App Oracle

@UziCryptoo It’s not about people or jobs. They do whatever it takes to increase the share price. Its

Musk, worth $470 billion, plans to become a trillionaire by replacing workers with robots. Bezos, worth $256 billion, plans to replace 600,000 jobs with robots. Zuckerberg, worth $216 billion, laid off 17,000 workers. Billionaires aren't job creators. They're job destroyers.

@globestreets441 @Solana_Emperor Kols get paid to shill and swap all coins to fiat. They aint trading.

@Solana_Emperor Is this an illustration of your path?

Life of a crypto trader

@cryptorover Trump smoking a cigar while teeing up at golf “Hey, you losers want to make some real money..?”

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Someone is front-running this war. At 3:40 AM, a $920 million short hit crude oil. Seventy minutes later, Axios broke that the US and Iran were closing in on a deal. Oil dropped 12%. That single trade: $125 million in profit. Minutes after that, Iran announced the "Persian Gulf Strait Authority." Oil ripped 8% the other way. This isn't the first time. $760 million was positioned right before Trump's last announcement. $920 million before this one. Every major move in this conflict has been front-run by someone who knew the headline before it broke.

@DavidChoiMusic @brivael I lost all my cards, I'm not max happy

@brivael Your playground analogy doesn’t take into consideration if a child is handicapped, or if they kids are taught to be bullies, or if one of the kids is actually the size of an adult.

Elon Musk avait dit un truc qui m'avait marqué sur l'allocation de ressources. En substance : passé un certain niveau de richesse, l'argent n'est plus de la consommation, c'est de l'allocation de capital. Cette phrase change tout. L'économie, dans le fond, c'est juste un problème d'allocation. Tu as des ressources finies et des usages infinis. Qui décide où va quoi ? Imagine une cour de récré. 100 enfants, des paquets de cartes Pokémon distribués au hasard. Tu laisses faire. Très vite, un ordre émerge. Les bons joueurs accumulent les cartes rares, les collectionneurs trient, les négociateurs trouvent des deals. Personne n'a planifié. Et pourtant chaque carte finit dans les mains de celui qui en tire le plus de valeur. Le système maximise le bonheur total de la cour. C'est ça, la main invisible. Maintenant fais entrer la maîtresse. Elle trouve ça injuste. Léo a 50 cartes, Tom en a 3. Elle confisque, redistribue, impose l'égalité. Trois effets immédiats. Les bons joueurs arrêtent de jouer, à quoi bon. Les mauvais n'ont plus de raison de progresser, ils auront leur part. Les échanges s'effondrent. La cour est égale, et morte. Elle a maximisé l'égalité, elle a détruit le bonheur. Le problème de la maîtresse, c'est qu'elle ne peut pas avoir l'information que la cour avait collectivement. C'est le problème du calcul économique de Mises, formulé en 1920. L'URSS a essayé de le résoudre pendant 70 ans avec le Gosplan. Résultat : pénuries, queues, effondrement. Pas parce que les Soviétiques étaient bêtes, parce que le problème est mathématiquement insoluble en mode centralisé. Quand Musk a 200 