Chandler

1.2K posts

Chandler banner
Chandler

Chandler

@C_Redmond13

Former Pro Baseball Player ⚾️ Head Trainer @bspbaseball 🏋🏻⚾️ Come train with me!👇🏻

Katılım Ocak 2012
238 Takip Edilen713 Takipçiler
Chandler
Chandler@C_Redmond13·
@Teacherman1986 Because the Cardinals teach the opposite.. smh🤦🏻‍♂️
English
0
0
1
247
Chandler
Chandler@C_Redmond13·
@TigersJUK No, they’re just actually being measured now instead of simply asked, “what’s your height”. Not that hard to comprehend.
English
0
0
0
105
Chandler retweetledi
Robert Stock
Robert Stock@RobertStock6·
A huge misunderstanding that people have is that an MLB batter should be protecting against every 2K pitch that could possibly be called a strike. An MLB batter shouldn’t even be protecting against all ACTUAL strikes. To do so would mean increasing your chase rates to an absurdly high level. And the likelihood a batter has a positive result (foul ball or a hit) on a perfectly executed two strike pitch is very low. Couple these two FACTS together, and anyone arguing otherwise means one of two things - you genuinely didn’t know this until now or you have an ideal floating around your head that doesn’t match reality. Juan Soto has the best eye in baseball. He’ll strike out looking many times this year. And that’s BECAUSE he has such a good eye. He was unlikely to do much with a perfectly executed two strike pitch. And by taking it, he cuts down on chases and gives himself the opportunity for the ump to call it a ball. Every single argument contrary to these facts is so disproven by reality is absurd these conversations exist, but we’ll still be having them decades from now 🙃
Robert Stock@RobertStock6

@ScoringChanges Absolutely NOT too close to take. A batter can’t be extending the strike zone by multiple inches against a guy throwing 102mph. Even if he swings he doesn’t do anything with the pitch. The best play by him is to leave it in the hands of the umpire. And that’s why we have ABS now.

English
74
56
563
102.9K
Chandler
Chandler@C_Redmond13·
@BarstoolHubbs @thewheelhousenj go ahead and show this to Frye 🤣 high pitch, and he was repeating Jones just for swinging thru a pitch on backfield lives the other day. Dude doesn’t have a clue!
English
0
0
0
167
Chandler retweetledi
Mark Hoover
Mark Hoover@MarkHoover71·
“If you’re a high school athlete you better be lifting year round. You’re competing with transfer portal athletes who train 48 weeks a year. You’re a baseball player who lifts for 3 months in the off season then says “I have travel ball” or “I’m not lifting in season” you are already behind. Lifting is the X factor for baseball players” @ZachDechant TCU @IAStrengthCoach
English
8
238
585
66.2K
Chandler retweetledi
Zac Goodman
Zac Goodman@ZacGoodman_·
The Trap Bar Deadlift… Weaker stimulus for the posterior chain than a Conventional/Sumo Deadlift. Weaker Stimulus for the anterior muscles than a Squat. I want to use exercises that deliver the highest stimulus per rep… we don’t pull on the Trap Bar for that reason.
English
11
2
69
13K
Chandler retweetledi
Path To Manliness
Path To Manliness@PathToManliness·
Women entering the workforce has completely destroyed quality of life for Americans 1. Two incomes became the new one income. Once everyone had to work, employers and banks raised prices. Houses doubled. Families didn’t get ahead. They just ran harder to stay in place. 2. Kids got raised by institutions instead of parents. Daycare replaces bonding. Schools replace values. Screens replace discipline. Then everyone wonders why kids are anxious and disconnected. 3. Communities disappeared. If both parents work all day, nobody is home. No neighborhood stability. No local support. Just isolated families worn out from the grind. 4. Stress shot through the roof. Two commutes, two schedules, no downtime, constant rushing. Marriages crack under nonstop exhaustion. 5. Divorce became the easy option. Two incomes make it simple to leave instead of fix problems. The family foundation got weaker. 6. Birthrates collapsed. If both parents are working 50 hours a week, having more than one or two kids is almost impossible. Entire generations are shrinking. 7. Government filled the void. When no one is home, institutions step in. Schools. Daycare. After school programs. Healthcare systems. Government support. Weak homes create more state dependence. 8. Men lost purpose. A man’s historical role to build, protect, and provide got diluted. Many men checked out. Society suffers when men have nothing to fight for. 9. Women were sold a false dream. They were told a career and a boss would make them happier than raising their children or building a family. Now we have record levels of burnout, depression, and regret. 10. Families turned into roommates. Everyone works. Everyone is tired. No one has energy for each other. The home stopped being a team and became a collection of exhausted individuals.
STUNNER@Cr7Godbrand

What opinion about women do you have that makes people feel like this?

