Dogd🅰️Ze

363 posts

Dogd🅰️Ze

Dogd🅰️Ze

@DogdAZe007

$ASTS Investor. Slowly moving to a more private X account. Been here since NPA and long term hold.

Katılım Aralık 2025
82 Takip Edilen55 Takipçiler
Dogd🅰️Ze
Dogd🅰️Ze@DogdAZe007·
@ArneLutsch Truly that was a class act video of bluebird pack out. Impressive doesn’t even cover it.
English
1
0
5
75
Anp🅰️nman
Anp🅰️nman@spacanpanman·
$ASTS: ABSOLUTE CINEMA™️
Anp🅰️nman tweet media
Deutsch
34
26
418
18.1K
Dogd🅰️Ze retweetledi
Rosanna Prestia, MBA
Rosanna Prestia, MBA@RosannaInvests·
🚨Three U.S. carriers just announced they’re killing cellular dead zones with satellites.🛰️ There’s exactly one publicly-traded pure-play building it. $ASTS
Rosanna Prestia, MBA tweet media
English
8
21
282
18.3K
C🅰️tSE
C🅰️tSE@CatSE___ApeX___·
@blueorigin @SpaceIntel101 Could we have a booster called ”shorts are rekt” Kind SpaceMob request. 🙏 We can also consider. ”To the moon!” ”Fly around and land back” Or maybe ”The big can of consequence”
English
5
1
56
2.3K
Blue Origin
Blue Origin@blueorigin·
"No, It's Necessary" has met its match.
Blue Origin tweet media
English
71
294
2.6K
227.6K
C🅰️tSE
C🅰️tSE@CatSE___ApeX___·
@WesTaylorDVM @CClok85 I spent my time prior to $ASTS Breeding cattle, growing trees, caring for my tennants, collecting military grade sensors, drones and firearms, municipality politics, raising a family w.3 kids, accumulating capital and serving in the swedish national guard. I’m just a farmer.
English
23
5
218
4.1K
C🅰️tSE
C🅰️tSE@CatSE___ApeX___·
Tucked into the footnotes and market analysis of this May 14 order are explicit references to major satellite direct-to-device approvals that the FCC handed down just two days prior (on May 12, 2026). $ASTS
C🅰️tSE tweet media
English
12
10
168
19K
Elish🅰️
Elish🅰️@11elisha33·
Why even talk about it? They’re two different companies, in two different industries, with two different end markets. One of them has tech that was previously thought to be impossible. Show some respect if you own AST shares. The forced RKLB vs ASTS rivalry still makes about as much sense as comparing Boeing to Verizon individual success timelines. This is pointless.
English
2
0
10
215
RocketMan
RocketMan@RKLBMan·
I own both $ASTS and $RKLB. It's a good question. Here's the difference IMO. $RKLB has launched 80+ times, and has flawlessly executed when called upon for various missions. They have a proven roster of products and services that many companies can literally buy today. $ASTS is essentially pre-revenue (yes, i know they make some $) and has a lot to prove. They have no commercial services yet. $RKLB gets the benefit of the doubt. $ASTS hasn't earned it yet.
G🅰️V Mac@gavmac12

* $RKLB delays Neutron * “It’s expected, it takes time to develop such complex tech. Space is hard after all” * $ASTS has manufacturing timeline slippage, while developing an entire new satellite design * “Scam stock! Abel is selling snake oil! It’s going to $0” Lol

English
19
3
221
42K
Dogd🅰️Ze
Dogd🅰️Ze@DogdAZe007·
$ASTS Many eyes on 75! IYKYK!
Dogd🅰️Ze tweet media
Suomi
0
0
0
113
Dogd🅰️Ze
Dogd🅰️Ze@DogdAZe007·
$ASTS “Fast is fine but accuracy is Final. You must learn to be slow in a hurry”. Wyatt Earp Large space-based phased arrays manufactured in Midland, Texas will provide accurate targeting for interceptors. @AbelAvellan knows how to be “Slow in a hurry”!
iPilot🅰️@OmniAeronautica

