Soleil Vert

🚨BREAKING!!! 46 IPCC Scientists REBEL: The Climate Narrative is Crumbling from Within!🚨 Forty-six scientists tied to the IPCC have stepped away or spoken out because their evidence-based views clashed with the official alarmist script. They weren’t “listened to.” Their data didn’t fit the doom-and-gloom story pushed in the Summaries for Policymakers. Don’t trust me, read their own words here! ⬇️ Dr. Robert Balling: “The IPCC notes that ‘No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.’ This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” Dr. Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.” Dr. John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.” Dr. Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.” Dr. Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.” Dr. Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.” Dr. Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” Dr. Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 ‘scientists’ who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.” Dr. Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.” Dr. Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.” Dr. Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.” Dr. John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.” Dr. Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.” Yet the grift rolls on. New grads, indoctrinated in universities, keep repackaging the same scares for the next generation. “Consensus!” “The Science says!” Endless control through manufactured ignorance. Meanwhile, nature doesn’t care about the narrative. Natural forcings rule. The Sun is cooling. Jet stream gone meridional. Cosmic rays surging, seeding clouds. Result? Wild swings, then global cooling. The emperor has no clothes, and the scientists who know it are finally speaking up. 🔥 Original work from The Dragons Breathe Substack: open.substack.com/pub/thedragons…

@BanounHelene @natpat6477 Aéroport International de Mahé (Seychelles) 3m d'alt, n'a jamais disparu sous l'eau. Pourtant les climato-dingos prédisaient en 1979, une montée des eaux ≈ 70cm pour 2025 (1,4cm/an). À ce jour, le rivage n'a pas changé de niveau...du TOUT !

For years we were told thawing permafrost would unleash a methane bomb. But new pan-arctic research dismantles those fears. Across Canada, Greenland, Siberia and Alaska, scientists found methane-eating microbes dominating methane-producing ones. This means that even under thaw conditions, the Arctic can act as a methane sink, not a source. Other studies echo the same result. Natural microbial competition suppresses methane, not amplifies it. The latest data all point one way. Runaway methane was just another overhyped climate scare. Nature has it covered.

@mauraislive c'est ce qu'ils veulent pour nous aussi... pas de transports individuels pour nous

La gauche bobo montréalaise s’amuse à nous parler de la…Transition énergétique de … Cuba! Alors que la majorité de la population - sous l’emprise d’une dictature sanguinaire - mange un seul repas par jour… les snobinards narcissiques s’excitent sur leur « cause »…

@EricRStPierre The Libs chose globalism, the UN with its 2030 agenda and their NetZero, over the needs of Canadians...

