Vinay Jonnalagadda

All set!

Chiranjeevi garu wrote a letter & supported the three capitals proposal & even stated that spending on Amaravati was a waste of money..all of this when lakhs of farmers were being abused & traumatised Now you expect him to speak up or tweet in support of Amaravati ? #Amaravati

@prasana_kumar @JayGalla @ncbn @JaiTDP @naralokesh 🙏

అమరావతి రైతులతో పాటు మనం గుర్తు చేసుకోవాల్సిన మనిషి మన గల్లా జయదేవ్ గారు @JayGalla 🙏 ఎన్ని ఇబ్బందులకు గురిచేసిన ధైర్యంగా నిలబడ్డారు🙏 వీరితోపాటు తన పొలాన్ని ఇచ్చి కేసులు పెట్టించుకుని ఇబ్బంది పడ్డ @vinayj అన్న కి కూడా నా పాదాభివందనాలు🙏 #Amaravati @ncbn @JaiTDP @naralokesh

A strong democracy depends not just on the government but equally on a responsible opposition. The conduct of @YSRCParty is hurting the people of Andhra Pradesh. It’s time for accountability and better governance. ఏక్ నిరంజన్ @ysjagan 🤦‍♂️ @JaiTDP @ncbn @naralokesh @JanaSenaParty

A foreigner asked why people go to Varanasi to die… this Indian boy’s explanation of moksha, faith & liberation is straight clarity.

I, G V Reddy, Advocate, hereby place on record my opinion on the Unanimous Resolution dated 28.03.2026 concerning the capital of Andhra Pradesh. The Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly in its sitting held at Amaravati on 28 March 2026 unanimously adopted a Resolution requesting the Union Government to amend Section 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 so as to expressly recognise Amaravati as the capital and define its extent. This reflects a strong and unified political will and from a policy perspective, it may enhance administrative certainty and improve investor confidence. However legally speaking, this Resolution is only a recommendation. The actual power to amend the law rests with Parliament. Even if Parliament accepts the proposal and amends the Act through a simple majority, the same Parliament retains the power to amend it again in the future. If a subsequent State Government passes a similar Resolution proposing a different capital arrangement, and the Union Government agrees, the law can again be modified. Therefore the present step provides stability for now but it does not create a permanent or irreversible position. In this background, a more enduring solution, in my respectful view would be to elevate the issue to the constitutional level by incorporating the capital designation within the Constitution of India. Such an approach would serve the long term interests of the State as well as the country, as it would bring stability to a matter of fundamental governance importance. It is also relevant to observe that, across the country, States have not generally revisited or altered their capital cities repeatedly. Stability in this regard is essential for institutional continuity and public confidence. It must be acknowledged that amending the Constitution is not an ordinary legislative exercise. Under Article 368 of the Constitution of India, any amendment requires a special majority in both Houses of Parliament, along with ratification by at least half of the State Legislatures where federal aspects are involved. This creates a very high threshold of political consensus. Therefore, any such amendment must also withstand judicial scrutiny. Once the capital designation is incorporated into the Constitution, it becomes practically very difficult to amend or alter it in the future. The combination of a high parliamentary threshold, mandatory State ratification and constitutional limitations makes such an extremely unlikely in practical terms. In that sense, constitutional recognition would provide a near permanent and stable solution. In the present scenario, the matter relating to the capital framework, including the concept of multiple capitals, is also pending before the Supreme Court of India. The final decision of the Court will have overriding authority. The larger principle that emerges is that the capital of a State is not a matter to be revisited frequently. It is a long term decision affecting governance, economy and public trust. While the present Resolution is a positive step towards clarity, true permanence can be achieved only through stronger legal or constitutional protection. Accordingly, while the current development strengthens Amaravati’s position, a more secure and lasting solution would lie in constitutional recognition by its very nature, makes future alteration practically difficult and ensures stability for generations to come. Regards, G V Reddy, Advocate.

Private colleges r warned not to advertise fake ranks or guarantees. Great—but what about telemarketing? Parents r harassed with admission calls. How r these colleges getting our phone numbers? Who is responsible for this data leak? @JaiTDP @naralokesh eenadu.net/telugu-news/an…

BREAKING: She exposed the insurance company totally ! Good point raised.

MS Dhoni at his Candid Best- "All the Masala in our Life comes from the WIFE" ❤️😂👏

కలెక్టర్ల సమావేశంలో సీఎం చంద్రబాబు కీలక వ్యాఖ్యలు మిమ్మల్ని కిడ్నాప్ చేసి అక్కడ పెట్టాలి.. అప్పుడు మీరు కరెక్ట్ అవుతారు మీరు ఇద్దరూ కూర్చొని ఏం చేస్తారో తెలియదు.. నాకేమీ ముఖ్యమంత్రి పదవి కొత్త కాదు, ఇది నాలుగోసారి వాట్ నాన్‌సెన్స్ యూ ఆర్ క్రియేటింగ్? - క‌లెక్ట‌ర్ల‌పై చంద్ర‌బాబు సీనియ‌ర్ కామెంట్స్‌

My son is 5 yrs old. I'll make sure that he listen to his podcast before he turns 10. No amount of schooling can teach what this guy has taught in 21 minutes.

