Russel PLANT

492 posts

Russel PLANT

Russel PLANT

@RusselPLANT1

Old man of the sea

Katılım Temmuz 2022
103 Takip Edilen18 Takipçiler
Russel PLANT retweetledi
Maxi
Maxi@AllForProgress_·
You might have heard of Maggie Oliver. She's a former Greater Manchester detective who, in 2012, was ordered to abandon her investigation into the systematic rape of children in Rochdale, and decided she would rather resign her warrant card rather than do so. Maggie, as that would imply, is one of the good ones. I constantly ask how our police can consider themselves worthy of the badge if they are not willing to return the badge rather than commit injustice in its name. Maggie did just that; she was asked to cover for criminals, so she told the shirts to stuff themselves and handed back her commission. She won a small but consequential victory in the High Court on Friday. Mr Justice Kimblin granted her foundation a full judicial review of whether the British state has actually done anything about the recommendations it accepted, in 2022, at the end of a seven-year inquiry into the institutional cover-up of decades of child sexual abuse. Maggie Oliver is one woman. She has no political party behind her and no standing in Whitehall. She has no peerage, no chambers, no billionaire foundation footing her bills. She was ordered, by senior officers, to drop her investigation into a network of men who were raping children in industrial quantities in her city, because of the demographics to which those men belong made the whole thing a bit awkward. Fourteen years on, she has done what nobody else in this country has been able to. She has hauled the British state into open court to answer for the choice it made, over four years and under two governments, to hold a seven-year, £200 million inquiry into the institutional cover-up of child abuse and implement, deliberately, none of that inquiry's recommendations. The Home Office accepted those recommendations in 2022. So did the Department for Education, the police inspectorates and the Crown Prosecution Service. And then nothing happened. The recommendations sat. The departments restructured. Ministers rotated. The girls and women who had given evidence aged. More such operations continued around the country, while the men who had run the previous set of them either walked free, left the country, or drew their own pensions. The state, in the manner of every institution Tony Blair ever built, had decided that the writing of the report was the action, and the doing of the report could be handed off to history. That is what Maggie Oliver has now forced into court. And the political class knows what that means. The Home Secretary has not commented. The Prime Minister has not commented. The candidates jockeying through the post-Starmer Labour succession have, at the time of writing, failed even to speak her name, as though they know that, if they do, lightning will flash in the sky and they'll be turned into a pillar of Tesco's-own-brand dishwasher salt. They are silent because they recognise, accurately, that the answers a judicial review will produce - to the question of why their inquiry's findings were treated as ornamental - will, should, must end the careers of every official who was supposed to act on them and did not. That councillors and councils, mayors, indeed entire political parties, will be caught under ultraviolet light and shown for their guilt. It's time a government did what the British state has spent twenty years declining to do. Take on institutional failure. Name the institutions that failed, in public, on the record. Name the officers and officials who covered it up, and the officers and officials who pressed for the cover-up too. Prosecute them under the standards that any other employee of a public organisation defrauding the public would expect to face. The recommendations the inquiry produced must be implemented in full, alongside whatever further measures a second look at the evidence then demands. There will not be another inquiry into the inquiries. There will be the verdicts. Maggie Oliver is one of the bravest people in Britain. She has earned, by her own resignation and by fourteen years and a foundation and a court case carried on her back, the right to expect from a future British government the simple thing that ought to have happened in 2014, in 2016, in 2018, in 2022 and in every other year of this national disgrace. She has not yet been given it; we have not yet been given it. But it will be given, and soon.
Maxi tweet media
English
266
4.1K
11.4K
187.8K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
@Lesleyknibb He’s a lousy prime minister of no noticeable integrity or principle. Mandelson alone should have ended him. He appears to have wanted power for the sake of power. He blows like a feather in the wind, U-turning so often he must have permanent whiplash.
English
534
3.7K
25K
254.5K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
Henry Winter
Henry Winter@henrywinter·
So a club can sell its hotel to itself, sell its women’s team to itself, but West Brom are punished, they believe, for legitimate “in-kind” donations to the Albion Foundation, its charity partner that saves lives. Albion also believe the alleged PSR breach is “less than £2m”
West Bromwich Albion@WBA

