sabstock

1.4K posts

sabstock

sabstock

@sabouring1

Katılım Mayıs 2014
70 Takip Edilen71 Takipçiler
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@TimHortons @ScottFoxonair Tim Hortons, you screwed over your brand withshort sighted policies. As long as I have a choice I will choose a different coffee shop. Its to little to late.
English
0
0
1
394
Tim Hortons
Tim Hortons@TimHortons·
Hi Scott, we think one of the biggest misperceptions about Tim Hortons is how the TFW program has been used. About 3.6% of team members were hired through the TFW program. These are positions in communities where restaurant owners faced documented labour shortages and went through the full government approval process before hiring. This new campaign will help Canadian restaurant owners hire 10,000 new local team members, supporting natural turnover and growth of Tim Hortons restaurants – including 80 new restaurants opening this year across Canada.
English
630
4
52
136.5K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@DominicCardy The Ukraine war has demonstrated the usefulness of possessing deep stocks of what was considered obsolete weapons. I dont think you should consider Canada starting with a limited inventory as sone sort of advantage.
English
2
0
0
147
Dominic Cardy 🇨🇦 🇺🇦 🇹🇼
Canada, pay attention. A rare advantage of having been so negligent in our own defence is we can skip to embrace this new technology. Work with Ukraine. Make this Canada's specialty.
Tymofiy Mylovanov@Mylovanov

Petraeus: The U.S. has not remotely learned the lessons it should from Ukraine. This is the future of war: Ukraine alone uses 10,000 drones a day, and 90% of Russian casualties are caused by drones. That should force institutional change. 1/

English
45
194
682
18.3K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@KenBoessenkool Why did they have to do that? Do you honestly feel we should be grateful for their incompetence in seeking up a predictable and fair regulatory environment?
English
0
0
1
83
Bryan Breguet
Bryan Breguet@Prominent_Bryan·
Guess where I am (Hint: the authoritarian Canadian Right loves this place)
Bryan Breguet tweet media
English
56
1
95
30.9K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@erinotoole If you had been in negotiations with a potential customer for over thirty years but they never committed and constantly stalled you would lose patience as well. There is other countries who will take our spot.
English
0
0
0
149
Erin O'Toole
Erin O'Toole@erinotoole·
If you are looking at buying a car you have been eyeing for years and the salesman suddenly starts insulting you and questioning your driving abilities would you pause and reconsider the purchase? Asking for a friend.
Murray Brewster@Murray_Brewster

Pentagon doubles down on Canada rebuke with demand for NATO spending road map, F-35 decision. Criticism follows U.S. decision to pause bilateral defence planning body. #cdnpoli #F35 #CanadaUSrelations #defence #NORAD cbc.ca/news/politics/…

English
656
444
3.3K
273K
Stephen Gordon
Stephen Gordon@stephenfgordon·
1) Repeal Harper's reduction of the GST 2) Repeal Trudeau's upper-middle-class tax cut
Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracy (IFSD)@IFSD_IFPD

𝗔 𝗸𝗲𝘆 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿 🇨🇦 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄: 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗼 𝘄𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴—𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲❓ Increased defence spending—and how it’s communicated—is coming into sharper focus following @IFSD_IFPD President Kevin Page’s @TorontoStar op‑ed this week. @CanadianPress' @Kyle_Duggan asked PM Mark Carney about why, as Kevin raised in his op-ed, the government hasn’t been more transparent about how Canada will go from spending 2% to 3.5% of GDP on defence. 💬 𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘵𝘩, 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘢𝘹𝘦𝘴. 𝘊𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘥𝘨𝘦𝘵. 💬 (Kevin Page, Toronto Star, May 18) With a weak economy, trade disruptions and rising defence commitments, Kevin agrees there's a clear case for increased public investment. But the fiscal implications are significant: elevated deficits, rising interest costs and reduced fiscal room. The government should be transparent about how they plan to manage the trade-offs Kevin adds that there are entrenched views in the deficit debate—but both perspectives can hold at once. The underlying challenge is one of balance: supporting growth and security in the near term while maintaining long-term fiscal sustainability. 💬 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗳𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 — 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 — 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲. 💬 🔗 CP (CBC): cbc.ca/news/politics/… 🔗 Read Kevin’s full Toronto Star op-ed: thestar.com/opinion/contri… #cdnpoli #PublicFinance #FiscalPolicy #DefenceSpending