milliards, il ne les consomme pas, il les alloue. SpaceX, Starlink, Neuralink, xAI. Chaque dollar est un pari sur le futur. Et lui a un track record. PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX. Il a démontré qu'il sait identifier des problèmes immenses et y allouer des ressources avec un rendement spectaculaire. L'État aussi a un track record. Hôpitaux qui s'effondrent, éducation qui décline, dette qui explose, services publics qui se dégradent malgré des budgets en hausse constante. Le marché identifie les bons allocateurs, la politique identifie les bons communicants. Le profit n'est pas une finalité, c'est un signal. Il dit : tu as alloué des ressources rares vers un usage que les gens valorisent suffisamment pour payer. Plus le profit est gros, plus la création de valeur est grande. Quand Starlink est rentable, ça veut dire que des millions de gens dans des zones rurales ont enfin internet. Quand un ministère est en déficit, ça veut dire qu'il consomme plus qu'il ne produit. L'un crée, l'autre détruit, et on appelle ça redistribution. Dans nos sociétés il y a deux catégories d'acteurs. Les entrepreneurs et les bureaucrates. L'entrepreneur prend un risque personnel pour identifier un problème, mobiliser des ressources, créer une solution. S'il se trompe il perd. S'il a raison, ses clients gagnent, ses employés gagnent, ses fournisseurs gagnent, l'État collecte des impôts. Il est la cellule de base du progrès humain. Le bureaucrate ne prend aucun risque personnel. Son salaire est garanti. Au mieux il maintient une rente existante. Au pire il la détruit par excès de réglementation, mauvaise allocation forcée, incitations perverses qui découragent ceux qui produisent. Mais dans aucun cas il ne crée. Regarde les 50 dernières années. iPhone, internet civil, SpaceX, Tesla, Google, Amazon, Stripe, mRNA, ChatGPT. Toutes des inventions privées, portées par des entrepreneurs, financées par du capital risque. Pas un seul ministère n'a inventé quoi que ce soit qui ait changé ta vie au quotidien. La France est devenue le laboratoire mondial de la dérive bureaucratique. 57% du PIB en dépenses publiques, record absolu. Une administration tentaculaire, une fiscalité qui pénalise la création de richesse. Résultat : décrochage face aux États-Unis, à l'Allemagne, à la Suisse. Fuite des cerveaux. Désindustrialisation. Dette qui explose. Et le pire c'est que la mauvaise allocation s'auto-renforce. Plus l'État prélève, moins les entrepreneurs créent. Moins ils créent, moins il y a de base fiscale. Plus l'État s'endette et taxe. Boucle de rétroaction négative parfaite. La maîtresse pense qu'elle aide, et chaque année la cour produit moins. Dans nos sociétés, ce sont les entrepreneurs, toujours, qui font avancer la civilisation. Les bureaucrates au mieux maintiennent une rente, au pire la détruisent. Aucune société n'a jamais progressé en taxant ses créateurs pour subventionner ses gestionnaires. La question n'est jamais qui a combien. C'est qui alloue le mieux la prochaine unité de ressource pour maximiser le futur de l'humanité. La réponse depuis 200 ans n'a jamais changé. Ce ne sont pas les fonctionnaires.

