SmallHead at Second

8.3K posts

SmallHead at Second banner
SmallHead at Second

SmallHead at Second

@straightupnail

Concerned Yankees fan.

Katılım Aralık 2012
236 Takip Edilen90 Takipçiler
Joe Walsh
Joe Walsh@WalshFreedom·
Why do you spread such dishonest bullshit @joerogan? Hillary publicly conceded & congratulated Trump the morning after Election Day. She then didn’t say a word about the 2016 election for 3yrs. And Trump didn’t just “question” the election. He refused to accept the result. He lied about it. And still does. And then he committed crimes trying to overthrow the election. He’s the only president in American history to do ANY of that. And he’s trying to fuck with the elections this year. And he again won’t accept the election results this year. So yeah Rogan, you attack our elections process like that, you ARE a threat to democracy.
matrixbot@thematrixb0t

Joe Rogan: "They'll pretend that Hillary Clinton didn't do multiple speeches where she said that the election was stolen, Russia stole the election, with no evidence. But when [Trump] questions the election, it's a threat to democracy."

English
1.9K
2.6K
12.8K
537.2K
SmallHead at Second
SmallHead at Second@straightupnail·
@AdamSinger Considering the average unemployment rate in the EU is 50% higher than the US, I’m sure they have the vacation time.
English
0
0
0
155
Adam Singer
Adam Singer@AdamSinger·
Americans: we are financially better off than you Europeans: thank you for your email, I'm currently out of office on annual summer vacation until 30th sept, 2026
Adam Singer tweet media
English
620
1.1K
20.6K
672.3K
Miss Jilianne
Miss Jilianne@MissJilianne·
I think it’s disgusting the United States charges $100 per person visiting our country to enter a National Park. Embarrassing too!
Miss Jilianne tweet media
English
6.7K
752
12K
5.1M
Zachary for Michigan
Zachary for Michigan@ZacharyForMI·
To be blunt, you don't have a viable business model if your business requires your workers to live in poverty. Your desire to be a small business tyrant can't come at the expense of your workers. Everyone deserves a living wage, yes even fast food workers.
Zachary for Michigan tweet media
English
63
1
11
4.8K
Thomas H. 💙
Thomas H. 💙@THemingford·
If paying people enough to live on "tanks your business", then the model was never viable. That is not an attack on small business, it is basic economics. You cannot build an economy on wages that do not cover the cost of living.
SmolCitizen ▚▘▚▘▚▘@smolcitizen

So many retards on X today all thinking they have an economics degree, when in reality they're championing a policy that would tank the economy and destroy so many small businesses. Here is a prime example.

