InARush

1.9K posts

InARush

InARush

@Rushing9000

Katılım Mayıs 2015
465 Takip Edilen46 Takipçiler
tradingbiotech
tradingbiotech@tradingsssss·
$CRVS i think most of the AD companies are going on a run bc of that $APGE acquisition
tradingbiotech tweet media
English
2
0
17
1.7K
InARush
InARush@Rushing9000·
@RudyResearch What is your price target for $CCCC in 2-3 years?
English
0
0
1
97
Rudy
Rudy@RudyResearch·
$abvx is now a bond, sells for at least 170+ seems pretty certain along with $prax approval. $cccc $cue and $zura for multi baggers now.
English
2
0
37
6.4K
Dragonballchad
Dragonballchad@dragonballchad·
$Tenx whats the expected upside here if ph3 hits considering their heavy dilution and cash need? goes up to 40?
English
4
0
6
2.8K
InARush
InARush@Rushing9000·
@pmill145 @semodough Exactly, KOL acting as if it’s the first time an oral medication that has bid dosing or food effects has blockbuster potential.
English
0
0
1
41
pm
pm@pmill145·
@semodough ? As if most things you put in your mouth don't require being aware of whether it needs to be taken with food or without, or time of day/night?
English
1
0
0
115
dough
dough@semodough·
$CRVS $KYMR Cowen KOL KOLs Expect Oral/Injectable Use Could Eventually Split The 30 Billion AD Market Multiple oral agents are in development for AD, and our KOL believes treatment selection between oral and injectables could be dictated by patient preference - especially if oral agents achieve similar efficacy to injectable agents. He expects that most patients might prefer orals initially, especially compared to currently available frequently injected agents - leading to his expectation for 70% oral / 30% injectable split in utilization. However, given compliance issues with oral agents and the availability of long-acting agents he expects the split will eventually be closer to 50/50. If oral drugs demonstrate a food effect requiring specific timing with dosing, then some patient preference might switch towards injectable options.
dough@semodough

$CRVS OPPY KOL call Oral options could change the landscape in AD, with a clear efficacy bar around 25-30% placebo adjusted EASI75 or a mean change in EASI of 60-70%, both at 16wks, based on dupilumab. Both $KYMR's '621 and $CRVS' SQL look promising with novel MOAs being an important addition to the space. Dr. Strober seemed a bit more enthusiastic about SQL given the longer treatment experience and placebo arm

English
1
4
25
7.7K
InARush
InARush@Rushing9000·
@A_May_MD What’s next? Are we running it back with $pali?
English
0
0
6
714
STEVE
STEVE@STvrosb·
$CRVS Momentum for CRVS is strongly bullish. The 14-period Slow Stochastic oscillator is above 80! This means that investors have been actively purchasing shares & driving the price higher.
English
1
0
6
548
InARush
InARush@Rushing9000·
@DamaskCapital Don’t disagree with you. Think there’s room for multiple players in AD even with all the competition. I do think safety validation over time will result in an increased likelihood of closing the gap vs other competitors.
English
0
0
0
59
Hego Damask
Hego Damask@DamaskCapital·
It's a novel ITK inhibition mechanism, which is always going to be met with some caution at first, even if preclinical safety data is v strong. Prescribers likely will want more real world safety data before prescribing in 1L. Likewise, there's going to be so much existing competition in AD ($KYMR, $NKTR, generic Dupi, et al) at launch; seems far more realistic to underwrite 20%+ in 2L than tangible market share in 1L, at least for now. But who knows, on paper it definitely fits the efficacy benchmarks for 1L in my view.
English
1
0
2
150
Hego Damask
Hego Damask@DamaskCapital·
Someone tell me why $CRVS isn't strong R/R at these levels (<$15/sh). Yes, they'll likely be 2L only in AD, but that's still a 3bn+ dollar opportunity, and at least 1bn risk-adjusted in the US alone. Rare that a biotech with data this promising trades at/below 1x risk-adjusted peak sales. Thoughts @A_May_MD @seedy19tron ?
English
2
1
4
1.2K
InARush
InARush@Rushing9000·
@HOThomasWPhelps @fortunoaurelar Since the partnership between $GLUE and $NVS was announced, the value of $GLUE has risen 367%. A partnership would be great news as well for shareholders.
English
0
0
1
154
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps@HOThomasWPhelps·
Not commenting on timing or what stage anything would happen, but NVS were not as high on my list until I did work on it over the weekend. When the time is right we will hear about something, but CRVS has lots of data coming and I would not think is in a rush. I would think $NVS is aware and watching, especially as they are partnered w/ $GLUE on their VAV1 degrader for Th17 diseases and I have written about the close proximity of VAV1 and ITK in TCR signaling and their differences. If you are interested in VAV1, you would have to know about ITK.
English
3
0
14
428
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps@HOThomasWPhelps·
$NVS website on R&D - Novartis interests seems good fit w/ $CRVS #soquelitinib oral ITK inhibitor: oncology and I&I Soquelitinib: - oral small molecule - immuno-derm (AD, HS) - durable profile = NVS goal long-term remission w/o chronic immune suppression novartis.com/research-and-d…
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps tweet mediaIn Honour Of Thomas W Phelps tweet media
English
6
10
40
4.5K
InARush
InARush@Rushing9000·
@HOThomasWPhelps If it is $CRVS, think it’ll be a partnership rather than a buyout. Think miller would like to more value creation.
English
0
0
1
387
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps@HOThomasWPhelps·
Prior post: I showed similarities and differences in $GLUE #VAV1 (scaffold protein) target in Tcells v $CRVS #ITK (kinase) target $NVS already in space, partnered ww/ $GLUE and should be aware of the pathway proximity of the two and their differences x.com/HOThomasWPhelp…
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps@HOThomasWPhelps

