Scott Peters

7K posts

Scott Peters banner
Scott Peters

Scott Peters

@ScottPetersSD

San Diegan, 2x dad, husband, enviro lawyer, elected, urbanist. #CA50 #permitreform #SDinDC #YIMBY🥑 #GoDuke #Padres Work acct: @RepScottPeters

San Diego, IAD, BWI Katılım Mayıs 2011
1.4K Takip Edilen11.4K Takipçiler
Scott Peters retweetledi
Rep. Don Beyer
Rep. Don Beyer@RepDonBeyer·
Just 3 days ago Trump was awfully concerned about the “pallets of cash” sent to Iran a decade ago, but is now going to give them nearly 10x that amount in the middle of a war. Clown show doesn’t begin to describe it.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent@SecScottBessent

Iran is the head of the snake for global terrorism, and through President Trump’s Operation Epic Fury, we are winning this critical fight at an even faster pace than anticipated. In response to Iran’s terrorist attacks against global energy infrastructure, the Trump Administration will continue to deploy America’s economic and military might to maximize the flow of energy to the world, strengthen global supply, and seek to ensure market stability. Today, the Department of the Treasury is issuing a narrowly tailored, short-term authorization permitting the sale of Iranian oil currently stranded at sea. At present, sanctioned Iranian oil is being hoarded by China on the cheap. By temporarily unlocking this existing supply for the world, the United States will quickly bring approximately 140 million barrels of oil to global markets, expanding the amount of worldwide energy and helping to relieve the temporary pressures on supply caused by Iran. In essence, we will be using the Iranian barrels against Tehran to keep the price down as we continue Operation Epic Fury. This temporary, short-term authorization is strictly limited to oil that is already in transit and does not allow new purchases or production. Further, Iran will have difficulty accessing any revenue generated and the United States will continue to maintain maximum pressure on Iran and its ability to access the international financial system. So far, the Trump Administration has been working to bring around 440 million additional barrels of oil to the global market, undercutting Iran’s ability to leverage its disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. President Trump’s pro-energy agenda has driven U.S. oil and gas production to record levels, strengthening energy security and lowering fuel costs. Any short-term disruption now will ultimately translate into longer-term economic gains for Americans – because there is no prosperity without security.

English
807
4.7K
16.5K
1.2M
Michael McFaul
Michael McFaul@McFaul·
Waiting for critics of JCPOA who were horrified by the money that agreement allowed to go back to Tehran to now show consistency and lambast Trumps delivery of billions (way more then ever happened under Obama) to this horrific dictatorship.
Hugh Hewitt@hughhewitt

Waiting for the old Team Obama to flood our feeds with “If we’d stayed in JCPOA, Iran wouldn’t have missiles that could fly 4000 KM.” Except the JCPOA didn’t put limits on the missiles.

