
Ted E. Bear, Esq.
2.1K posts


@BlueBoxDave This is the problem with non-critical thinkers. They think this is how this shit works. They don’t understand state law vs federal law, let alone specific laws. Yet we let them run their mouths like their uninformed opinions are just as important as actual facts.
English

@RobGeorge Just make one up like Bragg did and let a jury of Biden’s peers in Alabama decide.
English

@BlueBoxDave @RobGeorge “Make up one like Bragg did” do you really think this? Because if you do, you’re a fucking moron. If you don’t, you’re knowingly lying.
English

@JesseCharlesLee They’re not serious people. They are just like Trump. The rule they support only applies to their immediate position. They have no ability of forethought and any defense of objective morality or moral superiority is laughably ironic.
English

Just amazing how consistently on the nose these things are.

Mary Katharine Ham@mkhammer
Jailing your political opponents is bad, actually.
English

@heyimby @DavidZsutty @RepMikeCollins Like corporate fraud? Or do you only apply the law to poor people in red states?
English

@DavidZsutty @RepMikeCollins The only difference is that red AGs and DAs would punish people... for actually breaking laws....
English

@RepMikeCollins Time for blue states to stop subsidizing red states.
English


Mr Wu Tang! Nice to hear from you. I realize you are an expert in the fact that real prosecutors don’t bring cases without substantial evidence to meet their burden. In your case it meant 6 years in the slammer and 70 million in fines.
Martin Shkreli@MartinShkreli
English

@mkhammer @HamptonStevens I’d love to hear your legal expertise as to why any of the 34 counts of the exact same crime will ”fall apart on appeal”. You’re in a cult
English

@HamptonStevens I honestly wouldn’t argue for jailing & think this will fall apart on appeal. But even if it were a more clear-cut case, AND it were someone else Hillary or Biden, first-time non-violent offenders should get the standard for such defendants, which generally isn’t jail time.
English

@mkhammer @ArmandDoma Those are the parameters to convict someone of a crime? If their crime endangers national security?
English

@ArmandDoma Did Trump’s business records endanger national security? Have you even made that argument? I haven’t even seen anyone try to. The analogous case is the documents case, which is a far more sound one than this circus. Try to keep up.
English

@mkhammer I didn’t realize the 12 jurors had political opponents, actually.
English

@ChrisCuomo She’s mixing up her black people again, thinking Alvin Bragg is Tish James. So you tell me, Chris.
English


@RonFilipkowski If Trump can be convicted for committing business fraud by covering up his payments to his mistress from his business to enhance his chances to win the presidency, then we ALL can be convicted for committing business fraud by covering up our payments to our mistress from our bu…
English

@RonFilipkowski So opposing banana republic show trials is MAGA now? Go on.
English

@pointsnfigures1 @AriFleischer Ah yes, ending slavery and committing fraud to cover up an affair to protect your chances at running for office. Two sides of the same coin.
English

@AriFleischer in other news Abe Lincoln found guilty by southern judges for freeing slaves
English

@shaunmmaguire Imagine thinking Trump had anything to do with how his kids turned out. The fact that you give Trump any moral credit over anyone else tells me you’re in a cult.
English

I would much prefer for my children to become Ivanka Trump than Hunter Biden
Vinod Khosla@vkhosla
When will you right wingers acknowledge @realDonaldTrump lies blatantly when he is not hallucinating? Are his values what you want your children to have?
English

@EWErickson Is the irony rich because the Supreme Court are a panel of nominated jurists and the Manhattan Court case was decide by 12 every day citizens? Or are you being intentionally fucking dense by pretending they’re the same?
English

@Acyn I love that the party of “law and order” thinks that law and order shouldn’t apply to anybody who’s been in office, apparently. Which is a new revelation they’ve had solely for Donald Trump, of all people.
English

@ronrule “I’m tired of including people who don’t look like me and laws we don’t even enforce in the country with the highest rate of gun violence by tenfold” you’re a fucking idiot.
English

@ArgenTo46 @Mericamemed @NickJFreitas It’s funny how you literally do this and vote for people who actually want to force others to live how they do or leave. That’s fucking fascism. No one is making you be gay. No one is making you be educated (clearly). We want choice. You want force. THAT’S fascism, dipshit.
English

@Mericamemed @NickJFreitas funny how they throw that exact word around so very much
English

Well Democrats, congratulations. I didn't start out a Trump fan. I supported Rand Paul in the primary in 2016. I was skeptical of whether or not Trump would do what he said. Even after supporting him in 2020, I was frustrated by some of his policies...
...but now...now...I will enthusiastically campaign, donate and vote for Trump. Because if nothing else, he represents opposition to YOU. The people who engage in "lawfare," openly target your political rivals for prosecution while ignoring the real issues facing this country.
You have now showed us the rules of the game...don't be surprised when we start playing by them.
English

@Mericamemed @NickJFreitas Thanks for letting us know you’re a fucking idiot.
English






