Tom Vaid

3.7K posts

Tom Vaid banner
Tom Vaid

Tom Vaid

@TomVaid

materials chemistry, electrochemistry, batteries. 3 degrees of Kevin Bacon

Ann Arbor, MI Katılım Eylül 2019
720 Takip Edilen151 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Tom Vaid
Tom Vaid@TomVaid·
@erikphoel We need a total and complete shutdown of the social sciences until we figure out what the hell is going on.
English
7
1
91
14.2K
Robert Anderson
Robert Anderson@ProfRobAnderson·
@rexdelay Waste and pollution are different. Those are the two axes of the graph.
English
2
2
261
2.9K
Robert Anderson
Robert Anderson@ProfRobAnderson·
Any news article about pollution from plastic bags or other plastic products that does not point out that the US produces essentially zero per capita plastic pollution is ridiculously misleading. You can't even see the US here because it's basically on the x-axis. In a lot of countries, people literally just throw all their trash in the river. That's the plastic problem.
Robert Anderson tweet media
English
34
342
1.9K
81.8K
Tom Vaid
Tom Vaid@TomVaid·
@HistoryBoomer "walk through [unspecified] neighborhoods" is doing a lot of work here, as they say.
English
0
0
0
16
Carl
Carl@HistoryBoomer·
My Monday poker game buy-in is $600. So normally I have $600 in my wallet on gameday. That day, I'll ride the subway, walk through neighborhoods, and never think I'm going to be mugged. Because New York is not a crime-ridden hellscape.
English
13
0
32
1.2K
Tom Vaid
Tom Vaid@TomVaid·
@RichardHanania It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.
English
0
0
1
127
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
RIP Robert Trivers. His theory on the evolution of self-deception has been fundamental to how I see politics. "They can't really believe this stuff, they're just seeking money/power." Trivers taught us that these were the same thing.
English
14
31
329
39.9K
Bryan Caplan
Bryan Caplan@bryan_caplan·
I don't know of any careful thinker blessed with an abundant supply of careful critics. But the critics of @RichardHanania are especially willful in their incomprehension.
English
29
3
119
38.7K
kumikumi (in SF till Mar25th)
Our rental Tesla left us stranded on the side of the road for 3+ hours. We stopped to admire the scenery and once we came back to the car, we found out it was auto locked. We had no cellular reception. Tesla app said "Unlock failed. Check internet connection".
kumikumi (in SF till Mar25th) tweet media
English
152
89
1.4K
95.1K
Tom Vaid
Tom Vaid@TomVaid·
@DevinOlsenn @MorganHammar I agree... for humans. Is it super-aware of faster traffic coming from behind, and moves to the right lane in time? If so, maybe not so bad.
English
0
0
0
24
Devin Olsen
Devin Olsen@DevinOlsenn·
@MorganHammar Bad lane choices aren’t subjective. Camping the left lane when the right lane is empty is objectively bad.
English
4
1
48
1.7K
Devin Olsen
Devin Olsen@DevinOlsenn·
Tesla FSD does basically all of my driving with a push of a button - but to be transparent I would say on almost every one of my drives I still have to do these two things: - change the speed profiles regularly to deal with speed control issues - use the turn signals; this is to stop the car from making stupid lane changes or to get the car into the proper lane so it doesn’t miss an exit. I still think FSD is amazing but I really cannot wait until these issues and the few other lingering problems with FSD get solved.
English
306
35
1.3K
75.8K
Michael Hartl
Michael Hartl@mhartl·
@TomVaid @AdamSinger This isn’t open-mic night at the local club, it’s a professional broadcast by members of the official press. Journalists do not have poetic license when reading direct quotes live on air.