I literally can’t believe Anthropic released this for FREE. A 33-PAGE CHEAT SHEET on how to master Claude skills. Bookmark this or get left behind in AI: resources.anthropic.com/hubfs/The-Comp…

Simple machine produce a basket from bamboo. Amazing machine

Poor get welfare (often justified) and freebies. Rich get incentives in the name of development and job creation. The middle class gets pothole roads and lectures from politicians and bureaucrats.

An RMP gave Levocetirizine + Prednisone to an 86-year-old for a minor rash. He’s a 10th-fail & often drunk, but villagers trust him because overdoses give quick relief. Steroid misuse is being normalized in rural healthcare. @MoHFW_INDIA @ysathykumar @JPNadda @ncbn @naralokesh

A Heartfelt Thank You Letter, To: Kapil Sibal Ji & Abhishek Singhvi Ji Gentlemen. From the bottom of my heart. With folded hands. With tears of gratitude. Thank you. For years, an ordinary Indian had no idea. No idea that 5 crore cases are pending. No idea some cases outlive the petitioner. No idea 1170 complaints were filed in 2024. Against sitting judges. No idea the Law Minister told Parliament, 8,639 complaints. In 9 years. We were living in blissful ignorance. Then came you two. Two senior advocates. 80+ years of combined legal experience. Combined fees that could fund a district court. And you walked into the Supreme Court. Urgently. Breathlessly. To save India from, a Class 8 textbook. Jai Ho. Because of you, that textbook, 5,000 students would have quietly read it. And forgotten it. It is now the most talked about document. Every news channel is reading the chapter. Every WhatsApp group has the PDF. Every Indian is now googling, "pending cases in Indian courts." You wanted to suppress the information. You made it viral. Gentlemen, have you considered public awareness campaigns? India spends crores for this. You did it in one morning hearing. The beautiful irony? The chapter said judiciary has a backlog. You proved it. By using Supreme Court time. To ban a school textbook. The chapter said poor people struggle. To access justice. Your appearance fee for one hearing, could fund a district court's whole pending cases. The chapter said transparency is needed. You walked in. And made the whole country stare. At exactly that. Wah Counsel Wah!!! Masterclass. Now every Indian knows, 5 crore cases. Pending. Average disposal time, years. Sometimes decades. A former CJI's own words on corruption. Such great service, Sirs. Once again, Kapil Sibal Ji. Abhishek Singhvi Ji. You did what no RTI activist could do. What no journalist could do. What no reformer could do. You made judicial accountability, a dinner table conversation. In every Indian home. The students you tried to shield? They're reading it on Instagram. Right now. Bharat Mata Ki Jai!

This tradition is not safe. If gas is not burning properly, risk of carbon monoxide contact with chapati. @grok Am I right??

“The judiciary is the biggest hurdle in making India a Viksit Bharat” — Sanjeev Sanyal (PM’s Economic Advisory Council member (EAC-PM), said in his viral Nyaya Nirmaan 2025 speech. Today, the judiciary itself proved this statement 100% correct—again.

We now have evidence that gentle parenting doesn’t work. Here’s an uncomfortable truth about parenting no one wants to say out loud: The data is not kind to gentle parenting. According to teenagers, strict curfews. strict bedtimes, screen limits, device drop off times, dedicated homework blocks, and sleepover restrictions IMPROVE higher relationship quality. And yes, parenting difficulty goes up. Of course it does. Leadership is harder than appeasement. For the past decade we have been sold a watered down, Instagram friendly version of “gentle parenting” that often collapses into boundary avoidance, endless negotiation and emotional processing without enforcement. Parents terrified of saying no because they do not want to rupture connection. But connection without authority is not connection. It is dependency. When parents impose structure, the relationship improves. Teenagers report better parent child relationship quality in homes with curfews and rules. Younger kids report better relationships in homes with screen limits and bedtimes. Even device drop off times correlate positively. Why? Because structure is not cruelty. Structure is love made visible. A bedtime says: your brain matters more than your entertainment. A screen limit says: your dopamine system is not fully developed and I will guard it until it is. A curfew says: your safety matters more than your social standing. That is not authoritarianism. That is caring. Boundaries create friction. Friction creates growth. The parent absorbs the short term discomfort so the child does not pay the long term cost. Children do not experience well calibrated limits as rejection. They experience them as stability. The human brain craves predictability. Predictability reduces anxiety. Reduced anxiety strengthens attachment. That is why relationship quality goes up. Notice something else in the data. The strongest effects are around time structure. Bedtime. Homework. Devices. Outside play. These are environmental constraints. They scaffold executive function. The winning formula is not tyranny. It is high warmth plus high structure. The modern failure mode is high warmth plus low structure. That is just abdication of responsibility wrapped in empathy. Children need leadership, not negotiation. They need adults who can tolerate their anger. They need boundaries that do not move every time emotions spike. They need someone whose prefrontal cortex is fully myelinated. The harder path produces the stronger bond. Because when a child feels that someone is strong enough to hold the line, they relax. And relaxed nervous systems build durable relationships.