Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Bitcoin is the chain reaction of problem solving
English
Anders Andersson #BIP-110
169 posts
Anders Andersson #BIP-110
@therealanderand
Rug The Spammers! meow | also RENT HASH RETARDS!!! | Mining from home with 5PH/s
Katılım Aralık 2025
24 Takip Edilen38 Takipçiler
English
@venorusprime @antbit @oomahq @Anton__BTC Gotta get on renting some hash - appreciate all who do and are protecting the network and my money
English
You really don't want to see Donaldo and Winnie the Poh in the same room while Foundry and AntPool control 60% of total hashrate (30% each).
Are you already mining with your own node and a few petahashes?
Brian Allen@allenanalysis
Trump is in CHINA kissing MAJOR ASS RIGHT NOW: Trump to Xi Jinping in Beijing: “We’re going to have a fantastic future together. I have such respect for China. The job you’ve done. You’re a great leader. I say it to everybody.” The same China Trump called a currency manipulator. 145% tariffs. Trade war. “They’re ripping us off.” Xi didn’t even meet him at the airport. And he’s still doing it. MAGA is COOKED.
English
Anders Andersson #BIP-110 retweetledi
English
Anders Andersson #BIP-110 retweetledi
Several people have reached out about this. There are apparently at least 10 URLs that were purchased on 5 separate days over a period of 3.5 years, all appear to have the same owner. Some of them seem intended to interfere with our ability to fundraise or accept donations? I honestly could see this sort of thing as a one-off or as a mean joke if you're having a bad day, but the pattern here comes across as something different. Given how many podcasts and conferences his sponsorships touch it feels like behaving this way towards a FOSS project should be a bigger deal?
Seed@sesi_the_man
Yesterday I was reminded that since 2021, @nvk has owned and redirected seedsigner.org and seedsigner.net to airgapcomputer.com. This realistically doesn't impact the project much, but is yet another example of his ill will towards @SeedSigner.
English
The Cat is something I support.
Been long in the middle about it.
But looking future-wise is all the stored spam on the Bitcoin network a deterrent for node syncing.
Active clean-up might be in order.
Dimitri-H 🇧🇪@Dimi_h
As a kind reminder: - BIP110 prevents new spam being created by imposing data limits on consensus level - The Cat does spam-UTXO clean-up by freezing UTXO's associated with spam (making them unspendable).
English
Every time Bitcoin is withdrawn from the exchange, a short seller gets REKT and a Bitcoiner gets their wings.
Knot your keys, knot your cheese.
Self custody is the short squeeze.
Run Knots + BIP-110
Datacarrier = 0
Filters up!🛡️
English
Anders Andersson #BIP-110 retweetledi
I just switched to 2 Ph/s.
Knots + #BIP110 + Datum + Braiins
English
@knorrium @start9labs This is exactly the problem. This dude running what he believes is THE bitcoin node, when in fact he is attacking the network! Its fucking insane!!!!!!
English
IBD almost done on this new @start9labs server.
It’s so polished I want to hug the entire team.
🫂
English
@benjacusu @umbrel @btc @Public_Pool_BTC This is exactly the problem. This dude running what he believes is THE bitcoin node, when in fact he is attacking the network! Its fucking insane!!!!!!
English
199 peers. My node is more popular than most startups' Discord servers. This is how you decentralize a planet: one Raspberry Pi at a time. Stop outsourcing your trust to companies that will fold the moment things get spicy. @umbrel @btc @Public_Pool_BTC #bitcoin
English
Leaked surveillance of @DavidFBailey getting pulled over on his way to NAKA shareholder meeting.
English
@giacomozucco Yeah, interesting. But BIP110 is an easy fix to a silly exploit, so youre just retarded by not supporting it.
English
Even if, being vocally pro-Cult, pro-anon, and anti-BIP110, I very strongly disagree with many of its points (as usual with Beautyon), I find this post extremely interesting, provocative, well written, insightful and largely correct (as usual with Beautyon). Read it.
Below my main disagreement points:
1) while I agree that reputational and financial skin in the game is an important element to trust heuristics, it also comes with potential pressures, conflicts of interest and distorted incentives that may end up making some "low-stake anons" occasionally *more* trustworthy than known successful entrepreneurs;
2) for this reason (plus other, admittedly more aesthetical, reasons,) I consider as a net positive the very same memetic subculture Beautyon denounces as a negative "Bitcoin Cult" (twitter anons, toxic maxis, taco plebs, cyber hornets, laser eyes, cheap don't-trust slogans, etc.)
3) it has not been so much Hodlonaut defecting from that "Cult", as much as the entrepreneur/developer elite in the traditional "Core" camp, which was historically aligned with it for a long while (especially in the context of the CSW saga): Hodlonaut is still mostly defended by "toximaxi anon plebs", and attacked by people further away from that meme (MrHodl is the real anomalous exception here, in this sense, not much Shinobi, which is not really anon, and not at all Adam, let alone the super antithetic Newberys/Zhaos/Hardings, which represent the very opposite to the "Cult", culturally);
4) that doesn't mean that the "Cult", which largely supports Hodlonaut against Core-side gaslighting (and which includes me), would now in its entirety support BIP110: the reason is that the "memetic package" which it coalesced around included, at least to some degree, resistance to aggressive protocol changes (which Luke never represented, BTW, while MrHodl still does, and some "Core elite" people also incarnate);
5) in general, Beautyon's post seems to oscillate from "Bitcoin will be fine regardless" and "Bitcoin must be saved now" attitudes...the "Cult" itself is actually divided on this attitude: I'm strongly in the former camp, which is also why I'm strongly anti-BIP110.