@coinexcom @natgmi @TheBlockRunner Who’s the real buyer here beyond short-term speculators? Is there a clear path to utility, or is this just a Bitcoin miner meme? 0x7F3bE04b06337921F81B41bE48D5123B1b188A50

NAT season hits X Spaces 🌊 @natgmi @TheBlockRunner We’ll talk about miner incentives after the halving, Bitcoin’s long‑term security budget, and how BTC‑native $NAT ties into block production and fees. Drop your best $NAT questions to win 200 USDT! Join us today at 12:00 PM UTC🔗 x.com/i/spaces/1qGoN…

@betty_nft Count me in

Hello fellow Australians in crypto. There is a group chat. If you want to be in it, let me know. I’m going to bed and Il add you tomorrow. ✌️

@iotbtc @DMTnoob @iman_blockrun @Smikiovos1 @blockamoto @TheBlockRunner You did really well until you said it was retarded af, that's a buy signal for many. NAT needs good old fashioned utility to succeed.

sure at current mining difficulty the NAT block subsidy is about 386k $NAT. current NAT mcap = $97m = 0.0000002508 per NAT 386,000 x 0.0000002508 = $97 per block current bitcoin subsidy = 3.125 BTC 3.125 x 76,000 = $237,500 which means the current NAT subsidy is < 0.05% of miner revenue ( extremely insignificant at the financial scale bitcoin miners operate ) lets say the NAT market cap did another 100x to become $10 billion dollar token, which would put it in the crypto top 10 at that point the NAT subsidy per block = about $10k, still only about 4% of total miner revenue. significant, but not enough to fundamentally improve the economic dynamics of the network CONSIDER : - NAT supply constantly expands with every block, forever = constant, never-ending dilution - for miners to actually make use of the subsidy requires them to SELL the tokens for dollars to spend. the subsidy doesn't help miners at all unless they sell. this exerts a constant selling pressure on the market - for the NAT market cap to REMAIN at $10 billion would require an equal amount of constant buying pressure to absorb ongoing miner selling REALITY : speculators don't buy crypto tokens on a recurring basis out of altruism, to lose money "helping the network". they buy them for only 1 reason = to flip for a profit QUESTION : where is the perpetual buying pressure to absorb miner selling going to come from ? from the generosity of people who wish to donate their money to help miners by buying NAT from them ? what happens to the market cap / subsidy when the bear market arrives and everybody is selling instead of buying ? who will buy the tokens every day regardless what the market is doing ? the NAT narrative = "buy this token to help miners!" except that isn't why people buy tokens. that certainly isn't why YOU or anybody else bought NAT. you bought it to sell at a higher price, for profit so basically the entire premise is conceptually and mathematically nonsensical but you know who it does benefit regardless ? will & iman. who surely own most of the supply and are the primary suppliers ( sellers ) of NAT, who have presumably arranged with market makers to wash trade / pump the price on extremely thin liquidity to create fomo they and the market makers can sell into. whenever you buy NAT there's a good chance you're buying from them. and they will keep the money whether NAT ever makes a meaningful impact on miner revenues or not ( it won't ). i highly doubt they believe the narrative they're peddling themselves, because they're experienced enough to know shitcoin narratives tend to be short-lived and intelligent enough to do the math people in the TAP / NAT echo chamber don't see this, but people outside it can see this so clearly. and 99.9% of the people in crypto are outside the TAP / NAT echo chamber. which is why NAT will never gain sufficient traction to even approach becoming a top 10 coin nor will ever offer a sufficiently impactful economic incentive for miners or influence the destiny of the network. in the meantime buyers are trading their money to will and iman in exchange for a get rich quick dream masquerading as altruism, that isn't even remotely credible to anyone with a brain and a calculator so as i said 👉 the narrative is deeply implausible and retarded af hope that helps

The DOG cabal mocked NAT and DMT in their spaces calls Played clown whistles when we’d try to educate their audience Everything but have an open mind and an acceptance of anything new Now look where we are Elon was right The most entertaining outcome is the most likely

@tap_protocol @fitzyOG @TracNetwork Is it open source?

@fitzyOG @TracNetwork Perfect time to get TAP Wallet so you can manage all those assets in one place: ▶️ tracsystems.io/tap-wallet

It's amazing to see the @tap_protocol, @TracNetwork and DMT ecosystems all coming to life on Bitcoin at once. 💥 TNK 💥 TAP 💥 NAT 💥 GIB 💥 NATCATS 💥 ROYALS This space can be stressful. So I’m loving seeing everyone rallying together 🤌 Wonder what will happen tomorrow?

@Smb_Vc @iman_blockrun @natgmi @binance @cz_binance Tap that

The odds of @natgmi going on @binance is very high. Huge community, powerful narrative, organic, grass roots, helps strengthen Bitcoin. It ticks all the boxes. A higher $NAT market cap benefits everyone. Volume is exploding. In order for $NAT to get listed, Binance will have to integrate $TAP infrastructure just like @Gate and @MEXC did. @tap_protocol This opens the door for a $TAP listing further down the line. $NAT on @binance this year is very probable. The community strength will play a large role.

@Adeoluseyi01 @fa4our @CofGravity @CoinMarketCap If the iris hash leaked, it’s just a hash, it would still need to be linked to a World ID. The real concern isn’t the scan itself, it’s creating a single identity that could link your activity across the internet that you wanted to keep private.

