Abhimanyu Yadav

2.8K posts

Abhimanyu Yadav banner
Abhimanyu Yadav

Abhimanyu Yadav

@WorldlyReviewer

Pretty much made this account for anime and tesla news. MAL: https://t.co/dcmOK1Zbtt Tesla Referral Link: https://t.co/N9n3cKVXvZ

Austin, TX เข้าร่วม Aralık 2018
672 กำลังติดตาม264 ผู้ติดตาม
Abhimanyu Yadav
Abhimanyu Yadav@WorldlyReviewer·
@congressdj I drove almost 30k miles in 2025 and paid like $200/month. Now with 2 cars and a lot less driving I’m paying $250/month. The CR numbers are probably real but it’s not the average. Probably rare case numbers
English
0
0
0
7
Abhimanyu Yadav
Abhimanyu Yadav@WorldlyReviewer·
@congressdj That’s fair. In this clip only Tesla knows if there could have been a crash. v14 is so good that it’s hard to find anything definitive. Still wanted to share since this the worst thing v14 has ever done for me lol
English
1
0
1
10
DJ
DJ@congressdj·
@WorldlyReviewer When you start with “no clue” it’s not definitive. Sorry. 😣
English
1
0
1
27
DJ
DJ@congressdj·
If you have a video of a FSD disengagement that resulted in the *definitive* avoidance of certain accident or death, I’d invite you to post it here. Note: Don’t bother posting if the disengagement was done out of caution, which is comfort subjective to every driver in America.
English
11
1
28
2.6K
Abhimanyu Yadav
Abhimanyu Yadav@WorldlyReviewer·
@28delayslater Guaranteed this was the driver accidentally disengaging (maybe hand was resting on wheel when the curve came up). At this point Tesla needs to make FSD dumb people proof. This is getting ridiculous
English
0
1
0
35
Earl of FrunkPuppy
Earl of FrunkPuppy@28delayslater·
FSD crashes into a barrier. Details in first comment
English
38
7
46
8.5K
Abhimanyu Yadav
Abhimanyu Yadav@WorldlyReviewer·
@ChadMoran What’s the point in discussing an older version though. Clearly v14 works here so the issue is fixed and is not a safety concern anymore. The whole media outcry about FSD not being safe is fake then because current FSD works
English
1
0
0
139
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
I don’t even smoke lol 💨
English
16.4K
9.1K
145.3K
10.3M
RJ Scaringe
RJ Scaringe@RJScaringe·
I’m excited to announce a partnership with @Uber. As part of this, Uber plans to invest up to $1.25 billion in Rivian and deploy up to 50,000 R2 robotaxis. This partnership accelerates our path to Level 4 autonomy and supports our goal of building one of the safest autonomous platforms in the world—across both shared and personally owned vehicles. The combination of Rivian’s rapidly growing data flywheel, our in-house RAP1 inference platform (800 TOPS), and our multi-modal perception stack provides a powerful foundation to scale autonomy quickly and responsibly over the next couple of years.
Rivian@Rivian

A fleet of R2 Robotaxis is coming exclusively to @Uber. ⚡🌿 Today, we announced a partnership to help both companies accelerate their autonomous vehicle plans across 25 cities in the US, Canada and Europe by the end of 2031. rivn.co/uber

English
267
266
3.6K
503.1K
Kastro𓃵
Kastro𓃵@kastroPapiChulo·
@WorldlyReviewer @ChadMoran @28delayslater At the speed d vehicle was going, it seemed the system was thinking it was driving on the highway below. There is no way FSD woulda been going at that speed if it recognized the road it was on. This happens with normal GPS sometimes when one is driving through a flyover sometimes
English
1
0
1
10
Chad Moran
Chad Moran@ChadMoran·
Here's the original video, which looks like it's actual speed. I used two markers and consistently measured it. It took 75 frames in a 30 FPS video to travel 212.63 ft equating to 57.9 MPH (probably 60). The incident occurred in August of 2025. These are just facts. Yes the driver should have intervened sooner. Yes, FSD was approaching way too fast.
Chad Moran tweet mediaChad Moran tweet mediaChad Moran tweet media
Chad Moran@ChadMoran

I normally don't bother armchair quarterbacking these situations. But watching the Tesla Stans come into the comments is funny. Elon said Autopilot (FSD?) was disengaged 4s before the impact which if you watch the video looks like it was going way too fast at that point. Am I missing something?

