Charlie Dean Jr.
51 posts
The most complex/important historical question is why White men invented everything. I offer a new explanation in Greatness and Ruin (2025).
Toilets: 1596
Shower: 1810s
Syllogistic logic: 300s BC
Printing press: 1440
Electricity: 1750s
Calculus: 1680s
Optical Lenses: 1200s
Genetics: 1860s
Telegraph: 1830s
Perspective Painting: 1410s
Semiconductor Electronics: 1947
Archeology: 1800s
Monogamy: ancient Greece and Rome
Television: 1920s
Clarinet: 1700
Guitar: 1800s
Geometry: 300 BC
Philosophy: ancient Greece
Crossword puzzles: 1913
Rock Climbing: 1880s
Triathlon: 1970s
Photography: 1830s
Museums: 1759
Tennis: 1870s
Fencing: 1800s
Hockey: 1800s
Trains: 1880s
Skiing: 1800s
Non-Euclidean geometry: 1830s
Skateboarding: 1950s
Hiking/backpacking: 1800s
Computer: 1940s
Spectrometer: 1860s
Electromagnet: 1820s
High rises: 1880s
Classical Music: 1750s
A posteriori and a priori reasoning: 1780s
Decimal fractions: 1585
Airplane: 1903
Nuclear Energy: 1942
Steam Engine: 1780s
Historical Writing: ancient Greece
Telephone: 1876
Symbolic Logic: 1600s/1854
Harpsichord: 1500s
Piano: 1700
Power Loom: 1785
Gaslighting: 1807
Arc Lamp: 1809
Tin Can: 1810
Saxophone: 1840s
Violin: 1500s
Geography: 1700s
Highways: 1900s
Rugby: 1823
Golf: 1500s
Trains: 1804
Badminton: 1870s
Table Tennis: 1880s
Logarithms: 1614
Matrix algebra: 1850s
Bobsleigh: 1870s
Curling: 1500s
Thermometer: 1714
Romantic Love: 1100s
Clean water: 1900s
Hydrometer: 1600s
Radar: 1930s
Political Theory: 1600s
Microscope: 1590s
Accelerometer: 1920s
Telescope: 1608
Radio: 1890s
Mackintosh Raincoat: 1823
Matches: 1820s
Horse Riding
Fountain Pen: 1880s
Typewriter: 1868
Rocketry: 1920s
Bookkeeping: 1494
Geology: 1780s
Chariots: 2000 BCE
Electroscope: 1740s
Mechanized Clock: 1300s
Oil Drilling: 1859
Refrigeration: 1850s
Botany: 1735
Pasteurization: 1860s
X-Rays: 1895
Germ Theory: 1860s
Roller Skates: 1860s
Submarines: 1900s
Sewing machine: 1840s
Bicycle: 1860s
Blood Transfusion: 1901
Universities: 1088
Automobile: 1880s
Zoology: 1735
Paleontology: 1800s
Seismograph: 1880s
Cardiograph: 1903
Internet: 1969
Grammatical Writing: ancient Greece/modern Europe
Taxonomy: 1735
Anesthesia: 1840s
Turbine Engine: 1880s
Washing machine: 1900s
Novels: 1600s
Children's Literature: 1700s
Toaster: 1910s
Microwave: 1940s
Flying shuttle: 1733
Spinning Jenny: 1764
Coffee maker: 1800s
Plant Breeding: 1860s
Concrete: ancient Rome
Air-Conditioning: 1902
Vacuum cleaner: 1901
Dishwasher: 1880s
Assembly Line: 1913
English
@DadaAlpaca There is no ethical justification for bribing women not to kill their own children.
English
Can I vent about the term "Crisis Pregnancy Center"? I hate it. I've worked for these orgs and helped to raise hundreds of thousands for non-profits related to providing health, childcare, and adoption services for women during unplanned pregnancies.
