Sun Tzu Conte

3.4K posts

Sun Tzu Conte banner
Sun Tzu Conte

Sun Tzu Conte

@SunTzuConte

Wise words from the Italian football Guru

Katılım Ağustos 2016
15 Takip Edilen48 Takipçiler
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@websterkaroon 3 islands (Abu Musa, Tunb, Siri) are the easiest targets, but don't allow for control over Hormuz or Kharg. Everything else carries a higher risk from mainland fire, but is more strategic. U.S. had to evacuate bases in Bahrain. Why would they move closer and lose cover?
English
0
0
0
351
Alireza Talakoubnejad
Alireza Talakoubnejad@websterkaroon·
It's really hard to dismiss the probability of a land invasion of critical islands or the coast just because the Trump admin constantly seems convinced that if they just escalate one more step and do that one thing, then the other side will capitulate.
English
6
12
145
5.1K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
👀
Lindsey Graham@LindseyGrahamSC

Not only do I support @POTUS and his team's efforts to negotiate with Iran to find a solution to the threats this regime presents to the region and the world, I encourage it. It is the outcome I seek, not the method. I have confidence in President Trump's negotiating team to make sure that any deal would meet the military objectives laid out early on. These include: ❌ No ballistic missile program to threaten America or our allies. ❌ Iran no longer being the largest state sponsor of terrorism, ending its support for terrorist proxies throughout the region and the world. ❌ Definitively ending the Iranian regime’s ambitions to obtain nuclear weapons once and for all. If diplomacy can achieve these objectives, I would not only support it, but I would also prefer it because war literally is hell.

ART
0
0
0
8
Sun Tzu Conte retweetledi
Iran International English
Security forces in Tehran’s Chitgar township fired toward apartment windows from which anti-government chants were heard, while a pro-government gathering was held in the complex with the backing of officers, videos sent to Iran International show.
English
75
951
1.8K
71.4K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@BrewerEricM U.S. is trying to turn an Islamic revolutionary state into a rational state actor using regime decapitation and degradation. Similar terms were offered to Khamenei, Shamkhani, and Larijani. As much as it would benefit Iran, I don't see this fanatical regime agreeing these terms.
English
1
0
3
2.3K
Eric Brewer
Eric Brewer@BrewerEricM·
There are many things one could say about this proposal. I’ll offer three observations. 1. Iran is highly unlikely to agree to these conditions (and if it did, that should give us pause). The reasons are many, but a big one is that the points laid out here are essentially trying to force terms of surrender on a country that does not believe it’s been defeated. 1/
Nicole Grajewski@NicoleGrajewski

Details of the 15 point proposal, included full removal of international sanctions on Iran and U.S. assistance for civilian nuclear program. The point on ‘snapback’ is strange since those sanctions have already been triggered/would fall under point 12 (full lifting of sanctions)

English
15
69
272
99.2K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@GhonchehAzad The Islamic Republic needs a negotiated settlement more than the U.S. does. They have been ripped to shreds.
English
0
0
1
715
Ghoncheh Habibiazad | غنچه
Iranian politician Mohammad Javad Larijani has said on state TV that “God willing, the war will soon be brought to an end on Iran’s terms, and after that we shall face very important and unusual developments in the region”.
English
6
58
466
103.2K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@Osinttechnical The Islamic Republic is driven by an Islamist ideology that is irrational and anti-nationalist. It has for decades sacrificed the Iranian nation for a distant foreign cause (Palestine/Lebanon). It is unlikely to give up on its "Axis of Suicide," but Iranians can hope . . .
English
0
0
0
30
OSINTtechnical
OSINTtechnical@Osinttechnical·
The reported 14-point peace plan offered by the US to Iran, simplified: - All sanctions on Iran lifted - Iran gives up its nuclear weapons program, gets assistance building a civil nuclear program - Iran stops funding proxies - Hormuz remains open - Missiles discussed later
English
258
222
3.7K
1.1M
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@AimenDean It doesn't seem realistic, but "all sanctions lifted" would be the regime's golden ticket to survival. The nuclear enrichment program has long served as a bargaining chip for sanctions relief.
English
1
0
0
195
Sun Tzu Conte retweetledi
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Iran is going to make a deal. The new leadership gave us a significant present that showed me that we’re dealing with the right people.
English
1.4K
1.4K
6.9K
701.1K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@AliVaez @politico The Islamic Republic doesn't have any choice but to "drink from the poisoned chalice" once more. They are decapitated and getting hammered into oblivion. They will also lose control of the Gulf and some of their islands if the Americans deploy there.
English
0
0
0
75
Ali Vaez
Ali Vaez@AliVaez·
Told @politico: Ghalibaf is a quintessential insider: ambitious and pragmatic, yet fundamentally committed to the preservation of Iran’s Islamist order. That makes him an unlikely candidate to offer Washington any meaningful concessions. And even if he were inclined to test the boundaries, Iran’s military establishment and the broader security elite would almost certainly constrain him. politico.com/news/2026/03/2…
English
13
21
92
9.2K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@ntabrizy On the contrary, such a hardline appointment could give more legitimacy to any diplomatic solution. At this point, with U.S. forces bearing down on the Gulf, the Islamic Republic is facing a catastrophe of its own making. It must negotiate to retain its territorial integrity.
English
0
0
0
51
Nilo Tabrizy
Nilo Tabrizy@ntabrizy·
"this looks less like a system preparing for compromise, and more like one preparing to manage prolonged confrontation."
Babak Vahdad@BabakVahdad

