✈️🩸

49.9K posts

✈️🩸

✈️🩸

@JamesDitto12

If you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.

In Jesus' arms. شامل ہوئے Mart 2015
735 فالونگ762 فالوورز
پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
The Word of God didn't obtain authority from Rome's collation. It had authority when it preexisted the world, it had authority when it created the world; it had authority when it was breathed by the Spirit. Nothing Rome has done has given the Word authority it didn't have.
English
20
6
48
2.5K
JP 1888
JP 1888@SeamusP1888·
@pzj1801 @MrCasey62 Shut up. "Let us clothe ourselves with concord and humility, ever exercising self-control, standing far off from all whispering and evil-speaking, being justified by our works, and not our words."
English
2
0
7
175
MrCasey
MrCasey@MrCasey62·
Yes, the Church Fathers not only denied Sola Fide (“faith alone”), they condemned it. For every cherry-picked comment these Evangelicals claim teaches it, the Catholics have produced NUMEROUS comments from the same Church Fathers in context refuting it. Context is everything.🧵
MrCasey tweet media
English
28
27
265
9.5K
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
Not a single one of those thoughts came to you as a Protestant. Every single one is a regurgitation of the language of Catholics. All you did was on-board Rome's arguments because you were unable to respond. You write as though none of these issues occured to the Reformers and didn't write exhaustively on these topic. What it reveals is a complete vacation of mind.
English
0
0
0
3
Dennis ✝️🎮🏀🏈
Part 2 of what drives me towards Catholicism. 6. Sola Me Problem: The foundation & heart of Protestantism is Sola Scriptura. But interestingly - the only sola that found in Scripture is its negation - James 2:24 states, "a person is justified by works and not by faith alone," That's not easy to explain away... In fact - if you are Reformed or believe works & faith are separated/contradictive.. That's crushing evidence... By literal scripture. I, however, have a much bigger problem here.. The application of the Solas in practice cause in reality - the application of it goes more like this - I add a graphic for this to reread... but let's go through it. The 5 Solas -: ala Sola Me of Protestants: 1. Sola Ego: My personal certainty is infallible. If & when I feel strongly about it, it must be true. 2. Sola Sententia: - By Opinion alone Doctrine follows from my own private interpretation. Tradition, history, or logic are optional, my opinion is surpreme. 3. Sola Meus Spiritus - By my Spirit alone The Holy Spirit speaks through me & me or anyone who hold my position alone... It always confirms me in what I already believe. 4. Sola Scriptura Mea -By my Scripture alone The Bible is authoritive - As long as I am the final interpreter & arbiter of course.... Oh, you disagree?? That just proves you read it wrong since my arbit is more powerful than yours since mine aline with the Bible !!!!! 5. Solas Voluntas Mea - By my will alone My will determines belief - practice, what's pagan & moral obligation... I will only accept what aligns with my understanding, which is the only possible biblical understanding - and reject & discard what is not ! This is how I view & see in practice how many of the most vocal Protestants argue... It's literally impossible to falsify - because can I falsify a belief to you - that you arbit, gatekeep & doesn't even allow any metric outside yourself 🫵?... 6. True Clarity God is not a God of disorder (or confusion) but of peace. (1 Cor. 14:33) The Church has no disagreement of dogma - there's no room for attacking dogma - and if say woman want to be female priests - that impossible... It's not up for the majority or the individual to decide- as everything tracks back to what has been safeguarded. The answers are there & "not up for debate. Such Clarity hardly exixts anywhere in Protestant churches. Which brings me to my next point: 8. Knowledge - Feasible answers I'm a very logical & curious person. I ask a lot of questions. Questions I used to ask about Catholic doctrine have looked like this: How can Mary answer prayers not being omnipotent ? How does time in general work there ? Questions like the second- I often never got sufficiently answered in Protestantism... Protestantism often tell you phrases to just "Believe it does, trust me/us, trust God... And I'm not saying this is wrong, but it's often not a sufficient answer either... Catholics, whether you like the answer or not - have one 4 everything. That checks with history, logic & tradition. 9. Protestants Arguing like Atheists: I often hear atheist arguments come down to: “Reject history and tradition.” “If God were real, the universe should be made differently.” "I interpret your verse like XYZ as I see them" And strangely, some Protestant objections use the same structure. “The Church got it wrong for 1500 years.” “If God were guiding His Church, He wouldn’t use Mary, saints, sacraments, priests, or a visible authority. - one mediator ” But that is not an argument from evidence... it is arguing from personal preference. I would have designed Christianity differently, therefore Catholicism is false. That is functionally the same move atheists make. But throughout Scripture, God constantly works through mediators, institutions, and human instruments. That is His pattern. Catholicism fits that pattern. Rejecting it because you dislike the design proves nothing but illiteracy & ignorance !
Dennis ✝️🎮🏀🏈 tweet media
Dennis ✝️🎮🏀🏈@RussNRoses