English
59
21
263
12.7K
JrodSeahawks
JrodSeahawks@JSeahawks37453·
@straightupnail @judeinlondon Bro, im fine. Minimum wage ain't for me. But I think all humans who work full time deserve a wage that can support them. If a business can't do that, they don't deserve to be operational. If you dont support that you are a moron and kind of a POS
English
4
0
4
103
Congolesa Rice
Congolesa Rice@judeinlondon·
“I’m a multimillionaire but if I pay you minimum wage my business will go bust” Why would you tell on yourself like this
Congolesa Rice tweet media
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
159
294
4.3K
130.3K
SmallHead at Second
SmallHead at Second@straightupnail·
@redrichie You are being exploited. Or perhaps you think you are just smarter than his employees?
English
1
0
2
39
SmallHead at Second
SmallHead at Second@straightupnail·
@KernowDamo @DanPaulman You are the one that keeps refusing to think past your own hand-waves. You disregard the differences in people’s situations to answer your own ideologies.
English
0
0
0
3
Damien Willey (Kernow Damo) 🟢 🔴
“Pay people enough to live” does not mean “fund their mansion and five kids.” It means full-time work should cover basic costs without taxpayers topping up poverty wages. You knew that, of course. But the real argument was too hard for you, so you concoct this bulls*it and proudly argued with that instead. Best sit this one out I think
English
11
2
120
2.3K
Damien Willey (Kernow Damo) 🟢 🔴
The most revealing thing in this post is that the worker’s need to live never appears as a real business cost. VAT is real. Business rates are real. Energy bills are real. National Insurance is real. Rent is real. Beans, milk, cups, insurance, accountants, card fees, compliance, all real. But the person making the coffee needing enough money to pay rent, eat, heat their home, travel to work and not rely on state top-ups? Suddenly that is “silly socialism”. No. That is the cost of labour. If your business model depends on paying people less than they need to live, then the state is not attacking your business by demanding higher wages. The state is currently propping your business up by letting taxpayers subsidise the gap between what you pay and what your staff need to survive. That is the bit you cannot grasp, or do not want to grasp. You say businesses fail because they are unprofitable. Fine. Businesses do fail. But “I can only make a profit if my workers stay poor” is not a serious moral defence of a business. It is a confession. You say a cup of coffee has to absorb lots of costs. Yes. Welcome to business. But you are treating wages as the flexible bit that must always be squeezed so your business model survives. Nobody says, “If you can’t afford coffee beans, just get the taxpayer to provide the beans.” Nobody says, “If you can’t afford electricity, tell the staff to sit in the dark and call it prosperity.” But when the unaffordable item is the person being doing the work, suddenly everyone is supposed to become very mature and economically literate about poverty pay. You also get VAT badly muddled. VAT-registered businesses can generally reclaim VAT on goods and services bought for business use, and the VAT registration threshold is turnover above £90,000. So this line about 20% VAT and inputs not being claimable is not the killer argument you think it is. The bigger point is simpler. Workers do not get to tell landlords, supermarkets, energy firms and train companies that their boss has “compounding costs” so everyone must please wait quietly while they are paid less than a living wage. The worker’s bills have compounded too. Their rent has gone up. Their food has gone up. Their energy has gone up. Their council tax has gone up. Their travel has gone up. Funny how “proper economics” always discovers pressure when it lands on the owner, but turns into a lecture on realism when it lands on the staff. The Green proposal is £15 an hour by April 2027. The real Living Wage is already £13.45 across the UK and £14.80 in London, calculated on what people need to live, not what a struggling employer would prefer to pay. And even before that, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation found that a single working-age adult on the National Living Wage was nearly £7,000 short of the gross income needed for a minimum acceptable standard of living in 2025. So spare us the sob story that £15 is some wild Bolshevik fantasy. It is much closer to the actual cost of surviving than poverty pay dressed up as realism. You say jobs will disappear. That is always the threat. Every time wages rise, the same people emerge to announce that civilisation will collapse because a cleaner, waiter, carer or barista might be able to pay a bill without choosing which meal to skip. Yet the Low Pay Commission’s latest judgement was that recent National Living Wage increases have not had a significant negative impact on employment. That does not mean every business has no pressure. Of course small businesses are under pressure. Business rates need reform. Energy costs are brutal. Rents are often obscene. Big chains can absorb shocks that small independents cannot. But none of that proves workers should be the shock absorber. It proves the economy has been built so badly that the smallest businesses and the lowest-paid workers are set against each other while landlords, energy firms, banks and large corporations walk away with the margin. Your welfare argument is even worse. Universal Credit is explicitly available to people who are working but on low incomes, and as earnings rise, Universal Credit is tapered down. That means low wages and public spending are already linked. The taxpayer is already helping cover the living costs that low-pay employers do not meet. So when you ask “where does the money come from?”, one answer is: from the business that uses the labour. That is not extremist. That is basic decency. Profit is not ugly. Profit made by selling a product people want, paying suppliers properly, paying workers enough to live, and still having something left over is perfectly defensible. Profit made by underpaying staff and then expecting the public to top them up through benefits is not heroic enterprise. It is a business model leaning on the state while pretending to despise the state. And this “read a book” routine is always funny from people whose entire economic theory seems to be: owners must be protected from hardship, workers must be exposed to it, and taxpayers must quietly make up the difference while being lectured about socialism. A liveable wage is not a luxury add-on. It is the price of employing a human being. If a business cannot pay rent, it cannot use the building. If it cannot pay suppliers, it cannot use the stock. If it cannot pay energy bills, it cannot keep the lights on. And if it cannot pay workers enough to live, it should not expect applause for creating jobs that keep people poor.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A simple message to the silly socialists. You’re upset by businesses telling you that they will fail with the minimum wage increase. You’re telling business owners silly things like if you can’t pay the minimum wage then you don’t have a viable business. I want to make this easier to understand, because if you mean what you say, you want people to have jobs and earn a liveable wage. So listen, businesses fail for all kinds of reasons, mainly because they are unprofitable. We are seeing a wave of business closures at the moment because of the compounding costs from the state against a cost of living crisis. To make a cup of coffee profitable it has to eat a lot costs: - 20% VAT (the inputs can’t be claimed back) - Business rates (a tax before you earn) - Rising NI costs - Employment rights load - Rising energy costs - Inflation All these are imposed by the state. There is also a time tax with all the accounting, HR and regularity requirements which impose cost of consultants and time costs to ensure compliance, distracting owners from operating their businesses. Then there are the other normal costs. A business owner needs to make a profit else the business fails. If the business fails there are less jobs and lower tax receipts. If there are less jobs then public services crumble and welfare requirements increase. This is a compounding problem and what leads to the downward spiral of a country. So… where does the money come from if there are less jobs. The government borrows it, that increase in the money supply drives more inflation, making life more expensive for the people you want to help. Some who now don’t have the job they once had. So what now? What is your plan? I get it, you don’t really have one, this is what has happened to every socialist state, this is how a country goes from rich to poor. We have no divine right to be a wealthy nation and can certainly lose that status. So this is your challenge, can you accept society has a distribution of wealth which means there are rich and poor or would you rather everyone was poorer as long as there are no rich. That’s what socialists tend to want, though I have a secret for you, you can’t get rid of people being rich. I know you think profit is ugly, but the profit motive is what creates business and jobs. So anyway. I’m going to keep promoting proper economics because that’s how a nation becomes prosperous and prosperity leads to a net better outcome for all. This does mean I am going to have to make fun of your stupid socialist ideas. Good luck, read a book and stop being a dumb dumb.