West Bromwich Albion Football Club has released the below statement following publication of an EFL Club Financial Review Panel (CFRP) decision. 👇

English
467
2K
12.6K
1.4M
Russel PLANT retweetledi
David Piesing
David Piesing@DavidPiesing63·
@RobDorsettSky @JPercyTelegraph @GoldbergRadio @BuzagloToBalis @AliJones9 Hang on - the club had to borrow money BECAUSE Lai had literally stolen (I use that term without hesitation) money from the club with the Wisdom Smart “loan” that was made unlawfully by his stooge (then sole director of the club), Ke Xu, in blatant breach of his fiduciary duty to only act in the best interests of the company (being the football club) which that “loan” made to Wisdom Smart very clearly was not! I sent several emails to Ke Xu about this (I have copies), pointing out his blatant breach of fiduciary duty and demanding to know as a shareholder what he was doing to enforce repayment from Wisdom Smart. Every email was totally ignored. I also sent emails about it to the club’s auditors, Azets (I still have copies) who were obviously very interested. Crucially I sent an email to Rick Parry (Chairman) and Trevor Birch (Chief Executive Officer) of the EFL on 20th January 2023 about Lai’s “loan”, which led to two video calls with their “very interested” colleagues Mark Rowan (Chief Communications Officer) and Nick Craig (Chief Operating Officer) in May 2023 about all the shenanigans. I made them aware of facts regarding the Chinese ultimate beneficial ownership of the club which neither they nor the Premier League (who originally approved Lai as “fit and proper”) knew nothing about. Because of those illegal acts by Xu, as Lai’s puppet, money unlawfully disappeared from the club, leaving it days away from going into administration. If the club may potentially now suffer a points deduction some 3 years later directly because of the club having no option but to pay interest on expensive MSD loans taken out by Lai to literally keep the club in existence because he was unable to repay his own unlawful Wisdom Smart “loan”, then this would be a disgraceful gross injustice by the EFL and must be fully exposed and challenged. No sane person would deem that to a breach worthy of a points deduction. The EFL was made fully aware of the situation regarding that Wisdom Smart loan and if they cannot now locate their emails to refer to, I do still have them all. The EFL has had an absolute stinker here on multiple fronts (as did the Premier League before them) and they need to recognise that and immediately dismiss any charge against the club.
Rob Dorsett@RobDorsettSky

#wbafc: key area of dispute between Albion and EFL is over interest payments on loans taken out by Lai. If those £5m payments are included in PSR calculations, they are in breach. Club claims they shouldn’t be. Full explanation here. skysports.com/share/13532064