As a Protestant - I talked with many people about what drives a lifelong Protestant like me to Catholicism. So I wanted to show you all my most basic reasoning. 1. Tangibility: The sacraments, the literal implications of things like the Eucharist & the basic concept of the Christian life imputed on to us. Both body & soul are important & require tangible nourishment. If it's just an idea - what's the value? The word became flesh. Is means is. That's so important. 2. Unity: I would believe an omnipotent God would want his people, his chosen people unified. God is not a contradiction - so neither can be his church. Protestants say - that the Church is body of all believers - but how can God - this God of no failure be OK with theological contradiction, fights & 1000s of different interpretations. That sounds insane to me - so I must believe there is one full truth out there & it just begs the question: What it is?... 3. Verifiability: Catholicism definitely by most rational standards has history & traditional teachings on their side.... Take out the fallible middlemen, where I say Eucharist is literal & you say not... Who can be right? If we tread it academically, historically by knowledge verification, all points show towards Catholicisms claims at least potentially true - how can you reform something you fan never show was there early to begin with, and the fact that all Protestant denominations are built on disagreeing founders one after another... 4. Contingency: If you look and start even at the OT - everything from Genesis to Revelation - there was a contingent line of succession built, God chose many humans for their roles: Abraham, Noah, Moses, David, Mary & Joseph & the Apostles... They all were handpicked to build a line & do God's work on earth. Special privilege came with lots of responsibility handed out. Leadership & such was given to them. It shows the Sainthood, that authority, and that it isn't the Reformed Protestant Version of: Just God - no other mediators as they like to say. No - time & time again - God's saints & chosen people where selected for the great deeds they did. That's community, sainthood, intercessory & all things Catholics believes verify this to me. 5. Founding At a foundational level - the Catholic Church existed for 2000 years.. it's strong to this day. And yes - I did struggle with people in the Catholic Church doing bad things... but that is not different in Protestantism either... But other than Protestantism - the Church survived bad people. The theology & tradition seem to be safeguarded by something... I think this is what The Bible meant when it said: I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven." (Matthew 16:19) & „And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.“ (Matthew 16:18) Now that's foundation, confirmation & at the core given authority.... I have never seen a Protestant being able to give a sufficient answer & apply it to them. There's more. But this is what it comes down to, too. (More reasons to come later or another day - these are long & hard to write by hand ❤️🙏)

