Beau Seil

523 posts

Beau Seil

Beau Seil

@beauseil

Dubai انضم Mart 2009
408 يتبع531 المتابعون
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
If the U.S. is serious about creating new states, perhaps we should also consider it time to allow Puerto Rico statehood? Thoughts? Seems like low hanging fruit to practice statehood with our territories before we move to bring brand new geographies and peoples into our orbit
English
0
0
2
57
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
I wonder if Trump is using cabinet appointments as a litmus test to see just how “loyal” Republican lawmakers will be…he maintains the ability to withdraw nominations and tell his cabinet appointees “you’re fired” at any time.
English
0
0
0
56
Beau Seil أُعيد تغريده
ian bremmer
ian bremmer@ianbremmer·
feels appropriate that a department of government efficiency would have two heads
English
248
716
6.3K
393.4K
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
@DavidSacks The only way to prevent this is to change the time period between election and inauguration…which has always seemed too long to me. But even with that, some of the policies mentioned were passed early in the spring
English
0
0
0
7
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
@DavidSacks Whether or not we like the policies…to say that it is not democratic send like a stretch to me. They are still duly elected officials acting under their authority during the term for which they validly hold office. No?
English
1
0
0
29
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
Democracy!
David Sacks tweet media
English
85
235
2.6K
107.5K
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
@DavidSacks @the_carlosdp @Benioff @salesforce To avoid all of this, Open AI would have needed to have been originally set up as a for-profit, but that is not why Open AI was actually created. Its original founders and donors were focused on supporting its non-profit goals. The business opportunity only came later on
English
0
0
0
6
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
@DavidSacks @the_carlosdp @Benioff @salesforce Was it (a) a structural problem or (b) an execution problem? I believe it was a execution problem. Maintaining a board with the capabilities, experience, and maturity in handling high-stakes governance should have been a much higher priority for this structure to work well.
English
5
0
0
11
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
If founders want to create a relationship between a for-profit and a non-profit entity, @Benioff showed the way with @salesforce: set up a standard Delaware C-corp with a chunk of stock owned by the foundation. The non-profit benefits from the success of, but doesn’t control, the for-profit company. Allowing a non-profit board, with little or no skin in the game, to control the for-profit entity is a recipe for agendas and unintended consequences.
English
84
91
1.5K
536.3K
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
@DavidSacks @the_carlosdp @Benioff @salesforce But the non-profit could have "sold" its technology to for-profit and then used its proceeds to fund more development of other tools or do policy work on the safe use of AI. But the donors to the non-profit and everyone involved with the non-profit did not want that outcome
English
0
0
0
4
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
@DavidSacks @the_carlosdp @Benioff @salesforce If the non-profit wanted to ensure the safe development of AI technology that would not harm humanity, then the non-profit would have the right to govern how the technology was used by the for-profit entity and could revoke its "license" at any time
English
0
0
0
6
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
@DavidSacks @the_carlosdp @Benioff @salesforce one key factor that differentiates the approach that @benioff took with providing a foundation with significant ownership in @Salesforce. As I understand it, Open AI (non-profit) did the R&D and IP that allowed Open AI (for-profit) to have a business that could attract capital
English
0
0
0
5
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
@levelsio @SafetyWing I was flying from Sao Paulo to Montevideo, Uruguay and had to obtain insurance on the fly….thankful that @SafetyWing made the process simple and provided evidence to airline personnel that my insurance was in place. Would have been a fire drill if I didn’t have SafetyWing 👍🏻
English
0
0
1
473
@levelsio
@levelsio@levelsio·
Anyone have any good experiences with @safetywing I can use for the ad on Remote OK?
English
27
1
28
58.5K
Balaji
Balaji@balajis·
Uncle Sam is the new Sam Bankman-Fried. What just happened? TLDR: Tech ended up bailing out the government, because tech deposits were used to buy billions in government bonds under false pretenses. It's actually very similar to FTX, in that the entity which people trusted with their money was (a) close to the US government and (b) told them it had the money...right until it didn't. HOW SVB HAPPENED 1) First, the state set up fake accounting rules. Those rules allowed banks to tell customers they had money when they did not have money. [1] 2) Next, the Fed suddenly sent interest rates to the sky after years of keeping them near zero, denying inflation was a problem, and/or telling the world inflation was transitory[2]. 3) Finally, banks that bought bonds under the Fed's misleading guidance got rug-pulled. Skyrocketing interest rates meant the government bonds they bought just a few months ago were suddenly far less valuable.[3] So that's why people don't have the money in their SVB accounts. All their capital was used to buy bonds from the government, and the government allows banks to legally lie about this in their accounting. Uncle Sam is the new Sam Bankman-Fried. [1]: wsj.com/articles/bond-… [2]: washingtonpost.com/business/2021/… [3]: x.com/jamiequint/sta…
Balaji tweet mediaBalaji tweet mediaBalaji tweet media
Jamie Quint@jamiequint

An explainer on what is going on with Silicon Valley Bank: - In 2021 SVB saw a mass influx in deposits, which jumped from $61.76bn at the end of 2019 to $189.20bn at the end of 2021. - As deposits grew, SVB could not grow their loan book fast enough to generate the yield they wanted to see on this capital. As a result, they purchased a large amount (over $80bn!) in mortgage backed securities (MBS) with these deposits for their hold-to-maturity (HTM) portfolio. - 97% of these MBS were 10+ year duration, with a weighted average yield of 1.56%. - The issue is that as the Fed raised interest rates in 2022 and continued to do so through 2023, the value of SVB’s MBS plummeted. This is because investors can now purchase long-duration "risk-free" bonds from the Fed at a 2.5x higher yield. - This is not a liquidity issue as long as SVB maintains their deposits, since these securities will pay out more than they cost eventually. - However, yesterday afternoon, SVB announced that they had sold $21bn of their Available For Sale (AFS) securities at a $1.8bn loss, and were raising another $2.25bn in equity and debt. This came as a surprise to investors, who were under the impression that SVB had enough liquidity to avoid selling their AFS portfolio.

English
298
577
2.9K
2M
Dave McClure
Dave McClure@davemcclure·
my inbox literally *full* of emails from both co's + VC funds messaging "we are not with SVB and we are fine" OR "we bank with SVB and are working on the situation"... thousands of CEOs and CFOs working on these emails on a friday... likely many trying to make payroll. 👀🙏🏽🍀
English
9
5
73
17.5K
samir kaji
samir kaji@Samirkaji·
1/Now that the SVB auction is live, know that we believe them to be a very attractive purchase given relationships and core business. I expect that both banks and private capital will bid and there will be a lot of bids
English
13
32
285
199.5K
Beau Seil
Beau Seil@beauseil·
svbDAO launches to support SVB and the innovation economy. such a powerful use for a DAO. Help us spread the word and gather support for SVB. What an incredible effort to get this off the ground today!!!
Chris Georgen@c_georgen

After an inspiring day of community drive and shared purpose, I'm privileged to help announce the launch of @svbDAO! For everyone who believes in what @SVB_Financial does for our startups and innovators, this is for you. svbdao.xyz #rebankstartups

English
0
1
2
276
Beau Seil أُعيد تغريده
ian bremmer
ian bremmer@ianbremmer·
problem: if you’re doing business in china, you can’t comment on today’s hu jintao incident. have to ask yourself how much intellectual honesty is worth.
ian bremmer tweet media
English
500
1.4K
10.3K
0