wokalyte🫃

205 posts

wokalyte🫃 banner
wokalyte🫃

wokalyte🫃

@wokalyte

Katılım Şubat 2022
326 Takip Edilen36 Takipçiler
wokalyte🫃 retweetledi
Joe Kent
Joe Kent@joekent16jan19·
After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today. I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. It has been an honor serving under @POTUS and @DNIGabbard and leading the professionals at NCTC. May God bless America.
Joe Kent tweet media
English
73.2K
218.2K
846.4K
102.8M
wokalyte🫃 retweetledi
Tucker Carlson
Tucker Carlson@TuckerCarlson·
When you discover the CIA has been reading your texts in order to frame you for a crime.
English
12.7K
29.2K
145.7K
26.9M
Anna Zofia Niezgodzka
Anna Zofia Niezgodzka@Anna_Niezgodzka·
@TheDealMakerGuy One of the best thing about planes used to be no internet. Get a book,listen to music,meditate. We don't need to be connected all the time
English
3
0
12
2.8K
InvestorFromEurope
InvestorFromEurope@TheDealMakerGuy·
LOT Polish Airlines announced that they started installing Wi-Fi onboard their B787 fleet. Installing Viasat in 2026 when Starlink exists is something I can't comprehend. Good luck sending a single email before landing.
InvestorFromEurope tweet media
English
55
24
818
107.8K
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
@MyLordBebo Except Iran actually paid for the jets, Israel gets billions in "aid" every year, while our kids are struggling and our demographics are collapsing.
English
0
0
118
6.7K
Lord Bebo
Lord Bebo@MyLordBebo·
🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱 LMAO: Your taxpayer money destroyed your grandfather’s taxpayer money! Israeli jets (funded by your taxes) destroyed Iranian F-4/F-5 jets (funded by your grandpa’s taxes). Iran received them while the Shah was in power, before 1979.
English
140
1.2K
24.8K
1.6M
ҒβΔ GΩDDΣSS✨ΔΠDRΣΔ
ҒβΔ GΩDDΣSS✨ΔΠDRΣΔ@FBAGoddess444·
I f you are in the Austin Texas area take extreme caution driving on the 290
ҒβΔ GΩDDΣSS✨ΔΠDRΣΔ tweet mediaҒβΔ GΩDDΣSS✨ΔΠDRΣΔ tweet media
English
486
1.2K
12.8K
5.1M
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
@OldeWorldOrder @TuckerCarlson I could understand this one if their policy was to refrain from calling something "murder" until someone is convicted. There is a conviction in Floyd's case, there isn't one (yet) in the other two.
English
1
0
3
276
Tucker Carlson
Tucker Carlson@TuckerCarlson·
Larry Sanger built Wikipedia as an unbiased repository of the world’s knowledge, and then stood helplessly by as activists and intel agencies turned it into the most comprehensive propaganda op in human history. There’s nothing more corrupt. (0:00) The Origins of Wikipedia (4:27) Wikipedia’s Dangerous Policy Changes (14:01) Who Is Responsible for Corrupting Wikipedia? (17:47) Why Did Sanger Leave Wikipedia? (19:29) Who Is Wikipedia Co-Creator Jimmy Wales? (23:43) What Does the “Tucker Carlson” Wikipedia Page Say? (27:39) How Does Wikipedia Actually Work? (28:43) How Wikipedia Blacklists Conservatives (37:28) Is Wikipedia Controlled by the Intel Agencies? (40:16) Sanger’s Request to Elon Musk and Donald Trump to Help Fix Wikipedia (49:43) Are Wikipedia Editors Being Secretly Paid to Push Propaganda? (56:06) Wikipedia’s Dark Alliance With Google (1:01:41) How Wikipedia Can Be Saved (1:07:22) Which News Sources Are Blacklisted by Wikipedia? (1:17:29) Why Don’t We Know Who’s Editing Wikipedia? (1:19:53) Should Wikipedia Users Be Able to Rate Articles? (1:22:01) Why Wikipedia Should End Permanent Bans (1:27:16) This Is How to Bring Reform to Wikipedia Includes paid partnerships.
English
815
4.6K
18.3K
3.9M
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
@theo Sorry, you have the asshole take here. They have an established policy that is designed to make the package repo predictable for a large user base and downstream projects. Some dude wanting a nicer name for his package does not trump that.
English
0
0
0
33
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
This is why I am super bullish on @dhh's #omarchy. Someone with good taste, real world experience, who rejects postmodernism, and is not attached to the existing "governance" (aka grift) of existing distros. Godspeed, @dhh and #omarchy team!
English
0
0
0
73
