(((Cazador-de-Chimba))) 🇦🇺 🖖

@AlboMP @SenatorWong @Greens @AustralianLabor This is what you fund and support with my tax dollars.

@Larryjamieson_ I have no kids/wife and can live passive income approx $35k AUD a year so a developing country awaits. Split between 🇧🇷🇨🇴🇨🇱🇦🇷🇻🇳🇹🇭🇵🇭🇮🇩🇰🇪 and eastern Europe. Work a little remote. But as an Aussis Jew, I will make Aliyah to 🇮🇱, 10 year tax holiday. Otherwise it would be Uruguay

Assuming the changes to CGT go through, what do you plan to change with your investments and/or your tax residency?

@ctindale Fantastic 👏 I made an infographic about Hegemonic Progressivism which is the philosophy underpinning all this. Sort of. I'm no James Lindsay. I don't see any reason to stay in Melbourne, it's really gone pear shaped + will only get worse with Labor-Green-Teal regime.

@BabakTaghvaee1 Haha, I read your original post and read the replies, I also heard it from you first, and then forgot about it, until I saw it on CNN front page. Now it is verified. Well done 👍✅😁

@AustralianJA They think that they can recognise a non-existent entity, and things will just keep going on like before. Australia doesn't have the cards anymore. Israel doesn't give two shits, all that matters is the US veto on the security council.

The Albanese Government is 'deeply alarmed' with Israel. Oh no

@joshxhowie But is this not why they now don't have the skills for "direct action" or any towering intellectual figures on the left?

Christopher Hitchens identifies the creation of identity politics as the moment the left lost. I wonder if he imagined the damage it would still be causing nearly sixty years later.

Friendly reminder that the Danish government forcibly closed the sociology departments of the University of Copenhagen in 1986 because they had been completely hijacked by Marxists who converted them into ideological indoctrination centers. What must be done to the American university system is just as drastic, but it would require conservatives to abandon their commitment to procedural neutrality and wield an extraordinary amount of state power without hesitation or apology.

@BrandonWarmke I made a helpful infographic as part of educating myself on the terrible situation we are in

Probably no more than 10% of the American professoriate are unreconstructed Marxists. Many more are Marxist-adjacent and like to strike the pose. The more interesting fact is that in 2026 most academic departments would be more comfortable hiring a Marxist than a Republican.

@BenMFreeman Looking at the royal commission into anti-Semitism in Australia, it is clear that there is no future for Jews here. Same in Canada, UK, France. You can see here, even the first comment on your post is pure new hatred. I will be making aliyah too one day.

Tomorrow is the beginning of my last full week living in Scotland. Next Sunday (7 June), I will be making Aliyah, moving to Israel, and becoming an Israeli citizen. For years, I have written and spoken about Jewish peoplehood, indigeneity, exile, and home. Now I get to live it for myself. Not as theory. Not as history. But as my reality. After 2,000 years of exile, it is extraordinary that Jew can come home.

@NoahCarl90 Socialists students in the 60s never left academia and teaching. Now it's just socialists teaching socialism to future socialists.

Sympathy with Israel versus Palestine among White British people.

Violent bullying against flotilla anarchists at the airport in Spain cannot go unanswered. The Spanish Ambassador must be summoned to explain these hostile actions. We need accountability now.

@TopherField And the conservative minded people who live in the inner city, would prefer to emigrate overseas. Why stay as the country turns to socialism, when you can find a tax haven for 3 months of the year (Uruguay/Cyprus) and spend the other 9 months travelling (Asia, etc)

This is the hypothetical map resulting from the latest Redbridge polling. The city-country divide would be the worst it has ever been, and a Labor-Greens government would be clearly the government of the cosy city 'elites' at the expense of the people who feed and clothe the nation. Could Australia sustain such a divide? The resentment in country areas is already at boiling point... what would happen if we saw a result like this, but still had a Labor government?

There is a lot less anxiety-related unemployment in societies where there is a closer relationship between not working and not eating.

@rationalaussie Hegemonic Progressivism by Fabians in the Australian Labor Party. It's in all the schools, full of gender theory and indigenous knowledge. Combined with immigration from China where they already have social engineering.

Many Australians have been infected by Marxist ideology, especially those in government who have never experienced how difficult it is to actually get consumers to pay money for something you built using your own money and taking on all the risk. Not only have they never built anything themselves, many people in the Labor party have never even worked in private industry. It should be impossible to be a politician unless you have worked at least a decade in the private sector. One cannot possibly have an accurate model of reality if they grow up in housing paid for by hardworking taxpayers, spend their university years as an activist campaigning with other Marxists, then go straight into working in politics... Never having the slightest clue where money comes from or how value is actually generated. People on the left in particular have a very dangerous zero sum ideology, whereby they think the only way to get ahead is by taking it from someone else. 'I can't personally get ahead, so let's increase taxes on those who have (who generate all the wealth and provide all the jobs to those who don't want to take on risk).' This is why Marxist ideology is so ridiculous - these people sit on their ass all day doing jobs that only exist thanks to people who did take on all the risk, and succeeded to such an extent that they can afford to hire people who don't need to... Yet they are saying those people are the 'evil' ones that should be paying more? Like, my brother in Christ, you'd be a peasant begging for bread if it wasn't for entrepreneurs. The world becomes more prosperous through positive sum games - growing the pie for everyone - not through stealing it from the people who are responsible for growth in the first place. If you attempt the latter, those people simply leave the country, and rightly so. We are governed by insane Marxist idiots. Australians deserve better. It's One Nation, or no nation. You decide.

