Liz-d

1.2K posts

Liz-d

Liz-d

@Lizzee_d

Katılım Temmuz 2011
251 Takip Edilen55 Takipçiler
Liz-d
Liz-d@Lizzee_d·
@JournalistJill These awful women with no consideration for women need to get voted out! I hope everyone is listening hard to this nonsense! 🤬
English
0
0
0
15
Jill Foster
Jill Foster@JournalistJill·
Lib Dem MP says that because most women are assaulted in the home, we should be focusing on that rather single-sex spaces. So if a woman escapes and goes to a DV shelter - does this genius think single-sex spaces don't matter then? Gah...the idiocy.
teresa smith@treesey

Well done @RosieDuffield1 for eliciting NEWS from the @LibDems MP Marie Goldman who says they WANT TO AMEND the Equality Act. Did @LibVoice4Women know this? Also stay to the end of this clip for some disgraceful comments from Ms Goldman about women’s experience of male violence

English
15
35
135
1.5K
Liz-d
Liz-d@Lizzee_d·
@Glinner Apparently i had already signed it….
English
0
0
0
18
Liz-d retweetledi
Akua Reindorf KC
Akua Reindorf KC@akuareindorf·
I hope note has been taken of recent (unsuccessful) attempts by transactivist orgs to persuade @Ganhri1 to downgrade the @EHRC because of insufficient independence from govt Interference in the work of the @EHRC by the Executive seriously risks contravening the Paris Principles
Geri Scott@Geri_E_L_Scott

Excl: Bridget Phillipson told Britain’s equality regulator that it must “tone down” its guidance over single-sex spaces and make it more inclusive before she presents it to parliament. Phillipson said today she would publish the EHRC code of conduct next month after the local elections, and the EHRC confirmed it had "made adjustments where they help the code provide legally accurate, practical guidance that is useful to duty bearers". A source with knowledge of the process said much of the discussion had been over the “tone” of the document, with a feeling it had been approached with the aim of excluding transgender people rather than finding inclusive ways of operating while also upholding the law. Sources close to Phillipson said they "completely dispute" that she asked the regulator to "tone down" the guidance. They said the request was that the EHRC ensured there was clarity for all kinds of services and that the code was accessible and robust. The Times understands that the changes that have been made to the resubmitted code are minimal and that while the guidance itself will not change, the regulator had been asked to include more examples of how organisations can be inclusive within the law. thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…

English
4
84
282
7.4K
Liz-d retweetledi
Akua Reindorf KC
Akua Reindorf KC@akuareindorf·
🧵 A reminder that: The SC judgment wasn’t about whether trans people in general should be treated as the opposite sex under the Equality Act *It was already known that they should not* /1
Dr Mike Hill@DrMikeHill

@akuareindorf Are you saying it didn’t get reviewed and endorsed by the board of which you were a member? I, like others included businesses, charities and public sector organisations don’t think it was straight forward at all. Nor do they think the law is either clear or easy to implement.

