Mack Hat

@HowlingGoyim @grok @Howlingmutant0 @kriegmaxxing @justalexoki @Grok generate his response for me

@grok @Howlingmutant0 @mack_hat @kriegmaxxing @justalexoki The guy looks to well adjusted. Make him a ginger if you try again, I know I can't cuz I don't pay for this x account.

why are fat people so gross? is it some biological thing?

@Howlingmutant0 @grok @kriegmaxxing @justalexoki In the 90s she would be considered comically fat on TV.

@grok @mack_hat @kriegmaxxing @justalexoki She was way fatter lol

@sircalebhammer Watching now!

Sonalee Rashatwar told a college audience that a child being put on a diet is morally equivalent to a child being s*xually ab*sed... and a university paid her. The fat positivity movement was INSANE, and Ozempic proved it. Check out today's documentary: youtu.be/LbZ31_60z3M

@LASHYBILLS @grok @grok why aren't you responding

@LASHYBILLS @grok Make her look like a dwarf from Lord of the rings

What would pick a 304 or free gas for a year

@Howlingmutant0 @kriegmaxxing @justalexoki @grok turn this story into a funny comic

@kriegmaxxing @justalexoki Once I took my dog to the dog run and a really morbidly obese person came in and she freaked out and started barking and jumping up and down like “what the hell is that?!?!”, I felt really bad lol

As I was saying …

They typically limit data usage. Cheapest I could find quickly in the US was $15/month for 10gb data/unlimited talk and text. Companies often have promos for cheaper plans but only for the first 3-12 months. I pay $30/month for unlimited data. There's no reason why Americans need to pay $80 or more for a single phone plan people just are too lazy to shop around or use a prepaid plan for some weird reason.

@toly @AndrewYang It's true that phone plans are way more expensive in the US for the exact same service, not sure what the $20 plan you're referencing includes but my plan costs $6 (europe)

The average American spends $83 a month on their wireless bill. That’s $1k a year. The average European spends $35 a month on the same thing, or $420 a year. That difference adds up to $100 billion (!!!) a year extra spent by Americans on data.

@Sam0xSol @toly @AndrewYang I use a $30/month unlimited plan. Used to pay $20 for a 15gb plan.

@toly @AndrewYang Do you use the $20 plan?

@Howlingmutant0 I might frame this in my office.

Me when the Nigerian chess wizard jumps his piece in a zig zag checkers motion over the whole board and looks me in the eye and says “Chess Mate”

Good night to the feminists on X. I am likely the only man who has said that to you in years . See ya tomorrow.

@Howlingmutant0 @LizzyStarrrdust @Audjuice9989 Do you remember Old country buffet?

@LizzyStarrrdust @Audjuice9989 Yeah

I never understood why women like to show cleavage. I have nothing against it but I’m always curious to why they like doing that?

@greg16676935420 @BenStiller Don't understand can you explain that like I am five?

@BenStiller If they want to win next game they’re going to have to score more points than the other team

We lost that one

@Howlingmutant0 @AnderZin22

@AnderZin22 More of a jughead guy tbh

“I’ve been found out!” I yell as I recoil in horror

Be the change you want to see in the world

This is like saying a sober alcoholic of 20 years can't teach lessons about staying abstinent from alcohol. So only someone who's never had alcohol can teach alcoholics how to live alcohol-free? I would argue the person who failed at first but learned to fix themselves is the better teacher.

@Broomba51 I’m not saying they can’t have an opinion. What I’m saying is that it’s not plausible for them to position themselves as authorities on traditional family values, marriage, and motherhood, while their own household is the living counter example to every one of those things.

I wouldn't describe Rachel or Andrew Wilson as an authority on stable motherhood or relationships. She has 5 children to 3 different Fathers. One man abandoned her and his two kids over vague “personal issues.” The next Father was a criminal drug abuser who abandoned her and their one child fleeing legal trouble. Only Andrew Wilson gave her the trad family she now preaches. But he only committed to her after he was able to confirm the kids were his via DNA testing. What does that suggest about the dynamic? Rachel has shown self awareness and knows how her blended family looks, downplaying it as “youthful mistakes”. But mistakes these are not. This a well documented, multi year, behavioural pattern of maladaptive mate selection; serial monogamy with successively dysfunctional, low stability males, resulting in three different fathers for five children, two periods of single motherhood, and one tragic child fatality. And yet, she and Andrew think they are best placed to be critics of modern women and they are ab authority of what benevolent, stable family life should be like. Rachel and Andrew have built their entire brand shaming modern women for low partner standards, serial monogamy, single motherhood, and multiple baby daddies, the exact life she lived. Hypocrisy on full display. What kind of man is drawn to such a woman like Rachel Wilson to begin with? Well, Andrew is a bit of a bastard isn't he. Andrew Wilson’s core traits are abrasive high conflict dominance, arrogance paired with defensive aggression, and a rigid insistence on his unchallenged authority. You can see repeatedly by from his debate footage that he is irritable, rude, and bullying in style. Yes, he can be sharp and logical but he routinely shifts to personal attacks, insults, and verbal aggression when he perceives his authority or family is directly challenged. I don't think he can organically evoke genuine deference or voluntary submission from a desirable, respectable, agentic, and stable woman. Such a woman has independent, better mating options and would probably reject the unilateral “he is in charge of everything” authority because it clashes with her core traits. Rachel, shaped by a pattern of suboptimal mate selection and multiple children, has limited mating alternatives. So she explicitly conforms. She states on record that submission means “you submit to your husband in all things,” that Andrew holds charge of everything, and that she performs total domestic service because his dependability finally enabled the homemaking role her prior partners could not. He secures what he needs through a partner whose baggage makes compliance the rational exchange for security. They portray this trade off via a christian redemption narrative they co brand. Interesting.

@Notwokenow I can't imagine how people have this mindset these people really think the government exists to support them. Are people like this just low IQ?

Healthy, childless, adult woman complains about only receiving $16 a month in SNAP benefits. Though she claims to be working- she says her outgoing bills are more than her income. One of her “jobs” is selling stuff on Marketplace, and one is driving for DoorDash. Sounds like she can’t make and live within an appropriate budget. Why is that the responsibility of the US taxpayer? (And btw, she is clearly not going without any food.) She claims it’s the job of the government to provide for her. I say it’s her responsibility to live within her means. Giving SNAP benefits to people like this takes benefits away from the elderly and disabled. Naw, sis. Find a better job, declare bankruptcy, manage your money better. Whatever. Your financial problems are YOURS alone.

@ReidthePeep @Howlingmutant0 Well if that's the case we can't forget WrestleMania 2000!

@mack_hat @Howlingmutant0 Is it, though? youtu.be/88XnUHAX5-o?si…

An interesting phenomenon I’ve noticed recently is a type of guy who’s whole thing is asking for people’s addresses to fight then apparently hoping they decline to give them

@RockChartrand @RTSG_Main Man I wish I had you as a friend to back me up in conversations.

@RTSG_Main If nobody wants it, your labor has no value. If people want it, suddenly it does. That’s not labor determining value, that’s demand. You aren't even smart enough to know that you're digging yourself into a deeper hole.

LIBERTARIANS DON'T UNDERSTAND MARX: Value isn't "whatever buyers feel like paying". The regulator remains labor time, not aggregated subjective valuations. For example: Changes in productivity (new machinery) lower value, even if buyers still "want" the good just as much.

@ReidthePeep @Howlingmutant0 All I need!

@mack_hat @Howlingmutant0 ...No Mercy? You're offering N64 wrasslin', and you failed to bring WCW/NWO Revenge? Peasant.