Everything they do is good. I'm not critical of the services or the intent behind them. I just think it points to a cultural framing that should be discussed.
The whole marketing approach (from someone who did this professionally) is to put on kid gloves and make women feel as comfortable and cared for as possible in order to convince them to not obtain an abortion.
Like this is noble, but is that really the social arrangement here? Be as gentle as possible and provide everything a woman needs because she was being careless with her body and virtue otherwise she will MURDER HER OWN BABY?! Make it make sense to me.
English
This troglodyte doxed me because I wouldn't "disavow" his critics hard enough.
This says it all about the absolute scum bottom feeders you have to deal with in politics.
Douglass Mackey@douglassmackey
From the vault.
English
@LostMyHats You're a premillenial Southern Baptist. Hypocrite.
English
Not much in Dispensational Evangelicalism is more outrageously misguided than celebrating the Passover Seder. God's destruction of the Temple was his benevolent loving kindness to the Jewish people, to destroy their capacity to observe the Old Covenant religion that had been superseded and replaced by the New Covenant in Christ's blood. It was God's way of getting the most stubborn people on the planet to take a hint and move along.
But alas, that would require embracing the Messiah they rejected, because they wanted a Zionist Messiah, who would restore the earthly kingdom they wanted. They wanted a warlord, not a Savior. And so, in the centuries after the temple's destruction, they manufactured an all new religion, perverting the rites of the old and inventing creative solutions to the rites of Moses being impossible without the Temple. And from these man-made inventions, we get the 15-part Seder which is nothing like the Passover that God required under the Old Law.
At the very heart of the Seder is its central doctrine; the rejection of Jesus as the Messiah and Son of God. Its entire existence is owed to that rejection of Christ. And its individual parts serve the purpose of blaspheming the One God sent to redeem them. The Seder is a bastardized, illegitimate imitation of the Passover. The so-called "Christian Seder" is an imitation OF an imitation. That's the stupid part.
There is already a means for Christians to remember the Passover, and it's by celebrating the Messiah who is our Passover Lamb, the One whose blood was shed for us, so that if it covers us, death will pass-over us, that one day we will make it to the heavenly Zion, our Promised Land, the abode of God.
Neo-Judaizers and Dispensational Zionists believe there's some special magic in these Jewish rites, but it's little more than devil worship with a yarmulke, striking at the heart of the Christian faith. And this though - that by imitating or even worshipping alongside Jews there's some special juju is actually quite old. One of the Church Fathers, Chrysostom, had to deal with the influence of the Judaizers in Antioch.
He said, "Did the Jews ever observe our pre-Paschal fast (IE Lent)? Did they ever join us in keeping the feast of the martyrs? They do not run to the truth, but you rush to transgression..."If any of you shall go to the spectacle of the Trumpets, or rush off to the synagogue, or take part in fasting, or share in the Sabbath, or observe any other Jewish ritual great or small, I call heaven and earth as my witnesses that I am guiltless of the blood of all of you."
Chrysostom went on, "To go to the synagogue is a greater crime than going to the theater. What goes on in the theater is, to be sure, sinful; what goes on in the synagogue is godlessness..When God forsakes a people, what hope of salvation is left? When God forsakes a place, that place becomes the dwelling of demons...Certainly, it is the time for me to show that demons dwell in the synagogue, not only in the place itself but also in the souls of the Jews."
Writing from the perspective of Christ, he wrote to the Christians interloping with Jews on their feast days, "You made common cause with those who crucified me. You were obstinate toward me and started up again the festivals to which I had put an end..If, then, the Jews fail to know the Father, if they crucified the Son, if they thrust off the help of the Spirit, who should not make bold to declare plainly that the synagogue is a dwelling of demons?"