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
Imagine someone installing Linux on an old laptop to let a kid play on it, only for the kid to browse through the homepage of the distro's official "app store", featuring a bunch of fetish apps lol. There has to be a freedom-respecting solution.
English
1
0
0
58
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
Linux Desktop will not go mainstream until normies take over from the degenerates.
wokalyte🫃 tweet media
English
2
0
1
105
wokalyte🫃 retweetledi
JD Vance
JD Vance@JDVance·
A while ago, probably in 2017, I appeared on Tucker Carlson's Fox show to talk about God knows what. Afterwards a name I barely knew sent me a DM on twitter and told me I did a great job. It was Charlie Kirk, and that moment of kindness began a friendship that lasted until today. Charlie was fascinated by ideas and always willing to learn and change his mind. Like me, he was skeptical of Donald Trump in 2016. Like me, he came to see President Trump as the only figure capable of moving American politics away from the globalism that had dominated for our entire lives. When others were right, he learned from them. When he was right--as he usually was--he was generous. With Charlie, the attitude was never, "I told you so." But: "welcome." Charlie was one of the first people I called when I thought about running for senate in early 2021. I was interested but skeptical there was a pathway. We talked through everything, from the strategy to the fundraising to the grassroots of the movement he knew so well. He introduced me to some of the people who would run my campaign and also to Donald Trump Jr. "Like his dad, he's misunderstood. He's extremely smart, and very much on our wavelength." Don took a call from me because Charlie asked him too. Long before I ever committed (even in my mind) to running, Charlie had me speak to his donors at a TPUSA event. He walked me around the room and introduced me. He gave me honest feedback on my remarks. He had no reason to do this, no expectation that I'd go anywhere. I was polling, at that point, well below 5 percent. He did it because we were friends, and because he was a good man. When I became the VP nominee--something Charlie advocated for both in public and private--Charlie was there for me. I was so glad to be part of the president's team, but candidly surprised by the effect it had on our family. Our kids, especially our oldest, struggled with the attention and the constant presence of the protective detail. I felt this acute sense of guilt, that I had conscripted my kids into this life without getting their permission. And Charlie was constantly calling and texting, checking on our family and offering guidance and prayers. Some of our most successful events were organized not by the campaign, but by TPUSA. He wasn't just a thinker, he was a doer, turning big ideas into bigger events with thousands of activists. And after every event, he would give me a big hug, tell me he was praying for me, and ask me what he could do. "You focus on Wisconsin," he'd tell me. "Arizona is in the bag." And it was. Charlie genuinely believed in and loved Jesus Christ. He had a profound faith. We used to argue about Catholicism and Protestantism and who was right about minor doctrinal questions. Because he loved God, he wanted to understand him. Someone else pointed out that Charlie died doing what he loved: discussing ideas. He would go into these hostile crowds and answer their questions. If it was a friendly crowd, and a progressive asked a question to jeers from the audience, he'd encourage his fans to calm down and let everyone speak. He exemplified a foundational virtue of our Republic: the willingness to speak openly and debate ideas. Charlie had an uncanny ability to know when to push the envelope and when to be more conventional. I've seen people attack him for years for being wrong on this or that issue publicly, never realizing that privately he was working to broaden the scope of acceptable debate. He was a great family man. I was talking to President Trump in the Oval Office today, and he said, "I know he was a very good friend of yours." I nodded silently, and President Trump observed that Charlie really loved his family. The