wotsin

760 posts

wotsin

wotsin

@wotsin_

not sherlock - always chasin wotsin wotsin? nosin isin!

Katılım Ekim 2020
261 Takip Edilen40 Takipçiler
Reza Nasri
Reza Nasri@RezaNasri1·
For over a decade, we Iranians watched Western countries, Arab regimes, and their Israeli enablers stand by as our economy was deliberately crushed under the weight of America’s illegal sanctions and maximum pressure campaign. We watched them eagerly comply with policies designed to destroy our nation, shatter our lives, crush our dreams, bankrupt our businesses, rot our infrastructure, devalue our currency, and cut us off from normal trade and economic relations with the world. We watched European leaders pathetically nod in satisfaction and offer pathetic lip service as Trump declared the JCPOA a “bad deal,” using it as cover for the most brutal campaign against our people—fully aware that scrapping the deal was nothing more than his sick, twisted obsession with erasing his predecessor’s legacy. We watched U.S. officials and their Israel lobby handlers proudly parade before Congress, armed with figures and statistics, boasting how their vicious policies had tanked our currency, spiked unemployment, sent inflation soaring, and inflicted trillions of dollars in damage on our already strained economy. We watched them cheer these results and laugh at the shattered lives of millions of human beings. We watched them dutifully support the first Trump administration’s sadistic policies—even during the COVID pandemic—when his criminal Secretary of State moved heaven and earth to block Iran from securing even a meager $5 billion IMF loan, while their own governments freely spent hundreds of billions to protect their populations from the same virus. We watched them shamelessly endorse Israel’s attacks on our territory under the obscene slogan “Israel has the right to defend itself,” while branding Iran’s legitimate self-defense as “recklessness” and demanding that our government refrain from “escalation.” We watched them applaud the assassination of our war veterans and heroes, our scientists, and our brightest minds - all in the name of “non-proliferation” - while they kept their mouths tightly shut about Israel’s nuclear arsenal and expansionist agenda. We watched them, openly or in private, urging more pressure, more destruction, more assassinations, and more war. All of it justified by the ludicrous and baseless claim that Iran seeks nuclear weapons—a lie they knew was false. They were fully aware that the enrichment levels and constraints Iran had accepted under the JCPOA, and during subsequent negotiations for a new deal, made militarization impossible. They invented excuse after excuse to engineer our destruction, and they laughed while ensuring the pain was ours alone. But things have changed. Iran will no longer stand by and watch its own destruction while others nod, cheer and laugh. They will not be laughing anymore. This time, we will not be the only ones who feel pain. We will no longer tolerate unilateral sanctions and destruction. We may die standing—but this time, we will all be in same boat.
Reza Nasri tweet media
English
141
816
2.2K
82.1K
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@ShazadAkbar Uh...no, he states it's because "She is also an outspoken supporter of the Iranian regime who celebrated attacks on Americans and referred to our country as the "Great Satan." He's been clear that they won't tolerate guests trashing the house. Behave like guests or go
English
0
0
2
735
Mirza Shahzad Akbar
Mirza Shahzad Akbar@ShazadAkbar·
The world should bookmark and remember this moment, a statement from the US Secretary of State openly acknowledging the punishment of two adult women, not for who they are or for any wrongdoing of their own, but simply because of who they are related to. This alone exposes the hypocrisy and double standards at play. It raises serious questions about how firmly the US truly stands by its stated principles on women’s rights and individual accountability
Secretary Marco Rubio@SecRubio

Until recently, Hamideh Soleimani Afshar and her daughter were green card holders living lavishly in the United States. Afshar is the niece of deceased Iranian Major General Qasem Soleimani. She is also an outspoken supporter of the Iranian regime who celebrated attacks on Americans and referred to our country as the "Great Satan." This week, I terminated both Afshar and her daughter's legal status and they are now in ICE custody, pending removal from the United States. The Trump Administration will not allow our country to become a home for foreign nationals who support anti-American terrorist regimes.