English
1.4K
6.8K
46.8K
4.9M
Chandler retweetledi
Jeromy Bryk- Strength and Physique Coach
Unless you’re in the depths of a bodybuilding prep, your nutrition never needs to be 100% strict. Structured, yes. Strict, no.
English
13
9
196
10.7K
Chandler
Chandler@C_Redmond13·
@StrengthDebates So if I’m trying to build strength then I like how Louie Simmons said, since our eccentric is stronger than our concentric there’s no need to use all your muscle to lower the weight. You’re just tiring yourself out
English
0
0
0
42
Chandler
Chandler@C_Redmond13·
@StrengthDebates And building muscle and building strength are vastly different. Think Bodybuilder (muscle) vs powerlifter (strength) The BB wants the lightest weights to feel the heaviest by forcing contraction and slowing tempo. The PL wants to make the heaviest weights feel the lightest
English
1
0
0
330
Official Strength Debates
Official Strength Debates@StrengthDebates·
Ok I’ll give it a shot It’s the framing of the post I would change You’re giving me the option of doing a set of 10 reps with 100 lbs using a 1 sec or 3 second eccentric It’s a false choice. Both options are bad. My choice would be neither and I’ll tell you why Mechanical tension is the primary driver of hypertrophy not time under tension. So instead I would use a 130-150lbs for lower reps per set. More weight will yield more mechanical tension. Mechanical tension is the priority Your slow eccentric option is also more fatiguing. It will take longer to recover from between sets and between sessions due to the muscle damage. Fatiguing also inhibits motor recruitment. Ultimately preventing you from titrating up on stimulus Lowering the reps per set allowing to lift more total weight results in shorter set durations, easier to recovery from between sets and between sessions. Ultimately allowing you to titrate up on stimulus especially long term Reps near failure matter most. If you’re near failing at rep 10 that means the first 5-6 reps aren’t close so what are they even doing? Using heavier weight starts closer to failure, most of the reps qualifying as near failure. Lastly, slower eccentrics, bc of the muscle damage and fatigue result in many more chronic injuries like tendonitis and micro tears and strains I rest my case. Let me know if I made any progress
AntiDoc@AntiDoc

I don’t think I can be convinced time under tension doesn’t matter in weight training. Building muscle/strength is about stimulus and adaptations. If you press the 100lb dumbbells for a set of 10 with a 1 second eccentric, versus a 3 second eccentric, the muscle was exposed to that weight for 30 seconds vs. 10 seconds on the way down. In what world does it make sense that we wouldn’t make ANY adaptation from that additional stimulus? Plus, a stronger lifter is going to be able to control more weight, for longer, than a weaker one. If Jim’s 10 rep max on a dumbbell press is 100lbs in each hand; And Matt’s 10 rep max on a dumbbell press is 130lbs in each hand; In what universe is Jim able to control longer eccentrics, and get more time under tension than Matt with the 100s? None, because Matt is stronger and you need more adaptations in order to control the weight for longer. Exercise science sucks. This has been true forever to anyone with eyes.

English
10
1
40
17.3K
Chandler retweetledi
Blacksmiths Performance
Blacksmiths Performance@BSPbaseball·
Want to work on what big papi is saying? Try out the flamingo drill 🦩 and any variation thereof!
English
0
1
2
88
Marc Kennedy
Marc Kennedy@MarcKen61268632·
@CoachMarcusHill Can’t love this enough. Stems from being the sixth guy in line during BP and step in asking “can I see 1?” Buddy, 5 guys in front of you saw 40 pitches. Off a machine. Throwing the same pitch and speed.
English
1
0
6
448
Coach Hill
Coach Hill@CoachMarcusHill·
Even if you’re the leadoff guy you’ve taken hundreds of swings during the week, lifted weights, taken a round of pregame bp and you’re about to see a guy throwing 78-84 and you’ve watched his 8 warmup pitches. If you aren’t ready after all that you have a non competitive mindset problem
English
5
11
120
19.1K
Chandler
Chandler@C_Redmond13·
@CoachMarcusHill I once asked our leadoff hitter before the game if he was thinking about swinging first pitch… He said “Yeah, I think I’m going to today. I said “Good, you got 45 minutes to be on time”😂
English
0
0
3
258
Chandler
Chandler@C_Redmond13·
@JValentineDE @CoachSwit 100% Treat throwing like the weight room. Just monitor your volume AND intensity. Definitely have some low volume weeks/months. But taking more than 1 month completely off, I can’t see it being good.
English
0
0
1
7
Coach Swit
Coach Swit@CoachSwit·
I see a lot of people saying to throw year round. I have talked to numerous MLB doctors all of different ages and they all say for youth players to take 3-4 months off throwing. Been following this for 19 years of coaching and have had ZERO TJ surgeries. Not arguing with others just stating what works for my players.
English
29
17
161
29.7K