Annanes Bob

@Colonthreee @zeeg @makisuo That's great, I also did some of those 30 minute tutorials. Telling people they got lucky with money is rude and saying AI bad because it's random is shallow.

@AnnanesB @zeeg @makisuo I've worked with CV and NLP for a decade, even written applications to run natively on phones and other low-end devices in 2016-2017. Last year I did "text-to-transaction" for fintech using NLP. I currently got funded to do physics-based ML, because we need transparency.

if you want to come work on things like this i have open recs at Sentry $350k to $1m TC you need to have a proven track record, ample public work, be highly autonomous, 5+ years industry experience, and be based in SF or willing to relocate. if your github profile cant compare to mine, its probably not the right fit DM your credentials (or email to david at sentry)

@zeeg @Colonthreee @makisuo he's saying AI bad, but in a I'm-smarter-than-you and jealous-of-your-success type of way

@Colonthreee @makisuo i certainly didnt get lucky with comprehension as i have no idea what you just said

@meenverkarahan genelde özel muhamele bekleyen müşteri zaten normalden daha kaprisli ve memnun etmesi zor oluyor. doğru karar vermişler.

Bir satın alım yapacağız. Alım yaptığımız şirkete aylık yaklaşık 400.000 TL ödeme çıkacak. Karşı şirkette muhattap olduğum çalışanlarıda bu rakamları biliyor bu arada. Şirketin satış departmanından aradılar, Bugün veya yarın toplantı yapabilir miyiz?” dediler. Ben de dedim ki bu hafta programım çok yoğun arkadaşlar bugün veya yarın saat 5 gibi görüşebiliriz onun dışında saat geçte olsa uyum sağlarım dedim. Telefondaki şirketin satış sorumlusu bana ne dedi biliyor musunuz? 😄 “Biz maalesef Enver bey saat 5’e kadar çalışıyoruz.” Bende size kolay gelsin o zaman dedim.. Ah abi ah…

@dhh your dominant eye gravitates towards the left or the right, and culturally you're trained to read from top left. bottom bar for less important OS menus and non-dominant side for less important App menus is most optimal.

Maybe Windows was right about bottom bar?

@GergelyOrosz The devs literally had all of those best practices: plan mode, token with restricted access, extra system prompts. You haven't read the article.

Slow is fast - fast is slow. The whole industry will re-learn this with AI agents. It felt fast for this company to let an AI agent access all systems and build stuff (fast). Now, it turned into disastrously slow, when it wrecked it all. x.com/poiThePoi/stat…

Sucks for an AI agent to delete the prod DB - with no way to back it up - and risk the complete rental business. But the blame sits with the dev who decided to delegate decision making to the AI agent, and then not review actions, just YOLO it. Time for a blameful postmortem...

@mitchellh It's every day this week. Wasted dev time cost is probably in the millions in 2026 alone. I don't have the same connection you do to GitHub so I don't feel the need to mince words. GitHub is past the line of minimum reliability tolerations for any serious organization.

Ghostty is leaving GitHub. I'm GitHub user 1299, joined Feb 2008. I've visited GitHub almost every single day for over 18 years. It's never been a question for me where I'd put my projects: always GitHub. I'm super sad to say this, but its time to go. mitchellh.com/writing/ghostt…

@PalmerLuckey @SarkaryShahvir this is really the only justification for human robots, but I'd hazard a guess to say the applications are less than a dozen. my guess is we'll see something more streamlined than the boston dynamics dog, not less.

@SarkaryShahvir Because the humanoid robot can amortize cost of batteries+actuators+sensors+compute across dozens of appliances and use cases rather than duplicating it for each one. It is the same reason humanoids will be a big deal as an autonomous interface to legacy weapons platforms.

I don’t understand why no one is building dishwashers and laundry machines from scratch instead of building humanoids that operate those machines

@TimSweeneyEpic wow people don't know how to read. tough outlook.

The surest way to spot a monopoly? A company makes vast profits from vast markups, does a bad job, is hated by suppliers, and has no competition. Let Steam bring their store to iOS. Let Epic bring our store to iOS. Let the best store win!