English
105
19
272
90.3K
Anthony
Anthony@myonlinetrust·
@kattileast @JCChristopher @WorldlyReviewer The video started right about here, right? There was no problem slowing down from 47 and making the turn. If she had disengaged *and hit the brakes* she would have been fine. She did something else. I’m not sure if she hit the accelerator, but she didn’t brake much if at all.
Anthony tweet media
English
1
0
1
19
JC Christopher
JC Christopher@JCChristopher·
I just retraced the exact same path on 69 Eastex Freeway going northbound on the HOV lane and taking the Eastex Park & Ride exit, and Tesla FSD v14.2.2.5 handled its perfectly. It was the exact same setup on the exit as in the Fox News video. FSD slowed down with no vehicles directly in front as we entered the pylon area, and made a buttery smooth right turn.
English
29
19
260
8.3K
phil beisel
phil beisel@pbeisel·
Tesla’s forthcoming AI5 uses a half-reticle design, which is crucial for yield. A reticle defines the imaging area of a lithography machine, fitting two chips per shot effectively doubles yield. This means the Tesla chip design team had to carefully manage die features, for instance dropping the older ISP (and classic GPU) to make room for more AI cores. By contrast, NVIDIA’s Blackwell fills nearly a full reticle, making it a single-reticle design. If Tesla hits its compute and efficiency targets with AI5 in this half-reticle format, it’s almost like cutting fab requirements in half. And this has a big impact on Terafab, especially if it carries forward for AI6, AI7, etc.
phil beisel tweet media
phil beisel@pbeisel

Terafab may be the most essential vertical integration Tesla has ever undertaken— and it is truly non-optional. It will take years to build and will test even Elon’s speedrunning abilities to the limit, but that won’t stop him from trying. The breakthrough likely lies in overhauling the overall facility’s cleanroom model. By moving wafers in sealed pods with localized micro-environments, the fab no longer needs a monolithic ultra-clean space. Elon’s line about “eating cheeseburgers and smoking cigars” on the fab floor isn’t silly, it’s the practical reality of a radically simpler, cheaper, faster approach that could finally change the economics of chipmaking. This is all forced by the brutal “pinch” in chip supply. Tesla must produce on the order of 100–200 billion AI chips per year just to saturate its roadmap. That volume powers: FSD cars & Robotaxis (tens of millions of vehicles needing AI5 inference for near-perfect autonomy), Physical Optimus (scaling from thousands today to millions per year, each requiring AI5/AI6-level compute), Digital Optimus (the new xAI-Tesla software agents for digital/office automation, running massive inference clusters), Space-based data centers (AI7/Dojo3 orbital compute for GW-scale training and inference beyond Earth limits). AI5 delivers the ~10× leap for vehicles and early robots; AI6 shifts focus to Optimus + terrestrial DCs; AI7 goes orbital. No external foundry (TSMC, Samsung, etc.) can deliver that scale or timeline— hence the Terafab launch. Without it, the entire robotics + autonomy future hits a brick wall. Terafab isn’t optional; it’s the only way forward.

English
53
167
2K
318K
Abhimanyu Yadav
Abhimanyu Yadav@WorldlyReviewer·
@JCChristopher This is technically correct. So the proposed note is actually technically wrong
English
0
0
0
116
JC Christopher
JC Christopher@JCChristopher·
I went to the exact same location of the Cybertruck accident shown in the Fox News video. This is the US-69/59 Eastex Freeway northbound HOV lane at the Y-split near the Eastex Park & Ride exit (approaching from downtown Houston toward Humble). In the Fox News video, the vehicle failed to follow the right curve, going straight into the barrier. Well, I tested it twice today with Tesla FSD engaged the entire time with zero human intervention. And unless you think I am a hologram speaking to you from another dimension now, it worked out really well. Here is the video of me taking the exact same curve twice, with Tesla FSD v14.2.2.5.
English
828
1.4K
11K
1.1M
Traube Nuss
Traube Nuss@rumnusstraube·
@WorldlyReviewer @elonmusk @farzyness @pbeisel Driver present greatly simplifies all the issues above. Drivers can handle those exceptions. Large cities won't let cars drive on their own with nobody to call when there is an issue.
English
0
0
0
25
ΛI DRIVR
ΛI DRIVR@AIDRIVR·
@DavidMoss he said WIDE release in a “few” weeks early access rollout could be sooner or it could be one of those “two weeks maybe, six months definitely” kind of things
English
8
0
75
1.4K
Abhimanyu Yadav
Abhimanyu Yadav@WorldlyReviewer·
@mikepat711 Bro he said weeks. We can’t get hyped. We will be let down. But I’m so hyped that is actually coming and not scrapped
English
0
0
0
34
Mike P
Mike P@mikepat711·
Do you realize that when you press send on this you turn thousands of insane nerds into hyped up children who won’t be able to sleep tonight? I’ve gotta be up early too, you fucker.
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@DBurkland @pbeisel It’s in testing right now. Wide release in a few weeks.

English
18
5
128
5.2K
Abhimanyu Yadav
Abhimanyu Yadav@WorldlyReviewer·
@elonmusk @Tesla It is awesome. Even my mom is converted now after the 3 or so months she has spent time in the US
English
2
0
9
255
Abhimanyu Yadav
Abhimanyu Yadav@WorldlyReviewer·
speed limit reading is still a big issue. I think if they can solve that then they can rely less on maps. Like the car should be able to understand that 15 mph ramp sign. I as a driver would read and understand that it is only for the ramp. But that requires a larger context too. My memory is large. FSD’s is a few seconds right now
English
1
0
1
50
Traube Nuss
Traube Nuss@rumnusstraube·
@WorldlyReviewer @elonmusk @farzyness @pbeisel Driver present (but not paying attention) yes. Otherwise, maybe. There are just too many edge cases across millions of vehicles everywhere to let a car drive without someone around to handle the edge case.
English
1
0
0
105