issou chancla

Big news: Kimi-K3 by @Kimi_Moonshot is now #1 in the Frontend Code Arena with 1679 pts, surpassing Claude Fable 5. This is a 17-place jump from Kimi-k2.6 (#18 -> #1). In Frontend, Kimi-K3 ranked #1 in 6 of 7 domains: Brand & Marketing, Reference-Based Design, Data & Analytics, Consumer Product, Simulations, and Content Creation Tools, landing #2 only in Gaming behind Fable 5. The full model weights will be released by July 27. Congrats to the @Kimi_Moonshot team on this major milestone!

🚨 A new UMA scam attempt is taking place 🚨 UMArocks whales are trying to rug the "Will Iran agree to end Uranium enrichment" market In the last days since the MoU has been leaked, the have been accumulating massive amounts of YES shares. Their plan is to force resolution to yes based on a frivolous interpretation of the MoU text, as soon as it's signed. Point 9 of the MoU says : "Pending the final deal. The Islamic republic of Iran will maintain the current status quo of it's nuclear program" They want to pass it off as saying Iran has agreed to end enrichment during the negociations. This is ridiculous. Iran is currently : - enriching at 3.67% for nuclear reactors - enriching at 20% for medical isotopes - enriching at 60% for potential weapons This is the status quo. This is the entire reason there is a war. If the current "status quo" is that Iran does not enrich Uranium as part of it's nuclear program then why is the previous point mentioning negotiations on Iran's nuclear enrichment ? Point 9 even says that *the US and Iran* must both maintain the status quo, which is understood as "the US must not impose additional sanctions". No one in their right mind would think it implies that the US has agreed to end all sanctions during the talks It's obvious to any honest observer that "maintaining the status quo" means not expending their nuclear program, for example, not to start enriching uranium to 90% during the talks. But it is exactly why they are betting against it. They know that traders will fill their orders. As soon as the deal is signed, they will propose using their Whitelisted wallets and use their control of UMA to pass their made up resolution. If a consensus of credible reporting announces that Iran agreed to pause all uranium enrichment during the talks, then let it resolve to YES, but it is not what is happening there. @Polymarket must issue a preventative clarification saying that this alone will not suffice for resolution or a ton of traders will get burned before they step in @shayne_coplan @mustafap0ly

25/ RU 4th Cuck Division of the 1st Cuck Army claims capture of Borova but got lost and "liberated" Kolomyichykha for the 3rd time... Coordinates: 49.45615, 37.97097 Source: x.com/ZoamSc2/status…

When just learned that staking $POLY will increase maker rebate and reduce fees But what's more interesting to me is that it can be STAKED at all... This strongly indicates that Polymarket is working on releasing its own chain. Modern crypto platforms don't bother with staking when they just want to give benefits to token holders, it's enough that token be in the holder's wallet. If they are talking about staking then it means that $POLY will likely be a governance/fuel token for a Proof of Stake chain. This is reinforced by declarations from @devjoshstevens, VP of engineering, that announced a Chain Migration away from Polygon. The two options are : 1 - @Polymarket moves away from Polygon to settle on some other random chain, either L1 (too slow) or L2 (owned by a third party) that and $POLY becomes just a benefits token 2 - They move away from Polygon to their own new chain, that they can make as fast as they want by centralizing all while retaining ultimate sovereignty over it. In that case $POLY will in addition to benefits be the lifefuel of the platform. Option 2 seem waaaaay more likely to me and way more bullish too. @mustafap0ly like if you confirm