
sabstock
1.4K posts




Tim Hortons to dial back use of Temporary Foreign Worker program, aims to hire 10,000 locally theglobeandmail.com/business/artic…


Petraeus: The U.S. has not remotely learned the lessons it should from Ukraine. This is the future of war: Ukraine alone uses 10,000 drones a day, and 90% of Russian casualties are caused by drones. That should force institutional change. 1/


Well said - anyone who blames Premier Smith or any Albertan for the current unity problems in Canada needs to look hard in the mirror and ask themselves how they would feel if for 10 years Ottawa attacked their largest job creator, triggered mid-winter instability in their power grid and topped it off with taking $25 billion in net equalization/transfers while vilifying us at the same time. Let’s cut the “Alberta is just complaining and ungrateful” BS and get to solving the obvious root problems. The energy-deal undoing the 9 destructive Trudeau laws is the first big step in undoing that damage. But there is much more to be done. And a little bit of self reflection and self awareness by Laurentian elites, eastern media and Ottawa/BC politicos would be helpful to the unity cause.

Poilievre criticizes the Liberal CRTC's proposed 15% tax on streaming services like Netflix, calling for its reversal. "Conservatives oppose the Netflix tax," he said. "Everywhere you turn, Mark Carney is in your pocket."


Pentagon doubles down on Canada rebuke with demand for NATO spending road map, F-35 decision. Criticism follows U.S. decision to pause bilateral defence planning body. #cdnpoli #F35 #CanadaUSrelations #defence #NORAD cbc.ca/news/politics/…

𝗔 𝗸𝗲𝘆 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿 🇨🇦 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄: 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗼 𝘄𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴—𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲❓ Increased defence spending—and how it’s communicated—is coming into sharper focus following @IFSD_IFPD President Kevin Page’s @TorontoStar op‑ed this week. @CanadianPress' @Kyle_Duggan asked PM Mark Carney about why, as Kevin raised in his op-ed, the government hasn’t been more transparent about how Canada will go from spending 2% to 3.5% of GDP on defence. 💬 𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘵𝘩, 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘢𝘹𝘦𝘴. 𝘊𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘥𝘨𝘦𝘵. 💬 (Kevin Page, Toronto Star, May 18) With a weak economy, trade disruptions and rising defence commitments, Kevin agrees there's a clear case for increased public investment. But the fiscal implications are significant: elevated deficits, rising interest costs and reduced fiscal room. The government should be transparent about how they plan to manage the trade-offs Kevin adds that there are entrenched views in the deficit debate—but both perspectives can hold at once. The underlying challenge is one of balance: supporting growth and security in the near term while maintaining long-term fiscal sustainability. 💬 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗳𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 — 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 — 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲. 💬 🔗 CP (CBC): cbc.ca/news/politics/… 🔗 Read Kevin’s full Toronto Star op-ed: thestar.com/opinion/contri… #cdnpoli #PublicFinance #FiscalPolicy #DefenceSpending



For the record. No More Free Ride for Canada The pause of the Permanent Joint Board on Defence is not just a bureaucratic squabble; it is Washington’s opening move in a larger strategic game is to force Canada out of its free‑rider equilibrium. For 86 years, the board has been the institutional expression of Canada’s privileged status under the American security umbrella, a quiet assurance that Ottawa would always have a seat at the table when North America’s defence was planned. Putting it on ice is how the United States turns that privilege into leverage. The strategic game is simple. The United States wants Canada to undergo a structural adjustment that Canadian politics has spent decades avoiding: higher, sustained defence spending; faster delivery of real capabilities; and a serious industrial base anchored in energy and critical minerals. By pausing the PJBD rather than gutting NORAD or daily operational cooperation, Washington creates a reversible but highly visible penalty. The message is: the shield stays, for now, but the status, influence, and symbolism that Canadian elites prize are conditional on Ottawa finally behaving like a hard power rather than a moralizing stakeholder. Mark Carney has, belatedly, read this room. He knows a world of Iranian missile swarms, Russian attrition wars, and Chinese naval expansion will not indulge a G7 country that treats 2 percent of GDP on defence as heroic while treating its vast resource endowment as something to be constrained rather than exploited. The problem is that most of Canada’s political class, and the majority of its public, have not caught up. They still act as if the post WWII rules based era lives coupled with geography, good intentions, and ESG‑branded virtue restraint on resource development are a strategy that is sustainable. In that context, the PJBD pause is best understood as a forcing mechanism. It is designed to make clear that Canada must choose: either adapt, by rapidly ramping up defence spending, rapidly developing and processing its natural resources as strategic assets, and embedding itself more deeply in U.S. planning and production, or accept a future as a protected but marginal player, lecturing from the sidelines while others set the terms. The strategic game is to end Canada’s era of cost‑free virtue and make hard power, not slogans, the price of continued privilege. No one should be surprised.

A strong Canada that prioritizes hard power over rhetoric benefits us all. Unfortunately, Canada has failed to make credible progress on its defense commitments. DoW is pausing the Permanent Joint Board on Defense to reassess how this forum benefits shared North American defense. 1/3

Has Canada long neglected defence? 100% true. But it just reached 2% of GDP, with more to come. Strong alliances have always been a key US advantage relative to the USSR and now China; Trump is squandering what has long been a major source of US power.


A strong Canada that prioritizes hard power over rhetoric benefits us all. Unfortunately, Canada has failed to make credible progress on its defense commitments. DoW is pausing the Permanent Joint Board on Defense to reassess how this forum benefits shared North American defense. 1/3


You’d think a professor who’s focused on FP & who was a defence analyst at DND wouldn’t be trying to BS CDN’s about Carney’s slight of hand claims of spending 2% of the CDN GDP on defence in FY25/26. Carney’s counting on professors like Juno, the subsidized media, the enforced silence of serving CAF officers, the fact that NATO doesn’t audit its members claims & the ignorance of CDN’s that are too busy trying to feed their families & keep their own heads above water to care to check his BS claims. At best, even with the most generous accounting, you can say we only spent 1.6% of GDP on the CAF in FY25/26.


A strong Canada that prioritizes hard power over rhetoric benefits us all. Unfortunately, Canada has failed to make credible progress on its defense commitments. DoW is pausing the Permanent Joint Board on Defense to reassess how this forum benefits shared North American defense. 1/3

A strong Canada that prioritizes hard power over rhetoric benefits us all. Unfortunately, Canada has failed to make credible progress on its defense commitments. DoW is pausing the Permanent Joint Board on Defense to reassess how this forum benefits shared North American defense. 1/3


A strong Canada that prioritizes hard power over rhetoric benefits us all. Unfortunately, Canada has failed to make credible progress on its defense commitments. DoW is pausing the Permanent Joint Board on Defense to reassess how this forum benefits shared North American defense. 1/3

Whoa! Alberta judge throws out petition for separation referendum theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…


Mark Carney has been Prime Minister for a year. He promised to build at “speeds not seen in generations.” And today? Still no pipeline. Still no projects of "national interest." Get this Liberal government out of the way and green-light projects now.

Pierre Poilievre: "I got into politics and helped the previous Conservative government balance budgets, drop crime by 25%, lower taxes so people could afford their lives. Those were great days."


