Koen Robeys

63.1K posts

Koen Robeys

Koen Robeys

@Koenrobeys

"Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assault of thought on the unthinking" Ik deel veel rode idealen maar daarvoor hebben we blauwe middelen nodig

เข้าร่วม Ocak 2011
134 กำลังติดตาม320 ผู้ติดตาม
Michael Verstraeten
Michael Verstraeten@MichaelVerstrae·
"Kunnen biologische mannen zwanger worden?" Voor deze Amerikaanse gynaecologe die als 'expert" sprak in het parlement een zeer moeilijke vraag. Ze vindt immers dat we "inclusief" moeten spreken. En dus is het agressief om te zeggen dat biologische mannen niet zwanger kunnen worden. Dat is polariserend, volgens haar. Kijk, ik ben voor de vrijheid van iedereen om van zichzelf te vinden dat hij een man of een vrouw is. Ik ben er ook voor mensen aan te spreken zoals ze dat zelf willen. Dat is een vorm van beleefdheid en erkenning van hoe ze zich voelen over zichzelf. Maar als het zo ver gaat dat artsen niet eens meer de waarheid willen zeggen, of ze weigeren onder ogen te zien, omdat van sommige mensen gedacht wordt dat ze de waarheid niet aankunnen, dan zijn we helemaal van het pad af. De waarheid bestaat. En van artsen bij uitstek mag verwacht worden dat ze de waarheid spreken op grond van de wetenschap. Ik herinner eraan dat ook bij corona de artsen niet meer de waarheid spraken omwille van politieke wanen. Onder andere dat het vaccin 100 % safe was en geen bijwerkingen kon hebben omdat de waarheid zeggen zou kunnen leiden tot minder bereidheid voor vaccinatie tegen corona. Nooit meer zo'n misleidende onzin alstublieft.
Nederlands
59
92
480
20.7K
Koen Robeys
Koen Robeys@Koenrobeys·
@ProdigalNo_More @NotEvolution1 Tuttut! The only thing my logic says is there is nothing wrong with water, or whatever other stuff you might appy it to, coming from non-water. Do you think that @NotEvolution1 missed this simple insight by sheer superficiality?
English
1
0
0
7
Not Evolution
Not Evolution@NotEvolution1·
Naturalism is false
Not Evolution tweet media
English
22
2
23
789
Koen Robeys
Koen Robeys@Koenrobeys·
@ProdigalNo_More @NotEvolution1 As you just said yourself: water can come from non-water. So why are people pretending that any "stuff", like say, water, or life, cannot. I think it is either deep, deep ignorance or conscious misrepresentation: what do you think?
English
1
0
1
12
ProdigalNo_More
ProdigalNo_More@ProdigalNo_More·
@Koenrobeys @NotEvolution1 "Stuff coming from non-stuff"? Sounds like you might be dodging. Care to clarify what you're talking about now? We were talking about specifics. Now you've gone vague.
English
1
0
0
12
Koen Robeys
Koen Robeys@Koenrobeys·
@ProdigalNo_More @NotEvolution1 So you *know* that "stuff coming from non-stuff" is plain as, well, water. But @NotEvolution1 is trying to present it as a problem that can't be overcome: why do you think he is making such a childish mis-representation?
English
1
0
1
15
Koen Robeys
Koen Robeys@Koenrobeys·
Mooie beschrijving van het "wait, what" moment. Ook gehad.
Róisín Michaux@RoisinMichaux

Another woman's job is being threatened over her gender critical views. This time, Agnes Wold in Sweden. Agnes Wold is a much-loved public intellectual in Sweden who is known for her feminism, her level-headed response to the COVID lockdown hysteria (she’s a bacteriologist), and, more recently, for refusing to go along with the transgender dogma that has gripped Swedish bureaucratic, activist, media and political elites. On 20 May, the Swedish parliament approved an amendment to the law that criminalises “psychological violence” and “coercion” relating to “gender identity or gender expression (such as conversion practices)”, among other things. It is widely understood to be Sweden’s version of a conversion therapy ban (a more explicit law is likely if the left coalition gets into power in September). Speaking on a radio programme about the law, Wold told the host that she would take 4 years in prison— the penalty for trying to prevent someone from leaning into their opposite-sex, delusion — before she would allow the gender transition of a grandchild (hard agree). This comment set off major drama, with one famous gay media guy calling her the Swedish equivalent to “old hag” or “old crone”. Specifically, he said “get rid of the old hag. It is unethical of Sveriges Radio to give her access to a microphone,” which is a way of saying she should be fired from her public radio job. Many, many people have called for Agnes Wold to be fired throughout the trans-mania era, and a lot of them seemed to be hoping that this comment would be the final nail in her coffin. But the remarks seem to have the opposite effect. Not only did Swedish people get very offended by this little shithead calling their beloved based radio-granny an old hag, they started to ask questions about the law that she was criticising. And that, boys and girls, is how the omerta on the trans mass derangement got partially lifted in Sweden, and suddenly everyone started to ask: wait, what? Some kids think they’re in the wrong body and you can go to jail for telling them to snap out of it? Yes, dear Swedes, that’s what’s happening. Welcome to the conversation. We’ve been expecting you. As of writing, Wold still has not yet been fired.

Nederlands
0
2
5
573
Koen Robeys รีทวีตแล้ว
Suzy Eeckelaerts
Suzy Eeckelaerts@SEeckelaerts·
Biologe denkt dat de UBD van geslacht (teleonomie voor gameetproductie) impliceert dat je gameten moet observeren vooraleer je iemand kan seksen; dat proxyvariabelen waardeloos zijn, zoals genitaliën (correlatie 99,98%) en SRY-screening (correlatie 99,99%) @sigridschollen
Suzy Eeckelaerts tweet media
Nederlands
7
5
37
1.4K