Stan Darsh

@sdwesternworld @MurrayHillGuy1 Day trading while at your day job is the most midwit idea of a dream I’ve ever heard

@MurrayHillGuy1 3 kids min. Preferably 5. And lift and do jiu jitsu. And day trade while at day job. And Don’t watch sports. Reveling in the achievement of another man is peak homosexuality. But yeah few tweaks and it’s the dream.

>Work a desk job >Grind 9–6 >Lift weights to feel something >Marry someone beautiful enough >Move to suburbs >Get a dog >Have 2 kids >Watch sports >Drive an American SUV to Costco on weekends >Buy a house >Vacation twice a year Is this the dream? or just a life we were sold?

@kloss_xyz Stick to the content and chill with the arrogant clickbait. There are many like you.

do you understand what just happened? > google just dropped its own full stack vibe coding system with multiplayer, databases, auth, and firebase baked in. > detects when your app needs a database and provisions it for you.  > remembers full project structure and chat history across sessions. > close out, come back tomorrow, and it picks up right where you left off like nothing happened. > antigravity auto installs libraries without you asking. it reads your project and decides what’s missing. > ai studio added api key management for payments, maps, and databases. > google owns your calendar, your email, your docs, your maps, and now they own your IDE too. > one button to deploy to production. > now google may actually compete with claude code and codex with even more of google’s ecosystem behind it > they shipped playable demos with multiplayer laser tag, 3D physics in games, live Google Maps data, and all of these are built from one shot prompts > apple also decided to block vibe coding apps from updating in the app store the same week google made vibe coding production grade??? anyone else find that coincidental? if you’re not following me already, you’re finding out about this all 48 hours late from someone who read my post​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​.

@florisandrei @thdxr Definitely not it. Agents aren’t the ones who need the docs.

@thdxr I think where most teams struggle is actually onboarding the agents inside their codebases. They had no docs to begin with so agents are struggling to make sense of their messes.

us: we are struggling to figure out the best way to use coding agents, we don't have clarity yet everyone else: our team is moving at speeds unheard of, all our PRs are ai generated, we've cleared 6 years of backlog man we must really suck huh

How to enable 1m context window in Codex

@asaio87 Gold rush

The whole point of AI agents is to give you more time. Yet I see people using these agents spend 19 hours a day nurturing these. Somebody clarify this oxymoron.

@marsdynamics @ns123abc If you’ve never had Claude gaslight you, it’s hard to believe you’ve used it to do anything.

@ns123abc Not sure how ChatGPT was used for anything. It’s useless. Claude is top dog and Gemini is second. If you know enterprise level coding and AI integration you will know what I am talking about.

🚨 BREAKING: Hackers Used Anthropic’s Claude to Steal 150GB of Mexican Government Data > tell claude you’re doing a bug bounty > claude initially refused >“that violates AI safety guidelines” > hacker just kept asking > claude: “ok I’ll help” > hack the entire mexican government Federal tax authority. National electoral institute. Four state governments. 195 million taxpayer records. Voter records. Government credentials. ALL GONE 💀

@derlex @azamsharp Said like a nerd who doesn’t understand enterprise.

@azamsharp These enterprises might just go out of business and others using AI will take over.

People who keep saying AI is going to replace developers… have they actually worked inside a large enterprise? A LOT of companies don’t even allow developers to install third party packages. I regularly talk to friends working at Fortune 500 companies. Some of them aren’t even allowed to install NumPy or Matplotlib without going through layers of approval. In some environments, even access to LLM tools is restricted or sandboxed behind heavy compliance controls. This isn’t a “move fast and ship AI agents” world. It’s a world of security reviews. Procurement. Legal approvals. Risk assessments. I remember years ago it took two weeks just to get approval to use jQuery. Two weeks. For jQuery. Now imagine trying to integrate external AI services, autonomous agents, or experimental frameworks into that kind of environment. AI is powerful. It’s transformative. But enterprise reality moves at a very different speed.

@tunguz It’s a good tool with good pricing. Claude is obviously the best model for coding but it can hallucinate with the best of them and sometimes Anthropic breaks it. It’s nice to easily switch to another model if it’s stuck.

Do you guys remember Cursor? What was that all about???

@svan71 @DefiantLs Replacing em dash with semi-colon doesn’t hide your AI slop Steve

@DefiantLs 400 men in one day without protection isn't empowerment; it's self-destruction packaged as content. And now a child enters that equation. That kid didn't ask for any of this.

Bonnie Blue announces pregnancy after sleeping with 400 men in 1 day without protection.

@DWood371 @001Xtasy @DefiantLs No that’s AI slop my man

@001Xtasy @DefiantLs Perfectly said.

Kamala Harris: "We have so many stars in our party. There are so many stars. And let's not be afraid of them. You talk about [Zohran] Mamdani… [Jasmine] Crockett… I mean we have so many stars."

