Xyro

Let’s talk about HB26-1037, the so-called “Fourth Amendment protections” bill. After this vote, a few keyboard warriors rushed to social media to attack Republican legislators who opposed it. Interestingly, only one person actually reached out to ask why I voted no. Here’s the reality: What this bill did: It restricted law enforcement from accessing public third-party data, tools that can be used to investigate serious crimes like human trafficking, child exploitation, kidnappings, etc. What this bill did not do: It did not stop the collection or sale of your data. Companies, private individuals, and just about anyone else could still buy or access that same information. The only ones cut off from it would be law enforcement. That raises a serious question: how does it make sense to limit tools for solving crimes while doing nothing to actually protect people’s data, especially at a time when crime remains a real concern? Public safety must remain a top priority, and it always will be for me. Here’s my commitment to you: next session, I will bring forward legislation next year that truly addresses privacy in today’s digital world, something that actually protects people, not just headlines.

After all the defamation, threats, and insults... US Cancer Data Just Dropped Will there be even one single apology? Will allies acknowledge this? Will they remember we showed this mid-2021?