
Sheggie
129 posts

Sheggie
@shegaboose
Doctor but not like House or anything. 5 minute fitness buff.
Illinois, United States Katılım Şubat 2011
88 Takip Edilen10 Takipçiler

@StefanMolyneux Nonsensical. We can have free will, and God can also know how things turn out.
English
Sheggie retweetledi


@leahfiles I thought you would’ve done a deep dive on him by now and his mysterious connections😉
English

@StefanMolyneux It says in Genesis “In the beginning…” and believersacceptance of a distinct beginning and a linear conception of time led to a scientific culture in Christian Europe grounded in the idea of a lawful intelligible universe. It led to almost all the greatest human accomplishments.
English

Sigh
If you can accept that things exist with no prior cause, you can accept that the Universe exists with no prior cause
Strike Eagle@Eagle_Strike_EX
@StefanMolyneux God is eternal and has no prior cause, this is not hard to understand.
English

@RWMaloneMD Trump got played by Bibi. Now, all our bases are in deep trouble over there. So buckle up. Trump has to back away from Netanyahu. I fear he will not.
English

Sheggie retweetledi
Sheggie retweetledi

I'm Italian. After my thread on Italy's hidden cities blew up, a close French friend called me.
"You did Italy. Now do France. But don't embarrass yourself, let me 'elp."
We spent a weekend going back and forth. He'd suggest a city, I'd research it. I'd push back, he'd prove me wrong. By Sunday night, we had a list.
7 hidden cities in France that most people, including most French, will never think to visit, let alone move to.
No crowds. No tourist markup. Insane quality of life.
🧵


English

@MsMelChen Maybe his crystal ball is just better. Half a loaf is better than no loaf.
English

I'm loathe to the argument that people who we disagree with are grifters. To claim that someone holds ideas they don't sincerely believe is almost unfalsifiable for we cannot, after all, peer inside a human heart.
So I'll go ahead and assume that Tucker's current beliefs are honestly held.
The easiest explanation for this massive change of heart is that back in 2023, Tucker thought that it was BAD to have to live under a Chinese-led world order. He thought this because he believed the West was worth fighting for.
In 2026, he no longer thinks so.
What happened was that he has completely fallen out of love with America, and no longer sees any redeeming qualities in the entirety of Western civilization.
Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)@TheMilkBarTV
Tucker Carlson's MASSIVE FLIP-FLOP on China: From being a threat that should be 'isolated' in 2023 - to saying America should 'share power' with the CCP in 2026.
English

Joe Kent is the epitome of honor and servitude.
I’m proud to know Joe. There are few like him.
Mostly Peaceful Memes@MostlyPeaceful
Joe Kent has sacrificed immensely for our country. Disagree with him all you want. Anyone bad mouthing him can fuck right off.
English
Sheggie retweetledi

Heather Heying, in "Trump, 1 Year In" explains "we have placed the neuroses of women who are interested in being vocal and active front and center, and allowed those neuroses to triumph over reality...
You aren’t allowed to make a YOU problem an OUR problem...” - @HeatherEHeying
English
Sheggie retweetledi

@barnes_law You can’t have Russia and or China pudding hypersonic missiles in your backyard. It’s Cuban missile crisis part deux
English

There are ways to acquire necessary resources without military interventions, regime change or recreating colonialism. (Those methods generally backfire anyway, and don't even get the resources efficiently). For example, rapprochement w/ Russia would better achieve that.
Cernovich@Cernovich
If I understand some of you correctly: The United States should not do anything. Let other countries colonize and exploit the world, giving themselves control over rare earth minerals and oil, which makes us reliant on these powers. We should sit by passively. Is that about it?
English

@RaheemKassam @TheNatPulse The three earliest Church Fathers—Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch, and Polycarp—show no trace of Trinitarianism. Their writings speak only of God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, with the Son who is subordinate to the Father. The Holy Spirit is only mentioned rarely.
English

NEW @thenatpulse: Defending the Trinity on the Ninth Day of Christmas.
The New Year festivities may be over, bu......
READ ON:
thenationalpulse.com/analysis-post/…
English

@Trigger88506697 @StefanMolyneux I disagree with your AI. It took a while to fuse middle Platonism with scripture. Those three were too early and were just speaking in scriptural terms, which didn’t include the Trinity. The word Trinity and the phrase God the Son don’t occur in scripture for example.
English

@shegaboose @StefanMolyneux I reject religion, but AI on Trinity history:
30–100 AD: Practiced via baptism, worship, scripture.
100–180 AD: Early Fathers use triadic formulas, no technical terms.
180–215 AD: "Trinity" (Trias/Trinitas) first coined for existing practice.
325–381 AD: Formalized in Creeds.
English

On the Nature and Existence of GOD!
Stefan Molyneux discusses a caller's book, "Signature of the Trinity," which examines God's existence through the Christian Trinity. They consider the constraints of traditional arguments, the notion of the twofold nature of divine truth, and the strains between divine sovereignty and free will. Molyneux probes the caller's stance on logical inconsistencies and emphasizes rational morality. The exchange wraps up as the caller describes his work and suggests further conversations.
overcomemortgages.co.uk
Chapters:
0:00:00 Introduction to God's Design
0:00:09 The Journey to Writing the Book
0:01:45 The Unique Argument for the Christian God
0:04:26 Understanding Twofoldness in Divine Truth
0:06:58 The Contradiction of Free Will and Sovereignty
0:09:24 The Challenge of Grasping Divine Nature
0:14:12 Teaching Children About Morality
0:19:41 The Nature of Logic in Children
0:23:23 Explaining Morality Without Understanding God
0:25:49 Criteria for Twofoldness
0:28:48 Scientific Examples of Twofoldness
0:32:55 The Unity of Science and Faith
0:36:02 The Complexity of God's Nature
0:39:46 Genetics and Epigenetics: A Case Study
0:42:14 The Relationship Between Genetic Adaptation
0:47:17 The Argument for Twofoldness in Theology
0:52:31 Gavette's Insights on Unity in Plurality
1:08:49 Expanding on Modern Scientific Examples
1:13:09 The Unity of Reality
1:24:18 Debating Mysteries of Existence
1:32:53 The Bible's Human Influence
1:47:59 Understanding Genetics and Epigenetics
1:53:31 The Nature of Irreducible Primaries
2:02:15 Grounding Existence in Faith or Reason
2:06:58 Conclusion and Future Conversations
SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! x.com/StefanMolyneux
Follow me on Youtube! @freedomain1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@freedomain1
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
peacefulparenting.com
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows!
You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!
See you soon!
freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/…
English

Although her understanding isn’t perfect, she understands Romans 9 light years ahead of Leighton Flowers. She could probably beat him in a debate on it right now. This just goes to show that understanding Romans 9 is not that hard. Just an honest reading of the text, and you come to a somewhat similar conclusion as this woman. She does go a little bit more into the hyper-Calvinism extreme by implying God makes you sin, but generally she understands what the text is saying. And here’s the thing: the objections Paul raises only make sense if this kind of interpretation is correct.
English

@StefanMolyneux Boomers are impotent stooges. Much like silent generation, millennials, Gen X, zoomer’s, etc. etc. etc..
English