Christian Zionism presents a return of the ancient heresy of the Judaizers, which is much wider than simply demanding circumcision or dietary restrictions. Sometimes, Judaizing doesn't require that at all. The heart of the Judaizing heresy is the belief that Jews retain a special status with God even in their unbelief, and that they have obtained Covenant blessings and promises without faith in Jesus. That's the heart of the heresy. And it's that very notion that leads evangelicals in the year 2026 to embrace feasts that exist to reject Christ as Lord.
English
@PresbyInn @ryanburge The PC(USA) says out loud what PCA leadership says in private. Is there a dime's worth of difference?
English
A clear-headed analysis of the problems in the mainline is necessary for any kind of action moving forward. Again, as @ryanburge has shown, the PCA is going to face a massive die off in the next few decades and is going to need both people and resources.
I don't think Reformed Presbyterianism survives this century unless NAPARC merges its member churches institutionally and there's some kind of integration of PCUSA churches that have been fighting (unsuccessfully) to maintain some semblance of orthodoxy in the denomination. NAPARC has the members and the mission. PCUSA has the money and, to a degree, institutional leverage.
Disclaimer: I'm not suggesting NAPARC abandon doctrinal orthodoxy one bit to integrate PCUSA. I'm saying I think there needs to be a serious discussion about whether whole denominations can survive the passing of the boomer generation that have basically 0 substantial disagreements between themselves, URC, and OPC.
Daniel J. San Roman@dan_djsr
@PresbyInn Dawg, why are you out here on a Friday morning trying to make us sad about the history?
English
@bibeIradikaI Most Catholic conversions are over marriage and not belief.
English
They‘ve been telling us this for years now, always based on anecdotal evidence or statistically irrelevant sample sizes. The end of year numbers never confirm it.
Michelle Boorstein@mboorstein
The @nytimes called two dozen U.S. Catholic dioceses and found the numbers of folks converting this Easter are up in all of them nytimes.com/2026/03/26/us/…
English
@ObservingPCA Burns may have been only a junior high youth leader, not an actual pastor.
English
A former youth pastor from PCA Perimeter Church is currently wanted by the FBI. If you have any information about this lost sheep’s whereabouts, contact law enforcement immediately.
christianpost.com/news/former-me…
FBI San Antonio@FBISanAntonio
Christopher W. Burns is wanted by the #FBI for his involvement in a mail fraud scheme in Georgia in which he allegedly defrauded a number of victims out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. He has not been seen since leaving his home on Sept 24, 2020: fbi.gov/wanted/wcc/chr…
English
ABC News@ABC
The U.S. Army is expanding its recruiting pool by raising the maximum enlistment age from 35 to 42, according to new service regulations reviewed by ABC News. The Pentagon has estimated that only about 23% of young Americans (between the ages of 17 and 24 years old) are eligible to serve. Much of this is due to academic performance on the military’s SAT-style entrance test, obesity and criminal records. abcnews.visitlink.me/-OeXj3
ZXX
The answer is simple: they disestablished the religion from the state! Of course we can ask why they did, and whether they could have handled things differently to maintain establishment longer, but if their religiosity was tied to the state, and then no longer, it would decline.
Particularly Modern@Modern1689
And now it’s among the most godless places in America. Why? The same happened in Geneva. The same happened in The Netherlands. The same happened in Germany. The same happened in England. The same happened in Scotland. The same happened in France. What do all these places have in common? They are arguably representative of all of the greatest examples of Reformed piety to the point they seem like distant dreams of a bygone era we romanticize, that can’t be compared to the backdrop of our present societies. How could this be the result? They had varying degrees of state-established religion to the point of cultural saturation and civil reinforcement. Isn’t this the answer to all of the problems within our reach? How could they have fallen to utter ruin? Is this not the path to the golden age? These lands were richly furnished with Reformed truth and often upheld by established religion; yet when that faith became cultural rather than spiritual, nominalism took root—men bearing the name of Christ without the life of Christ. Thus the churches, filled with the unregenerate, gradually lost their power, and what was once living truth became an empty shell. For neither sound doctrine nor civil establishment can preserve a people in godliness, but only the continual new birth and renewing grace of the Spirit from one generation to another. It can’t be assumed rather than defended. It can’t be inherited rather than personally wrought and stewarded. “Unless the Lord builds the house, those who build it labor in vain.” Psalm 127:1
English
English
@GH0STD09 @TrevorSheatz For having consensual intimacy with a stone cold freak?