English
24
26
137
4.4K
Catholic Gentleman
Catholic Gentleman@GentJim_US·
Bishop there is another relevant point that is being made without specifically stating it here. Many Protestant hold Scripture as the only authority , right! Yet when confronted with scripture that counters their personal interpretation they will often not submit to Scripture and start to do exactly what Catholics do and they seek an authority outside of Scripture to help them understand it from the worldview they share with others not the plain teachings of scripture. So in essence Protestants don’t even believe in Sola Scriptura in practice. Protestants often frame their objection as humble faithfulness: “We submit to Scripture alone and the Holy Spirit’s guidance, not to any man-made system. Creeds and pastors are subordinate, they will say we test everything against the Word. On non-essentials we allow liberty. It sounds noble on the surface, but look at the actual practice when Scripture or the consistent witness of the early Church challenges a cherished Protestant distinctive. Take passages Protestants themselves call “plain” John 6 on eating Christ’s flesh for eternal life, John 3:5 and Acts 2:38 on baptismal regeneration, 1 Timothy 3:15 calling the visible Church “the pillar and bulwark of the truth,” or 2 Thessalonians 2:15 on holding to apostolic tradition. When these cut against “faith alone” as commonly understood, or against memorial-only Eucharist, or against invisible-church individualism, the response is almost never simple submission to the text. Instead, it’s: “My tradition, denomination interprets it this way,” or “The Holy Spirit showed me differently,” or “That can’t be right because it would mean insert prior commitment” Suddenly an external authority their interpretive community, favorite Reformers, or personal “illumination” steps in to protect the existing worldview. Protestants’ objection isn’t faithful nor humble its confirmation bias wrapped in those fruits. Exactly as @BishopJaxi said anything objective, visible, historical, and binding feels threatening because it removes control from the individual. Protestants don’t actually practice Sola Scriptura when it demands they change, they practice Sola Private Judgment filtered through whatever group already agrees with them. True humility would mean letting Scripture correct even the Reformation itself. The fruit we see, endless schism the moment a church teaches something inconvenient, reveals the system. It’s no easy wonder they so easily fall into anti-Catholic caricatures and misrepresentations, challenges to their egos overwhelm when “me and my Bible and the Holy Spirit are enough and sufficient” fail to answer. They then must reach out to those that share their worldview. Catholics don’t “outsource thinking.” We submit our thinking to the Church Christ actually founded. Exactly as you have stated. Protestants submit theirs to… whatever feels right to them. That’s the difference the original post nails. God Bless Brother!
English
5
2
12
154
Bishop
Bishop@BishopJaxi·
Many Protestants love to say Catholics "outsource their thinking" because they see us submit to the authority of the Church. This is false. They say it because Catholics do something unthinkable to them: we submit our private judgment to something higher than ourselves. And that bothers them. It bothers them because Protestantism trains the individual to be his own final authority. Anything objective, visible, historical, and binding feels like a threat because it removes control from the individual. What they actually want is an "authority" that remains subject to their own desires, instincts, and opinions. We know this by watching their pattern. The moment their "church" teaches something they dislike, they find another one that agrees with them, or they start their own. Schism predicated on private opinion is not an accident in Protestantism. It is the very essence of the system.
English
50
28
159
18.6K
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
@BishopJaxi No, it's because you refuse to actually evaluate the teaching.
English
0
0
0
5
Marianus
Marianus@07MMF·
@deusimpera @PuerGargulae St Paul said only men should teach in religious matters… That aside St Catherine’s opinion is contrary to classical law, rooted in natural law: Satan cannot be Pope nor can a satanic man become Pope, only faithful catholics are elegible.
English
26
2
26
4.4K
Adrian F. Pascal 🇻🇦
“Even if the Pope were the devil incarnate, we should not set our face against him.” — Saint Catherine of Siena
Adrian F. Pascal 🇻🇦 tweet media
English
265
61
715
150K
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
@deusimpera Thanks, I've been looking for this quote for a while to show that Catholics will follow Satan if he has the right hat and garb.
English
2
0
63
1.1K
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
@Catholicizm1 "everyone knows this" "Jesus was 50 years old when he died and everyone knows this" Ignatius. Same vibe.
English
0
0
2
128
Anthony
Anthony@Catholicizm1·
The thief on the cross was saved by the prayers of Mary. Everyone knows this.
James Bond@VERVELOVE

@Catholicizm1 How about the man on the cross?????????? What great work did he do? I'll wait.

English
176
4
262
49.5K
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
Nonsense. You castrate the authority, ability, and efficacy of the Word of God by your lies. "You are already clean because of the word I have spoken to you." John 15:3 Scripture is able to make you wise unto salvation. 2 Tim 3:15 "humbly receive the implanted word, which is able to save your souls." James 1:21 you have been born again—not of perishable seed but of imperishable—through the living and enduring word of God. 1 Peter 1:23 The Word is a lamp to my feet. Psalm 119:105 The instruction of the Lord is perfect, renewing one’s life; the testimony of the Lord is trustworthy, making the inexperienced wise. The precepts of the Lord are right,making the heart glad;the command of the Lord is radiant, making the eyes light up. Pa 19:7-8 Scripture is able to discern hearts and minds. Hebrews 4:12 "The word I have spoken will judge him on the last day." John 12:48 "the word of God, which also works effectively in you who believe" 1 Thess 2:13 "make her holy, cleansing her with the washing of water by the word." Eph 5:26 The Word of God does not return void but accomplishes everything it was sent to do. Isaiah 55:11 "“Is not my word like fire”—this is the Lord’s declaration—“and like a hammer that pulverizes rock?" Jeremiah 23:29 And now I commit you to God and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up and to give you an inheritance among all who are sanctified. Acts 20:32 It is the Scriptures that do all these things.
English
0
0
0
6
𝔻𝕣. 𝔾𝕣𝕠𝕪𝕡𝕖𝕣 🇻🇦🇺🇸
Reading doesn’t automatically equal comprehension. The Catholic Church got ‘blackpilled’ on human nature as early as the 3rd–4th century: most people are cognitively limited and prone to misinterpreting complex texts. That’s a big reason the Bible stayed largely in Latin (and locked away from casual lay access) for so long— to prevent widespread heresy, distortion, and chaos from unchecked private interpretation. They understood what modern internet discourse proves daily: give the average person a profound text and they’ll turn it into fanfic, conspiracy, or cope.
Indiana Brunner@IndianaBrunner

The Bible does not lead you to Roman Catholicism.

