James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲

47.3K posts

James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 banner
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲

James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲

@ReggaeRodent

Cheeky As Dirty Pants #Claddingscandal save us from this pain 😡 JUSTICE 4 MMTLP & MMAT snapchat Reggaedanger

Manchester انضم Eylül 2009
2.2K يتبع897 المتابعون
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
ArtBurn
ArtBurn@ArtburnDesigns·
I had no clue, and as an investor, having all of money yanked from the market without warning—after being explicitly told I’d have two more days to sell—is nothing short of THEFT! For nearly three years, #MMTLP has been clawing to uncover the truth behind their actions & in what happened to our money. Not one shred of honest information has been respectfully provided by the regulators we fund to protect us. #MMTLP #MMAT
English
1
22
32
429
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
JunkSavvy
JunkSavvy@JunkSavvy·
The problem with being under the influence, you don't always remember what you say, post, or text...but someone ALWAYS does. #FAFO #SipHappens #YappyHour
JunkSavvy tweet media
English
7
38
108
1.3K
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
Chris G
Chris G@808CG1·
MMTLP #FAFO #Veteran #Relentless Great article that is circulating on LinkedIn and X. Federal courts are beginning to scrutinize FINRA’s unchecked authority and the Kelly v. FINRA case in Nevada sits squarely at the center of that shift. Last week, two federal courts rejected long‑standing assumptions that FINRA and the SEC can force enforcement targets through a decade‑long administrative gauntlet before any constitutional challenge can reach an Article III court. In Black v. SEC and Smith v. SEC, the courts openly questioned whether FINRA can impose punitive sanctions without a jury trial and without Article III oversight. Both decisions stopped short of binding precedent only because FINRA escaped on procedural technicalities. That context matters for MMTLP and for the Kelly case. FINRA recently filed supplemental authority pointing to district court dismissals in Spears, Pease, Willcot, and Rolo. But those cases all share the same flaw: they assumed FINRA’s conduct was “regulatory” without ever examining whether the specific acts at issue were actually delegated under the Exchange Act. Kelly’s filings highlight what no court has yet addressed: • FINRA unilaterally altered issuer‑submitted corporate action data • FINRA converted a temporary halt into a permanent market deletion • FINRA acted without any SEC order, rulemaking, or statutory delegation • FINRA’s actions occurred outside the scope of Rule 6440 and Section 12(k) • And under Ninth Circuit law (Sparta Surgical), immunity attaches only when an SRO acts within authority actually delegated by Congress or the SEC That threshold question — was FINRA authorized to do what it did? — has never been answered in any MMTLP case. Even FINRA’s own filings inadvertently reinforce the point. In its objection, FINRA argues there are “no exceptions” to immunity so long as it acts pursuant to the Exchange Act which is precisely the issue Kelly raises. Whether FINRA acted “pursuant to” the Exchange Act is the entire dispute. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s unanimous Galette decision (March 2026) underscored a simple principle: separately incorporated entities cannot selectively invoke governmental immunity while avoiding governmental accountability. FINRA, a private Delaware corporation, cannot claim constitutional independence in one breath and absolute immunity in the next. The bottom line: The constitutional cracks appearing in FINRA’s enforcement structure, from Jarkesy to Black to Smith; are now intersecting with the unresolved statutory question at the heart of MMTLP. The Kelly case is the first to squarely present that issue under controlling Ninth Circuit law. The judiciary is finally signaling that FINRA’s authority is not limitless. And for the first time, the question of whether FINRA exceeded its statutory mandate in MMTLP is positioned for real judicial review. linkedin.com/pulse/finras-c…
English
9
130
207
5.6K
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
MARDÜK the META Guy😎🦋
MARDÜK the META Guy😎🦋@MetaGuyMarduk·
MMTLP Interesting statements made by @RepLisaMcClain in today's Financial Subcommittee on Capital Markets hearing. She is the one who has brought forth the RAMS act. Robert W. Cook and Gary Gensler need to be held accountable for being criminally negligent! Disgusting! Day 1153 of the #MMTLPFIASCO
English
20
285
369
14K
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
Lara Logan
Lara Logan@laralogan·
"It is time to uncover the weaponized bureaucracy that is stripping our public servants of their hard-earned futures.”
BusyBrands 🇺🇸@busybrands

