jassy annual shareholder letter helped too. Of course, if you had been reading my Substack, you knew all this was happening along with the CPU shortages WAY AHEAD of the mainstream media with dozens of data point sources from industry engineers (GTC) and the right curated industry executive quotes.


Trump just announced that Medicare patients will be eligible to buy GLP-1s for $50/month starting July 1st!










President Trump has, in private conversations, begun thinking about himself less as a peer of Washington and Lincoln, and more as an addition to Hegel’s immortal trifecta: Alexander the Great, Caesar, and Napoleon, @AshleyRParker and @michaelscherer write. theatlantic.com/politics/2026/…