@GkhnOzker @akincnr @Trendyol konuyu saptirmakla ugrasmana gerek yok. inandiklarina inanmaya devam edebilirsin, seni egitmekle ugrasasim yok. zaten yanlis bisey soylemedin, yanlis cikarimlar yaptin. doa raporundan sonraki iade kararini yerine getirmeyen bi sirketle karsilasmamissin, insallah karsilasmazsin.

Sen bence bi okuduğunu anla sonra gel tekrar konuşalım olur mu.? Yanlışsa dogrusunu kanun maddelerinden çıkar önüme koy. Ama eksiksiz.. 18. Madde yi gelip yazma hangi durumlarda geçersiz onu da yaz.. Trendyolda satıcı olmak icin LTD olmana gerek yok sahıs şirketi de olman yeterli.. Ayrıca kapatıp gitse de sirket sahibinin sorumluluğu bitmez. Geri kalan kısımdan da bahsettin ama anlamamakta zorlanıyorsun neyse..

Trendyoldan bir ürün aldık. Ürün (bozuk) ayıplı geldi. Ürünü iade etmek istedik. Kutuyu açıp denedik diye iademizi yapamayacaklarını ilettiler. Tüketici hakem heyetine gittik. Karar ürün bedelinin tarafımıza iadesi oldu. Kararı @Trendyol ilettik. Bize dönüşleri ektedir. Yorumsuz

@GkhnOzker @akincnr @Trendyol magdur'un avukat tutup kendisinin bulmasi, icra takibi baslatmasi gerekiyor. masrafi da o sirada kendisi yukleniyor. Bulursa daha istinaf hakki var. zaten burda sitem edilen olay bu, trendyol'un sorumluluk almamasi. Sen de gelmissin yasalar hakkinda yanlis bilgi veriyorsun

@GkhnOzker @akincnr @Trendyol verilen karara savunma mi olur? istinafa gitseydi soylerdi zaten. trendyol satici olmak icin ltd sahibi olmak yeterli. ondan bozuk urun sattiktan sonra sirketi kapatirlarsa veya email'a cevap vermezlerse trendyol'un onlara ulasmak icin bi yolu yok.

@GkhnOzker @akincnr @Trendyol kazanilmis davayi yargictan avukattan daha iyi biliyor verilen karari reddediyor masallah. purchasing manager tuketici haklariyla ilk defa tanisiyor.

Teknolojik ürünlerde, Kutu açıldığında ürün bozuk çıkarsa servise gönderilip doa raporu alınır. Doa raporu alındıktan sonra ürün yenisi ile değiştirilir yada iadesi sağlanabilirdi.. Normal de kurumsal da süreç böyle ilerliyor.. Size bu şekilde yönlendirebilirlerdi. İlgilenmek istemediler herhalde..

@notch @BOENSAW you think the gpu and the cpu compute the same?

@BOENSAW Are you telling me there are two types of computing? I will now laugh at you. Imbecile.

it uses a different part of the GPU specifically for framegen (tensor cores) so it can work in sync, and even if that wasn't the case, it's faster to generate a fake frame than a real one. I'm not sure why notch is playing dumb here

@Alientrap maybe make sure the cubes are standing up straight and aligned with the grid so the shift isn't so jarring? awesome work

Tried out a voxel physics idea where it breaks into individual cube bodies, then adds back to the voxel grid after

@EylonALevy you are the one who can not understand the implication of your own words. you are evil, retarded, or both.

Herr Dinkelberg is not only an antisemite making excuses for the Iranian regime’s ballistic missile attacks on Israeli cities, he is also an illiterate who struggles with logical inference but excels at strawmen and libels.

@leerob kind of sad to see that the result of all of this research was a sidebar and a chat interface again. will we ever get real innovation in this space?