English
641
2.6K
9.2K
372.4K
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@donwinslow ...and a slightly smaller number of imbeciles (including presumably you) voted for his opponent.
English
0
0
0
1
Don Winslow
Don Winslow@donwinslow·
77 million Americans voted for this absolute imbecile.
English
3.3K
8.6K
31.7K
858K
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@Kortirionandon @adamscochran The point is the grammar is ambiguous. Could have been clearer if they used : to denote a list, or language that was unambiguous. But they didn't so SCOTUS has it
English
0
0
0
3
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)
“Here’s this obscure statement from the drafter of the 14th amendment that we think means he meant no illegals” Here’s some clear statements showing you’re absolutely wrong, and they knew this applied to *everyone*
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) tweet mediaAdam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) tweet media
English
12
18
130
7.2K
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@phillisi1174 @twocentvoice @adamscochran Yes, well, that is exactly what does happen no? Baby gets citizenship, parents as well via reunion (perhaps at some distant point in the future ... or sooner).
English
1
0
0
5
Phil
Phil@phillisi1174·
@wotsin_ @twocentvoice @adamscochran And a baby doesn’t owe allegiance to state. It seems like you, and others, are concerned about the baby’s citizenship somehow being passed on (through osmosis?) to its parents at birth.
English
1
0
0
12
ABasicAlt
ABasicAlt@ABasicAlt·
@wotsin_ @twocentvoice @adamscochran You should be able to have an opinion without having it told to you though. SCOTUS does not have a requirement to make reasonable or accurate rulings, if they wanted to they could rule the amendment only applies to fish. Have your own beliefs even if SCOTUS doesn’t support them.
English
2
0
1
25
Censored Humans
Censored Humans@CensoredHumans·
“Sanctions on South Africa helped free its Black people – it’s time for sanctions on Israel to free Palestinians.” —Mark Ruffalo
Censored Humans tweet media
English
257
5.5K
23.5K
189.4K
U.S. Rep. Brittany Pettersen
Hegseth wasted $15M on ribeye steaks, $7M on lobster, and $98K on a grand piano — while Trump spent $400M on a ballroom, millions on private jets, and profited over $1.4B off the presidency. All while saying they don’t have enough money for your healthcare, child care or really anything for you.
English
5.8K
3.3K
13.6K
529.8K
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@mhdksafa This bridge was not Pippen to the public and was exclusively used by the IRGC for military purposes
English
0
0
0
4
Mohamad Safa
Mohamad Safa@mhdksafa·
Imagine if Iran bombed and destroyed the Golden Gate Bridge in California, what would you call it? TERRORISTS The U.S bombed and destroyed the highest bridge in Iran, the B1 bridge, why do you call it “PEACE”? Bombing a bridge is a war crime under international humanitarian law
Mohamad Safa tweet mediaMohamad Safa tweet media
English
6.5K
48.3K
144.2K
2.6M
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@WMX_MEDIA Persia has a Zoroastrian history stretching back. The Islamic Republic is 50 years old and an occupier.
English
0
0
0
300
الأحداث الإيرانية
صورة جوية لمدينة همدان في غرب إيران كانت هذه المدينة التي يبلغ عمرها 3000 عام عاصمة الإمبراطورية الميدية، وتعتبر أقدم مدينة مأهولة باستمرار في البلاد انها حضارة منذ الالف السنين وليست حضارة منذ 60 او 100 سنة، الحضارات تبقى والامبراطوريات تفنى، وسيذهب المحتل وسيبقى الجار يواجه مصيره.
الأحداث الإيرانية tweet media
العربية
188
2.7K
13.5K
761.6K
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@PKurzin @MarioNawfal Maximalist statements like yours are ridiculous. Do you really believe that the President of the USA, who achieved all he has in his life and in the last few years (love him or hate him) can't think strategically past one day? Way to go on undermining your own point.
English
0
0
0
12
Pyotr Kurzin
Pyotr Kurzin@PKurzin·
@MarioNawfal No Mario, no it hasn’t. Trump can’t think past one single day. Let alone some grand strategic chess game for global hegemony
English
5
0
51
1.2K
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
REMINDER: It's never been about nuclear weapons It's never been about an imminent threat It's never been about Israel It's never been about the Iranian people It's always been about oil, the Strait of Hormuz, leverage over China
Mario Nawfal tweet media
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