English
Virginity should not be the #1 factor Christians look for when considering who to marry. Godliness and being attracted to them is.
Virginity matters, and it's a blessing from God. It's not wrong to desire someone who is a virgin. And past sexual sin regularly carries present-day consequences.
But I fear we've placed virginity on such a high pedestal that it's become an idol for many.
The Bible doesn't say that someone "is free to be married to anyone [they want] — only if they're a virgin." It says that someone "is free to be married to anyone [they want] — only in the Lord (aka, only if they're a Christian)" (1 Cor. 7:39).
In other words, what matters above all else is that your spouse is a believer, virgin or not.
Again, while desiring to marry a virgin isn't a bad thing, it becomes a bad thing if it causes you to miss out on marrying the person who truly matters: the man or woman who's born-again, passionate about Jesus, excellent in the God-given characteristics of a godly wife or husband, and physically attractive to you.
And a mature Christian should desire those things in a potential spouse above all else, regardless of the past sins the person may have gone through (though they should certainly weigh out that aspect as well in this decision, since it does matter).
English
@MSugma71483 @DeanAbbott Sex ed, really? The 1970s called and want their leftist talking points back.
English
@DeanAbbott What astounds me is that many evangelicals oppose sexual education and consider it inappropriate to discuss sex in such public settings, yet don’t seem to apply that same reasoning when it comes to discussing sexual history before a large audience. Amazing.
English
Most people think evangelicalism is conservative but, in fact, large swathes of it are radically anti-traditionalist and, in their way, liberal.
Many evangelicals see traditional social virtues like modesty, propriety and prudence as hindrances to the practice and proclamation of the gospel and therefore congratulate themselves on violating these norms if, in their minds, doing so "brings glory to God".
That's exactly what's happening here. A man and his wife throw sensitive personal information into the social media gutter without thinking for a moment about dignity or social appropriateness and then, when people object, claim that people who value the social virtues they've discarded care less about God.
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz
My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world — what is viewed as nothing — to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us — our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)
English
@ObviousRises If you were a top spy, would you reveal secrets to Laura Loomer?
English
BREAKING: Laura Loomer admits that the CIA/Mossad and Israel are planning a major planning terror attack on US soil that will be "10 times worse than 9/11" using Muslim agents.
English
@michaeljknowles If humiliating yourself counts as good marketing, OK.
English
@LizzieMarbach @fkaaud @Not_the_Bee @TrevorSheatz The marriage isn't the problem. Both of them used embarrassing facts about her past to get online attention.
English
@fkaaud @Not_the_Bee @TrevorSheatz Why should he be embarrassed that he married a redeemed daughter of God?
English
My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin.
She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc.
We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!).
We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine.
She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8).
We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this.
Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47).
Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior.
A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands.
"God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world — what is viewed as nothing — to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us — our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31)
"Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)
Tom Buck (Five Point Buck)@TomBuck
If someone argues that a former promiscuous woman is "damaged goods" and questions whether a Christian young man should marry her, remember Rahab. She was a Canaanite prostitute but became a mother in the lineage of Jesus. God redeemed her, cleansed her, and Salmon married her.
English
@megbasham He painted his wife in a bad light and himself as the guy willing to take sloppy seconds. Both of them should have kept the story quiet. And why does she have a Tumblr account?
English
I don’t really understand the people shaming this guy for sharing his and his wife’s testimony, provided she was OK with him sharing. He wasn’t specific, just shared how the Lord redeemed her and what a godly wife and mom she is today.