Despite the mounting cries for transparency in the last 3 years regarding the MMTLP financial scandal, Chairwoman Ann Wagner (@RepAnnWagner) failed to mention the #MMTLP scandal during today’s House Financial Services (@FinancialCmte) proceedings. As the Chair of the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, her silence at the very moment in regards of MMTLP is inexcusable. Today should be a stark reminder of why the weaponization of regulatory bodies has reached a breaking point and we need more champions in congress such as @RepTimBurchett and @realannapaulina to spearhead committees like these. The #MMTLP scandal is not just a trading anomaly; it is a systemic failure. The @SECGov and @FINRA froze assets to protect institutional interests, effectively sacrificing the backbone of our country to shield the elites. We need investigative journalists like @LaraLogan to look into this financial scandal and expose why Congress continues to turn a blind eye to this unprecedented assault on retail investors. Who is Being Stripped of Their Future? America people who trusted the system with their life savings: • Veterans and First Responders: Those who risked everything for our safety. • Teachers and Nurses: The pillars of our local communities. • Hardworking Families: Citizens who relied on their 401(k)s and pensions for a dignified retirement. While families watch their retirement security vanish, regulators are retreating behind a wall of silence, offering either heavily redacted FOIA responses or denying requests entirely. It is time to uncover the weaponized bureaucracy that is stripping our public servants of their hard-earned futures. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @POTUS @GenFlynn @DOGE @TuckerCarlson @ShawnRyan762 @annvandersteel @LizCrokin @Beardvet @TheRobbCarter @cvpayne @RepEliCrane @elonmusk @SecVetAffairs @SecKennedy @SecScottBessent @SECPaulSAtkins

English
143
583
899
74.6K
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
Vic-μετα. 🦋FutureTechStock🦋
WHY HAVE THEY NOT SPOKEN A WORD AFTER THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS ASKING FOR HELP! IN FACT, THEY ALL KNEW(ALL UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS) WE HAVE REACHOUT TO THEM FOR MORE THAN 3 YEARS.... SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG ABOUT THIS COUNTRY!!
JunkSavvy@JunkSavvy

It wasn't an April Fool's prank. It was the 💣💣💣 no one saw coming... #FOIA 3 years ago today...THEY KNEW!!! #FINRAFraud The FOIA documents reveal extensive communications between senior FINRA officials and their SEC counterparts concerning issues with MMTLP trading. They knew there was a problem for more than a year and FAILED to protect investors. Key findings include: 💥Fourteen months prior to FINRA’s U3 trading halt, three FINRA committees—Market Operations, OTC Corporate Actions Team, and Market Fraud Team—were in active dialogue with SEC representatives re: MMTLP....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 2, 2022, a conversation took place between FINRA’s OTC Corporate Actions Team and an SEC representative regarding the proposed Meta/NBH spin-out transaction.....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 5, 2022, just one day before FINRA issued the first of two corporate actions, Sam Draddy noted that the “MMAT/MMTLP matter” had caught the attention of his Fraud Team and others, mentioning discussions with FINRA’s General Counsel and suspicions of fraud involving the two issuers, with “bluesheeting” already underway. They went forward with the corporate action despite RULE 6490.....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥Draddy, along with Boyle and Gibbons, arranged a Zoom meeting with SEC counterparts to discuss further....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 11, 2022, at 6:38 p.m. on a Sunday, FINRA CEO Robert W. Cook contacted an SEC official regarding a flood of shareholder complaints about the trading halt, some containing alleged threats (no evidence or law enforcement reporting evidence has been provided), prompting him to send his staff to work remotely while offering to brief his contact.....and they still FAIL to protect investors. 💥Concurrently, Stephanie Dumont, FINRA’s Executive Vice President of Market Regulation and Transparency Services, emailed an SEC contact to schedule an urgent meeting the next morning to discuss the MMTLP situation and the recent halt, copying Racquel Russell on the correspondence.....and still FAIL to protect investors. THEY KNEW. And for the first time, we no longer had to speculate...WE KNEW!!! Following this release and the public outcry, sources claim @SECGov held an emergency meeting to stop FOIA releases. The MMTLP Army did not receive another meaninful FOIA for over a year. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING???#Coincidence WE...ARE...NOT...GOIN...AWAY!!! #Relentless TRCH MMAT MMTLP

