Khee Bhoared Scheephe

3.3K posts

Khee Bhoared Scheephe

Khee Bhoared Scheephe

@keyboardchief

The man who thinks he can’t and the man who thinks he can, are both right

เข้าร่วม Haziran 2023
249 กำลังติดตาม270 ผู้ติดตาม
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@texasrunnerDFW @rev_cap We are looking at a sovereign debt crisis before the decade is out if interest rates don’t drop. While interest likely will go up in that scenario, prices will be crushed. Likely it will be triggered by accelerating AI layoffs. I think the chances of significant upside is low
English
0
0
3
93
Amy Nixon
Amy Nixon@texasrunnerDFW·
@rev_cap Have been renting and waiting the last 3 years. Not waiting another 5 In those 3 years, however, homes we were looking at have fallen 10-15% in price. So, no regrets renting when we did, and we won’t be buying the top, even if it’s not the bottom
English
11
1
68
6.1K
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
Have so many peers wrestling with the fact that home prices in their markets make no sense at all relative to even top 5% incomes but not patient enough to wait it out 5 years on the hope that something changes as the only policy consensus seems to be pump asset prices
English
30
7
280
150.9K
Aloha Giles ⚔️
Aloha Giles ⚔️@GilesAloha·
@keyboardchief @SteveOnSpeed Why would someone with a $4M net worth have a $2.5M place. That makes no sense unless it’s Cali and they bought it for $500k and it appreciated to $2.5M over 20-30 years.
English
1
0
0
62
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@ItsGoneAwry For a freedom loving American you sure have a lot of rules about what I am allowed to do with my fucken burger 😂🤡
English
0
0
4
27
It’s Ma’am, PhDelightful 🇺🇸
Bacon competes with the burger meat instead of complementing it. I’ll eat a burger with nearly any cheese, onions, I’ll take mushrooms, jalapeños, etc. but bacon doesn’t work and it also sticks out awkwardly from the sides, making it difficult to bite into. 0/10
English
80
0
43
4.3K
Meghan Murphy
Meghan Murphy@MeghanEMurphy·
Considering the amount of women I know who’ve gone through divorces and come out the other end, I feel 100% affirmed in my choice to not marry. Not-all-women, of course, but most are happier post-divorce and were unhappy-to-miserable in their marriages. I do understand the purpose of marriage—for the kids—but in general it doesn’t seem to make women happy so much as unhappy, stressed, and often kind of traumatized… I realize this is a gauche thing to say, considering the heterodox pro-marriage wave, but I think it’s generally true… Marriage just isn’t often an enjoyable or beneficial arrangement for many women…
English
572
19
364
105.4K
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@JennyWilli82501 @MikeBales And you shall have it. It just won’t be worth as much as they promised as instead of investing it and growing it they just inflated away its value. But you all know that. You watched it happen and did nothing about it.
English
0
0
2
24
Mike Bales 🫡🇺🇸
Instead of doubling the minimum wage and forgiving loans for irresponsible students, how about doubling Social Security for those who already worked hard and lived responsibly for 50 years?
English
501
1.5K
7.6K
64.1K
Amy Nixon
Amy Nixon@texasrunnerDFW·
@FinanceLancelot The losses aren’t necessarily layoffs, they’re future new job openings that won’t exist bc AI does the role This is part of why we are seeing a struggling entry-level job market today
English
13
4
42
2.7K
Financelot
Financelot@FinanceLancelot·
I haven't seen any AI job losses. All I'm seeing are job losses blamed on AI.
English
121
127
1.7K
57.7K
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@SamGilson13 @FreightAlley Stop copy pasting shit from AI. It only makes you seem smart to stupid people. You said 11% regardless of industry. Thats all we need to know about your actual knowledge on the subject. Thanks for chiming in though.
English
0
0
0
5
Sam Gilson
Sam Gilson@SamGilson13·
@keyboardchief @FreightAlley Lol. Cite a source. Statista, Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), World Bank, say otherwise. The original post said "worldwide". You're evading the truth with local variations.
English
1
0
0
43
Craig Fuller 🛩🚛🚂⚓️
People don't understand how obscenely large the logistics industry is. Worldwide logistics revenue is $11 trillion per year.
Object Zero@Object_Zero_

People don’t really understand how obscenely large the oil and gas industry actually is. Worldwide oil revenue is $4 trillion per year. Every year the oil industry collects more money than the US government. Not the US military, the entire US government. Every year the oil industry allocates $850 billion of capex to new projects, and those new projects increase the oil supply by about 1.8%. It costs half a trillion dollar a year, for every 1% of growth. Meanwhile, people think the $500 billion datacenter buildout is “unprecedented”. A year with $500 billion capex means a downturn and mass layoffs in the oil industry. It’s just a different scale. The same industry sells $2 trillion a year of gas. So $6 Trillion of revenue in 2025, and projected $8 trillion of revenue for 2026. There is a reason that the world has multiple “petrostates” with huge sovereign wealth funds, but no other type of mono-economy country with giant trillion dollar liquid funds. Many countries, such as Saudi Arabia produce oil and gas at 70% profit margins. So huge volumes and huge margins. That’s how you build multiple multitrillion dollar sovereign wealth funds that own a meaningful chunk of all global equities. These countries make huge equity returns in times of stability and huge oil returns in times of volatility. My point here, is that the datacenter capex can go much higher. It’s currently $6-700 billion, but for a major boom it could be double this. And the “oh noe! We need lots more datacenter plumbers!” is just a complete joke, when there’s an industry 10X bigger that literally does nothing but lay pipes everywhere. Embarrassing ignorance. Hyperscalers are still only using cashflow, and still each sitting on $100 billion cash reserves. They need to get off the pot and go and build some stuff, because it’s difficult to take them seriously watching them flap about in “hardware” aka heavy industry, for their fourth year.