The appointment of Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr as Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council is not a routine bureaucratic reshuffle. It marks another step in a broader and increasingly visible trend: the consolidation of Iran’s strategic decision-making within the security establishment, and more specifically within IRGC-linked networks. - Zolghadr is not a diplomat, nor a technocrat. His career has been rooted in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and later in the judiciary, two pillars of the system that prioritize internal control, threat management, and regime security over political mediation or external engagement. - In practical terms, this suggests that key files, especially nuclear negotiations, regional posture, and responses to external pressure, are likely to be even more tightly aligned with IRGC threat perceptions and priorities. The space for diplomatic flexibility does not disappear, but it becomes narrower, more controlled, and more tactical. - Put bluntly: this looks less like a system preparing for compromise, and more like one preparing to manage prolonged confrontation. - The broader takeaway is hard to miss. The IRGC is not just influential, it is steadily absorbing the core nodes of decision-making. And with each appointment like this, the distinction between state, security apparatus, and strategic policy becomes thinner. #Iran #Iranwar

English
3
22
48
8.7K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@dex_eve TP1 and TP2 were huge mistakes for Iran. IRI should have distanced itself from the Palestinian cause when it had the chance. All of this could have been avoided. Still, I don't see any evidence that Iran is gearing up for NPT withdrawal. Russia and China would also oppose it.
English
0
0
0
100
Decker Eveleth
Decker Eveleth@dex_eve·
I argue missiles not being able to achieve Iran's deterrence objectives makes nuclear proliferation a more appealing option, regardless of costs to Iran. While Iran in previous years was very keen on avoiding sanctions, their cost-benefit calculus is now entirely different.
English
7
6
47
3K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@academic_la If Ghalibaf is in Tehran, and the U.S. and Israel want to assassinate him, he would already be dead. There is a reason why they kept him around. Of course, Trump could be using the negotiations as a cover for inserting ground troops into the Gulf, but that is another matter.
English
1
0
0
123
Shaiel Ben-Ephraim
Shaiel Ben-Ephraim@academic_la·
The Iranians are worried that calls for negotiations on the part of Trump are a trap to assassinate the negotiators. This may torpedo talks. It shows the Israeli decapitation assassination strategy prevents any chance of peace and stability. A mechanism for permanent war.
English
38
152
610
17.5K
Sun Tzu Conte retweetledi
Democracy Now!
Democracy Now!@democracynow·
We are in a "new era" of “Pax Greater Israel” says Daniel Levy, president of the U.S./Middle East Project (@USMEP) and a former Israeli peace negotiator.
English
8
139
240
17.4K
Sun Tzu Conte retweetledi
DW Politics
DW Politics@dw_politics·
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier has said the US-Israeli attacks on Iran are "a violation of international law."
English
591
4.1K
9.9K
430.2K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@tparsi That is true, but you are forgetting that the Islamic Republic is to blame for this catastrophe. They put themselves in this position and brought about Iran's destruction for reasons that have nothing to do with Iranian national interests.
English
1
0
2
145
Trita Parsi
Trita Parsi@tparsi·
Israel's goal is to destroy Iran's industrial base and set the country back decades to ensure that Tehran cannot pose a challenge to Israel's hegemonic designs for years to come - regardless of the cost to the global economy, regional stability, or Trump's presidency...
English
123
810
2.5K
