Josh Sayler

3.5K posts

Josh Sayler

Josh Sayler

@ICXCGloria

Katılım Eylül 2011
139 Takip Edilen247 Takipçiler
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
On page twenty-six of “The Billionaire Tax” proposal in California, it explains how the state legislature can convert from a Billionaire Tax to an Everyone Tax without voter approval. They can also adjust the tax to be a yearly tax, not just one time…again, without your approval. Intelligence test for you: if this was meant to just target Billionaires, why did they write this in?
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath

The Billionaire Tax is actually an Everyone Tax. The Billionaire Tax is a new tax proposal written by four professors who don't believe in the American dream. Some of them aren’t even American…go figure. Despite its name, it applies to every California resident who currently has assets or ever will. The creators named it the Billionaire Tax so you would get into a froth andwouldn't look closely at what it actually does to you. On page twenty-six, it explains how the government can convert to an Everyone Tax without voter approval. They can also adjust the tax to be a yearly tax, not just one time…again, without your approval. Here's how the tax would work: As a voter, you're being asked to approve a tax that would require you to: 1. list all your assets and the value of each, then submit them to the California Franchise Tax Board. 2. authorize the tax board to appraise your assets and confirm the value of each. 3. pay a penalty of up to forty percent of your tax bill if the board determines your reported value was too low in their opinion. 4. allow the tax board to subpoena your financial records from every one of your financial institutions for auditing. This Everyone Tax runs 34 pages of shifty language describing how the government plans to take your assets. Read the fine print and decide for yourself. If this were truly a billionaire tax, it would be 3 pages. It’s 34 pages so that it can create the mechanisms to steal from all of you.

