ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
iMuffin
6.4K posts
iMuffin
@iMuffined
General Specialist
The Sunken Place เข้าร่วม Temmuz 2012
881 กำลังติดตาม357 ผู้ติดตาม
probably controversial:
i want a single codex account across personal + work
- i join a company and bring my account, the company links me to their org
- work in codex uses company tokens
- personal use uses my tokens
- employer can't see private convos/memories
- when i leave, i'm removed from the org. company-related convos and IP get auto-removed or redacted
- non-IP, general learnings, preferences, and memory come with me
English
first payment from apple coming in a few days let's gooooo
(far from profitable, i'm just excited to get my first mobile apps payment)
English
@AutismCapital oh man i've been cross platform doxxed
English
@thsottiaux Hell ya! auto review being more proactive and extra subagent work isn't necessarily a bad thing. an option to enable/disable those in the settings like the suggested prompts would be great.
English
Codex usage limits will be fully reset again in the next hour and we will credit one additional reset into your bank for your own usage over the next 24 hours.
We investigated reports that Codex usage was being consumed faster than expected. There wasn't one central issue, but a few smaller problems compounded for some users.
Here's what we found and changed:
- Actual usage: Auto-review had become more proactive, another change was triggering more subagent work, and background suggestions could run twice or retry too frequently after failures. We reverted the changes and fixed suggestion scheduling, duplicate generation, and retry behavior. This should reduce unnecessary background token consumption while preserving the work users explicitly request.
- Usage reporting: Auto-review was incorrectly appearing as GPT‑5.4 usage, and failed or rate-limited requests were still shown as turns. Auto-review now appears as its own category, and only successful requests count toward the turn graphs. Rate-limited requests were never charged, but they were being displayed incorrectly.
- Immediate relief: We reset usage limits while rolling out the fixes, then shipped hotfixes across the CLI, desktop app, and usage backend.
- What to expect: New usage data should be clearer and actual consumption should be lower. Historical charts may still show auto-review under GPT‑5.4 because older turn data was not relabeled. Features that intentionally perform more work; such as /goal, subagents, and higher reasoning levels will still naturally use more capacity.
All fixes are now deployed, and we've added more detailed monitoring so we can detect background-usage regressions sooner. We'll continue watching the results closely.
Thank you for building and doing all sorts of things with Codex.
Tibo@thsottiaux
Codex team is in a warroom on a Sunday combing through logs and checking whether there is anything that could lead to increased usage drains for some users. Taking it very seriously and won't rest until we get to the bottom of it.
English
i lowkey want to see a new github competitor drop every week at this point
microsoft turned github into “enterprise platform first, developers second”
competition would be healthy as hell for everyone in the space
English
i noticed RevenueCat includes subscriptions as part of MRR even if they've been cancelled already
might be a dumb question but does anyone know how to get a more accurate number? i wanna see what's actually recurring
English
@SakanaAILabs make fugu open source, that's the only way to walk the walk
English
TechCrunch on Sakana Fugu and the broader conversation around frontier AI access in Asia.
Our position remains that AI is best developed together rather than hoarded. Sakana AI will continue contributing to a more resilient ecosystem.
techcrunch.com/2026/06/27/asi…
English
Just build a product that Hacker News hates. It’ll surely be wildly successful!
English
iMuffin รีทวีตแล้ว
I’m fundamentally pro-business, but some businesses do real evil.
One of the most common business evils is using the power of government under false pretenses to hamstring competition.
Because this is so obviously shameful, it’s hidden under a moral smokescreen and often filtered through third parties. I believe Boeing was behind most of the 1970s opposition to supersonic—to protect themselves after their supersonic jet was cancelled.
Today we see the same thing with AI doomerism. The rate of innovation in AI is extreme — and tomorrow’s leading AI company could be one that hasn’t even been founded yet.
So it’s mighty convenient for the lazy and evil who are on top today to wrap would-be competitors in red tape.
This is wrong and destructive. And should be illegal and socially unacceptable. We must call this out where we see it.
English