I’m gonna be honest, in a world in which we are constantly posting details about our lives, how Christ changed us is the most important information we can share.
The world needs to hear—I was just like you once, and God saved me from that. which means he can save you too! Why wouldn’t we want to tell people that story?
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz
My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world — what is viewed as nothing — to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us — our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)
English
@PerfInjust How come Douglas Wilson did not get this sort of disavowal?
English
I’ve known Michael for many years. I don’t recall when we first met in person, but we became friends over three years ago. For much of that time, he lived near me. We’ve been to each other's houses. Our families have had dinner together, and our kids have played together. On a few occasions, he volunteered to help me with projects on the property: building a deck, moving felled trees, and other things. His wife is kind. He has good kids. Michael was repeatedly kind to me. I’ve spent more time with him than 99% of his critics, though I haven’t seen him much in the last year or so.
I once said that Michael is a “friend” and “a good man”—-something used against me for nearly a year now. No critic has asked what I meant by it, and my default response is to ignore such people. I was referring to his kindness and generosity to me, and to his concern for my spiritual well-being, which surpassed that of many people in my life.
Mindful of this history, and out of loyalty to a friend, I did not denounce or openly distance myself from Michael as he began to embrace positions that I reject. This came at great personal cost, not only for me but especially for my family. Online agitators and tale-bearers, most of whom are incapable of argument, insinuated that Michael and I are “fellow Nazis,” despite my numerous articles, videos, and books contradicting that claim. I do not expect any session or presbytery to correct these sinful accusations (WLC 144), despite several coming from those vowed to maintain the “peace of the church.”
Michael knows the cost of being associated with him. He knows that anything he says places burdens upon others. I chose to endure them. An elderly man at my previous church—known and well respected in both the OPC and the PCA—encouraged me to remain friends with Michael for his sake, and I did.
But the post below is a turning point for me. It represents a complete disregard for those who bear the costs of any degree of association. When consideration of others goes repeatedly unreciprocated, there comes a breaking point. It begins to look like exploitation. Obviously, “Christian prince” is a term I retrieved from the Protestant tradition, and it immediately recalls my work. Michael had to know that I, yet again, would be dragged into accusations of Naziism, even from those of decent will. He chose words (when there are alternatives) that instantly recall “Stephen Wolfe.” It is an act of betrayal. He has not considered how his actions affect others. He could have easily added, “I know that Stephen Wolfe does not agree with me.” But he did not.
As I’ve said for years now, I have no interest in retrieving Naziism, nor do I want a “Protestant Hitler.” Michael knows this, as I’ve said to him (among others) that revising 1930s German history is unnecessary to critique the “post-war consensus”. I am right-wing, but I am an American. By today’s standards, American history is right-wing, and it contains all the resources for recovering a manly, moral liberty and a Christian society. Anglo-Protestantism, despite its faults, is still the core tradition of America. Our fight is to recover it.
I have a high tolerance for differing opinions. I do not shy away from references to Marx, Nietzsche, Hegel, Heidegger, or “critical theory.” Viewing everything with the good/evil binary, or relying on a set of scary words to categorize intellectual history and various individuals, is unserious. I even use Marx in my MA philosophy thesis. But I would not say that we need a “Protestant Marx” or a “Protestant Heidegger”. We need a George Washington.
Given Michael’s behavior—his disregard for my position and the effects of his actions—I can no longer consider him a friend. But I will not take on a mission to destroy him. I will not toss epithets at him or make quips for spectacle. I simply cannot continue in what I consider an exploitive relationship. I pray that Michael and his lovely family would live well in godliness.
Michael Spangler@spanglermt
"Protestant Hitler" is the right term for the Christian prince we need today. By "Hitler" we name our need for ruthless anti-Judaism and anti-leftism, without which our nation will never be rescued. But by "Protestant" we name our urgent need for solid piety.
English
Virginity *before* marriage and devotion to the marriage bed *after* is the same picture. Both are chastity.