@AppOracleSDK @fa4our @CofGravity @CoinMarketCap @AppOracleSDK The hash is one-way in theory, but iris data is biologically unique and permanent unlike a password or even a face you can somewhat alter. Once that hash leaks or is correlated with other data, it's game over for privacy.

LATEST: ⚡ Sam Altman's World has partnered with Zoom, Tinder, and Docusign to integrate "proof of human" verification, using iris-based ID to confirm real users and detect deepfakes.

@fa4our @CofGravity @CoinMarketCap @Adeoluseyi01 Do you know about the technology? They scan your eye and create a hash code from it. What are you afraid of? Is that your face in your profile pic?

@CofGravity @CoinMarketCap @Adeoluseyi01 Biometric data like iris scans is permanent, you can’t reset your eyes like a password. It’s sensitive and valuable, so once it’s out there, that’s it. My concern

@Marrenin @worldoffisher @worldnetwork Did you buy the top and just sour? Just hard to believe one of the most prominent figures in AI is attempting a crypto rug pull for some extra cash.

@worldoffisher @worldnetwork is literally just a low float high FDV rugpull nothing else, the entire thing is a facade to attract idiots who buy but there is no value what so ever behind.

👀 $WLD situation is a bit ironic right now. On one hand, Sam Altman’s World Network just rolled out an upgrade focused on fighting deepfakes and bots, basically doubling down on its “proof-of-human” idea as AI content keeps getting harder to distinguish from real people. On paper, that’s a strong narrative. The internet clearly has a verification problem. But the market didn’t exactly celebrate it. Price dipped ~9.6%, and sentiment across the community feels… mixed at best. It raises a bigger question: Is the tech ahead of its time, or is the market just not convinced this is the solution people actually want? Because beyond the tech, there are still concerns people keep bringing up, privacy, adoption, and whether users even care enough about “proof-of-human” to use it at scale. As for recovery back to ATH… that won’t just come from upgrades or announcements. It’ll depend on real usage, real demand, and whether this whole identity layer becomes something people need, not just something that sounds good in theory. Right now, it feels like $WLD is caught between a strong idea and a skeptical market.

@wangandy Hey Andy did you catch our DM?

So much amazing proof of human content lately. Check it out!

@Sholi_software @sama Agreed

Sam Altman is a great leader. Too much stupid FUD about him. My support to @sama

I know @DiegoAltam9746 is going to do well. For starters, the game looks like a lot of fun. It’s a classic retro styled battle arena. I urge you to check it out when he shares it. What stands out though is the work he’s willing to put in. He added a feedback system from day one, so he’ll be learning and improving fast. That kind of effort matters, the people who go the extra mile are usually the ones who win. He’s also got an early mover advantage and now sits top spot on Audience Insights. As more apps integrate, his game should receive more installs and further feedback and reviews. Well done Diego! Wish you the best brother.

@PufLaunch Sigh

back in the golden days of ancient blocks, people were paying six figures for animal pictures on the blockchain

If you’re not willing to pivot based on app feedback you might not have what it takes.

@sama Hey Sam we launched an interoperable feedback system for World Mini Apps. You should check it out.

It is very nice to see Codex getting so much love. We are launching a $100 ChatGPT Pro tier by very popular demand.

@PufLaunch @wigamesofficial We made it

WorldApp is the best place for online gaming. No bots. Only real humans! $WLD Let’s boost our new game to 100,000 users! Fight with another humans for influence in any country you want!

@ZconnectWLD Cool daily puzzle game! More people need to discover this.

Hello dear Zconnect Daily players, Following the announcement we mentioned earlier, we have made some improvements to the game. To create a competitive environment, you will now need to pay a 1 WLD entry fee to start playing. Your goal is to complete the game as quickly as possible and get your name on the leaderboard. At the end of the day, the entire prize pool no matter the amount will be sent to the player who ranks 1st. For those who want to play without paying any fee, we have added a Demo button. This allows you to solve the daily puzzle for free, but your results will not be recorded on the leaderboard. Thank you for your continued interest and support!