@ConceptualJames I've updated my AI image of the situation, what do you think @ConceptualJames

Gen Z in 30 years telling their kids about how when they were their age, they lost their minds and blamed everything on Jews because they got tricked by radical Muslims and Communists.

@realDianaWest I made a helpful recap

Moscow's genius is to make its subversion (for ex., the Frankfurt School, Marcuse, etc.) appear as out of thin air. In fact, the "Frankfurt School' cancer which has spread across the West was developed in 1922 at Moscow's Marx-Engels Institute. archive.org/details/cry-ha…

@EinatWilf @HusseinAboubak It's all part of the plan, since the KGB days, followed by Marcuse in the 60s and Edward Said

Weekend reading by the always excellent @HusseinAboubak on Palestine as a word-symbol and the entire system built around it. Yesterday, in my talk in Baltimore, I read out this following paragraph that is towards the end of the piece, because it is the one that matters most - that the entire Palestine system rests on the human desire and choice to avoid responsibility and blame others for one's misfortune. "The entire system—the billions of dollars, the media empires, the proxy armies, the diplomatic maneuvering, the academic industries, the human rights apparatus, the regional competitions that shape the fate of nations—rests, at the last, on something so small that it is almost invisible: a man sitting before a television or a radio, choosing to feel righteous instead of choosing to be honest, and finding in that choice the only dignity available to him in a world that has stripped him of every other kind. He is the foundation of the Palestine system. He is its most exploited victim. He is its most essential participant. And he will not leave, because the system, for all the misery it produces in him and through him, is the only place in the modern world where his suffering means anything at all." And if there is a civilizational battle where Zionism and Palestinianism stand for core human struggles, at its core, I see it as this: Zionism stands for responsibility, human agency, the merging of vision and action, the spirit that says that even if we are dealt some of the worst cards in history, we take collective and individual action to change our lives. It is, by definition of historical action, messy, but it is life. Palestinianism stands for infantile rejection of responsibility, the righteous comfort in blaming others for one's misfortune, the elevation of perennial victimhood over action in history. It is therefore no coincidence that an age that revels in victimhood is elevating Palestinianism. It is the reason my pinned tweet is that "Zionism is a progressive cause that had the misfortune of success". (P.S. And what I find alarming is that domestically in Israel quite a bit of our so called leadership in Israel and some of their supporters have been infected by Palestinianism as a worldview that blames others for one's misfortune and prefers to destroy for others rather than build for oneself). open.substack.com/pub/critiquean…

@ConceptualJames Australia is lost, you are talking about the 22nd century? By 2100, the white European percentage of my city, Melbourne which will be the biggest city overtaking Sydney soon..... Will be 4% by 2100. 4% European, mostly Indian, Chinese and Islam.