104.2K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@citrinowicz The battlefield says otherwise. Iran is defenseless, its missile bases are mostly incapacitated or destroyed, and the Strait of Hormuz will soon be under U.S. control. Only greater devastation awaits Iran if the suicidal Islamic Republic doesn't reach a compromise with the U.S.
English
6
0
2
1.1K
Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش
It’s possible that, despite everything, Trump still views Iran through a “Venezuela lens” meaning believing there’s a figure in Tehran (Ghalibaf) who can play the role of Delcy Rodríguez and accept U.S. terms to end the fighting. If so, that reflects (yes again) a fundamental misreading of how Iran actually works. The system has become more radicalized, not less, and even senior figures like Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf don’t make decisions independently. Power is fragmented, ideological, and ultimately centralized in a way that doesn’t lend itself to quick political deals. Ghalibaf is not Delcy. Iran is not Venezuela. If the U.S. wants to end this conflict through a deal, it will likely have to meet at least some of Tehran’s demands. And there is little chance that Iran’s current leadership will offer more than what it was already willing to put on the table before the war. That raises a key question: is Trump trying to mislead Iran ahead of a possible escalation, build legitimacy for future military action, or does he genuinely believe a deal is within reach on U.S. terms? What seems clear is this: “Iran 2.0” will be more rigid, more suspicious, and far less willing to compromise. A deal with Tehran has become harder to achieve, not easier, as a result of the war. #IranWar
Eric Brewer@BrewerEricM

WTF is happening between the U.S. and Iran? A few hypotheses. A. Trump is greatly exaggerating the status of talks/odds of success to calm the markets, make people think the war is working, and buy himself time/decision space (including moving more forces into the theater). Also has the benefit of causing confusion in the Iranian system and later allowing Trump to say the Iranians said they were ready for a deal but weren’t. This hypothesis would be consistent with the argument that Iran now sees advantage to dragging out the war to impose further costs and reestablish deterrence. And the related theory that Iran would see its negotiating hand as stronger as a result (ie, it wouldn’t agree to the terms that Trump claims Iran had agreed to). 1/

English
45
228
794
292.9K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@mehdiy_fa I wouldn't mind anything that Iran says. The IRGC is completely decimated on the battlefield. Qalibaf and those around him are forced to negotiate terms, which will likely include sanctions relief and the release of frozen funds. The regime will spin that however it wants.
English
0
0
0
101
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@Pataramesh "Distant Periphery"! Game over for the Islamic Republic. I suggest they negotiate terms before the senseless death of more people or the further destruction of infrastructure and industry. The damage this suicidal Islamic regime has inflicted on Iran will be spoken of for ages.
English
1
0
0
319
Patarames
Patarames@Pataramesh·
First time we see JDAM equipped B-52 being used against Iran After 23 days is possible that regions at 🇮🇷's distant periphery, like Chahbahar, Jask or Islands (Abu Musa) ➡️ Have their air defenses sufficiently degraded to allow for high altitude bombing raids @ ~30km distance
Patarames tweet media
English
67
181
1.2K
125.5K
Sun Tzu Conte
Sun Tzu Conte@SunTzuConte·
@KasraAarabi Not likely. U.S. has no need for such games. It knows his location and has recon on him day and night. They are giving him a chance to be the new strongman in Iran. I would bet this was planned from long ago.
English
0
0
1
479
Kasra Aarabi (کسری اعرابی)
There is a scenario in which the U.S. & Israel are aiming to create the illusion of talks with Ghalibaf to identify his precise location &/or trigger elite fractures. Ghalibaf has many enemies due to his corruption, incl. within the IRGC (notably Mohammad Ali Jafari) & the Basij.
English
15
80
396
55.3K