English
1
0
2
51
Adam Singer
Adam Singer@AdamSinger·
This is still an all-timer clip, of MSNBC’s Brian Williams and NYT Editorial Board Member Mara Gay reading a tweet and at no point in their brains does the math click for either of them. They made a whole on-screen graphic too, which compounds how funny it is
English
673
1.2K
9K
1.1M
Tom Vaid
Tom Vaid@TomVaid·
@mhartl @AdamSinger That was poetic license. He added a little flavor to the quote, purposely.
English
2
0
0
59
Michael Hartl
Michael Hartl@mhartl·
@AdamSinger My favorite detail is how Brian Williams adds the phrase “lunch money” when reading the quote, which appears nowhere in the text itself. Not only can’t they do math, they can’t even read.
English
2
3
94
6.5K
A Park
A Park@APark13530380·
@HilltopHorror @RichardHanania Slop is the new slop. Karens frequently complain about Karens. Its hip to complain about hipsters. The midwit meme is mid. The snake eats it's own tail.
English
1
0
2
37
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
Yglesias: “Democrats, in my experience, like to flatter themselves that they’re a lot more sober-minded and rigorous than the Orange Man. That said, I think this episode should cause them to reflect a little on how true that is versus how much the entire party has gotten invested in trying to win elections with economic policy slop” slowboring.com/p/maybe-all-re…
English
5
37
422
25.7K
Tom Vaid
Tom Vaid@TomVaid·
@fawfulfan Addendum: Wait, actually something completely different from what I based this thread on. Half that money. (That can't be an addendum you clown.)
English
0
0
2
131
Matthew Chapman
Matthew Chapman@fawfulfan·
ADDENDUM: The $30,000 figure is actually for a couple, not for every individual retiree. It's based on CBO findings of switching to a flat UBI of 150% of FPL. cbo.gov/budget-options…
English
15
2
178
11.3K
Matthew Chapman
Matthew Chapman@fawfulfan·
I think what convinced me Social Security needs reform is the realization that if we replaced the entire Social Security benefits system with a flat $30,000 a year for every retiree, the trust fund shortfall would totally vanish and the poverty rate for seniors would go *down*.
Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦@JessicaBRiedl

My lead 2026 goal is convincing progressives to stop prioritizing the benefits of rich seniors at the expense of poor kids. Because giving Social Security & Medicare the first claim on all tax dollars is forcing everyone else to fight over the dwindling, remaining scraps.

English
111
211
3K
290.3K
Tom Vaid
Tom Vaid@TomVaid·
@RBehiel @WhiteHouse Definitely. What kind of fool thinks you send the ball dead center on the head pin?
English
0
0
1
30
Ben Dreyfuss
Ben Dreyfuss@bendreyfuss·
I’ve noticed occasionally the line for self-checkout is longer than the line for the cashier checkout, which mostly only makes sense if you’re planning on stealing! The innocent case is “muscle memory” or “autistic fear of people” but I think most are just stealing stuff
Kelsey Piper@KelseyTuoc

I doubt that anyone I know steals from Whole Foods, but the milieu that the article depicted, where it's normal for perfectly well-off people to steal things because why not, was really upsetting to read about, so I actually want to try to earnestly explain why you shouldn't do this just in case there's someone out there who has never had it explained to them. When a business opens - or really, as soon as a business starts making plans to open - a defining question for the business is how it will collect payment for the goods or services it provides. If you trust the people you sell to, you can be pretty relaxed about this; send people an invoice, most of them will pay it on time, any who don't will pay it a bit late. You have to think about convenience and mistakes but not about people trying to cheat you. This saves you so, so much defensive planning to make sure you get paid. It's so much easier. But if you're selling to the general public, you do have to think about people trying to cheat you. You have to structure the physical store so that it's hard for them to steal. You have to not carry some items that you'd like to sell, because they'd also be attractive targets to steal. If people swap price tags between items, you can't use stickers. If people put things on in the dressing room and wear them out, you need to pay someone a full time salary to monitor the dressing room. The world that we all live in is much poorer than the world we'd live in if people didn't steal. The stores don't carry things that they could carry if people didn't steal. They don't use pricing and inventory systems that would be way easier and more convenient if people didn't steal. But it could be much worse! If I walk down to my local Whole Foods today, items