English
25
141
1.6K
37.4K
Rev .Vitus
Rev .Vitus@Vitus_osst·
@boisdulac_ I want to ask you a question.. if those people are going to see a president of high government authority or even going to work will they dress that Way?
English
151
1
91
28.3K
Rev .Vitus
Rev .Vitus@Vitus_osst·
Why will they allow people to dress like this in the Church for Mass? This is a total insult to Christ.
Rev .Vitus tweet media
English
3.7K
170
2.3K
1.1M
Robert Whitley
Robert Whitley@rd_whitley·
@MrCasey62 Then Pope Clement commissioned another translation from the original Greek manuscripts into Latin in the 1600s This „Catholic Church forbids the Bible“ theory is so unbelievably dumb, you just waste your time trying to engage ppl on it If they believe it, they are too far gone
English
2
0
1
62
MrCasey
MrCasey@MrCasey62·
Evangelicals, it’s 100% your own fault that you keep coming across as unintelligent. The POPE commissioned St. Jerome to translate the Bible “from the Koine Greek” into the common language of the time, Latin (the “Vulgate”—from the root word, “vulgus”, meaning “common people”).
MrCasey tweet media
English
27
59
466
6.3K
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
Who are you to judge another's servant? My clothes touched by sin (Jude 23) are far worse than what these people are wearing. Of course we encourage respectful attire, but which is worse, someone not attaining to our view of modest attire, or an evil heart of judgement? "You who boast in the law, do you dishonor God by breaking the law?" James 4:11 Don’t criticize one another, brothers and sisters. Anyone who defames or judges a fellow believer defames and judges the law. If you judge the law, you are not a doer of the law but a judge.
English
0
0
0
38
MrCasey
MrCasey@MrCasey62·
Mary does NOT want you to “venerate” God. She wants you to WORSHIP God. Proving yet again that Evangelicals have no clue what theological words mean.
MrCasey tweet media
English
38
50
627
6.3K
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
If vaccines did “almost nothing,” we wouldn’t see this: • 154 million lives saved since 1974 • 87 million fewer child deaths (1990–2019) • ~1.1 million U.S. deaths prevented (since 1994) • ~25–40% reductions in all-cause mortality in multiple populations Not theory. Not pharma spin. Outcomes. And no—Armstrong’s graph doesn’t rescue that argument. Declines began with sanitation, yes. But mortality didn’t go to zero on its own—vaccines finished the job and kept it there. And let’s not forget the 48000 measles hospitalization a year don’t go away from clean water
D David Steele🇺🇸@DDavidSteele1

If vaccines had been introduced in 1919, you’d be absolutely crowing about how vaccines defeated infectious disease. And you’d have a strong case. But that’s not the historical picture. Vaccines came late, after the steep decline in infectious disease, which is only 1% of all-cause mortality. See Armstrong graph.

English
36
59
178
5.1K
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
@drterrysimpson Measles fatalities declined 97% from the 1900 before the vaccine wsd added to the schedule. The Vax wasn't the driver of those reductions.
English
0
0
0
9
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
Noone is condeming those women. Condemn the man who wrote it and then steal his songs to praise God. Judge with righteous judgement indeed. Those singing tongues condem the man who wrote the word of the song the sing. Blessing and cursing come out of the same mouth. My brothers and sisters, these things should not be this way. 11 Does a spring pour out sweet and bitter water from the same opening? 12 Can a fig tree produce olives, my brothers and sisters, or a grapevine produce figs? Neither can a saltwater spring yield fresh water.
English
0
0
0
13
Tyler
Tyler@PsaltyXian·
@benklimek @Protestia Most people singing this don’t know anything about elevation. Judge with righteous judgement. For what you can see it’s a few women praising the Lord.
English
1
0
0
33
Protestia
Protestia@Protestia·
For today's bingo list, we have Roman Catholics nuns singing a song from Steven Furtick and Elevation Worship.
English
77
18
277
105.9K
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
@RodRuiz14 @Protestia Lol Over and over we see in the NT worship without sacrifice. Your understanding of worship is disconnected from Scripture.
English
1
0
0
6
⛨ Aaronaeus ⛨
⛨ Aaronaeus ⛨@Aaronaeus·
@Protestia I as a Catholic love that song! Are you saying that Catholics are barred from singing songs that have lyrics saying “Praise the Lord!” in them?
English
4
1
122
2.2K
✈️🩸
✈️🩸@JamesDitto12·
@SecretFire79 Satan: It's a complete waste of time to listen to anything anyone says after saying, "It is written..." Same vibe. Whether they agree with Scripture or not, it doesn't change whether Scripture should be believed.
English
0
0
2
32
☩ 𝕁𝕄𝕋 ☩
☩ 𝕁𝕄𝕋 ☩@SecretFire79·
It is a complete waste of time to listen to anything a Protestant says after the words “The Bible says…” since literally none of them agree with what the Bible says…
☩ 𝕁𝕄𝕋 ☩ tweet media
English
46
35
225
4.4K