ZaxbysChicken
175 posts


@ConservNational @greg_price11 🤣get ready for the midterms bud. Your party is gonna get fucked
English

@wingsandthings0 @greg_price11 I’m so glad we brought back that great word and you are a fag aren’t you. Why do blacks feel the need to glue plastic strips to their heads. She doesn’t even know the law it’s really embarrassing but most blacks in any position or judicial seems to be a pathetic joke.
English

@MegynKellyShow @mrddmia @aronberg Then we all need to revoke our citizenships. And start getting the privileges of illegals because they have more rights than we do.
English

@ClayTravis They have different laws than we do. Its not that hard. Quit being retarded.
English

@Mustang_Scott @DittiePE 🤣🤣bro is so worried about my followers that you run away. Just admit you support a child fucker and ill leave you alone
English

@wingsandthings0 @DittiePE Following 780 with 39 followers?
Tell me youre a bot without telling me
Muted now byeeee
English

The Supreme Court hears arguments tomorrow on birthright citizenship. Before you accept any framing that this is a new legal question — it isn’t. We’ve been here before. Twice. Same amendment. Same four words. Different targets.
The 14th Amendment, ratified 1868, says people born in the United States and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are citizens. The Trump administration’s entire argument rests on those four words — claiming undocumented immigrants aren’t truly “subject to jurisdiction,” so their U.S.-born children aren’t automatically citizens.
We’ve heard this before.
1884 — Elk v. Wilkins
John Elk was a Winnebago man born on U.S. soil. He moved to Omaha, renounced his tribal allegiance, tried to register to vote, and was denied. Government’s argument: not “subject to jurisdiction” at birth. Supreme Court agreed, 7-2. Same four words. Different group.
1898 — United States v. Wong Kim Ark
Wong Kim Ark was born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents — parents who could never become citizens under the Chinese Exclusion Acts. When he returned from a trip to China, they turned him away at the border. Same argument. The Supreme Court rejected it 6-2 and ruled the 14th Amendment means what it says. That ruling has stood for 128 years.
2026 — Trump v. Barbara
The administration is literally citing Elk v. Wilkins in its brief — a case widely considered superseded by Wong Kim Ark — arguing undocumented immigrants don’t fall under U.S. “political jurisdiction.”
Also worth noting: this same administration prosecutes, detains, and deports undocumented people through federal authority. But suddenly they’re not “subject to jurisdiction” when it comes to their kids’ citizenship. They want it both ways.
The 14th Amendment was written in the wake of Dred Scott specifically to prevent the government from carving classes of people born on American soil out of citizenship.
Arguments are tomorrow.
English


@CBSNews Americans will just have to take it into their own hands.
English

The Supreme Court appeared skeptical of President Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship during oral arguments in the case on Wednesday.
“I walked into the morning thinking that there was no essentially no chance for the Trump administration,” CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson says. “I still end the morning that way, but I think it might be slightly closer.”
English


@grmarco @RedDirtBishop @greg_price11 Stfu retard. Different countries have different laws. If you dont like the way we do it here, the fuck off to a different country.
English

@RedDirtBishop @greg_price11 This should be the only argument needed! Spread this far and wide! So simple, yet they always want to help "everyone else". I am so done with half my paycheck paying for illegals, anchor babies, and fraud! Revolution sounds like our only avenue at this point.
English

@greg_price11 She needs to go she was never qualified to be a SCOTUS Dems placed this DEI moron in to help their destruction of the country. Why destroy it? Because Dems would rather rule ashes full of idiots then take the chance someone who can actually think and try and remove them.
English

@SenTedCruz You are less American than the babies that are born here to illegals
English

@Mustang_Scott @DittiePE Your side would have sex with the baby in your profile pic. You support pedophiles. You arent very smart, and if the baby in your profile pic is yours or in your family, i feel sorry for it.

English

It's not looking good for WWE...
FOX was disappointed with SmackDown ratings and cancelled.
NBC was disappointed with SNME and cancelled.
X was disappointed with Speed and cancelled.
Netflix & ESPN are both disappointed with WWE’s numbers, and realizing that they overpaid.
NXT will be streaming on YouTube because no one wants to air their PLEs.

English


