on the shelves won't be locked behind sheafs of plastic - that is only worth it when the background rate of stealing is much higher than it is at my local Whole Foods. When more people steal, businesses have to further intensify security, or go out of business. When you shoplift, you directly and unambiguously impoverish your community. You make prices higher for everybody else, you make stores less usable for everybody else, or you make businesses not viable that would otherwise be viable. The direct impact each time is small, but it's a lot larger than the direct impact of taking some trash out of the trash can to throw on the ground, or pouring just a tiny bit of poison into your local river, and most people have a deep, instinctive abhorrence of antisocially wrecking your community like that. So don't steal. The other thing that it seems possible some people might not understand is that while you might have a social circle that is incredibly nihilistic and cynical and thinks that everybody steals, in fact this is not true. Most people do not steal. Most people, if they learn that you steal, will lose more respect for you than you had to lose. I don't know anyone who has shoplifted except 'as a kid/teenager'. It is not always the case that virtue is rewarded and vice is punished but even before you bring the legal system into it, the risk-reward tradeoff of having everybody you know know that you steal things sometimes is absolutely terrible. Who would hire someone who steals things? Who would trust them around a vulnerable person? Who would want to live in a society with someone who will delightedly and routinely wreck it for the slightest personal benefit? I hope that "Gina" turns her life around. I hope that Gina realizes that she needs to. And if you have been told that it's just a corporation or that having ethics is lame or that if you think about it, other bad things happen too, like wage theft, so that means stealing is okay, I hope you really, actually, think about whether you'd accept any of those as excuses for anything else.

English
114
2
157
51.4K
Tom Vaid
Tom Vaid@TomVaid·
@neontaster You should check out the lyrics of Only A Fool Would Say That by Steely Dan.
English
0
0
0
41
Tom Vaid
Tom Vaid@TomVaid·
@hogster @RichardHanania Yes, this seems to have started with one goofball tweeting that Cowen isn't a highly respected economist.
English
0
0
0
30
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
I can't believe there's a "Tyler Cowen discourse" right now. Didn't want to justify it by participating but I'll just say I thoroughly denounce the critiques. Some of you are just jealous, or so focused on one narrow pet peeve you miss the big picture. Haters.
English
10
8
331
18.4K
~Jelly-Roll~
~Jelly-Roll~@Spezi_Korn·
@aakashgupta Tesla is not the only one producing 4680 cells with maxwell style dry process. They use machines from the same supplier, matthews engineering.
English
1
0
2
129
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
This is a 7-year, $218M bet finally paying off. Tesla bought Maxwell Technologies in 2019 for one reason: dry electrode IP. Then spent 5 years in what Musk himself called “incredibly difficult” production hell trying to make it work at scale. The L&F supply contract collapsed 99.99%. Industry analysts wrote the 4680 obituary. Now they’re filing their third patent in four months. January 29: the material recipe. November 2025: the binder chemistry. March 5: the actual machine design. Each patent locks down a different layer of the manufacturing stack. The recipe patent caps binder content below 2% by weight. The chemistry patent solves the cathode degradation that made pure PTFE electrodes lose 5x more capacity than wet-process equivalents. And this one patents the exact roller speed differentials that turn fragile powder into continuous film. The math tells the story. Old process: 10 calendering passes to form a cohesive film. New process: 3 passes. That alone triples throughput. Then add the 90% reduction in equipment capex and energy consumption from eliminating solvent recovery systems and drying ovens. Tesla is targeting 54% more range and 56% lower cell costs from the full dry electrode stack. A 69% reduction in capital investment per unit of output. And the patent layering strategy is ruthless. Competitors can’t replicate the material formulation without hitting the January patent. Can’t use the binder system without hitting the November patent. Can’t build the machine without hitting this one. Three overlapping moats around a single manufacturing process. Every other battery manufacturer is still running wet-slurry lines with toxic NMP solvents and factory-sized drying tunnels. Tesla just patented the physics that makes all of that obsolete.
