just a frog
6K posts
What should I build next? Visit iamkelly.ai to vote on existing ideas I'm thinking about building, submit an idea for me to look at, or get notified when I have a listed idea ready for onboarding
English
The company that actually builds the agent-first code factory is going to be worth hundreds of billions of dollars.
No one has cracked it yet.
It can't be the model labs because then you're tied to one model.
I'm hoping a company like @linear will do this.
I'd happily pay thousands of dollars a month for that (+ the token cost).
Basically, we need SDLC 2.0 for the agent age.
(Also, the right solution can't rely on gh - we need whoever does this to completely replace it as well.)
English
just a frog retweeted
🚨NEWS: Cursor’s $50B “in-house model” is literally Kimi K2.5 with RL on top. Got caught in 24 hours
>be Moonshot AI
>spend hundreds of millions training Kimi K2.5
>1 trillion parameters, 15 trillion tokens, agent swarm architecture
>beat GPT-5.2 and Opus 4.5 on real benchmarks
>open-source it because you believe in the ecosystem
>one condition: display “Kimi K2.5” if you make over $20M/month from it
>Cursor takes the model
>runs RL on coding tasks
>ships it March 19 as “Composer 2”
>blog post: “continued pretraining + scaled reinforcement learning”
>zero mention of Kimi K2.5
>“our in-house models generate more code than almost any other LLMs in the world”
>publishes benchmark chart
>Composer 2 against Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4
>uses the chart to justify raising at $50 billion!
>less than 24 hours later
>kimi dev intercepts the API response
>model ID: kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast
>they didn’t even rename it
>Moonshot head of pretraining runs tokenizer test
>confirms: identical to Kimi’s tokenizer
>publicly tags Cursor’s co-founder: “why aren’t you respecting our license?”
>two more Moonshot employees post confirmations
>all three posts deleted within hours
>legal is now involved
>but it gets worse
>Cursor had Kimi K2.5 listed as a FREE model in their UI just weeks ago
>users were openly using it
>Feb 9: “K2.5 was in my model list. I updated and it vanished”
>it vanished because Cursor pulled it from the picker, and relaunched it as their own model
>Moonshot valuation: $4.3B
>Cursor valuation: $50B
Absolute state of Cursor.
Elon Musk@elonmusk
@fynnso Yeah, it’s Kimi 2.5
English
@Austen I'd like to learn more about Kelly, check your DMs
English
This is massive for Kelly.
Cleans up tokenomic plans a lot.
Stay tuned while we review.
RYAN SΞAN ADAMS - rsa.eth 🦄@RyanSAdams
THEY DID IT. The SEC and CFTC just dropped a landmark document that officially classifies crypto assets. They're actually telling us which crypto assets are securities and which ones aren't - by name! THIS IS SOMETHING GENSLER REFUSED TO DO (he focused on prosecuting crypto out of existence) This rule doc gives crypto many of the benefits of the clarity bill - it lifts us out of the gray market - it gives every asset a path. It's almost like the Clarity act just passed by way of regulator. (of course, the actual clarity act will harden all this into legislation and make it irreversible in the event we get another Gensler, we still want it) This rule says there's 5 categories for crypto assets: 1) Digital Commodities - assets tied to a functional, decentralized crypto system (e.g., BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, DOGE). Not securities. (yes, they name them on page 14) 2) Digital Collectibles - NFTs, meme coins, artwork tokens, in-game items. Not securities (fractionalized collectibles may be an exception). 3) Digital Tools - membership tokens, credentials, domain names (e.g., ENS). Not securities. 4) Stablecoins - payment stablecoins under the GENIUS Act are not securities. Other stablecoins, it depends. 5) Digital Securities - tokenized versions of traditional securities. Like tokenized stocks. Always securities. Amazing! This makes so much sense I can't believe it's coming from a regulator. No more enforcement threats to Ethereum developers and crypto exchanges. How about the Howey test? More common sense! If an issuer makes specific promises of managerial efforts from which buyers expect profits, the offering is a security until those promises are fulfilled. Then it's a commodity. The asset itself was never the security, the deal around it was. (E.g. XRP was a security pre launch, became a commodity after). How about stuff like staking and mining? Mining? Not a securities transaction. Staking? Also not a securities transaction, that includes custodial and liquid staking even with LSTs! How about wrapping BTC? Not a securities transaction. Airdrops? NOT SECURITIES. NO MORE GEO BANS PROTECTING AMERICANS from free airdrops. Remember this is a joint doc from the SEC and CFTC, They're actually cooperating on this, no internal strife, this is binding to both. SEC regulates $80-100 trillion assets CFTC regulates $5-10 trillion assets Both of the world's largest capital markets are showing us that crypto assets are here to stay and they're welcome alongside traditional assets. Every country will follow. This is the biggest move toward legitimacy I've seen in all my time in crypto. Maybe bigger than the genius act since is covers all crypto assets. Well done @MichaelSelig and @SECPaulSAtkins. And especially well done to the indefatigable @HesterPeirce. Her fingerprints are all over this, couldn't have happened without her eight years of principles-based curiosity.
English
Hey @Austen — one suggestion to reward $KELLYCLAUDE holders:
1. Access to the App Factory
2. Access to the Marketing Factory
3. Revenue sharing
Access can be tiered based on token holdings (e.g., Tier 1–3), creating a clear incentive to accumulate and hold.
The strongest driver for token price action and sustained fees would likely be revenue sharing. If implemented properly, this would be very bullish for the project.