English
12
125
636
32.1K
Scott Peters retweetledi
Rob Wood
Rob Wood@MediawatchNw·
The Democrats of Pennsylvania could have had Conor Lamb as their Senator but instead looked at a big doofy guy in a hoodie and decided they preferred a guy who looked and acted more like them than an educated attorney with military experience. This mess is all on you guys.
Rob Wood tweet mediaRob Wood tweet media
English
736
1.8K
10.3K
939.6K
Jim Kessler
Jim Kessler@ThirdWayKessler·
Do you strongly support Siena over Duke? Somewhat strongly? Or not too strongly at all? #SienaDuke
English
3
0
2
654
Rob
Rob@robmac619·
@CompletedStreet honestly never knew this. Thought these circles had been there forever
English
1
0
2
508
Saad Asad
Saad Asad@realsaadasad·
Totally normal thinking is going on at the local Sierra Club chapters. They're writing this about a bill that legalized transit-oriented development!
Saad Asad tweet media
English
12
13
191
30.9K
Scott Peters retweetledi
Ray Dalio
Ray Dalio@RayDalio·
I Love and Endorse the Bipartisan 3 % of GDP Budget Deficit Solution In the House of Representatives there is now a bipartisan bill in the works to enact, and a growing agreement that we need, a 3% cap on the budget deficit. The bill was introduced by Representatives Bill Huizenga (R) and Scott Peters (D) to reduce and maintain the federal budget deficit at or below 3% of GDP. While most responsible members of both parties don't agree on much, they agree on this, which is also urged by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget and almost all knowledgeable investors, economists, and business leaders beyond them. Treasury Secretary @SecScottBessent has long been a supporter of this path, publicly saying, “I would urge [President Trump] to make public his desire to get the deficit down to 3% by the end of his term.”   In my book How Countries Go Broke: The Big Cycle, I described the mechanics of how the United States will go broke unless it gets the budget deficit down to 3% of GDP, which I describe as my "3% 3-Part Solution." All leaders from both parties I spoke with in private agree. The only impediment is their fear of the political consequences of being in favor of raising taxes and cutting benefits if that is required to reach the 3% GDP budget deficit. Passing this bill would be a step toward overcoming that objection as it would help legislators argue for fiscal responsibility. A stated 3% GDP ceiling goal would become a benchmark for accountability across administrations, providing both a rule and a report card. With it in mind, each year we would naturally ask, “Is the nation moving toward or away from sustainability?” That stated goal and progress toward fiscal responsibility would strengthens markets, bolster investor confidence, and reduce the risks of the U.S. experiencing a sovereign debt/currency crisis.
English
140
179
1.9K
195K
Scott Peters retweetledi
Terrible Maps
Terrible Maps@TerribleMaps·
Which Mexican country is your favourite?
Terrible Maps tweet media
English
450
1.9K
20.7K
1M
Scott Peters retweetledi
Nate Silver
Nate Silver@NateSilver538·
@dilanesper Was just in San Diego briefly and it was notably way more sports-y than LA or SF, lots of Padres stuff everywhere, lots of sports on TVs. Seems like a mistake to have 2 semi-redundant NFL franchises in LA instead of leaving one there.
English
59
63
1K
89K
Scott Peters retweetledi
Frank Luntz
Frank Luntz@FrankLuntz·
The U.S. has surpassed 2,000 measles cases for the first time in more than 30 years. As of December 23rd, a total of 2,012 cases have been reported. Of those cases, 24 were reported among international visitors to the U.S. abcnews.go.com/Health/us-meas…
English
373
322
696
295.7K
Scott Peters retweetledi
M. Nolan Gray 🥑
M. Nolan Gray 🥑@mnolangray·
Thanks to a series YIMBY reforms—and high-quality administration—in San Diego, the city has been in the midst of a building boom, even as construction has plummeted elsewhere. The result? Rents are down six months in a row.
M. Nolan Gray 🥑 tweet media
English
31
162
1.5K
107.6K
Scott Peters retweetledi
Neil Chatterjee
Neil Chatterjee@FERChatterjee·
As a Virginian who has seen my electric bills spike in both James City Co and Fairfax Co…this is incredibly reckless. Sets a terrible precedent. At a time when we need every available electron to keep costs down and maintain reliability. Counterproductive cnbc.com/2025/12/22/tru…
English
41
132
423
32.7K
Scott Peters retweetledi
David J. Bier
David J. Bier@David_J_Bier·
NEW data I've received: Just 5% of people detained by ICE since October 1 have had violent criminal convictions, 3/4 had no criminal convictions at all. Most "criminals" had immigration, traffic, and vice offenses. Not the "worst of the worst"...
David J. Bier tweet media
English
5.2K
2.2K
4.8K
2.5M
Scott Peters retweetledi
Josh Barro
Josh Barro@jbarro·
If you don't build new housing, rents rise in the old housing. If you do build new housing, rents fall in the old housing.
Barrett Linburg@DallasAptGP

Here's something fascinating happening in the apartment market right now. The cheapest, oldest apartments (Class C) are getting crushed right now. But ONLY in cities that just delivered tons of new apartments. Let me show you the numbers: Denver: Class C rents down 13.9% Naples: Class C rents down 13.5% Austin: Class C rents down 13.3% Phoenix: Class C rents down 10.5% San Antonio: Class C rents down 7.2% Dallas: Class C rents down 6.5% What do all these cities have in common? They just absorbed a massive wave of new apartments. But here's the twist... In cities that DIDN'T get a big supply wave? Class C rents are actually RISING. 20 cities saw Class C rents go UP more than 3%. 19 of those 20 cities had supply BELOW the national average. So what's going on? It's basically musical chairs. When a brand new luxury apartment opens up, where do those renters come from? They don't appear out of thin air. They move from slightly older apartments. Those apartments now have vacancies. So they drop their rents to compete. That pulls in renters from even older apartments. And down the chain it goes. Eventually it hits the oldest, cheapest apartments at the bottom. And here's why they get hit the hardest: People living in Class C apartments are already spending a huge chunk of their paycheck on rent. To fill empty units, landlords have to cut prices A LOT. Sometimes enough to attract people who couldn't afford market-rate apartments before. It's like a waterfall effect. The water (new supply) at the top pushes everything down. But here's the important part: This proves that building new apartments - even "luxury" ones - reduces rents all the way down the spectrum. If it was just an affordability crisis, you'd see Class C rents falling everywhere. In high-supply cities AND low-supply cities. But we're not seeing that. We're seeing a perfect split: Lots of new apartments = falling Class C rents Few new apartments = rising Class C rents New supply at the top creates relief at the bottom. Also: wages have been growing faster than rents for 3 straight years. More people can afford apartments today than before. The bottom line? This is what happens when you actually build housing. Supply works. (Chart and analysis from Jay Parsons - one of the sharpest real estate economists out there)

English
70
270
2.2K
227.7K