Tim R. 🍻

In 2026, I will embark on a 52-week challenge to buy at least one share of $SPYI, the NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF, each week. 🛒✔️ What is $SPYI? This ETF targets high monthly income by employing a data-driven call option strategy on the S&P 500, while preserving exposure to the index for potential capital appreciation. It utilizes Section 1256 contracts for tax efficiency and maintains an expense ratio of 0.68%. Who's with me? Brick by brick, we can build that income in 2026! 💵💵💵 Dividend Yield (12 Month Trailing): 11.7% Dividends Per Year: 2022 - $1.89 (Inception Aug '22) 2023 - $5.79 (First Full Year) 2024 - $6.12 🟢+6% YoY #52weekSPYIchallenge

@FrogMoonMama No, I totally get that. I was the same. One of the first I had sold and it took me a few days thinking about it to pull the trigger. Glad I did though!

@GridSentinel It was one of the first stocks I ever bought so was sentimental to let go... silly as that sounds.

Stocks I’ve sold out of: $LMT $MO Because. The older I get the more some things matter to me.

@ChadMoran @Woodsy0120 911? I'd like to report a murder... 👀

@Woodsy0120 Sliding in to ratio like...

It's always funny seeing people who don't know shit about sand driving getting a more agressive tread for sand. Either get paddles or the least agressive highway terrain. Old airplane tires are fantastic

@ChadMoran Ha! Can see where you guys would get that. Those rocks were tasty though! 🔥

@GridSentinel Bro I thought this was a zoomed out view if some red rock canyons.

Good eats about to go down in Big Bear (California Mountains). Cheers everyone! 🍻

@ChadMoran @kylaschwaberow Wow. That guy isnt an asset to the community that's for sure.....

@kylaschwaberow Name calling like toddler makes you look like you intellectually peaked in an Xbox lobby. Pop off.

Chad Moron: Tesla has no moat. Common sense dude: Tesla owns the cars, gigafactories & FSD. Vertical integration = huge edge. Chad Moron: What specific advantage does that give them? Common sense dude: Holy fuck you’re retarded. Chad Moron: 😫😭😭😤🤡💩

@theficouple Your poor engagement bait advice (that was community noted) didn't work. Lord help anyone following your recommendations.....

When you bought the $50,000 Tesla Model Y to save on gas & maintenance. Then you learned: - It loses 20-35% of its value by year 3 - It loses 55-58% of its value by year 5 So by year 5 you lost $35,000+ of value? ....Congrats on saving ~$1,000/yr on gas.

@Financialguide @theficouple That's all they do. No idea why anyone follows this trash.....

@theficouple Just another engagement farming post....we see them regularly from you...

@greggertruck Easy block. They are morons and have been for a long time. Total idiots.

Rage bait. Gas vehicles depreciate too. go look how much a Ford Escape is worth after five years and get back to me(it loses 50%, and has likely spent a good amount of time in a service bay at your cost!)

@RivianTrackr Hell yeah! Enjoy the day Jose! 🍻

Rocking a new fun shirt which means VIDEO

@theBocker70 @pfinanceblogs @theficouple Both. Very clearly both.

@pfinanceblogs @theficouple Are you retarded, or just severely ignorant? Chances of needing a battery replacement are less than 0.1%.

@ChadMoran @pfinanceblogs @theficouple Yeah it's not. They are only in it for the engagement bait though. 😂

@pfinanceblogs @theficouple How is it a killer? They have 125,000-150,000 mi warranty and rarely need it.

@pfinanceblogs @theficouple What an amazing bad take. Wow. Tell me you know nothing about personal finance without telling me.

@theficouple The battery replacement is a killer. That has kept us out of the EV game so far.

@ChadMoran Thats crap. He should be banned from using it.

Funny how he deleted the post. Where is the outage around this?

@TechOperator I'm most certainly not a fan of the media (on any side) nor could I answer for Chad, but I will say I tire greatly of the media treating all EVs as some odd red headed poster child with random and just flat out odd headlines.

@GridSentinel I agree with him. I posted as much yesterday. But he can’t see how the partial context Fox News video may be been misleading. 🤷🏻‍♂️ x.com/techoperator/s…

@DirtyTesLa I mean...I want to believe?

Wide release of FSD 14.3 in a few weeks 😱😱

@ChadMoran @AndyZeGerman I had him blocked and I was like well hell....don't remember why but clearly it was for a good reason. 😂

@AndyZeGerman All he does is copy/paste that. Zero personality.

Tell me that you don't know ANYTHING about me, without telling me. 😂🤣😂

@ChadMoran @DustinR83059581 @FredLambert He won't have one. 😂

@DustinR83059581 @FredLambert Citation?

Tesla fans using the “4-second disengagement” as a gotcha are missing the forest for the trees. Yes, the driver was technically in control of the vehicle at the moment of impact. But she was in control because FSD was already failing by driving too fast ahead of this sharp turn — it was heading straight into a concrete barrier at highway speed with no sign of correcting. Everyone who has frequently used FSD or Autopilot and paints this 4-second disengagement as a “gotcha” moment is being disengenous, and that includes Elon Musk. I have tens of thousands of miles on FSD, and I’ve experienced the system coming too fast into a turn at least half a dozen times. We’ve said this before and we’ll keep saying it: the problem with FSD isn’t what happens when the driver is paying attention and the system works. The problem is what happens when the system gives you every reason to trust it, and then suddenly doesn’t work. The driver has to recognize the failure, assess the situation, decide on a correction, and physically execute it, all in less time than the system needs to create the danger. Musk and Tesla’s propagandists can point to the logs all they want. The video shows what actually matters: FSD approaching a standard highway curve at full speed with zero indication it was going to navigate it. That’s the failure. Everything that happened after, including the panicked disengagement, is a consequence of that failure. The framing that this was “manual driving, not FSD” is technically true for the final 4 seconds and deeply dishonest about the full sequence of events. It’s exactly the kind of liability shell game that courts are increasingly rejecting, as that $243 million verdict makes clear. Tesla created the system, sold it as “Full Self-Driving,” and profits from the ambiguity. At some point, it has to own the consequences.

@tyhend88 Appreciated! The before. Ohhhh boy. I know you know how that goes....

@GridSentinel Very clean!

Quick little cleanup. It ain’t much but good for now!