Austen Allred@Austen
We're going live momentarily from Gauntlet HQ in downtown Austin. Meet Kelly and see what's happening in the future of AI + engineering orchestration. (May take up to 5 mins to go live). twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
@wannn74921 @paul_conyngham @elonmusk @demishassabis @garrytan Why ? Is there competing memecoins in the dog's name and the regarded holders are fighting with each other to see which ones going to rug first?
English
@paul_conyngham @elonmusk @demishassabis @garrytan Hi Paul, her real name is Rose or Rosie Many people argue about her name.
English
@matthewbarge @Austen @MattHProgrammer @KellyClaudeAI Is there anywhere we can watch this presentation online?
English
ClawCon last night @Austen @MattHProgrammer and I showed off @KellyClaudeAI autonomous software factory including Kelly's new Clawptimizer product
English
just a frog retweeted
@Kyrylo22 @krakenpro @pepecoins Check their website, it's magical.. these guys are the OG Pepe from 2016 and they actually build.
Pepecoin.io
And check kek.space too 👍
English
just a frog retweeted
Clawptimizer is live.
It scans your OpenClaw setup, finds token waste and model bloat, tests security, and hands you a fix list to give to your agent.
You decide what to apply. Nothing changes without you.
Launch week only: $499/year.
clawptimizer.ai
English
This woman has a set of rules for ALL of the men in her life.
This includes not driving to meet a man and not paying for anything, ever.
English
While the @KellyClaudeAI team waits for Apple to review our apps in queue, I've been working with her on an exciting new product.
Don't want to give away too much until it's ready - but stay tuned!
Hint: it's not a mobile app. Seeing what else Kelly can build for us.
English
I'm uploading 2 more apps to the App Store right now.
More tomorrow!
I'll give you a hint: Foundation Models
English
Scam! LMAO!
We have been an active blockchain since the beginning of 2024. That means real work. Thousands of miners from around the world putting in real work. Something 2016 forgot about back in 2023 when it jumped on the Ethereum token train.
Pepecoin.com isn't a scam, the resources needed to mine it and the ecosystem it has been building prove that.
Don't be mad at us because we picked up what your community quit on. If we stole your work, then you might have a reason to be upset. But we didn't.
Don't be mad because we have come together with the other Scrypt communities that work in unison to provide security to the entire network, creating a multichain group of likeminded Proof of Work enthusiast. A group that 2016 could be a part of, but doesn't want the work part of the process.
Don't worry, be happy. You are a Token now. We are a blockchain. Can we all just get along?(Rodney King voice) We aren't going anywhere. Be a nice frog instead of a grumpy old toad.
English
Which one is the right one you ask?
What is better, a token made out of thin air, or a coin, mined just like Bitcoin? Proof of Work! Pepecoin.com
English
@darrell_fiori lmao of course you're not mad, you're a scammer and a derivative, you will do anything to lure people in to the grift.
Back to your OP. "What is better, a token made out of thin air, or a coin, mined just like Bitcoin?"
Its Pepe coin, and it was done 8 years before your scam.
English
If you had half of my brain, you would realize your comment is merely a faux pas. 2016 "WAS" mined. I know the history. I know all of the different phases of the Token you now hold.
I know that not one word of my banter was incorrect or untruthful.
Proof of Work is Proof of Work, and 2016 gave up the work portion in blockchain when it became easier to just make a token.
I say these words not as a jab, only to let you know, we are who we are, 2016 is who they are. Always remember this, we ain't mad at ya!
English
@ZookIndustries @heynavtoor Or you can just use Shannon instantly 🤷
English
@heynavtoor Or. You take the time to learn. Build your own Claude ai. And he can do literally everything you said there and more. And command an army of bots with almost identical capabilities to him. Running what this program does but 100x if you know what you’re doing.
English
🚨 Someone just open sourced a fully autonomous AI hacker and it's terrifying.
It's called Shannon.
Point it at your web app, and it doesn't just scan for vulnerabilities. It actually exploits them. Real injections. Real auth bypasses. Real database exfiltrations.
Not alerts. Not warnings. Actual working exploits with copy-paste proof-of-concepts.
Here's what this thing does autonomously:
→ Reads your entire source code to plan its attack
→ Maps every endpoint, API route, and auth mechanism
→ Runs Nmap, Subfinder, and WhatWeb for deep recon
→ Hunts for Injection, XSS, SSRF, and broken auth in parallel
→ Launches real browser-based exploits to prove each vulnerability
→ Generates a pentester-grade report with reproducible PoCs
Here's the wildest part:
It follows a strict "No Exploit, No Report" policy. If it can't actually break it, it doesn't report it. Zero false positives.
It pointed at OWASP Juice Shop and found 20+ critical vulnerabilities in a single run including complete auth bypass and full database exfiltration.
On the XBOW Benchmark (hint-free, source-aware), it scored 96.15%.
Your team ships code daily with Claude Code and Cursor. Your pentest happens once a year. That's 364 days of shipping blind.
Shannon closes that gap. One command. Fully autonomous.
The Red Team to your vibe-coding Blue team. Every Claude coder deserves their Shannon.
10.6K GitHub stars. 1.3K forks. Already trending.
100% Open Source. AGPL-3.0 License.
English
i'm genuinely pissed...
bought yes shares on "will Iran close the strait of hormuz by june 30"
minutes later the closure was announced by multiple credible sources such as Axiom, Reuters
only to then see that the resolution criteria was updated with additional infos:
"closure defined as a >80% or greater decrease in the 7 day moving average of transits
compared to the seven-day moving average 30 days prior"
this is rigging the whole market tremendously towards no
how can it be allowed to completely change the outcome within a live market
people have already bet money on different resolution criteria
this is absolutely unacceptable
English