Justin "The Zig"⬆️

41.2K posts

Justin "The Zig"⬆️ banner
Justin "The Zig"⬆️

Justin "The Zig"⬆️

@thezigpc

Tech Enthusiast, Gamer, Advocate for modest #UBI Vote for the person, not the party!

Palm Bay, FL Katılım Ağustos 2008
2.2K Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Justin "The Zig"⬆️
Justin "The Zig"⬆️@thezigpc·
To secure a bright and healthy future for the next generation, we cannot afford to tear down the very safeguards that keep pollution and energy waste in check. Rolling back the environmental gains that took decades of work is not policy, it is theft. It steals cleaner air, safer water, and a livable world from the children who will inherit what we leave behind.
English
1
0
0
311
Justin "The Zig"⬆️
@samglacorte Frequent Fear pass with express once per house, and Fear+Express passes were highly limited and sold out quickly. No it did not let people skip 1k times a night. You had to buy Express Unlimited passes for what you are saying
English
0
0
3
289
Fred Flinstone
Fred Flinstone@themeparkexec·
@LucyLovely666 @ScottGustin They gave plenty of notice, arguably months haha and I can assure you the people who clog up the lines every night do not “make the event”
English
2
0
3
228
Scott Gustin
Scott Gustin@ScottGustin·
NEW: Universal Orlando confirms all multi-night Fear with Express Pass products have been discontinued "in an effort to provide the best HHN experience for all guests."
Scott Gustin tweet media
English
30
56
679
245.2K
Travis The Clown
Travis The Clown@TravisCoaster·
@thezigpc Totally understand this. Honestly. But I’ve been staying since it’s inception that it was a bad idea. And it just got worse
English
1
0
0
135
Justin "The Zig"⬆️
The issue is how long Universal waited to announce this. Single-night Express Passes had already been on sale long enough for some dates to increase in price. People plan and budget for these trips months in advance. Fear Passes with Express were an excellent value, but forcing frequent guests to buy individual Express Passes drastically changes the cost, especially now that the initial prices for key nights are already gone. Cancelling a trip because the expected cost suddenly increased by hundreds of dollars is not "entitled." It is basic budgeting.
Travis The Clown@TravisCoaster

People cancelling vacations for this is WILD. Like. Be for real and a bit less entitled. Thanks

English
5
3
31
2K
Justin "The Zig"⬆️
Waiting this long to announce that Fear Passes will no longer include Express is a pretty lousy way to treat the people who buy them every year. You let single-night Express Pass prices increase as availability tightened, then waited until well into the sales cycle to tell everyone that the usual Fear Pass with Express option was being discontinued. Now anyone who was waiting for that pass is stuck either paying inflated single-night Express prices or missing out on key dates they could have purchased earlier at the initial rates. This should have been announced before tickets and Express Passes went on sale. People could have planned ahead, budgeted properly, and secured their most important nights before prices started climbing. You are already getting reamed over the bad PR from this decision. The comments under your own post include loyal guests talking about cancelling trips, dropping hotel reservations, or skipping HHN altogether. Saying that other Fear Pass options are "coming soon" does not make up for how badly this was handled. What a great way to celebrate an anniversary year. /s The clock is ticking. Reconsider this before even more of your most loyal HHN guests decide this is the year they stop coming.
Universal Orlando Resort@UniversalORL

@CBrune15 Hello, as we continue to evaluate our offerings in an effort to provide the best Halloween Horror Nights experience for all Guests, we have discontinued all Fear with Express Pass products. Other Fear pass options will go on sale soon. Visit spr.ly/6010BEkhRO for details.

