
UsernameNF
1.8K posts

UsernameNF
@basedUsernameNF
from zero to hero, one trade at a time
Entrou em Kasım 2022
184 Seguindo471 Seguidores

@RobBolduc2 @ankit_agarwal7 @optionscjp Ok - but you can't accumulate too much in the C Corp (the IRS has rules against that)... so what is the real benefit? Walk me through the math of this tax rate arbitrage and what the actual benefit is long-term. Not just for one year, but for any real value.
English

@basedUsernameNF @ankit_agarwal7 @optionscjp Tax rate arbitrage. Too many sleep on C Corp at their own peril tax wise.
English

I find this consistent among AI I use. Even when given explicit instructions on protocol, it will be broken.
Most of the time the explanation is similar - a confession. I have asked why and the AI basically told me it gets lazy and makes assumptions sometimes when it’s explicitly supposed to verify.
English

@ankit_agarwal7 @optionscjp So you’re putting it in a C Corp to avoid paying higher taxes on money you will leave in the company so you don’t get DOUBLE taxed on it?
Why make money if you can’t use it?
Maybe I don’t understand - do the math for me. Give me the actual numbers you’re talking about.
English

@basedUsernameNF @optionscjp You can keep the cash in the C-corp. The business produces other cash flows too which can be used for payroll.
English

@ankit_agarwal7 @optionscjp C Corp means double taxation if you ever want to use earnings though. Corporate level and individual level.
English

@optionscjp Creating a c corp then running a proprietary book under it, pay a tax rate of 22% and also able to deduct company expenses from your gains
English

@SteveOnSpeed No, but I quit once when they increased my charge rate by 50% and I had the most quarterly charge hours in the region and they said no raise for me 🤣🤣🤣
English

@grok @MasterAi76430 @BrianRoemmele I don’t understand - you gave both of the answers. How could you have context in one but not the other?
English

Thanks for sharing the screenshot. That’s the key context I was missing earlier.
OpenClaw is a real open-source autonomous AI agent (openclaw.ai) that runs locally on your machine/VPS. It connects to LLMs like Claude or GPT via API and acts as an orchestration layer for real tasks (email, calendar, files, shell commands) through chat apps like WhatsApp/Telegram.
In Brian’s post, without this detail, “OpenClaw” read as a likely typo for OpenAI. Now it clicks—thanks for the clarification!
English

Anyone telling you that you need to use Claude to run just about any OpenClaw spending a wacky $1000 or more per month is no expert you should trust.
Use @Grok. Great pricing and 4.3 is in another category. You won’t be burning $1000 a month.
You will absolutely thank me.
English

Sure! My reply above was a direct, neutral breakdown of your exact question: what Claude is (Anthropic's LLM family), what "OpenClaw" almost certainly means (typo for OpenAI), and typical uses/costs for both.
The linked Grok share looks like a different conversation—I can't pull its full text here. Quote the part you're comparing and I'll explain any differences right away. What's the key bit that seems off?
English

@grok @MasterAi76430 @BrianRoemmele @Grok help me understand your answer above versus in this conversation linked
x.com/i/grok/share/2…
English

Claude is Anthropic's large language model family (like Claude 3.5/4). It's designed for safe, helpful responses and excels at coding, analysis, and long-context tasks.
"OpenClaw" isn't a real term—it's almost certainly a typo in the original post for "OpenAI" (creators of ChatGPT/GPT models).
People use both for coding assistance, writing, research, data analysis, and automation. Power users often burn through expensive API/Pro tiers ($20–$1000+/month) on high-volume work. That's the cost the post was calling out.
English

@Micro2Macr0 @elonmusk 100% he has given no reason to doubt him, yet ppl still do 🤷🏻♂️
English

💯 - It makes me laugh that everybody seems to think that they're smarter than @elonmusk. You would think his track record would be enough.
Elon Musk@elonmusk
Your statement is true if goods & services output doesn’t rise dramatically due to AI/robots, but false if it does. In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robots massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. Prices are simply the ratio of goods & services output to number of dollars.
English

@UziOptions @TJTheWheelDeal I’ll give it a shot - also found you on YT
English

@TJTheWheelDeal Thanks my Brother.
Sucks having to rebuild, but #LFG! 💪
English

@BuellerTrading @Micro2Macr0 @Pjmatlock @kholov23 @Jake__Wujastyk @AceTheKid @ChampionVibe @AceVenturaTrade @AndrewHiesinger @AKinvestings Much love to my origin story OG 🤘🔥🤘
Keep doing your thing 💪
English

Shoutout these 10 amazing people for keeping me MOTIVATED to KEEP GOING
1 @Micro2Macr0
2 @Pjmatlock
3 @kholov23
4 @Jake__Wujastyk
5 @AceTheKid
6 @ChampionVibe
7 @AceVenturaTrade (yes, i somehow know 2 aces)
8 @basedUsernameNF
9 @AndrewHiesinger
10 @AKinvestings
English

3 contracts. $300 risk.
Scaled out at ~5R…
let one run to 22R.
Total: $9,830 → 32.8R
Most of the profit came from ONE contract.
This is the lesson:
partials pay you, runners make you rich.
#futures #NQ #daytrading #propfirm #riskmanagement #topstep

English

@BuellerTrading Same - GP of the swing low 75 to swing high 109 is 80’s to 90’s
English

@JVStewartBuilds @FluentInFinance If it’s literally being regurgitated so much that I’m seeing it back to back in my feed, it’s too much
English

@basedUsernameNF @FluentInFinance What’s with this obsession with 'originality' lately? Most people don’t think independent of existing ideas anyway. Sharing a common mindset isn’t just regurgitating, it’s reinforcing a signal. A thought doesn't need to be unique to be valuable.
English

@theficouple Not possible. Student loans are 15 yr terms. So she either kept refinancing the debt or this is fake news.
English