English
0
15
28
384
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
Smash
Smash@Smash2j20x·
#MMTLP 👊🏼
Hanky and Panky@happypositive0

@SECGov Avoid investing in US markets. The SEC colludes with brokers to defraud retail investors. When caught it deletes data to hide the wrongdoing. Look into MMTLP, SEC's avoiding the publics' questions and pleas for transparency. It HAS NOT improved since @SECPaulSAtkins took over.

QME
1
13
23
277
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
Starboard Bound
Starboard Bound@StarboardBound·
FinraFraud @SECGov @FINRA MMTLP MMAT NBH FBI
kristen shaughnessy@kshaughnessy2

FINRA was told three years ago the $MMTLP community believed regulators were involved in a coverup. @palikaras recalls an early conversation he had with FINRA ombuds Sarah Gill “….The very first thing she asked me was ‘George are you recording this conversation?’ I said no. Then the second question was ‘are you broadcasting live our conversation?’…. I warned her that there is a sense of injustice… and this situation is going to continue to escalate…. … now we have a result that SHOULD SHAKE THE FOUNDATION OF THE MARKETS. I hope that every other CEO out there is listening or has the ability to review what is being posted…. What’s going to hopefully happen from here on in is that the administration should take a very close look at the facts. This is their own words…. …the coverup is bigger than the ‘crime’ ….” @palikaras @bleedblue18 @annvandersteel @JunkSavvy @busybrands

Indonesia
0
30
45
552
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
KKep
KKep@kimkep4796·
⚠️ Not Legal Advice (NLA) ⸻ 🧾 MMAT / MMTLP / NBH Meta Materials Inc. Bankruptcy Case No. 24-50792-gs (D. Nevada) 📅 Filed: Feb 5, 2026 📄 Order on Motion to Disqualify Christian Attar Firm (Doc. 2563) ⸻ ⚖️ Layman’s Breakdown (Straight from the Filing) 👤 Who is Traudt? •Investor who bought MMTLP shares •Tried to act like a “third-party intervenor” 👉 Judge says: ❌ No third-party intervention allowed in the main bankruptcy case ⸻ 🟡 What Standing the Judge Gives Him ✅ Limited Standing — “Party in Interest” ONLY “…may move the court for relief as a party in interest…” 👉 In plain English: •He can: •File motions 📝 •Ask the court for relief 👉 That’s the extent of it. ⸻ ⚠️ Standing is Already in Question “The chapter 7 trustee has argued that Mr. Traudt lacks standing…” 👉 Reason stated in filing: •His shares were converted into NBH, which is not the debtor ⸻ 🔑 Why the Court Still Lets Him Participate “…the chapter 7 trustee has not objected to Mr. Traudt’s proof of interest.” “Absent objection, a proof of interest is considered prima facie valid.” ⸻ ⚖️ Judge’s Position (Based on the Filing) 👉 The court is saying: •Since no formal objection has been filed, •His claimed interest is treated as valid for now 👉 This allows him to: •Continue filing motions •Be heard in the case ⸻ 🎯 Key Takeaway (From the Document Itself) •🟡 Traudt is allowed to participate as a “party in interest” •⚠️ His standing is challenged by the Trustee •⚖️ The court allows it only because no objection has been made yet •❌ He is not recognized as an intervenor ⸻ 🧠 One-Line Summary 👉 He can participate for now — but only as a “party in interest,” and only because no one has formally objected yet.
KKep tweet mediaKKep tweet mediaKKep tweet mediaKKep tweet media
English
11
43
102
4.7K
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
Tx.jayson
Tx.jayson@tx_jayjay·
MMTLP
KKep@kimkep4796