Ming@tslaming

BREAKING 🚨 @Tesla HAS ENGINEERED A SYNCHRONIZED MULTI-ROLL CALENDERING MACHINE THAT USES DIFFERENTIAL ROLLER SPEEDS TO EFFORTLESSLY TURN DELICATE DRY POWDERS INTO CONTINUOUS BATTERY ELECTRODES 🔋 For years, mastering the "dry battery electrode" has been the holy grail of Tesla's manufacturing roadmap. The promise was always massive: eliminate the toxic, energy-guzzling drying ovens used in traditional battery making, drastically shrink the factory footprint, and slash production costs. But handling delicate, dry chemical powders at industrial speeds has proven incredibly difficult. Early attempts relied on brute force, crushing the powders with immense pressure just to get them to stick together—a process that was hard on both the machinery and the materials. Now, it appears Tesla has finally cracked the code, replacing that destructive pressure with an elegant mechanical dance. The secret to this manufacturing breakthrough lies in rotational physics rather than brute force. By programming each successive roller in their new lamination machine to spin slightly faster than the one behind it, Tesla creates a gentle shear force that pulls the dry powder along. This clever manipulation of speed eliminates the need for the massive pressures and thick, free-standing films that previously held back dry battery manufacturing. These exact mechanics are laid out in patent US20260066263A1, which was published on March 5, 2026, under the title "System and methods for manufacturing a dry electrode." This document gives us an unprecedented look at how the company intends to scale up its next-generation energy storage products without relying on outdated wet processes. Instead of depending on toxic liquid slurries or giant drying ovens, the new system handles free-flowing particles with remarkable grace. The machine supports the fragile powder film entirely on the rollers themselves from start to finish. This delicate touch is exactly what allows them to seamlessly process advanced, air-sensitive chemistries directly onto metal foils. To understand why this shift is so significant, we first have to look at the messy, expensive hurdles that have defined battery making for decades. ⚖️ The problem: Overcoming the limits of traditional electrode manufacturing Battery manufacturing has historically relied on wet processes. These traditional methods require mixing active materials, which are the core chemical ingredients that actually store and release electrical energy, with toxic liquid solvents. This mixing creates a wet, thick batter known as a slurry. The slurry is then coated onto a metal foil, a thin conductive sheet that acts as the backbone of the battery to collect the electricity. After coating, this wet layer must be passed through massive drying ovens to evaporate the liquids. This entire baking step consumes immense amounts of energy and takes up a huge amount of factory floor space. Dry electrode manufacturing attempts to solve this massive inefficiency by removing the liquids entirely. Older dry processing systems tried to achieve this by using heavy pressure and exceptionally high shear, which is an intense frictional rubbing or smearing force similar to aggressively spreading cold butter on delicate bread. These extreme forces were needed to pack the dry powders into a cohesive film, meaning a solid, continuous sheet of material that tightly holds itself together. The resulting film then had to be physically strong enough to support its own weight as it floated and moved across the gaps in the machinery. Building a machine to handle these intense pressures while keeping the fragile, unsupported film intact proved to be highly complex and prohibitively expensive. This is exactly where Tesla’s new architecture steps in, replacing brute force with a far more sophisticated mechanical dance. 💡 Tesla's solution: A synchronized multi-roll calendering architecture Tesla designed a specialized calendering machine, which is essentially a heavy pressing device that flattens materials much like an industrial pasta maker. This architecture uses multiple rollers arranged in a continuous sequence. Instead of forcing the dry powder into a standalone sheet that has to hang freely in the air, the system feeds the raw dry powder directly into the first set of rollers. The true innovation of this design lies in how the machine controls the speed of these rotating cylinders. Every subsequent roller in the sequence is programmed to rotate slightly faster than the one right before it. This deliberate speed difference creates a gentle shear force within the powder mixture. We can think of this shear force as a mild stretching and aligning action, very similar to how a baker gently stretches dough to make it perfectly smooth. This gentle pulling action causes the newly formed dry film to naturally adhere to the faster moving roller, making it cling to the metal surface almost like a magnet. The film simply rides