I was taking Luna out for a walk today with my wife. A friendly woman with her dog joined us for a bit. She was super chatty, gave Luna a delicious treat, and her big fluffy dog got one too. She was especially fired up about the price of gas. She seemed pretty savvy, sharing all the tips she uses to save at the pump, and she kept saying how brutal it is for regular folks now that it’s climbing toward $1.90 a litre. I told her I was surprised we haven’t hit $2.00 yet, like they’ve already seen in B.C. She looked absolutely stunned. And you know what? Millions of Canadians are going to wear that exact same stunned look when gas really starts marching north of $2.00 a litre — because it’s coming, folks. It’s coming hard. Millions of us are already tapped out and broke. We’re the ones staring at the pump in disbelief, doing the mental math on whether we can afford to drive to work, pick up the kids from hockey, or even run to the grocery store without wincing. And while we’re scraping by, Canada, this massive, resource-rich beast of a country, could be an absolute economic powerhouse. We could be the energy capital of the world. We could be creating wealth, lowering prices for every family from coast to coast, creating hundreds of thousands of high-paying jobs, and telling the world “come and get it” on our terms. If the Liberals had just positioned us properly. Instead? They sold us out to ideology and handed the Americans the keys to our own wallet. Think about it. Canada sits on the third-largest proven oil reserves on the planet, the oil sands alone are an absolute monster. We’ve got natural gas for days, hydro power that could light up half the continent, and the geography to be the energy bridge between North America, Asia, and Europe. Done right, we could be exporting clean, reliable Canadian energy to the world at full price. No more selling our raw bitumen at a massive discount to the Americans while they refine it and sell the finished product back to us at a premium. No more begging for pipeline capacity. No more watching our own oil get bottlenecked and discounted because Ottawa spent years demonizing the very industry that could have made us rich. We could have had pipelines running east, west, and south, Energy East, Northern Gateway, a properly fast-tracked Trans Mountain that didn’t balloon into a multi-billion-dollar clown show. We could have had west-coast ports shipping our product straight to hungry markets in Asia instead of forcing 97% of our crude down a single leaky pipeline into the U.S. market where they set the terms. We could have built refineries here at home so Canadian families aren’t getting gouged at the pump while American refiners laugh all the way to the bank. But no. The Liberals, with their virtue-signaling, their endless environmental reviews, their Bill C-69 that basically made it illegal to build anything bigger than a lemonade stand, and their carbon tax that punishes every driver, trucker, farmer, and senior just trying to heat their home, chose ideology over infrastructure. They killed project after project. They delayed, they regulated, they virtue-posted on social media while the rest of us watched our lifeblood get siphoned off. And now? The Americans have us by the throat. They control the pipelines. They control the refining capacity. They buy our heavy crude cheap because we have nowhere else to send it, then sell us back gasoline and diesel at whatever price the market (and their profit margins) will bear. Every time global tensions spike or a refinery hiccup happens south of the border, we feel it immediately at the pump, while our own vast reserves sit there like a trapped gold mine we’re not allowed to fully develop. This isn’t bad luck. This is policy failure on a national scale. This is why your wife is cutting back on groceries. This is why the single mom down the street is choosing between gas money and rent. This is why truckers are idling their rigs because the numbers don’t add up anymore. This is why small businesses in every province are closing their doors. Energy is the foundation of everything, heating, transportation, manufacturing, food production. When you let ideologues strangle that foundation, the entire economy starts to crumble. And the worst part? The Liberals had the chance, hell, they still have the chance under Carney, to flip this script. To say “Canada first,” to fast-track the infrastructure, to partner with industry and Indigenous communities the right way, and to turn our energy advantage into real sovereignty and real prosperity. We could be the envy of the world instead of the cautionary tale. We could have 85 cent gas and a booming economy funding better healthcare, better roads, and actual climate innovation that doesn’t bankrupt families. But they chose the opposite. They chose the photo-ops, the international applause, the net-zero fairy tales while real Canadians get hammered at the pump and in the wallet. So the next time you’re standing at that gas station watching the numbers climb, remember this: it didn’t have to be this way. Canada didn’t have to be held hostage by American leverage. We could have been the energy powerhouse of the planet, rich, independent, and thriving. Instead we got weak leadership, neglected infrastructure, and a government that would rather lecture you about your carbon footprint than secure your future. Wake up, Canada. It’s time to demand better. Because at $2.00 a litre and rising, we’re not just paying at the pump anymore, we’re paying for decades of Liberal failure. And Luna and I are tired of watching good, hardworking people get stunned into silence while the country we love gets sold short. What do you think, am I wrong? Or is this the conversation we all need to be having before it’s too late?

@HarrisonHSmith yeah, the only solution at this stage

Its INSANE how easy it would be to fix 99.9% of the problems in America. A benevolent dictator could solve most things within 2 or 3 weeks. Within a year, we'd be living in paradise.

@Gravantus you love so much your video games, don't you?

"dopamine hit around Candy Crush" I don't believe it's possible to be more out of touch with anyone under 40 than this.

@FrantizekPaul well, I had 2 room mates addicted to video games, they were like junkies

The BoomerCon trope of young White males as lazy gamers can't end soon enough.