$NVS $GLUE #Vav1 target in #Tcell TCR pathway near #ITK inhibited by $CRVS #soquelitinib Key differences: 1) Vav1 expressed in more tissues than ITK 2) ITKi ⬆️CD8+ Memory Tcells 3) ITKi ⬇ ALL #Th2 cytokines #IL2 #IL4 #IL5 #IL13 4) Vav1 deficiency ⬆️IFN-γ, ITKi same IFN-γ

English
1
3
17
2K
InARush
InARush@Rushing9000·
@GhostCat_ @teslarosa I don’t know if $CRVS would be selling off this early but I do think a partnership could occur this early/
English
0
0
2
421
Ghostcat
Ghostcat@GhostCat_·
@teslarosa Think $crvs provides the best r/r for them at this point and mgmt probably more inclined to sell
English
2
0
1
492
Teslarosa
Teslarosa@teslarosa·
Monitoring the chains of all these companies for a potential $NVS acquisition. 1. $CVTK Good target, bit expensive 2. $CRVS Phase 1 a little too early, but cheap. 3. $NKTR Not super confident it would be them, but do it anyways Novartis!
English
4
0
20
5.8K
J
J@jayabacus·
Won’t Zumi and all the IL4/13’s face bisimilar’s in 2032 (ish) for 1L? Why wouldn’t insurance simply mandate a biosimilar first? There must be something or why would they spend $11B to buy APGE?
English
2
0
11
2.7K
InARush
InARush@Rushing9000·
@HOThomasWPhelps Do you think $CRVS could also enroll early? I’m hoping they can, but since they are enrolling 40% r/r patients I think it may take longer.
English
2
0
1
774
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps@HOThomasWPhelps·
Atopic Dermatitis Space Heating Up? Plausible $KYMR accelerating oral #STAT6 degrader KT-621 timeline increased competitive urgency around $APGE for $ABBV buyout this week Today's news compresses lead $APGE and $NKTR biologics had over orals in development behind them
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps tweet media
In Honour Of Thomas W Phelps@HOThomasWPhelps

Is $KYMR rapid enrolment for Ph2b atopic dermatitis, 6 mo ahead of schedule an indication of strong demand for oral therapy in AD? Should bode well for $CRVS Ph2b enrolment for oral ITK inhib #soquelitinib in AD Mirrors rapid uptake of oral ICOTYDE $JNJ $PTGX in psoriasis

English
3
0
18
9.2K
Investor & Climber
Investor & Climber@Investorclimber·
@HOThomasWPhelps As I consider you wise, any idea on why the different behaviour of the market on the different tickers?
English
2
0
0
144
haodongvli
haodongvli@haodongvli·
$CRVS: please do not sell yourself cheap $APGE
English
3
1
15
2.7K
pm
pm@pmill145·
@biotech_jack No clue but one thing's for sure- the many $crvs shorts caught flat-footed.
English
2
0
4
821
Biotech_Jack
Biotech_Jack@biotech_jack·
How much could $CRVS rise on Monday due to the $APGE deal? Please provide estimates.
English
6
0
7
4.3K
Bored
Bored@Ikkydiphoenix·
$APGE BO tells us a thing about $NKTR and $CRVS: or $ABBV didn't consider them or they want more than $11B
English
3
0
2
695