English
1.2K
9.9K
36K
4.3M
Scott G
Scott G@scttfrnks·
@sonic79894 I don’t really care how anyone spends their money, but the guy on the right looks ridiculous and he’d still look ridiculous if he were white.
English
3
0
52
13.6K
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Matthew Marsden
Matthew Marsden@matthewdmarsden·
I'm old enough to remember when @elonmusk and DOGE uncovered billions of waste, fraud, and abuse. Somehow, I missed the arrests of the people who did it. So glad they got that soldier, though. Phew.
English
187
2.2K
10.6K
59.8K
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna@RepLuna·
If members of Congress are caught insider trading, it’s a small, couple-hundred-dollar fine. If you’re caught doing it in the military, like in MSgt Dykes’s case, you could be facing up to 50 years in prison. Anyone who cannot see that members of Congress are insider trading is either low IQ or willfully ignorant. Let’s take Nancy Pelosi, for example, it is statistically not possible for her to make a 17,000% return and outperform Warren Buffett without insider information. 🤡
English
1.5K
10.5K
37.8K
370.9K
Breadman
Breadman@BTCBreadMan·
Wife and I found an amazing house today on 2 acres of land in a very nice neighborhood. Significant upgrade from our current home/yard/hood. The kiddos want to veto it because they would have to switch elementary schools. They are in 2nd grade and kindergarten. Dad advice?
English
7.4K
106
5K
1.1M
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Mostly Peaceful Memes
Mostly Peaceful Memes@MostlyPeaceful·
Congress watching soldiers get arrested for insider trading
Mostly Peaceful Memes tweet media
English
407
11.5K
65.9K
1.4M
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Kyle Becker
Kyle Becker@kylenabecker·
We're not saying that Charlottesville itself is a "hoax." We are saying the SPLC allegedly *HELPED* to engineer the conditions for it happening, and then materially aided-and-abetted a Unite the Right organizer and thereby promoted a clash between protesters and counter-protesters. Then the SPLC fundraised off it, successfully, and the Democrats weaponized it to push a bogus narrative in the 2020 election. So the SPLC benefited financially and the Democrats benefited politically. That is why the Biden administration shut down an investigation into the SPLC after banks flagged its suspect activities. I don't know why you leftists continue to pretend that we're all stupid. It's a tired act. When you flail with these vapid counter-arguments, it just makes you look like a huckster, in addition to a race grifter.
English
576
3.7K
21.7K
28.5M
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Seamus (FreedomToons)
Seamus (FreedomToons)@seamus_coughlin·
"The people the SPLC paid in Charlottesville weren't actual Nazis, they were undercover good guys!" So you're telling me there were very fine people on both sides?
English
99
864
10.3K
138.7K
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Joshua Charles🇻🇦
Joshua Charles🇻🇦@JoshuaTCharles·
What so many refuse to recognize: Women refusing to dress modestly is just as much the result of the disorder of sin as men falling into lust. Both choose the lust of the eyes and the flesh over the humility and self-control of love. If you are a Christian woman, and love your own soul, and the souls of Christian men, you will dress modestly. If you are a Christian man, and love your own soul, and the souls of Christian women, you will do everything you can to fight lust.
English
49
131
1.2K
28.4K
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Saik0Shinigami
Saik0Shinigami@Saik0Shinigami·
@BachmannRudi 2020, 36 seats 23R/13D. Popular vote was 53.43%R for 63.9% of seats. This is ~10% split upwards. 2022, 38 seats 25R/13D. Popular cote was 58.78%R for 65.8% of seats. This is ~7% split upwards. The new numbers more closely match popular vote. Literally less gerrymandered.
English
1
1
1
1.7K
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
I agree that those issues should be a non-starter on the Right. But there are plenty of people who are avowedly opposed to Israel and who also are avowedly opposed to the family, marriage, and the sanctity of human life. Most of them would not call themselves conservatives, that’s true. But some of them do. More to the point: you say the dividing line is over the issue of Israel. So my question to you is whether you’d consider an anti-family, anti-life leftist who opposes Israel to be an ally. In other words, are they on your side of the line? To answer the question for myself, I’m America first. I never want to see Israel’s interests placed above my country’s interests under any circumstance. I also oppose this war in Iran. But if someone agrees with me on those points yet disagrees with me about protecting the family, marriage, and human life, I would not consider them an ally in any meaningful sense at all. The family is the bedrock of civilization. It is the most fundamental thing. Even more fundamental than the nation. We must be aligned on that, at least, in order to be allies.
English
276
29
1.1K
138.6K
Josh Sayler retweetledi
Anna Matson
Anna Matson@AnnaRMatson·
RFK Jr puts the measles hysteria to bed. “This has become a talking point for Democrats that somehow I caused the measles epidemic. The measles epidemic started in January 2025 - before I came into office.” “Most of the people affected are over the age of 5 years old, meaning their decision to not vaccinate predated my appointment to this office. We had about 2,200 measles cases last year and we had 1,700 this year. This is not unique to the United States. This is a global outbreak. Mexico had 3x the number of measles cases than we did. We did better than any other country in the world at controlling the epidemic. Mexico has 3x the number and it has 1/3 of the population. Canada has twice the number and it has 1/8 of our population. Europe had 33,000 cases in the last year and a 127,000 the year before and they have one half of our population. So the problem is not me.”
English
248
4.2K
22.4K
528.4K
Josh Sayler retweetledi
silvaticus 🌲
silvaticus 🌲@TranscendNWO·
I've heard Protestants say 2 Timothy 4:3–4 is applicable to Catholicism. You tell me, which is more appealing to itching ears: Doctrine that says: - Just say this prayer and you're good to go - You should try to stop sinning, but if you do sin, no biggie, just say you're sorry privately and move on, it's between you and God - You should go to church but it's kinda optional - You should get baptized but you don't have to - There is no one who has any real authority over you - If you don't like one church just go to another that fits you better Or Doctrine that says: - You must work out your own salvation with fear and trembling - If you sin (mortally), your salvation is lost, and you must confess to a priest (who eventually recognizes your voice and can hold you accountable) to be restored - You must go to church - You must get baptized properly - Your church has meaningful authority over you - If you don't like the service, too bad it's essentially the same everywhere 2 Timothy 4:3–4 > "For the time will come when people will not endure sound doctrine; but having itching ears, they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own desires, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths."
English
23
19
243
11.8K
Josh Sayler
Josh Sayler@ICXCGloria·
@Yachochacho @calicea5411 @PikeTheCommies @richjmatt26 @MattWalshBlog I wasn't intending to tell you what to do, though I didn't phrase my statement poorly. Still no excuse to speak to people the way you are. Do you speak to people in person like this? Or do you only feel comfortable being over the top insulting because of the anonymity?
English
1
0
0
21
Josh Sayler
Josh Sayler@ICXCGloria·
@ChivalryGuild You're all just making the same argument as Bernie Sanders when he says that no one should be in business if they can't afford to pay "a living wage."
English
0
0
0
12
Josh Sayler
Josh Sayler@ICXCGloria·
@breakingbaht It's hilarious to me the two of the simultaneous trends on this site are "meat prices are too high!" and "Farmers need to pay higher wages!"
English
0
0
1
83
Eric
Eric@breakingbaht·
She's trying to literally hire indentured servants. She wants them to live on the farm and work 16 hours a day and do it for essentially slave wages. Im all for discussions of what realities we need to discuss as to what the market will correct to given this situation, but you cant deny that these people are essentially trying to hold on to a situation that they cannot without just taking advantage of 3rd worlders. Idc if they do the Antebellum thing of playing with their slave's kids as a way to feel better.
Covfefe Anon@CovfefeAnon

This is like the classic dril bit >I can't find workers for my farm >Offer a higher wage >No

English
50
136
1.6K
88.6K