Every wind turbine and solar panel on earth today is expected to be decommissioned and replaced long before Net Zero in 2050. We aren't just building a new energy grid, we're initiating the world’s largest, most resource-intensive replacement cycle. The staggering cost of these recurring cycles is expected to add trillions to an already massive price tag. McKinsey Global estimates the transition requires $9.2 trillion per year, totaling $275 trillion by 2050. However, these figures are only the baseline - they don't account for the new price ceiling driven by the physical failure and required replacement of first-generation infrastructure. Most of today’s 225,000 wind turbines (over 1.2 TW capacity) will exceed their 20–30 year lifespans by 2050. This necessitates waves of decommissioning or 'repowering' on a scale never seen before. With wingspans rivaling an Airbus A380 or Boeing 747, these massive composite structures are fueling blade graveyards that present a disposal challenge unmatched in human history. Projections suggest 43 million tonnes of blade waste and 60–80 million tonnes of solar PV waste by 2050. A global rebuild of this scale must compete for finite resources. China currently refines 90% of the global rare earth supply, creating a precarious geopolitical dependency for the permanent magnet technology required for modern turbines. * Rare earths: Neodymium and praseodymium for magnets; dysprosium and terbium for heat resistance. * Essential metals: Massive quantities of copper for wiring, tungsten for components, and tin for soldering. * Physical scale: Larger direct-drive turbines require 0.5–2 tonnes of rare-earth magnets per MW, supported by vast quantities of steel and concrete. A 'second transition' is destined to become a third, and a fourth—replacing the entire global inventory every few decades. This demands a WWII-scale 'D-Day' mobilisation of capital and labor, occurring just as subsidies fade and private investment thins due to uneven returns. Furthermore, the 'diesel paradox' remains: heavy mining equipment is still powered by the very same fossil fuels the transition seeks to eliminate. The math suggests a looming collision between physical reality and political agendas. Image: The Casper Regional Landfill in Wyoming has become a global focal point for 'clean energy waste'.

@acormierd on a vu le film "Disparaître" et puis après on a passé à l'immigration massive...

Du PQ au PLQ, les élus se mettent à parler de la relance de la natalité. Victoire pour la droite nationale ou feu de paille ? Soyez là en direct ce midi (18h en FR)

@iluminatibot that alone should be investigated... they stole so much money the RCMP must have a cut

Justin Trudeau's net worth in 2020 was $10M. At the end of 2022 it's $385M. He made $351,000 as PM. Where are his tax returns?

Hydro-Québec veux mettre des éoliennes dans les plus beaux coins de nature du QUébec

@lise_samson @denipoitra @MercedsLandry ça fait longtemps que pleins de produits sont kosher et ça veux dire payer un rabbin pour chaque variété et ce sont tous les consommateurs qui paient

@denipoitra @MercedsLandry Même chose pour la Ferme des voltigeurs. Attention : le logo halal apparaît souvent à l’endos du produit…

J'ai décidé de boycotter les produits de Famille Fontaine, même si c'est une entreprise de mon coin. Tous leurs produits (sauf le porc, allez savoir pourquoi) sont halal. Pas de choix pour ceux qui ne veulent pas payer un extra à l'imam. Donc je boycotte. Et vous?

@MVxT225376 les fromages dans les grandes surfaces sont pas bons, et coûtent très cher

Le saviez-vous ?

@FoodProfessor no, it is to fill someone pocket with public money... you are being a bit naive here 😆

BREAKING NEWS: PM Mark Carney set to announce a sovereign wealth fund, a major shift in how Canada invests in its economy. This could be a game changer for agri-food. More capital for infrastructure, processing, and supply chains would increase competitiveness globally. It will only benefit agriculture if agri-food is treated as a national priority—not an afterthought.

@DOGEQuebec2026 décroissance énergétique dans un froid polaire...

Nos élus nous tirent vers la médiocrité totale. Faillite en vue !

Canada NetZero and Australia are the same mistake

Wind and solar deliver some of the most expensive electricity because they need near full gas backup to keep the grid steady. A 100 megawatt wind farm still needs 100 megawatts of fast start gas power behind it - another 100 million dollar cost. Consumers pay for the backup, developers collect the subsidies (and that's before counting the fiberglass blades that can't be recycled, the concrete bases that can't be reused and the rare earth mining that makes it all possible). They call it clean energy, but it's built on coal, gas, concrete - and deceit.

@Joanne_Marcotte normalement les médias doivent jouer le rôle d'opposition, ou de vérification du pouvoir... critiquer le chef de l'opposition est moins important car il n'est justement pas au pouvoir...

Cet exposé du président du comité d’éthique du fédéral est CRUCIAL - Il n’est pas normal que le Canada soit devenu un pays où les médias demandent des comptes à l’Opposition plutôt qu’au gouvernement; - Il n’est pas normal que ce sont maintenant des Youtubers qui font ce travail; - Il n’est pas normal de rendre si difficile le travail de l’Opposition dans les comités. « Faites votre sacré boulot., les MSM!!! »