When a man says "I'd prefer to marry a virgin" he is declaring his intent to unite himself with a chaste woman.
These effete baboons in your pulpits are devotees to Satan, church. There must be a revolution in our pews or we will justly be burned on the fire that is kindling. Oust such men and if you cannot, flee.
Ken Shepherd@KenShepherd
So a godly Christian widow who was a virgin until she married her now-dead husband is out of the question for your kids?
English
@millerman You're a Straussian, and you think a lot of other people are part of your cult.
English
A new diagnostic quiz
10 questions for you to think about.
This is probably more fun for people who are relatively new to philosophy. Try it out and see!
I am having a lot of fun creating these tools, quizzes, and resources.
Enjoy!
diagnostic.millermanschool.com
English
@GreeneMan6 That’s what they want. The “Beautiful losers” critique was always projection. The only beautiful losers on the right are the extremists who let perfect be the enemy of good.
English
This is just a long way of saying that no organization will ever be good enough.
If your standards for "being subversive" are a "six degrees of Kevin Bacon game", then there will never be a non-subverted organization, so congratulations, you will be forever in a state of total atomization and do-nothingism.
BasilianThought@BasilianThought
how about you point to a single organization "on the right" where one would be able to say with their whole chest "I don't particularly care for this tr--y that Anna Khachiayn wants to shove down my throat. I don't think JD Vance is secretly based and have no reason to believe that it will be any different than Trumps second term, "net nagative migration" is not Mass Deportations, I don't fuck with giving a blank check to Silicon Valley libertarian homosexuals with procured children so that they can give us a new and improved AI-powered patriot act brought to you by polymarket. and there is such a thing as jewish supremacism that is represented by the likes of Bari Weiss and Yoram Hazony and finically supported by the likes of Sacks, Andreeseen, and Theil in exchange for supporting their rent-seeking and pushed by the likes of Laura Loomer, Brandon Gill who tell me the problem is that the immigrants are MUSLIM while having nothing to say about Indians taking over Texas and New Jersey. and im sick and tired of fucking foreigners like Nick Land promoting Tommy Robinson and a Raw Egg f--t and some f--t ass Romanian and some Canadian f--t doing PR work for Erik Prince" Find me that organization and maybe we'll have a place to start.
English
@LostMyHats People who think the US Constitution is something holy are called Mormons.
English
FREE GIFT FOR YOU: Insight to Incite released “A Patriots Catechism” of the U.S. Constitution to everyone, subscriber or not.
Only 5% of American adults can named all of the first ten amendments in the Bill of Rights. From the Marxist capture of American academia in the 60s, all the way to No Child Left Behind, our educators have gradually stopped teaching civics and government to our nations’ kids. This is a solution to that.
Using the catechism teaching method, it includes includes 345 questions, covering the full legal foundation of American government from our first principles, to working through the Articles, to the structure of Congress, the Presidency, the Judiciary, and all 27 Amendments, in the same question-and-answer format that has been used to transmit doctrine for centuries.
* The difference between a republic and a democracy
*Why the Senate was originally structured the way it was, and what the Seventeenth Amendment broke.
*Why the Electoral College exists and why abolishing it would hand permanent power to a handful of urban population centers.
* What habeas corpus is and why surrendering it is one of the most dangerous things a free people can do.
* What the Tenth Amendment actually says about federal power.
* What the Second Amendment actually protects and why.
* What treason means under the law.
* Why the income tax is
constitutionally and morally problematic.
* What the Fourteenth Amendment says about birthright citizenship, and what it actually means when read rather than misread.
Written years ago, I’ve just updated it with a workbook that can be printed to hand to your kids and go through it in roughly one year.
You don’t have to subscribe to get it. Although, let’s be honest. You should. Go premium and ALL the archives, e-books, Zoom gatherings, everything. But this one’s free. Go get it.
Click the link in my bio.
English