LMT ⚡️

13.7K posts

LMT ⚡️ banner
LMT ⚡️

LMT ⚡️

@Limitless_LT

Ai | Robotics | Tech Investor | Animal Welfare | Truth Seeker | 🇨🇦

Canada 가입일 Şubat 2011
1.4K 팔로잉1.2K 팔로워
고정된 트윗
LMT ⚡️
LMT ⚡️@Limitless_LT·
@TomiLahren Yeah, the U.S. is exceptional at productizing everything. Even your prison system:
LMT ⚡️ tweet media
English
36
58
657
38.5K
Dr. Sally Sharif
Dr. Sally Sharif@Sally_Sharif1·
I became a Canadian citizen! I was born in an authoritarian regime. This is the first time I can vote in democratic elections. What an honor! ❤️ I believe democracy is the zenith of our achievements as humans. Not electricity, not the automobile, not the Internet. A planet of smart apes could have invented those. But we created democracy and peaceful existence that precludes war and violence. I have only one goal as a new citizen: to uphold democratic values (and pay taxes 😏).
Dr. Sally Sharif tweet media
English
924
287
3.5K
134K
LMT ⚡️
LMT ⚡️@Limitless_LT·
Fun one for anyone wanting to learn, start here... Get some wireless sensors (i.e. YoLink Lorawan), and some Philips Hue lighting, and use Ai to automate (i.e. when I open door, turn light on). Use Claude Cowork, as it works straight out of the box with a Pro Sub. (OpenClaw is great too, but you'll get mired in complicated problems that require a lot of SW developer knowledge)
English
0
0
0
8
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
If AI can now solve math, discover physics and chemistry breakthroughs faster than human PhDs, why are we still training humans to be physicists? Serious question. Should education shift from 'learn to do X' to 'learn to direct AI doing X'? The wrong direction costs a generation their careers.
English
826
126
1.2K
391.9K
LMT ⚡️
LMT ⚡️@Limitless_LT·
@valdombre Yes, this really pisses me off. All these Corps complaining incessantly are just trying to drive down the cost of labour. Period.
English
1
0
6
214
Riley Donovan
Riley Donovan@valdombre·
Young Canadians wait in massive three-hour lineup for a job fair in Calgary as youth unemployment hits 14.1%. Yet the business lobby tells us they need cheap foreign labour because of "labour shortages".
English
69
387
1.3K
21.4K
LMT ⚡️
LMT ⚡️@Limitless_LT·
@k1rallik Great post. Now how do we implement this with local inference?
English
0
0
0
350
The Real Mr Bench
The Real Mr Bench@therealmrbench·
Why did Mark Carney fly to Boston, Massachusetts today? Nothing on his schedule saying he would leave Canada and enter the USA.
English
779
518
1.6K
431.7K
LMT ⚡️
LMT ⚡️@Limitless_LT·
@trq212 Please add a simple clock which shows token multiplier depending on time of day. This would make it much easier for everyone, especially considering time zones.
English
0
0
0
174
Thariq
Thariq@trq212·
Overall weekly limits stay the same, just how they're distributed across the week is changing. I know this was frustrating. We’re continuing to invest in scaling efficiently. I'll keep you posted on progress.
English
148
12
919
350.8K
Thariq
Thariq@trq212·
To manage growing demand for Claude we're adjusting our 5 hour session limits for free/Pro/Max subs during peak hours. Your weekly limits remain unchanged. During weekdays between 5am–11am PT / 1pm–7pm GMT, you'll move through your 5-hour session limits faster than before.
English
2.1K
483
7.1K
7M
Justin Wolfers
Justin Wolfers@JustinWolfers·
Federal worker job satisfaction: 69% → 33% in one year.⁣ Willingness to recommend their workplace: 67% → 35%.⁣ ⁣ "What we're seeing here is not a wobble or a rough patch or growing pains. It's a collapse."
English
30
372
1.5K
43.2K
LMT ⚡️
LMT ⚡️@Limitless_LT·
@AlexFinn @richiemcilroy Gotta say man, Anthropics new tools are excellent. My OpenClaw got corrupted and i spent 8 hours trying to fix it, to no avail. It’s cool, but still a science project.
English
0
0
1
195
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
@richiemcilroy the most popular open source tool ever made that's still in a exponential trajectory? yes I remember
English
13
0
160
13.1K
Dr Danish
Dr Danish@operationdanish·
Who can reply to this?
English
79
0
58
9.4K
Juanderful
Juanderful@Juan23456·
@RepNancyMace Freeing the Persian people and having a Westernized Iran can play a huge role in securing stability in the middle east and stabilizing the US economy. That's a highly educated population that has essentially been jailed by the regime. The potential is endless.
English
502
61
1.5K
252.6K
Rep. Nancy Mace
Rep. Nancy Mace@RepNancyMace·
Just walked out of a House Armed Services briefing on Iran. Let me repeat: I will not support troops on the ground in Iran, even more so after this briefing.
English
6K
13.4K
84.1K
7.4M
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA
Mark, you are getting close to understanding why single payer cannot work. But I fundamentally disagree with the idea that we could ever just "know" costs well enough to make it work. Hayek was right about this. The relevant knowledge is too dispersed, too local, and too dynamic to ever be gathered and priced correctly by central planners. Take basketball. Imagine single payer basketball. The government is the only purchaser of basketball entertainment in all its forms. Fans are not allowed to just buy a ticket to the Mavs game. Instead, a central office decides who gets to attend and hands out tickets based on "need." The central planners also handle the TV deals, merchandising, concessions, and every other revenue stream. Everything goes through the government, with no out of pocket cost to any consumer. Now teams no longer compete for fans on price, experience, convenience, or innovation. They submit cost reports to Washington explaining what it allegedly costs to run a game. But here is the problem. If there is no market price for tickets, media rights, parking, merchandise, or concessions, how exactly do you decide what the game is worth? How do you decide what players should be paid? How do you know whether a courtside seat is underpriced, overpriced, or priced just right? You do not. You are guessing. So bureaucrats step in and decide the approved reimbursement for a regular season game, a playoff game, courtside access, halftime entertainment, parking, and concessions. What happens next? If the approved rates are too low, teams do not magically become leaner and more innovative. They cut where fans can feel it. Fewer games. Worse arenas. Less staff. Delayed upgrades. Lower quality. Longer waits. Less access. Maybe smaller market teams shut down altogether. If the approved rates are too high, you do not get efficiency either. You get lobbying. Every team hires consultants to prove that its fan base is poorer, sicker, more rural, more complex, or otherwise deserving of special payment adjustments. Soon the league is no longer about basketball. It is about coding, compliance, modifiers, subsidies, carveouts, and political influence. Teams make money not by pleasing fans, but by persuading Washington that their costs are uniquely deserving of reimbursement. And once government is the only buyer, there is no real price discovery left. There is only political bargaining disguised as pricing. The Knicks get one deal. Rural teams get another. Old arenas get subsidies. Favored constituencies get carveouts. Every interest group insists that without one more special adjustment the whole sport will collapse. Fans are told this is fair because nobody has to pay at the gate. But of course they still pay. They pay through taxes. They pay through rationing. They pay through fewer choices. They pay in lower quality. They pay by being told which arena they can use, which game they qualify for, and how long they have to wait. That is the key point. Knowing the accounting cost of hosting a basketball game does not tell you the right price of a ticket. Price is not cost. Price emerges from supply, demand, scarcity, quality, preference, and competition. A central planner can know what it "costs" to turn on the lights, pay security, and clean the arena. That still tells him nothing about what a seat is worth to fans, what kind of experience teams should offer, which franchises are efficient, or where new arenas should be built. Healthcare is even less suited to central planning than basketball. It is more heterogeneous, more personal, more local, and far more dependent on dispersed knowledge. The fantasy is always the same: if only the people at the top had better data, they could set the right prices. No, they could not. They would still be guessing, just with nicer spreadsheets.
Mark Cuban@mcuban