along the solid surface of the rollers through the entire machine rather than floating across open gaps. Because the delicate film is constantly supported by the steel rollers beneath it, it never has to be structurally strong enough to support its own weight. By keeping the material anchored to the rollers, Tesla was able to strip away layers of unnecessary hardware that previously cluttered the production line. ⚙️ Mechanical simplicity: Removing idler rolls, reducing pressure, and adding heat Older machines required numerous idler rolls, which are unpowered cylinders that simply help route materials along a path, and dancer rolls. We can think of dancer rolls as weighted movable pulleys that bob up and down to maintain a constant tension on a moving web. These extra components were necessary to guide the fragile and unsupported film through the open air from one processing section to the next. The Tesla design completely eliminates the need for these extra guiding wheels. The film simply passes directly from one nip point, the tight pinching area where two heavy rollers meet to squeeze the material together, straight to the next. The brilliance of Tesla's multi-roll system is also its modularity. The architecture isn't fixed. The machine can be configured with anywhere from three rolls creating two pinch points up to seven rolls creating six pinch points, depending on the exact thickness and density required for a specific battery chemistry. Furthermore, it is not just about physical pressure and speed. It is also about heat. The system allows for precise, independent temperature control for every single roller. The final roller in the stack, for example, can be heated to a specific degree to assist with the final lamination. It isn't just mashing the powder onto the foil. It is creating a permanent thermo-mechanical bond. Because the equipment does not have to fight against the weakness of a free floating film, the machinery requires much lower pressures to compress the powder to the desired thickness. The equipment can therefore be built smaller and lighter while still achieving high precision tolerances, meaning the exact microscopic accuracy required for the final battery electrode to function safely and efficiently. However, even the most advanced rollers cannot perform miracles on plain dust. To achieve this level of precision, the raw material itself must be fundamentally engineered to hold together under this gentle pressure. 🌪️ The invisible spiderweb: Dry fibrillization Before the powder ever reaches the machine to begin this rolling process, it undergoes a crucial physical transformation. According to the patent, the raw battery ingredients are first fed through a high-shear device. This is a powerful machine, such as a jet-mill, which uses high-speed streams of air or intense friction to violently crash particles into one another. The mixture fed into this mill includes the energy-storing active materials, the conductive particles that help electricity flow smoothly through the battery, and the dry binders. These binders act as a powdered chemical glue designed to hold the entire structure together. This intense pre-mixing step physically stretches those dry binder particles. The intense friction forces them to unravel and form a microscopic matrix of thin, web-like fibers. We can think of this process like pulling a dense cube of sugar into fluffy, interlocking strands of cotton candy. This sticky, fibrillized network is the secret sauce that successfully holds the active battery materials together without needing a single drop of toxic liquid solvent. When this spiderweb powder finally hits the rollers, the machine is not just compressing loose sand. It is flattening a cohesive, interconnected structural matrix that is already clinging to itself. Handling this delicate and sticky web of powder requires extreme care, as uneven dumping will cause clumps that ruin the precise tolerances of the final battery. 🎛️ Mastering powder flow: The funnel shaped charging hopper To manage this tricky material, the physical journey into the machine begins at a highly specific funnel shaped charging hopper. This component is essentially a large storage reservoir used to hold and continuously dispense the fibrillized mixture without destroying its delicate web-like structure. This container is designed to maintain a perfectly constant level of bulk material. A rotary metering roller sits at the bottom of this hopper. This spinning cylindrical tool acts much like a water wheel portioning out equal scoops of water, and it is equipped with small indented pockets called cells that are sized exactly to the microscopic grain size of the powder. As the roller turns, a flexible doctor blade strips the powder precisely. We can think of this thin and flat scraping tool acting just like a baker using a straight edge to level off a measuring cup of flour so the amount is absolutely perfect. The measured powder is then conveyed to an oscillating brushing device, a specialized brush that rapidly swings back and forth to distribute the mixture. This meticulous brushing process ensures the powder is perfectly uniform. It completely avoids any cavity formation, meaning unwanted empty air pockets or uneven clumps, and prevents material decomposition before it even touches the moving conveyor surface. Once this uniform layer is established, Tesla deploys high-tech sensors to ensure that every single micron of the material meets their rigorous standards. 