Meet the new Cursor! Very excited about this. Wanted to share a bit more of the story of how we landed here, how the product evolved, and some of the technical details on the new interface. I've been coding primarily with agents since Opus 4.5, but hadn't found an interface I loved (including our own). Agent sidebars or CLIs worked but still felt limiting to me. And our first iteration of the "agent window" wasn't good enough yet. So we went back to the drawing board to build a completely new interface for agents in December. The trend seemed pretty clear that increasingly less time would be spent in traditional IDEs. But as we started to dogfood early versions, it was very hard to give up some parts of an editor. Even if agents write 98% of the code, that last 2% of viewing files, debugging, many small edits and refactors, and having all the niceties like go to definition, LSPs, and more were really important. We couldn't remove those. So @ryolu_ and I started prototyping some ideas late Dec for a new interface. It would start simple/zen, but then allow you to still go deeper as needed. And slowly we developed enough conviction to make it real. The Cursor eng/product team then took some of those early ideas and made something 10x better than I imagined. Seriously major kudos to the team! We started fresh with this new UI in a lot of ways. "Deleting the product" is especially important as models continue to improve and the UX needs to be continually rethought. However that doesn't mean you have to throw out *all* the good ideas. Making it easy for existing users to adapt is also very important. In this new interface, we own all the pixels. We were able to design a system/architecture that takes all the learnings from Cursor 1/2 and moves away from some of the VS Code constraints we were limited by. I definitely empathize with feedback that in Cursor 2 we were moving around the UI too much and changing icons/buttons. Agents were taking over more and more work, and they started to break out of the IDE UI. We needed to iterate and try a bunch of things, and that was annoying for those of you expecting a more consistent editor experience. Making this new agent interface as a separate window actually also makes the Cursor 2.0 IDE *better*! Rather than continuing to try and extend the IDE to have agents own the entire UI, we were able to simplify and delete a lot of code by using existing VS Code patterns. Namely, agent chats are now just normal tabs like any other file. This is much more stable and familiar for doing splits/panes and all related keyboard shortcuts. A win-win-win, as they say. But also in this architecture refactor, we were able to address some local vs. cloud divergence and tech debt that had accumulated over time. The core Cursor agent harness is the same across the desktop app, web app, CLI, etc. So there really shouldn't be two code paths like: if (local) { ... } else if (cloud) { ... } Cloud agents were not used much until we gave them the ability to use a computer and record demos of their work, so now that usage has grown considerably in the past few months, it was even more important to nail this abstraction. We think cloud usage will continue to grow and be a big part of 2026. Finally (this is already a long post, oops), we have been able to really focus on performance in the new interface. I'm sure there will still be things to improve (please send them to us) but we've spent considerably more time profiling, investigating, and patching memory/cpu leaks. We are also now using the React Compiler! s/o @poteto who has also been making a bunch of perf improvements. The end result here is that Cursor 3 feels much more pleasant to use. Faster, more reliable, less UI jank. You get to use all your favorite models, local or cloud, run automations, install plugins, get back demo videos, and more. Give it a try and lmk your feedback! We're gonna be shipping updates quickly in the coming days.

@sdamico when I was there I didn't meet a single normal human being. at least for the computer science curriculum, i don't think it's possible to ask a hard enough question where a student admitted to stanford will receive anything less than an A-, no matter how advanced the subject is.

Talked to someone who graduated Stanford last year — 1. said that grade inflation was so out of control that much of the class has a 3.9+ because professors just hand out A+’s now. 2. said they made majors like chemE dramatically easier by removing required “hard” classes

@marchr I honestly hate every change you've done to the start menu. just let me get rid of everything and keep the pinned apps.

I'm really excited for the work we're doing on Windows to improve the quality and craft of the OS. I work on the Windows design system & core surfaces (like taskbar, start, & settings). If there's something you'd like to see improved in the design of Windows, let me know!

@coopersmany @ta22824232 @gundemio eger 30,000 TLye adam alirsan, o adam bi migros kasiyerinin gosterdigi ozenden fazla ozen neden gostersin? asgari ucretle arge yaptiricagina yaptirma daha iyi. o paraya goz yuman insanlarin kalibresi yerlerde olacak tabi ki.

@ta22824232 @gundemio Sizin de belirttiğiniz gibi dandirik önemsiz bir departman personeline bile asgari ücretin üzerinde bir rakam söylenmiş, tam olarak bu dandirik iş için sizin beklentiniz nedir ?

Bir insan kaynakları uzmanı, mülakat yaptığı adayı neden elediğini açıkladı. "Siz bize her ay 20 bin TL ödeseniz aslında kendinize yatırım yapmış olmaz mısınız?' diye sordum. Aday 'ben buraya para kazanmaya geldim' dedi. Mülakatı bitirdim."

@dhh tops the charts for the cringiest thing I've seen this month

Europe could rediscover an appreciation of its roots and join the pantheon of heroes any day it would like.