English
11
13
73
15.8K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@Gray_Mackenzie Ya this is never going through. Carney is slow playing every hard decision just like Trudeau.
English
0
0
0
23
Mackenzie Gray
Mackenzie Gray@Gray_Mackenzie·
In Vancouver, the PM lays out three conditions that must be met for a pipeline to be built 1) Building of the Pathways CCUS project 2) BC should get "substantial economic and financial benefits" 3) Indigenous consultations, as well economic benefits and potential ownership #cdnpoli
English
496
161
567
154.7K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@IvisonJ Canadians also support federally supported school lunch programs, daycare and low taxes. It doesn't matter what the polls support when the issues are hypothetical and/or in isolation.
English
0
0
0
61
John Ivison
John Ivison@IvisonJ·
The "majority of the public has not caught up" with the need for more defence spending says this commentator. Except polls show nearly 3/4 of Canadians support spending 5 percent of GDP on defence. So take what you will from the rest of this bloviation. ekospolitics.com/index.php/2026…
James E. Thorne@DrJStrategy

For the record. No More Free Ride for Canada The pause of the Permanent Joint Board on Defence is not just a bureaucratic squabble; it is Washington’s opening move in a larger strategic game is to force Canada out of its free‑rider equilibrium. For 86 years, the board has been the institutional expression of Canada’s privileged status under the American security umbrella, a quiet assurance that Ottawa would always have a seat at the table when North America’s defence was planned. Putting it on ice is how the United States turns that privilege into leverage. The strategic game is simple. The United States wants Canada to undergo a structural adjustment that Canadian politics has spent decades avoiding: higher, sustained defence spending; faster delivery of real capabilities; and a serious industrial base anchored in energy and critical minerals. By pausing the PJBD rather than gutting NORAD or daily operational cooperation, Washington creates a reversible but highly visible penalty. The message is: the shield stays, for now, but the status, influence, and symbolism that Canadian elites prize are conditional on Ottawa finally behaving like a hard power rather than a moralizing stakeholder. Mark Carney has, belatedly, read this room. He knows a world of Iranian missile swarms, Russian attrition wars, and Chinese naval expansion will not indulge a G7 country that treats 2 percent of GDP on defence as heroic while treating its vast resource endowment as something to be constrained rather than exploited. The problem is that most of Canada’s political class, and the majority of its public, have not caught up. They still act as if the post WWII rules based era lives coupled with geography, good intentions, and ESG‑branded virtue restraint on resource development are a strategy that is sustainable. In that context, the PJBD pause is best understood as a forcing mechanism. It is designed to make clear that Canada must choose: either adapt, by rapidly ramping up defence spending, rapidly developing and processing its natural resources as strategic assets, and embedding itself more deeply in U.S. planning and production, or accept a future as a protected but marginal player, lecturing from the sidelines while others set the terms. The strategic game is to end Canada’s era of cost‑free virtue and make hard power, not slogans, the price of continued privilege. No one should be surprised.

English
31
26
129
14.5K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@jkenney "Launch the procurement of 12 submarines" Oh great so we are what 20 years away from having a new submarine fleet? Cmon the fact that you tried to sneak this in as an accomplishment shows the weakness of your argument.
English
0
0
0
138
Jason Kenney 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇮🇱
This is nonsensical and counterproductive. Canada is finally getting serious about investing in national defence. This should be welcomed and encouraged by our allies, not attacked. For the first time since the Cold War, we have achieved the longstanding 2% GDP target, and are credibly moving to the new 3.5% core defence target. The Blame Canada crowd here is claiming that’s all the result of creative accounting. Nonsense. - We have adopted the same framework for scoring defence spending as most of our NATO allies - The federal budget and estimates show real, material budgeted increases to meet the targets - We are spending $55 billion to build 15 cutting edge destroyers, part of the larger naval ship building strategy launched by the Harper government - The RCN is about to launch the procurement of 12 new submarines - The RCAF is finally about to take possession of our first tranche of F35s as part of the new fighter jet fleet - Canada is spending tens of $ billions to modernize and expand Arctic military capacity - The decline in total Canadian Armed Forces personnel has finally turned around, and force size is expanding. Anyone who works in or close to the Canadian defence sector knows that this is real. Exciting things are happening in defence tech innovation, procurement, industry partnerships, etc. Canada’s underinvestment in national defence goes back decades under different governments. It was allowed to get to a shameful state, and for too long we have preened about our moral authority while living rent free under the American security umbrella. It will take time to achieve the ambitious goals of Canada’s defence rebuild. But Prime Minister Carney’s commendable defence reset began just a year ago. The Permanent Joint Board on Defence has been a key platform for cooperation on North American defence since the Second World War. It has operated in good times and bad: during our joint operations in the Korean and Afghan Wars; during much lower levels of Canadian defence spending; and even when a US President threatened to annex Canada. Our two countries have shed blood together in the defence of freedom. Geography dictates that we will always need each other to defend North America. So our alliance must be able to stand above occasional tensions in the bilateral relationship.
Under Secretary of War Elbridge Colby@USWPColby