🔬 High precision hardware: Gamma gauges and playless bearings Controlling a fragile powder film across multiple rotating cylinders requires immense mechanical precision. The text reveals the integration of Gamma gauges. These are highly advanced sensors that use safe levels of radiation to peer through the material, much like a medical X-ray checks for bone density. They constantly monitor the film thickness and specific mass, meaning the exact weight and concentration of the powder packed into a given area, as it is being manufactured in real time. To maintain these incredibly tight tolerances required for high density battery electrodes, the calendering rollers are fixed in a unique position. They use playless conical bearings. We can think of these specialized tapered mounts as perfectly snug sockets that completely eliminate any wobbling or vibration in the heavy spinning cylinders. The faces of these individual rolls can also be customized with hard face ceramic or chrome coatings. They can even be patterned as an embossing roll, a textured stamp that presses a permanent physical pattern into the material, to impart specific textures directly to the electrode surface. This level of microscopic control is impressive on its own, but it becomes truly transformative when the machine has to handle complex, non-continuous patterns on the fly. 🗜️ Intelligent lamination: Solving the intermittent coating challenge Modern battery designs often require intermittent electrodes. These are essentially strips of foil where the active battery material is applied in separated patches, leaving blank spaces of bare metal in between. We can picture this layout like the dashed white lines painted down the center of a highway. These bare spaces are absolutely necessary for attaching electrical tabs, the small conductive metal strips that act as bridges to carry the electrical current out of the battery cell and into the device. Laminating these patchy films creates a severe mechanical issue. The lamination rollers, which are massive spinning cylinders that bond the layers together much like an industrial strength sticker machine, exert immense force. When these heavy rollers suddenly reach a blank gap in the powder coating, the sudden lack of thickness causes the heavy metal to slam violently together. This aggressive slamming not only damages the expensive machine over time but also easily tears the delicate metal foil. To solve this destructive problem, Tesla integrated intelligent gap control actuators into the laminator. We can think of these actuators as lightning fast mechanical pistons or shock absorbers that can precisely push back against the machinery. Sensors carefully monitor the moving web and detect exactly when a blank uncoated area is approaching the rollers. The central computer controller then instantly engages these opposing actuators to perfectly counteract the heavy crushing force normally used to stick the layers together. This rapid adjustment maintains a perfect and constant gap between the rollers so they can glide smoothly over the bare foil without making any destructive contact. But avoiding a violent collision is only half the battle; what happens to the continuous sheet of powder when the rollers lift up? The patent outlines a specific "peeling" mechanism. The machine actively peels the un-laminated powder film away from the bare metal current collector. By utilizing a doctor blade to assist in peeling away this waste material, the machine leaves behind perfectly clean, bare metal gaps for the electrical tabs while the un-bonded powder can potentially be recycled back into the system. 🕸️ Automated material handling: Self webbing belts and on the fly adhesives Tesla has built automated material handling directly into the machinery to reduce factory operator intervention. This means the equipment moves and manages the delicate battery components entirely on its own, greatly reducing the need for human workers to manually adjust the line. The system can be designed to be completely self webbing, which is a clever mechanical trick where the machine basically threads itself. We can think of this like a modern sewing machine that automatically pulls the thread exactly where it needs to go without requiring a steady hand. A continuous belt, essentially a long looping conveyor, runs under the rolls. This belt actually rises up during the delicate startup process