English
45
220
644
93.8K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
Paul Weston
Paul Weston@PWestoff·
The Royal Navy by numbers: Frigates: 7. Available: 3 Destroyers: 6. Available: 1 - HMS Dragon (broken). Naval Manpower (excluding Royal Marines): 20,000 Admirals : 40 Commodores: 90 MOD Civil Servants: 55,000 Clown Service - destroyed by politicians. forcesnews.com/services/navy/…
English
525
2.8K
9.5K
204.6K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
Maxi
Maxi@AllForProgress_·
A British company called Skycutter, based in the East Midlands, just finished first out of the entire field in the Pentagon's Drone Dominance Program. Score of 99.3 out of 100. The largest order goes to them: two and a half thousand units, an initial Pentagon contract of twenty million dollars, with an option to scale up to two hundred million. Read that and really soak it in. It's something that rarely happens anymore. A small British startup beat the entire American defence-tech industrial complex on its own home turf, in a competition the Pentagon designed itself, against companies that get whatever they ask for from Washington on a Tuesday morning. It looks likely to be followed by something that always happens - Skycutter are, by the looks of things, going to pack up their talent and their operations and move all of it to America. Why? The MoD, they say, is too slow. The procurement cycle is too long. There is no clear pathway from "British company that builds something the world wants" to "British company that the British state buys from in serious quantity at serious speed." No byway through which you move from "A potentially world-toppling IP advantage" to "Complete and deserved domination of the global market." So we are about to lose them. Not because they want to leave, but because the country that produced them cannot organise itself fast enough to keep them. The MoD's response, by the way, was to issue a statement saying it wants the UK to be "the best place in the world to start and grow a defence business." It does not want to do this. Indeed it is difficult to convey, in polite English, how galling that sentence is when read alongside the news it is responding to. You're a serious country? You'd fight for a company like Skycutter. You'd fight to take them if they weren't yours, and you'd fight like mad to keep them if they were. A serious country has someone in Whitehall whose entire fucking job is making sure the next Skycutter doesn't end up in Virginia. We have, instead, a Defence Office for Small Business Growth. Which is the kind of name you give a thing that you created for no purpose other than taking the piss out of it.
English
99
710
3.8K
590.9K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
MikeD
MikeD@mjdaly57·
Lucy Powell has been the Labour MP for Manchester Central since 2012 and is currently Deputy Leader of the Labour Party. Where to begin? The Gorton & Denton by-election? My abiding memory is not so much Hannah Spencer causing a significant upset but the abysmal, negative campaign run by Labour. A campaign that was coordinated by Lucy Powell. I don’t recall seeing the Labour candidate, Angeliki Stogia, say anything but I do remember the bitter, petulant and negative tweets that Lucy was posting every day, primarily about @ZackPolanski and @TheGreenParty. Lucy does seem to court controversy. There was her dismissive ‘dog whistle’ comments in respect of grooming gangs. And Lucy has recently been found to have rented her flat to a fellow MP and claimed expenses (approx £30,000) - to cover the rent. Lucy is member of the lobby organisation Labour Friends of Israel and was very much involved in the plots, coups and leadership bids aimed at taking down Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership of The Labour Party. The @ElectoralCommUK website shows that Lucy has personally been given £84,004 in donations. These include: £15,000 from Electricity Group Ltd. £5,000 from the Trevor Chinn, Gary Lubner funded/Morgan McSweeney run consortium @LabourTogether £10,000 from Martin Taylor. £9,500 from @Opal_RealEstate £5,016 in tickets & hospitalityfrom @Google & @bpi_music for two @BRITAwards ceremonies. £1,988 in tickets & hospitality from @CricketAus for an Ashes match at Lords. 🏏 £333.60 in tickets from @Channel4 for a rugby super league match. 🏉 £1,047 in tickets & hospitality from the @EFL for the Carabao Cup Final. ⚽️ £1,600 in tickets & hospitality from @global to attend Capital’s Summertime Ball. 🌞🍹 £2,600 in tickets & hospitality from @PRSforMusic for the Glastonbury Festival. 🎸 £582 in tickets & hospitality from @bpi_music to attend the Mercury Music Prize. 🎸 £990 in tickets & hospitality from Camelot to attend the Rugby League World Cup Final. 🏉 £3,432 in tickets & hospitality from @PinewoodStudios to attend the BAFTAs 🎭 £2,741. 42 from @unitetheunion £1,303.40 in tickets & hospitality from @ITV for the National Television awards. 📺 £3,440 in tickets & hospitality from @Channel4 for the @BAFTA awards. 🎭 £6,088 in tickets and hospitality from @SilverstoneUK for the British Grand Prix. 🏎️ £1,050 from the @the_LTA for @Wimbledon tickets. 🎾 £2,860 in tickets & hospitality from @ManCity for matches at the Ethiad.⚽️ £595 in tickets & hospitality from the @IvorsAcademy for The Ivor Novello Awards. 🎶 £900 in tickets & hospitality from the @premierleague for a match. ⚽️ £1,100 in tickets & hospitality from @englandcricket for a match at Lords. 🏏 £600 in tickets & hospitality from the @FootballAssoc for the FA Cup Semi-Final. ⚽️ £3,477.60 in tickets & hospitality from @TheJockeyClub for the Grand National at Aintree. 🐴 £402 in tickets & hospitality from @SOLTnews for The Olivier Awards. 