I don't know if you have noticed that Western Europe is falling, and the Commonwealth is about as Woke as it gets. Where does that leave the Western Alliance? How about the United States? What say ye, America Firsters? The long general (though not total) period of peace we have enjoyed since WWII is broadly known as the Pax Americana, and it is effectively a generally peaceful and secure world order mostly managed under an International Law Agreement known as the United States Navy, backed by the rest of the U.S. Armed Forces. That peace was facilitated not merely by American peace through strength but also through a network of Western allies throughout Western Europe and the British Commonwealth (including the UK, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia), plus some others, who provided intelligence sharing and strategic military staging for the United States military (seeing as they never really made real militaries of their own after WWII, for the most part). Now, in the 21st century, the Commonwealth and Europe have gone Woke, and they're heavily infiltrated with Islamism. They are on the precipice of disaster, and even if they weren't, they're not particularly engaged with American interests anymore. In fact, they're mostly hostile to them since Trump upset the whole little Great Reset, Agenda 2030 program in 2016. The competing doctrine to that "Postwar Consensus" world, in which Western Europe and the Commonwealth will mostly be slaves, is called the Multipolar World. The idea is simple. The world won't be unipolar (U.S. global hegemony, since 1991) or bipolar (U.S. vs. USSR, 1945-1991). There will be at least three poles, perhaps four (Russia, China, Islamic, Western/US). This is the Russian nutjob Aleksandr Dugin's fantasy, and the World Economic Forum had fully bought into the program too. It's meant, essentially, to let the People's Republic of China and the Islamic Frankenstein's monster rise, with Russia getting better scraps and big revenge on the West that broke the Soviet Union. It's the "New World Order" program we've all been running from. Of course, a single new hegemon will eventually arise from it, probably the PRC, but the WEF/UN had somewhat different ambitions by the same path, as does the Islamist project. What if you love America and the American way of life? What if you love life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? What if you love freedom? What if you want the free nations of the world to enjoy something like the Pax Americana? Well, you can't have that with the Multipolar World model. Western Europe will be slave to the Islamists. Eastern Europe will go to Russia. The Commonwealth, outside of Britain, will be split apart between Islamists and the Chinese. America will be isolated, divided internally, shrunken, and eventually defeated. RIP freedom. We can have it, though, with a new alliance structure, and if you don't understand this, you don't understand anything about what Trump is doing on the world stage. It isn't just about stopping China or BRICS or securing against terror or grabbing oil or controlling shipping lanes. A whole new world alliance structure (of good guys) is in the works, and the enemies of freedom and prosperity know it and are doing everything possible to stop it. The first link in this new chain of allies is the U.S.-Israel alliance, and virtually the whole plan depends on this alliance staying strong and accomplishing its initial goals. That's why it's under such heavy attack. It's literally the key to Western values being strong in the 21st and into the 22nd centuries. Nothing less than that. This alliance could be strengthened immeasurably by being joined by a freed and restored Iran. You must understand this. It isn't just that the IRGC is awful, evil, and on the other side of all of this. It's not just the oil, though that's really important too. It's also that Iran sits geographically at the crucial crossroads of the entire Eastern Hemisphere and the trade circumstances of almost six billion people. Strategically, at least in certain ways, this growing alliance would likely include India, were it to get off the ground, and Japan as a far-Eastern endcap. It could conceivably include South Korea, though that's dicier now than it was two years ago, and it would likely include Taiwan after a fashion. This alliance would effectively control the Western hemisphere, CENTCOM, and a significant strategic presence in the Pacific Theater. As a result of this alignment and its consequences, Australia and New Zealand might start rethinking some things in a big way, thus changing the course of some of the Commonwealth. It's definitely in their interests, and they're already starting to realize their current peril, though not strongly enough. Eastern Europe would want to join as protection against Russia. Western Europe remains a wildcard, but it also stands as largely irrelevant from a strategic perspective save the fact that the European nuclear powers (France and Britain) cannot become Islamist. Canada would resist all of this until it couldn't, which is stupid and oh-so-idiotically Canadian. Most of the Arabic Middle East wants to modernize. Many of them are sick of the backwards radicalism and want to participate in the 21st century, whatever other designs and ambitions they have for their own kingdoms. They might not join in as strong allies to this development, but they're likely to be solid partners in such a program, unless BRICS and the "New Silk Road" (Belt and Road Initiative) are better deals. Which side do you want them on with all that? This is what we're really talking about, guys. This is what's really going on. This is what President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu are actually brokering in the world. If you care about freedom, prosperity, and peace, you're backing this. If you aren't backing this, you're backing evil empires like the People's Republic of China, the Islamist Crescent, and the revenge fantasies of post-Soviet Russia. The first link in this chain for peace and prosperity over the next century is the U.S.-Israel alliance. That's the key to making the whole project work. That's why there's such a huge push to break that alliance now before this really gets solidified as the core of what what will replace the faltering Western Alliance in this twenty-first century. You have a choice. You can support and help reinforce this first link in the chain of freedom, peace, and prosperity for the next 100+ years, or you can be on the side that opposes these, not just in the moment but in the future, not just for some people out there somewhere who you don't care about, like in today's Iran or China, but for most of the people in the world for most of the next century. If you have turned against the U.S.-Israel alliance, or just Israel, or just Jews, as the result of Red-Green-Brown propaganda over the last few years, you are a useful idiot against this freedom, peace, and prosperous future, but you can stop that today. You can understand what's happening in the world beyond your group chats and get on the right side of one of the most important questions and hinges in world history.

@kevinbonham I follow how Reform have built a true political party from scratch, and One Nation has no Zia Yusef or Danny Kruger, or the Tories like Suella and Jenrick. Whatever polling says, "new Australians" in metro areas and lack of structure will mean they ever succeed.

One Nation internal chaos. Shocked I tell you, shocked. (Some interesting details in here.) theguardian.com/australia-news…

Former Director of France’s Military Intelligence: “There are 3 centers of Muslim terrorism: Qatar, Turkey and London”

@AmbHerzog J-Street is a cancer. From the day they were spawned.

Here’s my take on whether j-street is pro-Israel 🇮🇱 To me, to be pro-Israel is to draw a clear line between criticizing Israeli government policies - and supporting anti-Israel agendas and libels de-legitimizing the State of Israel. To be pro-Israel is to go from pronouncing support for Israel’s right to exist (thank you for the generosity…), to supporting the provision of the means critical to defending that very existence. To be pro-Israel is to listen to Israelis; In our vibrant democracy, most Israelis share the view that j-street doesn’t qualify as pro-Israel.