walgesinge

17 posts

walgesinge

walgesinge

@walgesinge

Katılım Mart 2025
83 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@axiochrono @nikicaga Funnily enough I'd call this post "directionally correct" because I agree that the term can be useful, but that the examples don't apply. That's more of a "wrong" vs "not even wrong" type situation.
English
0
0
12
133
Axio 🔶
Axio 🔶@axiochrono·
@nikicaga Nah I think it's a pretty useful term. Not all falsehoods are created equally. It's wrong to say 2 + 2 equals 5, and it's also wrong to say 2 + 2 equals the Bavarian Soviet Republic, but one is obviously more wrong than the other.
English
7
0
18
594
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@mawensx @IsomorphicPhi Why is "denominator" rational and logical but "namer" weirdly poetic when they both mean the exact same thing Equality sign is also very literally "the sameness mark", like that is literally what these words mean
English
0
0
2
58
Marcus
Marcus@mawensx·
@IsomorphicPhi Täljare from tälja (to carve/whittle). Nämnare from nämna (to name/mention). Swedish math terms are weirdly poetic. Also: 'likhetstecknet' (equality sign) is literally 'the sameness mark'
Svenska
2
0
9
1.7K
Iso (math fool)
Iso (math fool)@IsomorphicPhi·
It's bizarre the things you never ponder in your own language. Why, in Swedish, are the numerator and denominator called the woodcarver and the mentioner?
English
27
39
1.7K
69K
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@redhead_ophelia An alphabet is a type of script, and cyrillic is an alphabet. What do you think those words mean?
English
1
0
14
762
redhead ophelia 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈
1. Cyrillic is not an alphabet but a script. 2. In order for you to understand how stupid this sounds, imagine a person who, after learning the English alphabet, thinks that they should understand all the languages using the Latin script.
English
18
34
721
14.6K
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@richten_nach @PAHoyeck Ok gut das sind jetzt halt zwei Biografien die sich direkt widersprechen. Die eine sagt er war in der HJ, die andere nicht. Woher nimmst du die Gewissheit dass die eine Quelle stimmt und die andere nicht?
Deutsch
0
0
0
9
Corsec | Eras Tour SP N2+N3✨️
@mixteluv @DrAllyLouks I believe she means that every sound can be deconstructed into a combinations of different frequencies that you heard before (20Hz-20kHz). In this case a "sound" would be more comparable to a complete image made of different individual colors (which you've seen before).
English
2
0
84
1.2K
Nope
Nope@bingbongscho·
@nikicaga @ajoajoajoaj All Schools in the UK have to teach in English even in Scotland and Wales where they have multiple national languages
English
5
0
16
1.9K
Nikolaj🇺🇦🇵🇸
Nikolaj🇺🇦🇵🇸@nikicaga·
Its normal for minorities to also learn the national language, but this new law makes EVERYONE primarily learn Mandarin in schools, and that's clearly a brutal form of linguistic opression
Nikolaj🇺🇦🇵🇸 tweet media
English
92
201
2.9K
84.9K
Tam 🇬🇧🇨🇳🇷🇺
@TheMindScourge The difference between the American SMO and the Russian SMO is the Americans genuinely expected it to last 4 days while the Russian one wasn’t but people thought the Russians thought that because of some dipshit American general saying it would
English
8
1
45
2.2K
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@Leuler__ @dummboschreiner Dann hoffe ich, dass du dich enorm blöd dafür fühlst, bis heute nicht das Latein korrekt auf die Kette zu kriegen. "Maximum", mit m.
Deutsch
1
0
3
212
Leuler 📯
Leuler 📯@Leuler__·
@dummboschreiner Als ich studiert habe, hat man sich schon blöd gefühlt, wenn man länger als 2-3 Erwähnungen des Audimax gebraucht hat um zu checken, dass es kurz für "Auditorium Maximus" ist und damit "größter Hörsaal" heißt.
Deutsch
2
0
10
4.8K
dummbo 🇵🇸
dummbo 🇵🇸@dummboschreiner·
Studiere jetzt seit 9 semestern und hab bis vor paar wochen nicht gewusst was "Audimax" bedeutet Immer wenn das iwer gesagt hat habe ich einfach chillig reagiert und mir nichts anmerken lassen so "ah ok cool"-mäßig
Deutsch
45
3
1.5K
260.4K
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@larsweisbrod @_trimmich DNNs können auch als sehr primitive Sprachmodelle funktionieren, so wurde das vor ~15 Jahren gemacht. Die haben dann halt immer nur exakt drei Tokens gesehen und dann das vierte vorhergesagt. Das ist natürlich limitieren.
Deutsch
0
0
1
14
@larsweisbrod@det.social
@[email protected]@larsweisbrod·
Beim CNN verstehe ich wenigstens, dass das "weight pooling" die Zusatzinfo ist, die das DNN durch Convolution bekommt. Bei Transformern versteh ich nicht mal, wo und wie so eine "Zusatzinfo" reinkommt. Werden da faktisch irgendwo auch weights gepoolt oder so?
@[email protected]@larsweisbrod