🎭 £694 in tickets & hospitality from @the_LTA for Davis Cup matches. 🎾 £470 in tickets & hospitality from @SkyBet for the Carabao Cup Final. ⚽️ £340 in tickets & hospitality from the @WPBSAofficial for the snooker World Championships. 🤵 With her £170,000+salary, expenses (£42,410.65+ claimed in the last year), generous donations, shareholdings, rental income, housing allowances, TV and radio appearance fees and perks, Lucy is sitting very nicely in her career as an MP. And as an MP, Lucy initially voted to retain the two-child benefit cap, voted to scrap the winter fuel payment to pensioners, voted for the welfare changes that will impact people who are disabled and unwell, voted against an inquiry into grooming gangs and voted to restrict trials by jury. ‘The Labour Party - Working For You’. @UKLabour @LucyMPowell #LocalElections2026 #LabourDoorstep @McrLabour @BBCNews @itvnews @Channel4News @_LFI @RSylvester1 @observer @guardian @MichelleDewbs
MikeD tweet media
English
124
951
1.3K
49.3K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
My monologue from today’s The Times at One with Andrew Neil @TimesRadio FAILURE TO INCREASE DEFENCE SPENDING A NATIONAL SCANDAL. The failure of the Starmer government to increase defence spending by anything like enough is becoming a national scandal.  The need has never been greater in peacetime. Wars are raging in Ukraine and the Gulf. A revanchist Russia bears down on Eastern Europe. The Strait of Hormuz is in Iranian hands — and closed.  President Trump has gone from rightly demanding NATO’s European members do more for their own defence to wrongly threatening to pull America out of NATO altogether.  Yet the Starmer government sits on its hands doing next to nothing.  It sensibly commissioned a Strategic Defence Review when it came to power in the summer of 2024. That review reported in June 2025.  The government accepted all 62 of its proposals to reconfigure our military and rearm the country. It promised a Defence Investment Plan by the autumn to show how we’d pay for it.  Almost a year later there’s still no sign of it. Neither the PM nor the Defence Secretary can tell us when we will see it.  Meanwhile defence spending stutters, wholly inadequate to the tasks at hand. Trump’s War in the Gulf has exposed just how hollowed out our armed forces have become  — a diminished Navy, most of which cannot be deployed at sea  — an airforce short of fighter jets — a minuscule army incapable of mounting a major armoured fighting force — a country without its own ballistic missile defence.  Yet none of that can be put right on current or planned levels of defence spending.  Of course Labour’s inheritance was a terrible one. Fourteen years of Tory government were marked by a clear deterioration in our military prowess.  In the Cameron/Osborne years between 2010 and 2016, defence spending was cut in real terms by 22%. A fatal fall. Subsequent upticks did little to fill the hole that cut left.  But blaming the Tories only gets you so far. Rather than making up for lost ground the Starmer is largely standing still.  It inherited defence spending in its first year — 2024/25 — of £60 billion. It increased that by a mere £2 billion for 2025/26 — a pathetic amount in a dangerous world. And that’s in cash terms, without taking inflation into account.  It’s added only £3.5 billion — again in cash terms — for the upcoming financial year 2026/27. It barely takes the defence budget to 2.5% of GDP.  Yes, there are bigger rises in the years after that. But it’s still too little, too late — and barely moves defence above 2.5% of GDP.  Starmer has vaguely committed to 3% in the next Parliament — ie the early 2030s — and to 3.5% by 2035, which would be the next parliament after that. But these are only ambitions. There is no roadmap, no blueprint, no budget plan to get there.  Defence spending needs to be ramped up far more quickly than that. Instead, sleight of hand is exaggerating what small increases there are. Ministers try to slip in the intelligence services when counting defence. The cost of helping Ukraine. Unfunded pay rises for the military.  It all means that in real terms even the small uptick in defence spending is not as big as it seems.  There was a time when, as a share of GDP, Britain spent more on defence than any other NATO member bar America. It is a measure of our military decline that we’re now 12th — and still slipping.  The money is there if only there was the willpower to move it to defence — from the massive profligate expense of net zero, from the ballooning welfare budget, from a new time-limited tax, perhaps on luxuries, if that’s what it takes.  Other countries get the need to rearm — Germany, Poland, the Baltic States, Canada, even the peace-loving Scandinavians. But not Keir Starmer’s Britain.  It is his single biggest dereliction of duty. He needs to put it right. Before it’s too late. Or it will be forever the blackest of marks on his tenure in power.
English
117
385
1.4K
133.6K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC@BishopDewar·
As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese
English
5.5K
18.5K
59.5K
2.2M
Russel PLANT retweetledi
Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧
Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧@TiceRichard·
Dan, Are you having a laugh? How can a property company with properties approx £6m value be spending £1.8 m (30%) pa on property expenses? Year in year out. That stinks Political parties are taxable on trading and commercial income. This Labour company has never paid corporation tax in 24 years despite over £30 million of income…. Either they are spectacularly incompetent or something very improper appears to be going on @Gabriel_Pogrund
Dan Neidle@DanNeidle