English
8
6
54
5.3K
Justin "The Zig"⬆️
So the Republican Party cannot get its election bill passed on its own merits because it refuses to seriously negotiate amendments addressing the disenfranchisement of eligible voters. Instead, it now wants to force the bill through by attaching it to unrelated, must-pass national defense legislation. That is not Congress "doing its job." Congress is supposed to debate legislation, negotiate with fellow members, address legitimate concerns, and amend bills until they can earn enough support to pass. If a bill cannot pass independently, the answer is not to hide it inside something else. Here is what I would recommend: 1) Replace mass voter-roll purges with accurate voter classifications. Voter records should clearly distinguish between eligibility for federal, state, county, and municipal elections rather than simply removing people from the rolls. States and local governments retain authority over their own elections, and some jurisdictions may legally permit noncitizens to vote in certain local elections. Federal citizenship requirements can be enforced without erasing lawful state and local flexibility. 2) Eliminate the financial barrier to obtaining required documentation. Replacement birth certificates, marriage records, court orders, and other necessary documents should be free or heavily subsidized for low-income citizens. The government should not impose a documentation requirement and then charge eligible citizens for the evidence needed to exercise their right to vote. Voting should never come with a financial obstacle. 3) Make Election Day a federal holiday. Citizens should not have to choose between earning a paycheck and casting a ballot. A federal holiday, expanded early voting, and adequate polling locations would make participation easier without weakening election security. 4) Create a reasonable process for resolving documentation problems. Eligible voters whose names have changed, whose records contain errors, or whose documents are unavailable should have access to provisional registration, sworn attestations, and a clear appeals process. Bureaucratic mistakes should not automatically cancel a citizen's vote. 5) Require the government to do its part to help citizens comply. If Congress creates documentation requirements, it should fund public outreach, document-replacement assistance, mobile registration services, and trained personnel to help voters navigate the process. I support verifying citizenship for federal elections. I do not support using that goal as an excuse to create unnecessary costs, mass purges, or bureaucratic traps that prevent eligible American citizens from voting. Negotiate the bill. Fix the problems. Pass something that protects both election integrity and voter access. Do not bury a deeply controversial election bill inside national defense legislation and pretend that is responsible governance.
ThePersistence@ScottPresler

OH MY GOSH! The House just voted 215-211 in favor of a special rules resolution, which instructs for the text of the SAVE America to be attached to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The House is doing its job. @SpeakerJohnson is keeping his promise.

English
0
0
0
34
Justin "The Zig"⬆️
If the SAVE Act passes without meaningful amendments, many eligible citizens could be disenfranchised simply because they cannot easily obtain the required documents. We will need an immediate, coordinated effort to help people identify what documentation they need, obtain replacement records, and complete their voter registration. Since many of these documents are not free, that may also require creating a privately funded assistance program to help cover the costs for those who cannot afford them. We cannot allow paperwork, fees, or bureaucratic barriers to silence eligible voters. We must organize now, support one another, and do everything possible to minimize the disenfranchisement this legislation could cause.
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh

🚨 JUST IN: The US House has just ADVANCED forcing the SAVE America Act into must-pass national security funding legislation, on top of stopping the seasonal clock change — 215-211 SECURE OUR ELECTIONS! Citizenship, voter ID — send it to Donald Trump's desk ASAP 🇺🇸

