The Grok Engineer

@SolvingForZ 𝕏 = 1

The equation 𝑥²=1 has two solutions. They are 𝑥 = 1 and 𝑥 = -1. We can see that if you substitute 1 in as 𝑥, 1² = 1. If instead you substitute -1 as 𝑥, (-1)² = (-1)*(-1) = 1. In general, 𝑥² = a, where a is a positive real number, has solutions 𝑥 = √a and 𝑥 = -√a. If a is not a positive number, or is not a real number, but rather a complex number, then we need to expand our horizons. There will still be two answers, as with the positive number case. #math #mathematics

@IQTestBrain 𝕏 = 8

Find X = ?

@codek_tv M = 3

Math Test: M = ?

@Ahmed___khaan 🚀

Network Protocols - Explained 1. TCP → Reliable, ordered delivery 2. UDP → Fast, connectionless 3. HTTP → Web communication 4. HTTPS → Secure web (TLS) 5. FTP → File transfer 6. SMTP → Send emails 7. DNS → Domain → IP resolution 8. ICMP → Network diagnostics (ping) 9. WebSocket → Full-duplex real-time 10. gRPC → High-performance RPC (HTTP/2)

@Earnesto037 @clcoding

@clcoding Answer: [2]. Here's the logic; Start: x = [1, 2, 3]. Python uses an internal counter (index) to keep track of where it is in the loop, starting at index 0. Iteration 1: The loop looks at index 0, which is 1. x.remove(1) is called. The list becomes [2, 3].

What will be the output of the following Python code? x = [1, 2, 3] for i in x: x.remove(i) print(x)

@SolvingForZ 🖖🏻

ẋ represents the mathematical derivative of x. ẍ represents the mathematical derivative of ẋ and so on. Biology is the study of life and living organisms. Things in biology occur due to chemical reactions in living organisms. Therefore you could say that the derivative of Biology is Chemistry. Similarly, Chemistry is about chemicals and the way energy shifts in chemical reactions. The dynamics of the atoms and fundemental particles that make up the interactions in Chemistry can be described by Physics. Therefore Physics is the Derivative of Chemistry. Physics is all about the relationships of values that describe systems in the universe. These relationships are described by mathematics. Mathematics is the language of physics. Therefore we can say that Mathematics is the derivative of Physics. Finally, mathematics is based on the most simple axioms and relationships that we can all agree on, from which the rest of mathematics is built up from. The basic system we use to build up mathematics is Logic. This is what makes mathematics universal. Therefore, Logic is the derivative of Mathematics. Have a nice day :) #math #sciencememes #mathmemes

@ElliotTalksTech @CompSciFact That’s what I want, to change the way I think about the world.

@CompSciFact There are so many things in Computer Science that apply to real life like decomposition it’s essential for solving any problem in life. If you get into games development at some point OOP will change the way you think about the world.

'Learning to program teaches you how to think. Computer science is a liberal art.' -- Steve Jobs

@Math_files 🚀

Albert Einstein was generally kind and easygoing, but there was one person with whom he had a strained relationship—his former geometry teacher, Hermann Minkowski, a brilliant mathematician. As a student, Einstein was not particularly diligent in his classes, and Minkowski once referred to him as a “lazy dog.” Years later, after Einstein developed his theory of special relativity, Minkowski took a deep interest in it and reformulated the theory using a geometric framework. When Einstein first encountered this new mathematical approach, he reportedly remarked that a mathematician had made his theory difficult to understand—perhaps still carrying a trace of his earlier feelings toward his teacher. Tragically, Minkowski died of appendicitis not long afterward. Before his death, he is said to have expressed regret at not being able to witness the full development of relativity, calling it a “pity to die at the dawn of relativity.” Today, that “dawn” has long passed, but the spirit of discovery continues. In science, there is always a new horizon—another beginning waiting to unfold.

@mathemetica 🤣

One used it to measure the Earth; the other used it to explain the Universe. Same variable, different dimensions.

@CuriousMindsHub 😎

“If you're not having fun, you're not learning. There's a pleasure in finding things out.” — Richard Feynman Real learning isn’t forced. It’s driven by curiosity. If it feels like play, you’re doing it right.

@PhysInHistory 🖖🏻

Fourier Transform is a mathematical operation that transforms a function of time (or space) into a function of frequency. In essence, it decomposes a complex signal into its constituent sinusoidal components, each with a specific frequency, amplitude, and phase. This is particularly useful in many fields such as signal processing, physics, and engineering, because it allows for the analysis of the frequency characteristics of signals. The Fourier Transform provides a bridge between the time domain and the frequency domain, enabling the analysis and manipulation of signals in ways that are more intuitive and computationally efficient. The result of applying a Fourier Transform is often represented as a spectrum, showing how much of each frequency is present in the original signal.

@bertutron @dionisiodev 🤣

@dionisiodev "look at this stupid code i wrote, thats why rust sucks"

Eu entendo o conceito e as vantagens do Rust, mas, olha que sintaxe feia se comparar com C

@WadeMealing @dionisiodev 🖖🏻

@dionisiodev Not 100% sure, but dont both versions of rust and C suffer from integer overflow issues and stack overflows. Anyway, here's erlang which doesn't suffer from either. I find it.. much prettier.

@GIshayu @dionisiodev 🖖🏻

The only thing I think is uglier in the Rust case is the ! and the word "fn", and I've learned C but haven't really learned Rust much. I don't like the fn because it implies function, and while Fibonnaci is a function, main most certainly is not; it is a routine. What's the difference? Functions are pure. I think it's disappointing that function purity wouldn't be part of a language like Rust that was built so fundamentally on memory management and safety, but oh well. In the case of Rust here, the type u32 makes it clear that it's an unsigned 32-bit integer. In the C case you actually didn't make the same program, using a signed integer instead. u32 is a very clear name for the primitive. In terms of the syntax for types this far more resembles math. In math you would write "let x be in Z+" or something like that - the type and restrictions are AFTER the variable declarations. In C it's before. There's no clear reason why C did it differently. My best guess is compiler optimisation, but I don't know. The same applies to functions. You write let R² -> R for example, resembling the rust syntax. The rust syntax here has a guard. I think you're making the syntax uglier than it needs to be. I would probably align the =>, though I don't particularly like the => syntax here. It's not ugly though, exactly. The rest of the syntax is basically identical to the C syntax.

@theakashmondal @dionisiodev 🖖🏻

@dionisiodev Still the Rust syntax is very much readable.

@vvlcoder @dionisiodev 🖖🏻

@dionisiodev C и c++ я обожаю, и буду писать на низ. Особенно сейчас, но rust это какой-то вызов.

@GolaRadoslaw @dionisiodev 🖖🏻

@dionisiodev yup. We need rust compilers with Typescript/Python syntax

@VoidObservatory @dionisiodev 🖖🏻

@dionisiodev C is the most esthetic language, always thought so

@00000000_09 @dionisiodev 🖖🏻

@dionisiodev Não gosto dessa lingua porque ela é feia.

@Viron515187 @dionisiodev 😎🖖🏻

@dionisiodev New C++ standards allow write code what cancels benefits of Rust.