
Neil 𝕏
13.8K posts

Neil 𝕏
@Neil_X10
Disruption Investor | Business & Stock Analyst | Due Diligence | Institutional Pedigree | Tech. & AI-fanatic | Concentrated Multi-year 10X+ Investments | 🇺🇸
เข้าร่วม Haziran 2016
1.5K กำลังติดตาม5.9K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด

During periods like this, I think the best use of time for $LMND investors is to go deeper on the business itself.
If you want to strengthen or challenge your view, here’s the material I’d recommend working through:
• Investor Days 1 and 2
• Interviews with Daniel Schreiber
• Interviews with Shai Wininger
• Interviews with key team members, including:
- Tim Bixby (financials)
- Michal Langer (product)
- Maya Prosor (product)
- Adina Eckstein (product)
- Sean Burgess (claims)
- Ori Erez (engineering)
There really is a lot of substance out there if one is willing to do the work, and the community is generally happy to help point people in the right direction as well.
I’ll try to host another Space in the next couple of weeks. If there are specific topics people would like to see covered, drop them below.
English
Neil 𝕏 รีทวีตแล้ว


Damn, not a great number. US must have shrank YoY. However I still expect Q2 to be stronger due to oil prices. They probably couldn't accomodate the late-quarter orders in Q1.
*Walter Bloomberg@DeItaone
$TSLA TESLA 1Q MODEL 3/Y DELIVERIES 341,893, EST. 353,928 TESLA 1Q MODEL 3/Y PRODUCTION 394,611, EST. 377,147 TESLA 1Q OTHER MODELS PRODUCTION 13,775, +18% Q/Q TESLA 1Q OTHER MODELS DELIVERIES 16,130, EST. 12,393
English

@Neil_X10 @theallinpod lemonade already uses in-house models for claims. podcast chatter won't change that.
English

Last week's @theallinpod had a section on AI-related valuation impacts, moats and disruption (from 36:56).
Useful insights for $LMND investors.

English
Neil 𝕏 รีทวีตแล้ว

Not sure who this guy is, but he makes a compelling case as to why $LMND is way undervalued today much like $PGR was on IPO and after.
traviswiedower.com/2026/03/24/lem…
English

@ShadyJosh5 @grok @Ironic_Ape didn’t you recently highlight the overhaul LMND did with their pet pricing models? My understanding was its precision pricing vs parametric.
English

"Parametric insurance—automated, trigger-based payouts that slash LAE toward zero—is exactly the kind of efficiency play Lemonade was built for.
Chubb’s move validates the model Lemonade has been executing since launch, but Chubb brings massive scale, balance-sheet strength, and now retail distribution (PetSmart)."
Makes it sound like Lemonade is following a parametric insurance model as well. I thought they had a precision pricing model.
English

Parametric insurance's usage in the pet insurance market is worth keeping an eye on as the market develops.
For those interested in diving into the details, @grok does a really great breakdown of what this could mean for $LMND investors.
x.com/i/grok/share/3…
Cedar Street Research@CedarStResearch
$CB just did a thing in Pet. How do we get LAE down to 0%. Go parametric.
English
Neil 𝕏 รีทวีตแล้ว

@AverageDude37 @STICKSAND1 @TeslaUberRide Their legal / technical HQ is NYC. But the real HQ is Tel Aviv.
English

@johlarss Tis but the calm…
Shai Wininger@shai_wininger
(reminder) I'm quiet here = I'm super busy building something.
English

$LMND
“AI compresses the time it takes to do things. It does not compress the time it takes for things to happen.”
Michael Bloch@michaelxbloch
English

@HardYackaMacka @FelixKern2 Don’t wait too long. You’re already giving off fomenter vibes.
English

If you’ve watched all of them with the experience you claim to have, and this is your conclusion, then you have a deficiency in your interpretative ability as well a lack of understanding of how large organizations actually work.
Why don’t you share your thesis fully fleshed out instead of spamming every LMND post with FUD-inspired commentary?
English

I have! And every earnings call, blog post and interview danny schreiber / shai have ever done. Address the argument technically if you're appealing to technicalities or just take a belief based view. Mine is based on the compounding nature of AI shifting value from electron to the atom. Software UX, claims and underwriting will be completely commoditised and the hard asset in insurance that has a right to earn the same notional cost of capital is BALANCE SHEET. As a wise man once said, "I beseech you in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken" (don't be dogmatic)
English

@HardYackaMacka @FelixKern2 Great. Have you watched both of the investor days from LMND?
English

@Neil_X10 @FelixKern2 TA and BPD? Basically invented the terms
English

@CedarStResearch Thats perfect. Thanks for sharing and for clarifying.
This will be very interesting to track overtime.
English

@Neil_X10 Yeah wasn't saying one is better then the other simply reposting the data. It's the U.S. Statutory direct written premium and direct loss ratio data. I think NAIC started tracking Pet separately from inland marine in 2024 so it's relatively new.
English

@HardYackaMacka Yep, it’s you. Still spamming LMND posts I see…
Mackattack@HardYackaMacka
@ASchulz888 Everything they do is replicable. Value in insurance isn’t software user interface anymore, it’s the actual product (the product being balance sheet). They have no IP data and no software edge anymore
English