English
17
52
561
66.7K
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@FreightAlley @grok It’s always fascinating when someone reverts to their credentials in an attempt to win an argument they can’t win on merit.
English
1
0
0
68
Craig Fuller 🛩🚛🚂⚓️
I have more financial analysts covering logistics on my staff (many of them worked on Wall Street covering transports before coming to us) than any firm on Wall Street and we have 100+ Wall Street firms that buy our data and research because we have the richest data and research on the sector.
English
2
0
11
309
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@hiwaymyway @FreightAlley I am in logistics and have worked in different supply chain roles. In terms of dollar amounts though even in the most consumer-based economies like the US, goods consumption is a small fraction of both consumer and corporate expenditure, logistics cost are a fraction of that.
English
0
0
0
20
The Lorryist
The Lorryist@hiwaymyway·
@keyboardchief @FreightAlley It kind of hides in plain sight. Almost physical goods take multiple journeys between raw material state and finished goods for consumers. I find it very easy to believe it's that proportion of the economy.
English
1
0
0
27
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@FreightAlley @grok I never said exclude warehousing or forwarding. But those are only a part of the supply chain. Including the whole supply chain and calling it logistics revenue is a great leap. Perhaps a financial analyst covering logistics can weight in.
English
2
0
0
353
Craig Fuller 🛩🚛🚂⚓️
I’ve been in logistics for 47 years and run the largest logistics media and data business in the world and you are the first person I’ve met that claims that logistics is only transportation, discounting every other logistics function (warehousing, forwarding, etc). 70% of US freight moves by trucks, its closer to half worldwide. But logistics is far more than transportation, by every definition except yours.
English
1
0
10
409
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@FreightAlley @grok I think it hard to separate properly because conglomerates don’t report logistics costs separately. Shipping and warehousing is logistics when provided by a third party and easy to track but when self-managed it gets wrapped with other functions.
English
0
0
0
22
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@FreightAlley @grok Ok. Not exactly the value of the cargo but all services in the supply chain, most of which have nothing to do with logistics. The $3 trillion for trucking seems accurate for global. Given that 70% of freight moves by trucks, strictly logistics. Is probably $ 5-7trillion.
English
2
0
0
420
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@FreightAlley @grok Grok is pulling information from the same articles I read. This is the problem with AI summaries. Misses the point. The figure includes supply chains. Thats like including your rental car’s value in your net worth. It includes the value of the cargo, not the freight cost.
English
2
0
2
527
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@SamGilson13 @FreightAlley Even if that was true, which it isn’t ( its about 3% on average), it would assume that the whole economy is made up of the goods economy. Its less than a third of the GDP. Most of the GDP is services and digital/finance/IP etc
English
1
0
1
41
Sam Gilson
Sam Gilson@SamGilson13·
@keyboardchief @FreightAlley Logistics is typically 10-11% of the cost of doing business, regardless of industry. The math is not hard. (Transfer payments are not GDP, either.)
English
2
0
0
60
Khee Bhoared Scheephe
Khee Bhoared Scheephe@keyboardchief·
@porterstansb @JillFilipovic New York is todays Detroit. The irony is that the jobs were lured away from Detroit. New York is actively chasing them away. Since its much bigger and more developed, the fall will also be much more staggering…
English
0
0
0
77
Porter Stansberry
Porter Stansberry@porterstansb·
The level of financial illiteracy in our country is staggering. Most countries (and most cities) want to offer fair and transparent tax policy to all property owners so that the market for these properties will continue to appreciate, driving collected property taxes higher. Targeting 13,000 specific homeowners with very large additional tax penalties ensures: 1. No one build these homes anymore, because no one will buy them anymore. 2. The market for these properties will crashed, driving down property tax revenues. 3. And, most dangerously, this law forgets that these people -- the 13,000 who own these properties -- most likely contribute massively to New York City's economy and tax base through their corporations that are based in New York -- like Citadel, for example. If you think targeting millionaires and billionaires with unfair taxes won't cause them to leave, you've never met one. Nor have you ever read a single book about these kinds of wealth taxes and what always happens -- every single time -- they are passed. Please... at least try to hide your complete ignorance. Last one out of Zombie Town turn out the lights.
English
8
4
88
2.8K
Jill Filipovic
Jill Filipovic@JillFilipovic·
What exactly is the argument against a pied-a-terre tax for second (or third / fourth / fifth) homes worth more than $5 million owned by people who do not even live in the city? It just seems like such a glaringly obvious common-sense policy.
English
695
67
1.7K
425.2K