It's not that surprising that a property holding company owned by a political party makes a teensy taxable profit. It is surprising it's failed to file accounts. Potentially an offence (albeit one that's almost never prosecuted).

English
151
514
1.8K
216.8K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧
Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧@TiceRichard·
@UKLabour @TorstenBell must explain how Labour’s own propco, Labour Party Properties Ltd, earned over £30 million in rents since 2020, yet paid ZERO corporation tax 🤔 Seems coincidentally very high property & admin costs wipe out profit every year 🤔 @Gabriel_Pogrund @DanNeidle Also latest accts 6 months overdue 👀
English
20
316
1.1K
16.3K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
A Man Of Memes
A Man Of Memes@RickyDoggin·
A MASTERCLASS IN MILITARY INCOMPETENCE The Starmer administration’s handling of the Iranian crisis is being whispered about in the corridors of Whitehall as a historic "cock up" of the highest order. Despite receiving a formal request from the Americans on 11 February—a full 17 days before the offensive actually commenced—the British government appears to have spent that critical window in a state of paralyzed indecision. The U.S. request was not an invitation for Britain to join the initial "decapitation strikes," but rather a plea for the Royal Navy to help shield vulnerable Gulf allies from the inevitable Iranian retaliation. Instead of stepping up to protect the 240,000 British citizens living in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, the Ministry of Defence oversaw a period of baffling inaction that has left regional partners feeling utterly betrayed. The diplomatic fallout has been described by insiders as nothing short of catastrophic, with Middle Eastern allies expressing "undiluted fury" at the lack of British support. A former minister with deep ties to Amman reports that Jordan is "fking furious," while leaders in Kuwait and the Emirates are openly questioning whose side Britain is actually on. The Cypriots are reportedly "incandescent" after learning that military assets were actually withdrawn from their vicinity just as the threat level spiked. Only this week did it emerge that HMS Dragon would finally deploy—nearly three weeks after the initial American SOS—a timeline that military experts say is far too little and far too late to restore trust. Strategic failures have been compounded by what veteran commanders call a total lack of foresight regarding naval positioning. The only available Astute-class submarine was permitted to continue its journey toward Australia, despite having passed through the Gulf just weeks ago when it could have been held as a vital contingency. Security officials now warn that the Trump administration is viewing the UK’s "free riding" with growing contempt. There is a palpable fear in the MOD that the Americans, tired of London’s dithering, will simply cut Britain out of the loop entirely and strike a direct deal with Mauritius to secure the long-term use of Diego Garcia for future operations. Inside the government, the situation is being described as "incoherent" and "unconscionable." By allowing the United States to utilize British bases like RAF Fairford for strikes while simultaneously refusing to participate in the missions themselves, Starmer has managed to achieve the worst of both worlds. Critics say they have invited the risk of being targeted by Tehran without the benefit of having any say in the coalition's strategic direction. One former defence chief has branded this policy "reprehensible," arguing that Britain has effectively surrendered its seat at the table in exchange for a front-row seat to its own strategic irrelevance. The sobering reality in Whitehall is a growing sense that the UK no longer has the capacity to shape events in the Middle East. A former Downing Street adviser noted that the "intensity of Labour’s feelings" on the conflict is now matched only by their lack of influence. Allies have stopped listening because they no longer believe Britain can—or will—deliver on its security promises. As the Trump administration continues its high-tempo campaign to dismantle the IRGC, the United Kingdom finds itself sidelined, watched with suspicion by its friends and emboldened by its enemies, all due to a fortnight of inexcusable hesitation.