of stringing the material through the equipment to automatically guide the fragile powder layer in the proper direction toward the next roll nip. If the electrode formulation requires a binder, which is a chemical glue used to hold the active energy storing particles together, the machine features an entirely separate powder hopper. This dedicated storage bin can apply adhesive directly to one side of the film on the fly, meaning it adds the glue while the materials are actively moving at full production speed. This neat addition completely eliminates the separate manufacturing step of pre coating the metal current collector foils with adhesive before they even enter the machine. By consolidating these disparate steps, Tesla has managed to turn an entire factory wing’s worth of equipment into a single, sleek production unit. 🏭 Factory optimization: Consolidating the production line The physical layout and structural design of the equipment allows Tesla to align two powder delivery systems on the exact same machine. We can think of these delivery systems as giant and precisely calibrated spice shakers that constantly sprinkle the active battery ingredients. One hopper feeds the top roller and another feeds the bottom roller, while a central copper or aluminum foil is fed directly through the middle of the spinning cylinders. The machine compresses both dry films and bonds them to both sides of the metal foil at the exact same time. This bonding process acts like a massive mechanical sandwich press that firmly sticks the active ingredients to the metal core. It combines the calendering, laminating, and slitting steps into a single continuous action. Calendering tightly flattens the powder into a precise thickness, laminating permanently glues those flattened layers to the foil, and slitting finally cuts the wide master sheet into the narrow strips needed to assemble individual battery cells. This streamlined flow does more than just save space; it provides the precise environment needed to work with the volatile and experimental chemistries of the future. 🚀 The strategic masterstroke: Securing Tesla’s present and future The key invention of this patent—the continuous multi-roll calendering machine utilizing differential roller speeds—directly solves Tesla's immediate manufacturing bottlenecks. By entirely eliminating the massive and energy-hungry drying ovens required for wet battery slurries, Tesla can drastically shrink the physical footprint of its factories today. This consolidation translates to significantly lower capital expenditures and reduced operating costs, ultimately driving down the sticker price of their electric vehicles and heavy-duty energy storage systems. But looking toward the future, this low-force lamination technique is what secures Tesla's position at the forefront of next-generation energy storage. Because the gentle rolling process does not crush delicate chemical structures, engineers can seamlessly transition these exact production lines to advanced, highly sensitive chemistries. This opens the door to energy-dense lithium metal powders, high-capacity silicon oxides, molten sulfur, and even solid-state electrolytes. Building this physical grid using a completely dry process allows engineers to finally move beyond traditional lithium-ion constraints, paving the way for vehicles that charge faster and drive much further on a single plug. Furthermore, producing lighter and more energy-dense power sources is absolutely critical for untethered applications beyond passenger cars. High-performance dry electrodes will be the exact technology needed to power advanced humanoid robots, allowing machines like Optimus to operate for full work shifts without a bulky battery pack. It is also a foundational requirement for aerospace innovations, advanced satellite networks, and orbital technologies. The implications of this patent even stretch beyond energy storage entirely. The ability to continuously print high-density, porous films without using toxic wet solvents is a holy grail for several other massive industries. The patent explicitly notes that this exact machinery can be used to manufacture ultracapacitors, hydrogen fuel cell components, and even water purification electrodes, potentially lowering the cost of industrial water desalination worldwide. By mastering this fundamental manufacturing step through clever rotational physics, Tesla isn't just improving car batteries; they are building the exact power foundation required to electrify the broader economy and support the next decade of advanced engineering.

English
89
398
3.6K
404.7K
Tom Vaid
Tom Vaid@TomVaid·
@IanAdAstra @wil_da_beast630 True, Earth will not turn into Venus (who is claiming that?). But burning all the fossil fuels in the ground would raise temperatures by 10 C and sea levels by > 50 meters. That's pretty bad. And these assertions the climate change is essentially made up by scientists seeking...
English
1
0
0
9