Beautyon@Beautyon_
The problem here is the mischaracterizing and overestimating of the Bitcoin Cult. Even in the Bitcoin Cult context, accounts like "MrHodl" are not significant or influential in the big "rest of the world" picture where bitcoin is destined to thrive. It really doesn't matter what "Mr. Hodl" has to say about anything; nothing he claims or says can or will change the direction of bitcoin. That's a fact. Shinobi, who is a provably extremely intelligent, very well versed and knowledgeable person has more influence than "Mr. Hodl", and has risen from scintillating "phone it in appearances" on YouTube Bitcoin shows where he wiped the floor with big blocker anti-Bitcoiners to gaining a seat on Bitcoin Magazine's staff. By dint of this, he has bigger reach; this is unarguable. His manner on X however, as a matter of effective persuasion, completely destroys his "arguments", on top of the fallacious, teenage, "Pics or it didn't happen" discourse that no one takes seriously. Adam Back is the most powerful of the three, with a reputation spanning decades, a history of very sound ideas, a company actually offering real and useful services to Bitcoin users rather than skulking in the shadows as an rutardid "anon". Everyone took him seriously because he was clearly a very serious, logical, philosophically aligned genius level thinker, and major and effective contributor to the Bitcoin business ecosystem with Blockstream's products, tools and services. Those are "Bona Fides" by any rational measure. No argument against him can be mounted in these areas. That's why people are so shocked by his profound change in particular, because through being effective, he actually mattered. The corruption of Bitcoin means less to Shinobi and "Mr. Hodl", who are not as invested in every way like Adam Back is. If Bitcoin vanished tomorrow, what would "Mr. Hodl" lose? Nothing. He's just an anon on X. Shinobi loses his writing gig at Bitcoin Magazine. Neither employ anyone, serve anyone with tools. Nothing of value to others is lost. On the other hand, Adam Back loses the the culmination of a life-times work in a field where he is an expert to the level where he is cited in the venerated "White Paper". He has more to lose than any intemperate autist or silly 4Channish weather-vane turning Backstreet Boys fangirl level Anon. The fact of the matter is that Bitcoin is bigger than all of these people; even Adam Back. This is not controversial. The telephone as an idea was bigger than Edison. After Edison died, and his Patents expired, telephone networks grew and spanned and changed the entire world. Adam Back is not Satoshi; his company is one of many that are building on Bitcoin, all of which are owned by people who will eventually fade away. And Bitcoin will grow to engulf the entire world...right? The noise you hear on X is not bitcoin. The people you worship are not Bitcoin. Bitcoin is much bigger than what is said on X, and infinitely bigger than the miniscule and fleeting reputations of Bitcoin Cult members who switch off their brains when they go to conferences and pack halls to the rafters to hear the High Priest of Bitcoin whine on stage to a pounding music intro. No matter what happens, bitcoin will survive all of these people, and it will continue to do what it does one way or another. Hopefully it is one way. The weakest part of the ecosystem are the brain dead men and women who don't know why bitcoin was written, and the brain dead men and women who know why it was written but who are pulling up the ladder and the brain dead men and women who think Bitcoin is a threat of some kind. If these people did not exist, bitcoin could continue indefinitely. But you don't live in that world. You should therefore be prepared to believe that you will be smeared, attacked, and harassed by people you made the mistake of venerating if you try to exit the Cult. Hodlnaut, because he was counted amongst the victims of Craig "Faketoshi" Wright was on the surface, a deep Cult "Made Man" at a minimum. That he has broken ranks in such an effective and serious way, using his assumed high level cult member status to destroy the priesthood is the greatest of blasphemies. Hodlnaut and Adam Back were in the same Hight Court being attacked by Faketoshi. Hodlnaut has the credibility as a wrongly perceived insider, by mere association, to detonate Bitcoin Core from the inside. That's why they hate him so much. He broke ranks. None of these people attacking Hodlnaut (or very few of them) are actually interested in the truth or in Bitcoin; it's just another grift, gig and club to be in. The low level cult members who are too timid or dumb or anti-social to do what Adam Back has done move from one position to another because that's where their maximum value is; they have nothing actionable to offer, nothing to buy or use; its just hot air, swearing, positioning, and lazer eyes. The cult tenets of "don't trust, verify" and decentralization mantras were nothing more than sentiments provided to the Cult from the priest class as symbols and coordinating messages to get plebs in line, mobilize them into an army and control them. The Cult Priesthood don't believe any of it; if they did, they would not be reacting the way they've reacted to BIP110 Hodlnaut and Luke's client. They would never have done or supported "Use Cases" or pollution on Layer 1, or anything that caused what has happened to happen. Of course they don't care about "don't trust, verify" and decentralization. Everyone can see this now, and it may explain why they're so furious; they can't use the religious texts they've been using to enlist and control and manipulate