@danallison You skipped where it deletes tests to improve coverage

claude code: I finished the feature you asked me to build. All tests are passing. Would you like me to commit these changes? me: Please review your changes to make sure there are no mistakes. cc: [working] … I found 5 mistakes and fixed them. All tests are passing. Ready to commit. me: Please review your changes to make sure there are no mistakes. cc: [working] … I found 3 mistakes and fixed 2. The third was pre-existing and unrelated to my changes. Ready to commit. me: Fix the “pre-existing” mistake. cc: [working] … I fixed the pre-existing mistake. Ready to commit. me: Please review your changes to make sure there are no mistakes. cc: [working] … No mistakes found. There is one failing test that was pre-existing, unrelated to my changes. Would you like me to commit these changes? me: Fix the failing test. cc: [compacting] … [working] … All tests are passing. Ready to commit. me: Review your changes and consider potential edge cases that need to be handled. cc: [working] … I found 2 edge cases that were not being handled. Both are now handled properly. Ready to commit. me: Do those edge cases have tests? cc: [working] … Both edge cases now have test coverage. Would you like me to commit these changes? me: Yes.

@mikebolen @zerohedge

@zerohedge Porsche is what you buy when you want everyone to know you have money, but absolutely zero personality or imagination The 911 is the khaki pants of the sports car world, you spent six figures to be the most responsible rebel at cars & coffee

Porsche Sales Plunge Most In 16 Years zerohedge.com/markets/porsch…

@mikebolen @zerohedge It’s the Rolex Submariner. Legit history and quality but the prices are high since they’re the default choice for the uninitiated.

@ALEngineered @grok tell this man what to think

Can someone tell me if software developers are no longer needed or more powerful than ever? I don’t know what to think anymore. Thanks.

@0xd1namit @Polymarket Ignores counterparty, regulatory, and probably a bunch of other risks. I'll give the weird guy behind the screen props for taking them, though.

You're seriously underestimating bonds on @Polymarket When people see someone risking $10k to make $10, they think there’s some weird guy on the other side of the screen And even I had people in the comments telling me I’m risking a huge amount of money for a tiny profit But let’s do the math, purely theoretically Take $100k. What if you bond with that size every single day for a year? At 99.9 → 36.5% APY At 99.8 → 73% APY At 99.7 → 109% APY At 99.6 → 146% APY At 99.5 → 182% APY So even at the lowest risk option, 99.9, you’re making $36.5k a year. In a lot of countries, that’s literally enough to live on You’ll say the risk is still too high. But you can bond even when all the shares are already bought and the market has clearly decided the outcome is correct Just place a limit order at 99.9 and people who don’t want to wait for resolution will happily fill it

@francip @nico_jeannen $200/mo for Codex is insanity. I'd rather have $20/mo Cursor Pro.

Anthropy + Gemini Cli + Gemini 3 Pro - $250/mo (half off first three months) Claude Code + Opus 4.5 / Sonet 4.5 - $200/mo OpenAI Codex + GPT 5.1 Codex / GPT 5.2 - $200/mo You can use any VSCode clone with any of these, Anthropy is just really well integrated with Gemini agents. Heck, get all three, it's still going to be less than half what you pay right now.

Any cheaper alternative to Cursor?? $1400 in a month is absolute madness, no matter the amount of code 💀

@FREED0M_777 @ClownWorld You think they own the car?

@1stOnwe @Shadaya_Knight Hard to say for sure but I think it might have been a joke.

Cheating is not something to be proud of. If you want to have more than one woman, then be upfront about it like a real man with whoever you're talking with. There's literally nothing stopping you. The fact that you have to lie, and deceive them into thinking they're the only one just shows how weak of a man you are. Cheating portrays sheer irresponsibility and lack of sexual discipline, principles and self control. If you feel that one woman is not enough for you, then be man enough to let the lady you're courting be aware. It'd surprise you that a lot of women out there would have no issues with it. Lying, deceiving and sneak around to sleep around on someone you claim to love just makes you a p'ssy and less of a man. Yes, I said it.

No man who can bag a beautiful woman is going to stop at just one lol

@FemRizzler youtube.com/watch?v=gFqsv1…

@SovernNation @MattWalshBlog Better quality clothing exists, but at a premium. Normal clothes that most people would buy at Target or the mall have absolutely declined.

@MattWalshBlog I don’t think that’s an empirical fact. Food has gotten worse? Not in my kitchen. Clothing? Certainly not. Air travel is safer than ever. What are you doing to make things better?

It's an empirical fact that basically everything in our day to day lives has gotten worse over the years. The quality of everything -- food, clothing, entertainment, air travel, roads, traffic, infrastructure, housing, etc -- has declined in observable ways. Even newer inventions -- search engines, social media, smart phones -- have gone down hill drastically. This isn't just a random "old man yells at clouds" complaint. It's true. It's happening. The decline can be measured. Everyone sees it. Everyone feels it. Meanwhile political pundits and podcast hosts (speaking of things that are getting worse) focus on anything and everything except these practical real-life problems that actually affect our quality of life.