A strong Canada that prioritizes hard power over rhetoric benefits us all. Unfortunately, Canada has failed to make credible progress on its defense commitments. DoW is pausing the Permanent Joint Board on Defense to reassess how this forum benefits shared North American defense. 1/3

English
820
217
1.3K
190K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@dgardner The issue is that we're always on the cusp of a change. We are always making pledges and promises. I know you think this times different but it probably isnt.
English
0
0
2
15
Dan Gardner
Dan Gardner@dgardner·
Canada is now undertaking its biggest military expansion since the Second World War but rather than praise that change, a top Trump official ignores it entirely and instead pisses on Canada from a great height. The stupidity of these people is staggering.
Thomas Juneau@thomasjuneau

Has Canada long neglected defence? 100% true. But it just reached 2% of GDP, with more to come. Strong alliances have always been a key US advantage relative to the USSR and now China; Trump is squandering what has long been a major source of US power.

English
343
207
1.3K
62.6K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@DominicCardy Its going to be real awkward when we need the states to shoot down another spy ballon.
English
0
0
1
63
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@thomasjuneau Was Canada not damaging Cabadian interests by underfunding our defence?
English
0
0
4
183
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@thomasjuneau How did we reach 2%? I dont think the US or Europe is enthused about our 300,000 strong bureaucrat militia.
English
0
0
1
149
Thomas Juneau
Thomas Juneau@thomasjuneau·
Has Canada long neglected defence? 100% true. But it just reached 2% of GDP, with more to come. Strong alliances have always been a key US advantage relative to the USSR and now China; Trump is squandering what has long been a major source of US power.
Under Secretary of War Elbridge Colby@USWPColby

A strong Canada that prioritizes hard power over rhetoric benefits us all. Unfortunately, Canada has failed to make credible progress on its defense commitments. DoW is pausing the Permanent Joint Board on Defense to reassess how this forum benefits shared North American defense. 1/3

English
307
112
556
94.7K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@IvisonJ How did we hit the bench mark? Creative accounting and increasing salaries doesn't give us any additional capabilities.
English
1
0
0
304
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@erinotoole What did he say which was inaccurate? Canadians are satisfied with our leaders blowing hot air than actually getting results/increasing our capabilities.
English
0
0
0
167
Erin O'Toole
Erin O'Toole@erinotoole·
This is profoundly misguided and quite strange coming right after the President’s visit to China. Canada has been and will be an ally that shares values of liberty. As a Canadian whose grandfather deployed to Alaska for joint defence in WWII, I hope we don’t lose sight of that.
Under Secretary of War Elbridge Colby@USWPColby

A strong Canada that prioritizes hard power over rhetoric benefits us all. Unfortunately, Canada has failed to make credible progress on its defense commitments. DoW is pausing the Permanent Joint Board on Defense to reassess how this forum benefits shared North American defense. 1/3

English
975
243
1.8K
273.6K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@acoyne Wow checkmate! This won't backfire and I totally dont see any completely foreseeable consequences.
English
0
0
0
61
Nate Erskine-Smith
Nate Erskine-Smith@NateForOntario·
Leaving federal politics to make a bigger difference, and it was good to catch up with the Prime Minister as we head into an important weekend.
English
337
182
967
251.6K
sabstock
sabstock@sabouring1·
@bruceanderson Accomplished more than you ever will in your miserable life.
English
0
0
0
4