English
8
271
1K
52.4K
Liz-d
Liz-d@Lizzee_d·
@jan_murray Fecking terrifying!! Kids should be nowhere near these punters!! 😳
English
0
0
1
22
Janet Murray
Janet Murray@jan_murray·
Some pics from Sunday's Girlguiders Against Trans Exclusion (GATE) protest against the new 'no boys' in the Girl Guides rule - held in Norwich. 'Keep the Rainbow in Rainbows' Photos shared publicly on Instagram @christopherhayesthinks
Janet Murray tweet mediaJanet Murray tweet mediaJanet Murray tweet mediaJanet Murray tweet media
English
11
7
36
1.1K
Alexa 🎗️🧡🧡🧡
It’s a complete mystery about why people assume he’s trans. 1) ugly 2) long hair in combover style 3) choker around neck to hide the madam’s apple 4) girls name 5) noncery about minors 6) irrational obsession with JKR
Alexa 🎗️🧡🧡🧡 tweet media
English
11
7
98
1.3K
Liz-d
Liz-d@Lizzee_d·
@Jonathan_Hinder @CConcern The NHS is very lucky she came back after how she was so appallingly treated……Please let the circumstances and people who pushed her persecution be investigated and people held to account.
English
0
0
10
150
Liz-d
Liz-d@Lizzee_d·
@cavakaggyreborn Gosh that’s unfortunate/awkward given he is one…..circular much? 🤯
English
0
0
3
25
cavakaggyreborn
cavakaggyreborn@cavakaggyreborn·
So biological male is now a transphobic slur according to Sparkles 🙄🙄
cavakaggyreborn tweet media
English
13
7
25
408
Liz-d
Liz-d@Lizzee_d·
@NoShirleyNo How many one-offs a week are considered a one-off? 🤔
English
0
0
0
4
Liz-d retweetledi
Gerry
Gerry@GerryKeogh_·
LGBT Youth Scotland’s latest scandal exposes catastrophic governance failure and Equalities Minister @kaukabstewart Stewart’s unforgivable negligence. The sudden resignation of Timothy Guy Westwood as convener of LGBT Youth Scotland (LGBTYS) has ripped the lid off the charity’s broken recruitment and oversight processes. Appointed to the board in late 2024 and fast tracked to convener after the 2025 AGM, 25 year-old Westwood boasted an impossibly glittering CV: senior roles at the British Red Cross, Mind, and Amnesty International, plus “portfolio director, lawyer and adviser” on multiple boards. Independent verification destroyed the claims within hours. The British Red Cross has no record of him. Mind confirms no senior role. His profile photos showed obvious AI generation or heavy digital filtering. Yet LGBTYS either swallowed the fantasy whole or chose to ignore the glaring red flags until public exposure forced his exit. This wasn’t a minor HR error. It was a total collapse of basic due diligence by an organisation that claims to safeguard vulnerable young people aged 13–25. When a charity handling public money and shaping youth policy can’t be bothered to check credentials, it reveals something far darker: a pattern of putting ideology and optics before competence, safety and accountability. And this isn’t isolated. LGBTYS has a documented history of safeguarding red flags: Links to a former CEO convicted in 2009 as part of a major paedophile ring. A current £900,000 civil claim from a man alleging he was groomed as a teenager by charity-linked adults who introduced him to adult venues, alcohol and exploitation. Allegations of volunteers advising self-harm to children instead of discouraging it. Open defiance of the UK Supreme Court ruling on the legal definition of “woman” Despite this litany of serious concerns, the charity has pocketed more than £13.4 million in Scottish Government funding since 2015 and continues to influence LGBT education and policy in Scottish schools. That brings us to the real scandal: Minister Kaukab Stewart. As Equalities Minister, Stewart is personally responsible for this funding pipeline. When safeguarding concerns about LGBTYS were raised in Parliament in 2024, she airily replied that the government had “engaged” with the charity, found “no further action” needed, and would keep the money flowing for 2024–25. That response now stands exposed as dangerously negligent bordering on reckless. Handing millions of taxpayers’ pounds to an organisation with repeated governance and safeguarding failures, without rigorous independent scrutiny, is a grotesque abdication of ministerial duty. Instead of demanding proper vetting, transparent recruitment and immediate corrective action, Stewart chose to defend the charity even as it thumbed its nose at the Supreme Court and basic accountability. This isn’t oversight. It’s ideological capture and it has left vulnerable young people at risk while Scottish taxpayers foot the bill. Enough. Time for a full independent investigation into LGBTYS and for Minister Stewart to explain exactly how she let this happen on her watch.
Gerry tweet mediaGerry tweet media
English
28
259
569
9.7K
Liz-d
Liz-d@Lizzee_d·
@TheParty1sOver @stueymaco No, he does JoUrNALiSm…..it’s something different! You don’t need to be able to spell or conjugate proper sentences for it! 😉
English
0
0
1
19
Women Won’t Wheesht
Women Won’t Wheesht@WWWheesht·
Just a quick note. If you haven't been "payed" for Saturday, please drop us a note. We were using the same delivery service that Terf HQ use for the monthly gold bullion & cheques from Russia, but we believe there may be some transportation delays due to the issues with the Strait of Hormuz. Just a reminder of the pay scales: £1,000 - Walk by & look interested £2,000 - Stay for >10 mins £3,000 - Stay for an hour £4,000 - Stay for an hour & hold banner £5,000 - Stay for an hour, hold banner, clap at the end of, at least, 2 speeches. £10,000 - Top Terf Package Stay for an hour Hold banner Clap at the end of each speech Whoop at least once Sing along to For Women's Rights Thank Police for their assistance Dispose of any litter Come to pub
Stuart Macintosh@stueymaco

Was anybody “payed”?

English
116
173
947
15.7K
Liz-d
Liz-d@Lizzee_d·
RT @Psychgirl211: Hi X So, I've just had two officers from @MPSLewisham come to my house. They provided me a Ring doorbell and they will…
English
0
23
0
3
Liz-d retweetledi
Mother Superior
Mother Superior@T0MB0Y0·
Is this the same @oliviabaileymp who was “pleased to chair a roundtable with LGBT+ organisations” that was top heavy with men in dresses posing as women. And she invited Mridul Wadhwa, former CEO Rape Crisis Scotland, a man who said female victims of Rape Crisis Scotland who he perceived as bigoted should “reframe their trauma”. *Olivia had deleted this post but women have a kitchen drawer of receipts. Note that @bphillipsonMP reposted it. So women know that OB and BP are just simping for the T. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
Mother Superior tweet media
English
5
79
246
4.2K
Outspoken Women
Outspoken Women@women_outspoken·
@stueymaco He's getting muddled. The SWP and TQ+ groups here in Cardiff payed (sic) people to protest against us with travel passes and, it would appear, sandwiches. We know because they announced details of the travel passes to us via megaphone. Your side pays, mate. We pay for ourselves.
English
3
6
41
461
Sarah Phillimore
Sarah Phillimore@SVPhillimore·
It had been pointed out to me that the stick figure of the ‘dead Terf’ has only leg and this could be a coded reference to me. I find this an interesting observation and sadly I would not be remotely surprised if it was directed at my disability: this is how these men behave and are supported to behave. Regardless, it is a wholly unacceptable public threat/incitement to violence and I hope will be added to the pile of cross examination material for Mr Maugham.
Sarah Phillimore@SVPhillimore

When the BSB ask for my comments on the GLP request for review of its decision I shall send this photograph and Jolyon Maugham’s post in support of Bash Back. Once the GLP are stupid enough to take this to the High Court in judicial review, I shall be an interested party and my intervention will be a concise presentation of the GLP commitment to domestic terrorism. This will hopefully be the start of identifying Maugham’s and his adult daughter’s active links with these groups. I have had more than enough of these men now and I will use every lawful means at my disposal to end their attempted reign of terror.

English
10
50
298
8K
Liz-d
Liz-d@Lizzee_d·
@stueymaco How can anyone be that thick??!! If he really “believes” that people would NEED to be PAID to attend then that really speaks volumes….he just cannot fathom how much women and supporters value women’s safety, privacy and dignity away from creeps like him…🤷‍♀️
English
1
1
18
393