Irgendwie sind Transformer mir ein großes Rätsel. Der Witz eines DNN ist doch, dass es Zusammenhänge zwischen den Daten lernt. Und jetzt besteht der große Durchbruch namens "Transformer" darin, dass man ihm NOCH mal EXPLIZIT sagt: Bitte lerne Zusammenhänge zwischen den Daten? Hm.

Deutsch
1
0
1
3.5K
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@larsweisbrod @_trimmich Da kommen dann Sequenzmodelle wie RNNs oder eben Transformer ins Spiel, die eine (prinzipiell) beliebig lange Sequenz verarbeiten können. Der Unterschied zwischen RNN und Transformer ist dass RNNs ein Token nach dem anderen sehen, und Transformer alle auf einmal
Deutsch
1
0
0
32
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@larsweisbrod @_trimmich Was der Kommentar sagen will, ist dass ein DNN erstmal eine fixe Inputdimension hat. Sprache wird für das Modell als Sequenz von Tokens dargestellt, jedes Token ist ein Vektor einer bestimmten Länge (zB 512). Ein DNN kann nur eine exakt festgelegte Menge dieser Token verarbeiten.
Deutsch
1
0
1
38
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@BafiKush Sinn vollständig erhalten, aber viel griffiger gemacht. Sehe das Problem nicht
Deutsch
0
0
7
133
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@KateGoesTech I fully support all military aid to Ukraine and think it should go a lot further than it currently does. I still think it was the correct decision to not have direct confrontation between nuclear powers (ie US / French / UK pilots shooting down Russian planes)
English
0
0
2
162
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@tcanham459 German military requires parliamentary approval, Germany took part in the Kosovo intervention. Funnily enough under a Green foreign minister
English
0
0
0
66
Tom Canham 🏳️‍🌈
Tom Canham 🏳️‍🌈@tcanham459·
It's impressive how every policy proposal from the Greens is the stupidest position you can possibly take on any issue. If this had been in place in 1999 the Kosovo genocide would have been allowed to happen while we sat, ineffective, doing nothing.
Dr Ellie Chowns MP@EllieChowns

Today I tabled a bill which would require any UK military intervention to have a lawful basis, viable objective, and approval by MPs - legislation the PM once said he himself would pass when he was running for Labour leader. He supported it then, and he should support it now.

English
20
38
278
13.7K
Steve W
Steve W@SteveW37912222·
@AlrxCox Sorry to break it to you, but the Ango-Saxons are real and they were not "Neo Nazis". And Charlie is referring to the nazi statement. Show me where Restore said they are neo nazis or when Anglo-Saxons were Neo Nazis, I rest my case.
English
4
0
0
2.3K
Alex Cox
Alex Cox@AlrxCox·
Libellous?? 😭 You literally said just over a day ago that being British requires Christian faith.
Alex Cox tweet media
Charlie Downes@cfdownes_

.@policylaila What you have said here — on national television — is libellous. Nowhere have I or Restore Britain said that you have to be “white and Christian” to be British. Nowhere have we talked about the “Aryan race”. We are not “neo-nazis”, and to suggest that we are puts us in severe danger. Charlie Kirk was murdered because of rhetoric like this. I am consulting with Restore Britain’s legal team about next steps. I urge you to publicly retract and apologise, immediately.

English
42
88
1.2K
94.5K
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@RVanderblight @hexprax "van" is also incredibly common in normal Dutch surnames, much weaker of an aristocracy signal than "von"
English
0
0
13
1.8K
Christin
Christin@hexprax·
If your surname has "Von" prefix shit on it I'm not saying that part. That time is over. You need to move on.
English
58
307
10.7K
323.2K
walgesinge
walgesinge@walgesinge·
@legalstyleblog Wouldn't it be "President of the Republic" for France if you're going for the full official titles?
English
1
0
1
86