$ASTS GOLDEN DOME ISN’T JUST ABOUT MISSILE INTERCEPTORS. IT’S ABOUT BUILDING A SPACE-BASED SENSING, COMMUNICATIONS, TRACKING, AND DATA NETWORK AT GLOBAL SCALE. That is where @AST_SpaceMobile starts becoming extremely interesting. Most people still look at AST only through the lens of consumer direct-to-device cellular service. But the U.S. government is openly signaling something much larger now: a persistent, resilient, proliferated space architecture capable of tracking, communicating, processing, and coordinating across thousands of assets in real time. The Congressional Budget Office estimate being discussed here is staggering because it reveals the true scale of what Golden Dome may ultimately become. A constellation measured in thousands of satellites is not simply a weapons program. It is an orbital infrastructure buildout. AST already possesses several characteristics that align directly with this future: • Massive phased-array technology proven in orbit • Extremely high power generation capability on spacecraft • Broadband connectivity directly to standard devices • Advanced beamforming and software-defined network architecture • Global cellular spectrum relationships and regulatory positioning • Vertical integration and large-scale satellite manufacturing capability • Existing relationships with AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Google, and government entities • Prime contractor status under the SHIELD/Golden Dome ecosystem That last point is important and underappreciated. AST was not randomly mentioned in defense discussions. The company was officially announced as part of the Missile Defense Agency’s SHIELD initiative through a prime contractor award structure. That immediately elevated ASTS from “commercial space telecom startup” into a company now operating adjacent to next-generation national defense architecture. The market still largely prices AST as if it is only pursuing rural cellular coverage. But Golden Dome concepts require exactly the kinds of technologies AST has spent years developing: persistent low Earth orbit coverage, large deployable arrays, resilient communications, distributed sensing, space-based networking, and massive power availability on orbit. And once you begin discussing constellations potentially costing hundreds of billions over decades, the valuation framework for companies participating in that ecosystem changes dramatically. This is why many investors believe AST is evolving into something much larger than a telecom company. It increasingly resembles critical infrastructure for the next era of space-based communications, defense, sensing, AI distribution, and sovereign network resilience. The Business Wire release is worth reading carefully because it confirms AST is already inside the conversation: businesswire.com/news/home/2026…

English
0
0
3
241
Dogd🅰️Ze
Dogd🅰️Ze@DogdAZe007·
$ASTS the true leader in the race for mobile broadband D2D.
iPilot🅰️@OmniAeronautica

$ASTS THE FCC JUST TOLD YOU WHO THE REAL DIRECT-TO-DEVICE PLAYERS ARE Today’s FCC release was not subtle. The regulator explicitly framed America’s future in direct-to-device connectivity around only a handful of serious infrastructure players, and @AST_SpaceMobile was named directly alongside SpaceX in the agency’s own messaging. Read the language carefully. The FCC states it already approved AST’s “competitive 248-satellite D2D system” and tied that approval directly to America’s “global leadership in next-gen D2D offerings.” That is extraordinary regulatory positioning for a company many retail investors still treat like a speculative science project. Meanwhile, Brendan Carr is openly talking about a future with “at least three facilities-based providers” in D2D. Not dozens. Not unlimited competition. A small number of national-scale infrastructure winners. And AST is specifically being elevated into that conversation by the FCC Chairman himself. What casual investors are missing is that this FCC document effectively confirms several things simultaneously: • AST now has authorization for a 248-satellite commercial constellation in the United States. • The FCC repeatedly emphasizes “competition” because regulators do not want a single-player monopoly in space-based cellular broadband. • AST is integrated with AT&T, Verizon, and FirstNet using actual carrier spectrum and carrier core infrastructure. • The FCC is signaling long-term regulatory support for D2D as strategic national infrastructure. • The agency is creating clarity around exclusive-use spectrum rights and buildout expectations so companies can invest at massive scale. This is the part the market still does not fully grasp: AST is no longer being discussed as an experimental satellite company. The FCC is discussing it as part of the future architecture of American wireless infrastructure. That changes valuation frameworks completely. The government is openly talking about ubiquitous smartphone connectivity from space, rural coverage, public safety integration, competition policy, spectrum policy, and next generation industrial leadership. Those are trillion-dollar infrastructure themes, not niche themes. And look at the players orbiting this ecosystem now: AT&T. Verizon. FirstNet. Google relationships. Defense implications. National infrastructure implications. Potentially exclusive spectrum structures emerging around D2D. The FCC itself is now effectively validating that direct-to-device broadband from orbit is becoming a permanent layer of the communications stack. Retail still thinks this is a meme stock. The regulators are talking about national strategic infrastructure.