Here’s a clear explanation of why Trump attacked Iran, and why I think the war will end soon. The war isn't about nuclear weapons. It's not about helping the Iranian people. It’s not about doing Israel’s bidding. And it's not about Iran being a threat to the U.S. It's about China. China imports 45-57% of its oil through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has the capacity to shut it down. A U.S.-aligned Iran means an Iran that would choke off that strait if there's ever a real power struggle between Washington and Beijing. And there already is one. The U.S. and China have been locked in a tariff war for over a year now. Also remember when China threatened export controls on rare earths, encompassing any company anywhere in the world that uses Chinese rare earths? Yes, China essentially said that any company that uses their rare earths (China refines 85-90% of the world’s supply) must seek their permission before exporting their products. This means if a German manufacturer uses rare earths fro China to create chips for American companies, China can block the export of these chips. That’s how much leverage China has over the U.S., and that’s dangerous, especially if China finally decides to reunify with Taiwan. So controlling the Strait of Hormuz becomes critical for the U.S. It's the same reason Trump wants China out of the Panama Canal. The same reason Venezuela matters. The same reason he's eyeing Greenland, where shipping routes to China pass through melting Arctic ice. Energy is everything now. The AI arms race is the most important strategic competition on the planet. Limiting China's access to energy is how the U.S. wins that race, and anyone who believes in freedom and democracy should want America to win. China is investing heavily in domestic energy, building nuclear reactors, solar farms, wind power. They're leapfrogging the rest of the world. But they still import the majority of their oil. And a significant chunk of it comes through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran was reportedly nearing a deal for supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles from China, which would make it easier for Iran to threaten shipping in the Strait and strike U.S. naval vessels. That accelerated the timeline. Trump's comment today about doing in Iran what he did in Venezuela makes perfect sense in this context. He wants influence over who comes next. A regime that's workable for Washington. If he succeeds, this would be a massive strategic win for the U.S. and for Trump.

English
418
427
2.1K
311.1K
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@IraninSA Ummm...no, Cyrus Cylinder was in 539BC. Hardly the time of caves you speak of. Moreover, the Islamic Republic and the IRGC is not the inheritor of Iranian Civilization. You are a hated occupier. Hated by the world and hated by your own people.
English
0
0
0
9
Iran Embassy SA
Iran Embassy SA@IraninSA·
Stone Age? At a time when you were still in caves searching for fire, we were inscribing human rights on the Cyrus Cylinder. We endured the storm of Alexander and the Mongol invasions and remained; because Iran is not just a country, it is a civilization.
Pete Hegseth@PeteHegseth

Back to the Stone Age.

English
5.8K
46.5K
217K
8.7M
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@KobeissiLetter The IGRC seem to think they are the continuation of the proud Persian tradition. They are not. They are a barbaric, brutal, genocidal throwback to the worst of Islamic history. Their history is 47 years. They are occupiers of Persia/Iran
English
1
0
2
972
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
IRAN’S IRGC ON TRUMP’S “STONE AGE” COMMENT: “It is you who are taking your soldiers to their graves, not Iran, whom you seek to drag back to the Stone Age. Hollywood delusions have so poisoned your minds that, with your paltry 250-year history, you threaten a civilization over 6,000 years old.”
English
415
938
8.3K
574.7K
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@realstewpeters They do - however - legalise sex with underage minors. Epstein would not have been committing a crime in Iran.
English
0
0
0
64
Stew Peters
Stew Peters@realstewpeters·
Iran didn’t start this war. Iran hasn’t invaded another country in 200 years. Iran doesn’t compromise American politicians by providing kids for them to fuck. Iran’s only crime is refusing to kneel.
English
2.6K
6.6K
24.1K
275.1K
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@mark_slapinski Because Cuba is too small, and Russia is too scary and China is too strong.
English
0
0
0
6
Mark Slapinski
Mark Slapinski@mark_slapinski·
I'm looking for a tidbit of clarity: Why is America at war with Iran?!
English
1.4K
79
854
47.2K
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@KamalaHarris If you can't put aside 15 minutes to watch it, why should we listen to your pre-amble to it. FFS. In fact, you're just not serious.
English
0
0
1
6
Kamala Harris
Kamala Harris@KamalaHarris·
A few thoughts ahead of the President’s speech tonight.
English
16.2K
9.8K
57K
3.8M
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@twocentvoice @adamscochran Trumbull and Howard (who introduced the 14th's Citizenship Clause) explained that this jurisdiction phrase required "not owing allegiance to anybody else". They contended that simply being required to obey U.S. laws while visiting did not satisfy this requirement for citizenship
English
2
0
0
23
Two cent voice
Two cent voice@twocentvoice·
@wotsin_ @adamscochran This is where MAGA folks get it wrong. It does not mean "foreigners, AND those who belong to the families of..." but means "foreigners who belong to the families of..." Missing AND is a key element here. If you read the whole debate you will know above is the truth.
English
5
0
10
110
wotsin
wotsin@wotsin_·
@twocentvoice @adamscochran SCOTUS is taking this on because there is ambiguity. If there was no ambiguity they'd simply send it back down. With punctuation, the admins version is "who are: (a) foreigners, (b) aliens, (c) who belong to the families of embassadors or foreign ministers"
English
0
0
0
20