A Man Of Memes tweet media
English
987
4.7K
15.2K
668.8K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
J Stewart
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_·
🚨BOMBSHELL EXPOSÉ: TREVOR PHILLIPS RIPS LID OFF LABOUR'S GROOMING GANGS COVER-UP 💣 Keir Starmer and the Labour Party Sabotaging National Inquiry to Hide Racial Targeting of White Girls and Decades of Failure in Their Own Councils In a devastating intervention, Sir Trevor Phillips has blown the whistle on what he calls a deliberate political cover-up at the heart of Britain's grooming gangs scandal. The former Equality and Human Rights Commission chair accuses Labour of sabotaging the national inquiry because of its explosive racial implications — and because so much of the abuse took place under Labour-controlled councils that did nothing to stop it. “The government clearly never wanted these two things to be put together,” Phillips declared. He points to Labour's efforts to downplay “the intersection of race and sexual predation,” insisting the perpetrators deliberately targeted victims because they were white and outside the groomers' community. “These children are chosen because of their race. They are chosen because they are white and because they’re outside the community of the groomers.” Phillips highlights the chilling uniqueness of these crimes: unlike typical child abuse kept hidden, grooming gangs operate in plain sight — with perpetrators knowing they are shielded. “The other thing is these people know that they are protected. They’re protected politically, they’re protected by social workers, they’re protected by local police. That is the scandal here.” He pulls no punches on why a full reckoning has been avoided: “Much of this took place in local Labour councils and the authorities who were supposed to be watching over this, stopping it, monitoring it and all the rest of it were controlled by those councils and they did nothing.” This is not just institutional failure — it's a politically motivated shield thrown over horrific, racially aggravated sexual exploitation that went on for years under Labour's watch. Right now, they deserve justice — and Britain deserves the full, fearless national inquiry that has been denied for far too long.
English
643
8.7K
21.4K
808.8K
Russel PLANT retweetledi
SOI media 🇬🇧
SOI media 🇬🇧@MediaSOI·
Brexit should have been the start of the rebuild of Britain. The people voted for it, but the people in charge never wanted it to happen, and have sabotaged it every step of the way.
English
71
498
3.5K
27.6K
Jonny Drury
Jonny Drury@JonnyDrury_Star·
It could be Morrison - it could be another permanent manager Which way should Albion go? Give it to Morrison or bring someone else in - if so, who would you want to see come in? Let us know your thoughts #Baggies fans
English
33
1
11
4.3K
Lewis Cox
Lewis Cox@LewisCox_star·
Where next then? Sensible answers please!!
Lewis Cox tweet media
English
81
1
63
17.9K
Russel PLANT
Russel PLANT@RusselPLANT1·
Should have sacked ER by now the new stand in would ve had the fans backing now its just going to be toxic instead i hope ER has got a tin helmet because he's going to need one #wba
English
0
0
0
392
Russel PLANT
Russel PLANT@RusselPLANT1·
Albion were dier today gutless never laid a glove on cov its time for the cornerflag now , even though it feels to late, sad to see our club die like this rather fight on with the youngsters than that shower boing boing #wba
English
0
0
0
415
Russel PLANT retweetledi
Nigel Farage MP
Nigel Farage MP@Nigel_Farage·
Incredible news. Overnight the Chagossians have returned to their homeland on the Chagos Islands. They are now British passport holders on British territory. I wish them well.
Nigel Farage MP tweet mediaNigel Farage MP tweet media
English
443
2.6K
15.9K
601.1K