English
164
449
1.7K
74.8K
JrodSeahawks
JrodSeahawks@JSeahawks37453·
@ZephyrCryptoX @judeinlondon Im pretty certain im wealthier than you. Not poor, not bitter. Just know what's right. You on the other hand, definitely miserable and praying to god you somehow get lucky and feel the slightest bit of empowerment in your life
English
5
0
7
190
JrodSeahawks
JrodSeahawks@JSeahawks37453·
@judeinlondon I love how all the bootlickers come to the poor millionaires defense, before they go clock into their 40k a year job.
English
5
3
72
1K
SmallHead at Second
SmallHead at Second@straightupnail·
@judeinlondon Businesses close all the time. The owner doesn’t need to go lose money first. Do you know how businesses work? This isn’t some secret.
English
1
0
0
72
Jon Thompson
Jon Thompson@JohnnyFocal·
To be honest, you don't actually have a business. You have a business based on exploitation, which means your business model is neither sound nor ethical.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
354
40
396
31.4K
Jon Thompson
Jon Thompson@JohnnyFocal·
@TaiPan_StraunCo @PaulLeach51 No, I’m perfectly fine. The problem is that everyone else has rather impressively demonstrated they either don’t understand what’s being discussed, are being deliberately provocative for engagement, or have mistaken confidence for intelligence.
English
6
0
2
249
alabama 🇵🇸
alabama 🇵🇸@alabamarust·
@Arbeitologist ‘let me exploit my low paid workers for personal gain otherwise I’ll close my shop.’ K bye
English
14
1
79
1.4K
Arbeitology
Arbeitology@Arbeitologist·
i love how these people think they have some god given right to have their small business - even if they demonstrably can't afford it
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
224
216
4K
68.8K
peter kenny
peter kenny@peterke60628957·
@NotThatHughes If you cant pay your workers a living wage, you shouldnt be in business.
English
147
12
719
22.7K
Hughes-on-the-Wold
Hughes-on-the-Wold@NotThatHughes·
My business is only viable if I underpay my workers
Hughes-on-the-Wold tweet media
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
1K
6.8K
79.7K
1.8M
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
@declercq If you have access to the median data, I'd love to see it — just going with what I can find
English
6
0
27
4K
Josh
Josh@scoshjott·
@SilentMasses99 @omgsidewalks The clerk at company A and the clerk at company B are both making $120k/year, despite company A making $999M more than company B, the executives and shareholders at the top of company A decide to layoff 1/4 the workforce and give themselves bonuses with the excess profits.
English
3
0
0
62
‏ً
‏ً@omgsidewalks·
Actually, you don’t earn a billion dollars. You steal it. Nobody works a billion times harder than a Doctor, a nurse, a teacher, or a farmer. That money comes from underpaying the people who actually did the work. Stop worshipping hoarders who are just really good at wage theft.
English
646
1K
4.2K
62.5K
SmallHead at Second
SmallHead at Second@straightupnail·
@omgsidewalks Do you want wages to be related to: 1. Risk 2. Intelligence 3. External value 4. “How hard you work” You aren’t making any sense.
English
0
0
0
8