English
0
0
0
28
Justin "The Zig"⬆️ retweetledi
All Purpose Geek
All Purpose Geek@allpurposegeek·
So @NeowinFeed posted an article that touches on something that I keep clamoring about. Client's getting locked out of their accounts regarding losing 2FA apps. x.com/NeowinFeed/sta… A key takeaway from this article, and something I wish phone providers like @TMobile would take seriously, is that losing access to 2FA is not a minor inconvenience. For some accounts, it can mean being permanently locked out. To be clear, in this article's case, the issue was an account compromise where the attacker changed the 2FA information. That is different from a phone trade-in or upgrade gone wrong. But the core problem is still very apparent: When access to 2FA is lost, changed, wiped, or not properly transferred, the user may have no practical way back in. With Microsoft personal accounts, if a user loses access to their 2FA method and has no backup recovery options configured, such as SMS, email, recovery codes, or another trusted sign-in method, they may be locked out for good. That is why this matters during phone upgrades. When a customer is told "everything transferred," they may believe that includes their authenticator apps. In many cases, it does not. If they trade in or wipe the old phone before confirming their authenticator apps work on the new phone, they can lose access to email, banking, work accounts, cloud storage, medical portals, social accounts, and years of personal data. This problem is only getting more serious as more services push users away from SMS and phone-call based 2FA toward app-based authentication. Some providers are dropping or limiting SMS 2FA entirely, often citing cost, abuse, or security concerns. X/Twitter is an example of this, since SMS-based 2FA is no longer available unless you have a paid account. Phone carriers do not need to turn every CSR into a cybersecurity expert. They just need to train them to ask one simple question before a customer trades in, wipes, or gives up their old phone: "Do you use an app on your phone to approve logins or get security codes?" That is it. If the answer is yes, then the customer should be told to test those apps on the new phone before giving up the old one. For the details, carriers could provide a simple pamphlet or counter flyer listing common authenticator apps, such as Microsoft Authenticator, Google Authenticator, Duo Mobile, Authy, Bitwarden, Proton Authenticator, 2FAS, RSA Authenticator, and others. A 30-second conversation, a checkbox, or a simple flyer could save a customer from losing access to their digital life.
NeowinFeed@NeowinFeed

Two things not enough people do, securing online accounts and reading the terms and conditions, just cost one user 25 years of data. #Microsoft #OneDrive neowin.net/news/user-lose…

English
0
1
0
165
Justin "The Zig"⬆️
Justin "The Zig"⬆️@thezigpc·
This changes nothing about the constitutional issue. If you don't like birthright citizenship, amend the Constitution. That's literally why the amendment process exists. Executive orders are not a magic wand for rewriting constitutional text. What is remarkable is the intellectual inconsistency. The same crowd that spends years proclaiming "shall not be infringed" as if every word of the Second Amendment is untouchable suddenly discovers that the 14th Amendment is somehow open to creative reinterpretation because it's politically convenient. Pick a standard. Either the Constitution means what it says until it is amended, or it doesn't. You don't get to be an uncompromising originalist on Monday and a constitutional gymnast on Tuesday because the amendment in question no longer aligns with your policy preferences.
Nick Sortor@nicksortor

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump announces he is filing for a RE-HEARING with the US Supreme Court on birthright citizenship after an ANCHOR BABY HOSPITAL was discovered in Texas "Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with 'Deliveries starting at $4000.'” "That is a CRIME, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision.” “US CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE!” —— FULL POST: “Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with “Deliveries starting at $4000.” Likewise, similar signs going up all over our Country. Billions of Dollars will be illegally made by this SCAM, with Citizenship going to anyone willing to pay. It will be, by far, the number one way of becoming a citizen, and then the entire family will be allowed to follow. Not sustainable. NOBODY SAW THIS COMING!!! AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! In fact, that is a crime, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP”

English
0
0
0
23
AT&T Help
AT&T Help@ATTHelp·
@thezigpc Hello Justin, this is Emma on behalf of AT&T. I’d really like to help you. Could you please share more details about the issue, so I can assist you as effectively as possible? ^Emma
English
1
0
0
26
Justin "The Zig"⬆️
Justin "The Zig"⬆️@thezigpc·
The point I am trying to bring up is that when you are dealing with a client that wants service, it is on you to validate service availability before a client signs a contract. Your rational is backwards. A feasibility study requiring a signed contract can make a potential client, in this specific case a local city hall, go through all the internal bureaucratic approval to get a project approved and only after that, only after they sign a contract with you, they are told its not possible. It is a waste of client resources on something that you as a company should do on their own as you own your infrastructure/nodes.
English
0
0
0
5
AT&T Help
AT&T Help@ATTHelp·
Thank you for reaching out. I understand your concern. We require a signed contract before a site survey as it confirms your commitment, allowing us to allocate technicians and resources efficiently. This helps avoid delays, and we'd like to look into this and see what's affecting your service. • For faster assistance, send us a DM on: - X (Twitter): @ATTHelp - Instagram: @att - Facebook: AT&T We're here to help with your concern. ^Emma
English
1
0
0
61