⚠️ Not Legal Advice (NLA) ⸻ 🧾 MMAT / MMTLP / NBH Meta Materials Inc. Bankruptcy Case No. 24-50792-gs (D. Nevada) 📅 Filed: Feb 5, 2026 📄 Order on Motion to Disqualify Christian Attar Firm (Doc. 2563) ⸻ ⚖️ Layman’s Breakdown (Straight from the Filing) 👤 Who is Traudt? •Investor who bought MMTLP shares •Tried to act like a “third-party intervenor” 👉 Judge says: ❌ No third-party intervention allowed in the main bankruptcy case ⸻ 🟡 What Standing the Judge Gives Him ✅ Limited Standing — “Party in Interest” ONLY “…may move the court for relief as a party in interest…” 👉 In plain English: •He can: •File motions 📝 •Ask the court for relief 👉 That’s the extent of it. ⸻ ⚠️ Standing is Already in Question “The chapter 7 trustee has argued that Mr. Traudt lacks standing…” 👉 Reason stated in filing: •His shares were converted into NBH, which is not the debtor ⸻ 🔑 Why the Court Still Lets Him Participate “…the chapter 7 trustee has not objected to Mr. Traudt’s proof of interest.” “Absent objection, a proof of interest is considered prima facie valid.” ⸻ ⚖️ Judge’s Position (Based on the Filing) 👉 The court is saying: •Since no formal objection has been filed, •His claimed interest is treated as valid for now 👉 This allows him to: •Continue filing motions •Be heard in the case ⸻ 🎯 Key Takeaway (From the Document Itself) •🟡 Traudt is allowed to participate as a “party in interest” •⚠️ His standing is challenged by the Trustee •⚖️ The court allows it only because no objection has been made yet •❌ He is not recognized as an intervenor ⸻ 🧠 One-Line Summary 👉 He can participate for now — but only as a “party in interest,” and only because no one has formally objected yet.

HT
0
14
23
362
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
_T1hS_0N_
_T1hS_0N_@Stef_carpedm·
You and your staff are out for no one other than yourselves. ~What's in that file you've got tucked away on your computer, Ralph, title "FINRA?" ~ Oh, and tell Darcy we say hello..."Oh, what good news!" Can't wait to buy her a virtual coffee.
English
1
15
27
398
James Reggles 🇬🇧🇮🇪🇯🇲 أُعيد تغريده
Rare DD
Rare DD@RareDealsHere·
Rare DD@RareDealsHere

New Video 🎥 " $MMTLP: The Red Flags Ignored By The @SECGov". We know the SEC moves slow, but we also know that MMTLP has been on their radar since at least 2021! Is the SEC taking the investigation seriously? Have they noticed the links between @FINRA, Ari Rubenstein & those that attempt to disparage the MMTLP Community? One, two, or even three of these links could've been written off as a coincidence, but 1 by 1, after doing some digging they all appear to lead back to Ari Rubenstein & his companies. Don't believe me? Just watch this short 10 minute video & see for yourself! @FBILosAngeles @FBIWFO @DOJCrimDiv @TheJusticeDept @SecretService @The_DTCC @RepRalphNorman @MikeCrapo @denniskneale @MetaGuyMarduk #MMTLPFiasco

ZXX
1
28
39
546