Single payer COULD cut cost and improve care but there are 2 fundamental issues. 1. All plans proposed have placed the Sec of HHS in charge of the program. You can't have a political appointee in that position and it's hard to de-politiicize HC in this country 2. They assume that they can get providers and specialists to accept whatever rates they set. You are talking about organizations that in most cases, don't even know their costs. Why ? They don't want to know their costs. For lots of reasons to long to dig into here Proponents of M4A have to first get hospitals to the point where they can define all their costs and do a Bill of Materials for procedures. You can't negotiate a price for all Americans if you don't know what your costs are It's Shark Tank 101. So we get a stalemate. Politicians don't do the work needed. Hospitals and providers avoid the work needed Other countries started on their path to universal care decades and decades ago. When healthcare was much simpler technically and fiscally. If senators won't support the Break Up Big Medicine Bill or anything comparable , there is no chance of getting to single payer. Our politicians don't have the backbone to do what is needed. You can call out all but Hawley and warren. No one else has uttered a syllable in support

English
63
22
220
101.5K
David Shapiro (L/0)
David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi·
You know how when Windows XP first came out, the minimum spec was 64MB of RAM and how that seems insane today? Today's AI are like Windows XP running on minimum spec compared to where they'll be in 10, 20, or even 30 years. Just imagine. Your watch will be smarter than the top 100 humans on the planet.
English
13
6
127
6.1K
Ran Neuner
Ran Neuner@cryptomanran·
After 12 years in this market, this was the first time I seriously questioned whether it still made sense to stay. Nothing has been working. No real narratives. No money is being made. And everywhere I look, the message is the same: move to AI. But when I actually started digging into AI, I realized something most people are missing. AI doesn’t replace crypto; it actually depends on it. Because the world we’re moving into isn’t humans transacting with apps… It’s AI agents transacting with each other, 24/7, at a scale we’ve never seen before. And that creates a completely new problem. How do you process millions of tiny payments between machines, across borders, instantly, with no trust between parties? The current financial system simply can’t handle that. The fees are too high, the rails are too slow, and the system was never designed for this kind of activity. But crypto was. So the way I see it, we’re not early to AI. We’re early to the infrastructure that powers it. That’s the real opportunity, and the reason I’m not leaving. I break down the full thesis and how I’m positioning in today’s video. [link in comments]
English
159
35
435
95.4K
LMT ⚡️
LMT ⚡️@Limitless_LT·
@TXMCtrades Eventually the truth will come out. Agree completely.
English
0
0
0
23
LMT ⚡️
LMT ⚡️@Limitless_LT·
@yacineMTB 100% a psyop. American Oligarchs control all our media.
Français
0
0
1
143
LMT ⚡️
LMT ⚡️@Limitless_LT·
@MaMoMVPY What’s the difference? Intelligence is prediction.
English
0
0
0
6