president was right. Charlie was so proud of Erika and the two kids. He was so happy to be a father. And he felt such gratitude for having found a woman of God with whom he could build a family. Charlie Kirk was a true friend. The kind of guy you could say something to and know it would always stay with him. I am on more than a few group chats with Charlie and people he introduced me to over the years. We celebrate weddings and babies, bust each other's chops, and mourn the loss of loved ones. We talk about politics and policy and sports and life. These group chats include people at the very highest level of our government. They trusted him, loved him, and knew he'd always have their backs. And because he was a true friend ,you could instinctively trust the people Charlie introduced you to. So much of the success we've had in this administration traces directly to Charlie's ability to organize and convene. He didn't just help us win in 2024, he helped us staff the entire government. I was in a meeting in the West Wing when those group chats started lighting up with people telling Charlie they were praying for him. And that's how I learned the news that my friend had been shot. I prayed a lot over the next hour, as first good news and then bad trickled in. God didn't answer those prayers, and that's OK. He had other plans. And now that Charlie is in heaven, I'll ask him to talk to big man directly on behalf of his family, his friends, and the country he loved so dearly. You ran a good race, my friend. We've got it from here.
English
15K
76.8K
533.8K
15M
wokalyte🫃 retweetledi
Dave Smith
Dave Smith@ComicDaveSmith·
ZXX
411
2.1K
11K
592.1K
LaurieWired
LaurieWired@lauriewired·
When you make a Bank ACH transaction, it’s literally just an SFTP upload. Sent as a NACHA file, it's 940 bytes of ASCII text. Bank-to-Bank transactions cost ~0.2 cents. As long as it travels via encrypted tunnel; it’s compliant! Here’s how the quirky system works:
LaurieWired tweet mediaLaurieWired tweet media
English
205
979
12.8K
1.2M
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
What you’re hearing now is the sound of millions of people realizing that they have been played by a politician, again. For some, it may have been the first time, but in any case, it’s a terrible feeling. #EpsteinCoverUp
English
0
0
1
38
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
@tmikov @dhh @levelsio That's because they have not been fully westernized yet. Give a few more years, you'll have your own "extinction rebellion" idiots protesting on the streets :).
English
0
0
0
14
Tzvetan Mikov
Tzvetan Mikov@tmikov·
@dhh @levelsio This is insane. Everyone in Bulgaria, the poorest country in the EU, has AC.
English
1
0
8
1.1K
@levelsio
@levelsio@levelsio·
My lasting legacy will be getting AC installed in every last building in Europe reviving their eco brain rotted minds back to high IQ and ambition
English
382
140
5.8K
374.3K
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
@Indiana_IoT Ultimately, the State is to blame. 1) Data not removed upon contract cancellation, 2) using some "contractor" who doesn't follow basic security, 3) not promptly explaining to the public exactly what happened and how it will be fixed going forward. #outsourcing #infosec
English
0
0
0
37
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
Based on media reporting, the @Indiana_IoT is blaming a former contractor. But why was subscriber data not removed from former platform by the State? This breach could not happen if data was not there. Why is SFP config for in.gov allowing mail from former svc?
English
1
0
1
39
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
It appears that the GOVDELIVERY accounts used by multiple State of Indiana agencies have been compromised. Received emails from INDOT, INDNR, all signed and validated. All link to a malicious site. #infosec #breach #incident
wokalyte🫃 tweet media
English
5
0
2
189
wokalyte🫃
wokalyte🫃@wokalyte·
More proof from other agencies. I only received it from @INdnrnews and @INDOT because those were my subscriptions. Most likely this was sent out under multiple agency names. All have valid SFP headers and signed DKIM by their GOVDELIVERY "cloud"
wokalyte🫃 tweet media
English
1
0
1
64