
SMB Healthcare PE
2.5K posts

SMB Healthcare PE
@roblarson
Healthcare SMB acquisitions and Healthcare mid-market PE. Tweets about business strategy, science, and disrupting healthcare.




The average invidual spends nearly $9k/yr on ins and nearly $26,000 per family/yr. Direct Primary Care can cost $75/mo For $900/yr you get unlimited same-day visits, your doctor's cell number, and wholesale labs. The math isn't complicated. The system is. #DirectCare

When I was on the ISS for my nearly year long mission, there was a telomere experiment comparing my telomeres to my earth baseline and my twin brother as a control. Hypothesis was they would get damaged and worse due to the environment. Turns out they got better. Initially NASA thought maybe it was due to exercise and diet. After I returned we learned JAXA had a telomere experiment on some small worms the same time I was there. Their telomeres got better too. Never saw the worms doing any exercise. After further study determined it was the radiation.





All roads lead to Universal Basic Income.





Talked to a new-ish private equity portco CFO the other day... He was dropped in from the PE firm - had previously been an associate. The deal was going sideways and he wants to be an operator, so he raised his hand to step in. (Btw, this is a great way to transition into an operator role if that's your goal, especially if you're on the younger/less experienced side.) Back to the story- this was a tough assignment. Clear turnaround situation. His main observation after a few months: the company had done what the MD told them to do for years and it just didn't work. Bad investment, bad strategy, bad operating. He was frustrated because the MD had zero self awareness. And now, he himself was somehow part of the problem just a couple months in... MD is screaming and yelling and carrying on. Constantly wanting to change out people (having already fired CEO, CFO). Just pushing pushing without any new direction. Doubling down on the same ideas. Blaming everyone but himself. I'm sure there have been plenty of mistakes by plenty of people to get to this point. But at some point, the buck stops somewhere. This MD runs the firm and this deal - approved the investment, designed the capital structure, directed management, etc. - but there has been zero admission of guilt or willingness to pivot. Definition of hubris. I was in a similar situation earlier in my career. It's a tough spot when your boss won't admit mistakes or pivot and instead blames others. It leaves the organization paralyzed - scared of trying new things and certain the old things won’t work… If you find yourself in that situation, good luck. Continue doing a great job amidst the tensions you’re facing. Go the extra mile. And importantly, recognize that whoever is flailing their arms above you- that person is a human being. Different people take different approaches. Sometimes they are just trying to create urgency with the screaming and yelling. Try not to take it personally. But more often than not, it’s just a human being- probably scared, insecure, frustrated, and embarrassed - who doesn’t really know what to do either. Treat them as you would any human- with respect and compassion. Do an excellent job. But based on your evaluation of the situation and the leader, it may be prudent to move on. Don’t waste your life working for temperamental losers. And as you evaluate joining a new firm/portco, ask questions about how folks handle conflict and try to talk to others who have been on deals that didn't go as expected. You can’t always learn everything beforehand, but those could be revealing conversations.






You are half right. And the half you are missing is worth billions. Every generation has a moment where the 'middleware' looks doomed. In 1994, everyone said ISPs were dead on arrival — why pay for internet access when the infrastructure would commoditize? Then AOL hit 30 million subscribers and sold for $164 billion. In 2008, everyone said payment processors were toast — open banking would kill the middleman. Stripe was founded anyway. Now it's worth $65 billion. The pattern isn't 'services die.' It's 'bad services die. Trusted services become infrastructure.' Here's what the 'agents will rebuild everything cheaper' thesis misses: Agents still need *trust rails.* Stripe isn't valuable because it moves money. It's valuable because 10 million businesses trust it won't break on Black Friday. Vercel isn't valuable because it deploys code. It's valuable because it doesn't go down when your product goes viral at 2am. AI can reprice capability. It cannot reprice *reliability reputation* built over a decade. The companies that survive this aren't the ones with the best features. They're the ones that became the *default answer* when something absolutely cannot fail. Commodity is a cost question. Trust is a different market entirely. The graveyard of tech is full of cheaper alternatives that nobody used.



- Claude for coding. - Supabase for backend. - Vercel for deploying. - Namecheap for domain. - Stripe for payments. - GitHub for version control. - Resend for emails. - Clerk for auth. - Cloudflare for DNS. - PostHog for analytics. - Sentry for error tracking. - Upstash for Redis. - Pinecone for vector DB. You can literally ship a startup from your bedroom now. It’s not that deep bro.