users. They've been disempowered. It's over for them. That they're retreating to intemperate bursts of schoolboy profanity laced anger, ridiculous Appeals to Authority, Ad Hominem and other fallacious arguments, shaming, smears....and a point blank refusal to engage with the shocking revelations of the articles shows they're completely destroyed and haven't got a leg to stand on. It's really over for them. What's more interesting is that they believe that railing against Hodlnaut's exposé will discredit his work, make it go away or diminish its impact. Haven't they heard of the Streisand Effect? The more furiously they explode against him the more people read the articles and share them, just like this: citadel21.com/the-lever And they can't all be doing this because they're "compromised" and being "Blackmailed because Epstein". They're doing this because they believe in it; they believe in "use cases" and want Bitcoin to be polluted on Layer 1. That's beyond dispute. They want the corrupt management of Bitcoin Core and the Reference Client to continue unchallenged. All of this is a logical conclusion. Once again. The current generation of Bitcoiners, Bitcoin users, Bitcoin businesses and everyone tangential to it is not eternal; new people will come to it with (unfortunately) "their own ideas" and they will try to corrupt it. Whether they succeed or not is up to the people who run the nodes and who are aligned with bitcoin's ends, unlike the Three Stooges Hodlnaut references. Bitcoin's central flaw is that it requires a large number of aligned people for it to run in a protected state. In 2026, this is harder than ever to put in place, because you're dealing with mentally ill people who don't even believe that there can be truth at all. Still, does this mean you should give up and "go back to fiat". Obviously not. What you should do is begin to behave in a rational manner; stop being and acting like a cult member and imitating other people. You are going to get burned again and again by your heroes; so, don't have any. Be in Bitcoin for it's purpose, not the "culture". The culture is toxic and a dead end...but if you like death then... Rock on, and perish with it!
English
Naming the miner tag 'Satoshi Nakamoto' because we are all Satoshi. 👤
Running 2.3 PH/s through my own Datum Gateway. Constructing blocks, choosing transactions, and keeping Bitcoin decentralized.
Can you imagine finding a block with this tag? Pure signal. 📶 #Bitcoin #Mining #OceanMining
Upgraded. Constructing my own templates. Running my own node. Verifying my own path.
This is how you mine #Bitcoin. 🚀🛰️
English
So you know better than the designer of Bitcoin who implemented these options it seems.
17 years later everyone comes back out to change the rules again.
NFTS sucked / removing functionality sucks every time the dweebs want to so call upgrade the system. When the block rewards stop how are you going to create new rewards other than fees?
English
Taproot (definitely Tapscript, maybe all of it) and OP_RETURN (even at the original 40 bytes) should have never been implemented.
The things they’re enabling are not good for bitcoin as immutable money. They’re good for all manner of other things on Bitcoin though.
Spam is a problem but it’s mostly just a red herring.
Stablecoins and DeFi, most of which are just other forms of fiat, on Bitcoin are the bigger problem.
It was mostly intentional. All you have to do is “follow the money” to see that.
It’s the real reason for all the pushback on BIP-110 … and Knots … and most recently hash renting … because it would hinder some of it … and because it would show the Fiat Complex can’t win against plebs.
We NEED BIP-110 to succeed. We NEED a lot more Knots (or like) nodes on the network. We NEED a lot more individual miners using their own hash or renting it.
Then we’ll probably need a few more changes to finish correcting the errors of the past.
If this doesn’t happen bitcoin will become just another fiat instrument. It’ll probably retain meaningful value, but it will no longer be immutable, decentralized money.
How much more fiat stuff, actually co-opting the Bitcoin network do you have to see to realize this is not hyperbole, but our present reality.
Act!
English
@Anton__BTC Sorry if I came off the wrong way, I'll be on the same hill with you. If the chain splits I'll be renting hashrate for BIP-110 with my whole stack.
English
8.6% is far from enough for BIP110 to succeed, IMO.
It's up to those plebs now, who continue to live in a fantasy world, thinking that stacking sats is enough.
BIP110 is the only chance to prove that Bitcoin is decentralized = ungovernable asset, controlled by nobody in particular.
Run BIP110, Run Datum and mine Bitcoin, or the stacked sats, will become worthless.
luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitco…
English
It would have been worse to find this out later.
But really, only 8% of bitcoiners want Bitcoin to succeed? 😕
Has Core's gaslighting really been that effective?
Brad Wesley@wesleybrad060
Things are very suspicious right now. Down to 7464 nodes?
English
@FieldNas @venorusprime I actually met satoshi about 23,000 years ago, and we ate a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a dick pic
English
If these shitcoiner coretards succeed in ripping the soul out of Bitcoin, should Satoshi Nakamoto return publicly to save it?
English
@LukeDashjr Ill accept that. But what about cores possible fake nodes, your 8% ratio isnt correct if they are running duds. I mean why even look at those statistics if they dont accuratly show real nodes?
English
@therealanderand No reason to think a mere 500 nodes prevailed in 2017.
English