English
0
0
2
255
Anp🅰️nman
Anp🅰️nman@spacanpanman·
$ASTS: ❤️ A bittersweet but wonderful moment reading the recent Bloomberg piece on the SpaceMob. Seeing Steve Larrison recognized as a key research contributor and founding member is a beautiful acknowledgement of his legacy. He is deeply missed by us all.
Anp🅰️nman@spacanpanman

$ASTS: Dear SpaceMob family, Today I laid to rest our dear friend @steve_larrison. I picked this beautiful spot that has two chairs overlooking Kennedy Space Center so friends can sit with him and share fond memories together. Steve, I am so happy that you were able to watch your BlueBirds lift into the heavens and look forward to sharing many more launches together. Godspeed my friend, we all miss you dearly but take comfort knowing that your spirit and kindness continues on in all of our hearts. ❤️ You can join Steve here: maps.app.goo.gl/tPyPZzirBhk3Wh…

English
14
23
470
26.1K
Dogd🅰️Ze
Dogd🅰️Ze@DogdAZe007·
@Defiantclient2 @realjoncooper Quietly I have been thinking the same thing. The market will reward ASTS even if they only have 30 up by the end of the year. We are years ahead of the competition.
English
0
0
3
130
Kevin Chen
Kevin Chen@Defiantclient2·
$ASTS: Some of you are taking that “launch every 1 to 2 months on average” wording way too literally. Some of you are literally calculating a launch of 3 every 45 days and determining number of satellites launched by year end that way. The “on average” opens up the vagueness of guiding a launch schedule. The thing about launch is that it’s out of AST’s control. So their guidance will also be vague by design. Today's PR is on track with the April 19 PR which said: The company is currently in production through BlueBird 32, with BlueBird 8 to 10 expected to be ready to ship in approximately 30 days. The company continues to expect an orbital launch every one to two months on average during 2026, supported by agreements with multiple launch providers, and it continues to target approximately 45 satellites in orbit by the end of 2026. There will be some months where it’s possible to see TWO launches in the same month (a SpaceX and a Blue Origin or a SpaceX and a SpaceX). AST has a multi launch contract with SpaceX and they also have one with Blue Origin. If AST starts a steady state AIT rate now with BB8-10, they will quickly be bottlenecked by launches instead of production. This is also why on the March 2, 2026, earnings call, Abel said they actually see more like ~45 in orbit and ~60 built. They know there's a bit of a launch bottleneck. How close AST gets to “approximately 45 in orbit” this year will depend on how many Blue Origin launches we can get IN ADDITION TO the ~monthly SpaceX launches. They also have a 3rd unknown heavy lift vehicle on standby. Some of you will say "the delays add up". Add up to what, exactly? They’re really in a race against just themselves. + The closest competitor is SpaceX with their Starlink Mobile V2 satellites which depend on Starship to get into orbit. Those aren’t slated to start deploying until mid 2027 which is their current guide. But like all things Elon and all things space, it’ll probably be delayed. + So then where do we end up with Starlink Mobile V2 commercial service start? Like mid 2028? End of 2028? AST has a lot of time. + The MNOs will wait. Most of them see SpaceX as an existential threat. + Governments want to avoid vendor lock with SpaceX. So why does it really matter if AST gets ~45 to 60 birds in orbit by year end 2026 versus by end of Q1 2027? Answer: It does not actually matter.
AST SpaceMobile@AST_SpaceMobile

Announcement: Mid-June launch of three Bluebird satellites aboard a Falcon 9 rocket.🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 32 next-generation satellites at advanced stages of assembly to be ready for launch. Network deployment with a launch every one to two months on average. Space-based cellular broadband. Built in Texas. 🌎📶📱 #ASTSpaceMobile #Broadband #ConnectingtheUnconnected #BlueBirds

English
28
30
332
27.7K
GTK
GTK@MisterGTK·
A$T$...hmm, looks like BofA woke UP a smiling GIANT! (triple digits)
English
3
2
36
1.4K