Binary_exp\01t

Mr. Mellon, While many, including myself, appreciate your tenacity here, this is a perplexing tweet... You are calling for the release of UAP space data, satellite data, and detection from the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System; however, you yourself have commented on several occasions on the existence of both the legacy programs and recovered materials/biological samples. The number one example that comes to mind is this redacted Signal messaging screenshot you released in 2024 in response to Sean Kirkpatrick voluntarily offering Signal exchanges between you and him for a FOIA release. This redacted exchange with an unknown individual not only confirms you know the management structure, security control systems, and ownership of the crash retrieval portfolio, but that you are also aware of a highly classified memo by SecAF in the 1950s that is still in effect to maintain cover for the legacy programs. Indeed, you also in this exchange confirm you are aware of the Air Force legacy SES-2 gatekeeper (likely Russel E. Wyler) and state the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash was indeed real and recovered. So why exactly is this memo by a former SecAF or the release of the Kingman wreckage and biologics not a priority for you? These have lower precedence than your listed IMINT/SIGINT data?.... You have said similar things on several occasions regarding UFO retrieval and exploitation, including a 2023 NewsNation appearance with Chris Cuomo where you stated: "I’ve been told that we have recovered technology that did not originate on this Earth, by officials in the Department of Defense and by former intelligence officials." newsnationnow.com/cuomo-show/ufo… This feels like a bizarre pivot back to your and Mr. Elizondo's ~ 2017-2023 narrative of discussing an amorphous non-human presence on this planet without breaking into the fine details of recovered technical vehicles or biologics. At the same time, I find it bizarre that your list is excluding maritime UFO sensor data encounters. We know, all the way back to the days of Project Blue Book, USO/maritime UFO encounters are often strikingly anomalous and occur almost more frequently than any space-based UFO monitoring and tracking. Others and I share the concern that within the Age of Disclosure documentary, Jay Stratton, who retired as a Defense Intelligence Senior Executive (DISES) from the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), purposefully excluded Navy elements from the film's "Legacy Program" outline to protect his Naval interest or prior exposure to Naval Legacy Elements. Mr. Mellon, are you doing the same? Admiral Gallaudet has advocated for the study of UFO/USO in maritime environments tirelessly. Why do you not also advocate for release of such data? An additional worthy pursuit, as I have publicly requested, is for you to comment on your former SSCI coworker, Mary K. Sturtevant. As I have stated, I am aware that whilst Sturtevant was Lockheed Martin VP of Government Affairs and VP for Intelligence, Joint and Science & Technology Progams, she aided in the blocking of the Kona Blue PSAP UFO materials transfer between Lockheed Martin and the AAWSAP. My public request to you can be found here: x.com/UAPGERB/status… Why is UFO retrieval, exploitation, and reverse engineering, for which you have advocated transparency in the past, taking a backseat to a handful of specific sensor data?

🔥 "[Senior-Trump-administration officials] are very serious and under serious pressure from the White House to get out, literally, as much as possible [on UFOs]." ~Mellon 🔥 (New! - I'm getting a little excited again, but let's see if it happens.) @ChrisKMellon: "I've also, like [Grusch], heard from some senior-administration officials that they are very serious and under serious pressure from the White House to get out, literally, as much as possible. It was a very encouraging message from people associated with the [Trump] administration who are working the problem. "And they asked me what I would prioritize, and I gave them some suggestions." (How about telling us what you told them to prioritize? I hope it was: Crash retrievals, bodies, and images or videos from our best sensors (satellite imagery) that show clear right-angle turns and instant acceleration? Something where we don't have to debate what we're seeing and is clearly anomalous. We'd take that!) Mellon: "So, I'm very hopeful that, along with Dave {Grusch], that these future releases will continue and hopefully improve." @lesliekean: "Fantastic. I've heard the same thing, that there are people working closely with Trump who are deeply committed to this, so, it's pretty exciting."

I agree with @MichaelLazovsk3 here. Our administration is undeservingly getting credit for transparency, while making a mockery out of the subject. It will and always has been journalists that have moved this topic forward. Not government. So what do we do next? WATCH FULL : youtu.be/aumAJ6fyv5s 🛸🥋🐺⏰